⭕ Circle theorems practice

Answer key

1. (a) 60° — Method: the angles of a triangle add up to 180°, so add the three expressions, solve for x and then substitute back into the expression for angle B. Working: 2x + 3x + 4x = 9x, so 9x = 180 and x = 20. Angle B is 3x, so angle B = 3 × 20 = 60. Answer: 60°. The distractors: 20° is the value of x, from stopping as soon as the equation is solved instead of substituting back; 120° comes from using 360° as the angle sum, which gives x = 40 and 3x = 120; 80° is 4x, the angle at C, from substituting into the wrong expression.
2. (b) 35° — Method: angle CBE and angle ABC lie on a straight line at B, so they are supplementary; angle ABC then equals angle ADC because B and D are both on the major arc AC (angles in the same segment). Working: angle ABC = 180 − 145 = 35 degrees, using angles on a straight line. Since B and D are both on the major arc AC, angle ADC = angle ABC = 35°. Answer: 35°. Find angle ABC FIRST from the straight line at B before applying the circle theorem: using the given 145° directly, doubling or halving it, or subtracting it from 180° a second time all give the wrong angle.
3. (c) VW — Method: within one circle a chord's distance from the centre is fixed by its length, because a chord passing nearer the centre cuts further across the circle; so the chord that lies closest to the centre is simply the longest one listed. Working: the four lengths are 6 cm, 10 cm, 14 cm and 15 cm. Placing them in order, the greatest is 15 cm, and that length belongs to VW, so VW lies closest to the centre. Answer: VW. The distractors: PQ comes from reversing the rule and taking the shortest chord to be the one tucked nearest the centre; TU comes from knowing that the very longest chord is a diameter, deciding that such a chord passes through the centre rather than lying close to it, ruling the 15 cm chord out on that ground and taking the next longest; RS comes from reading 'closest to the centre' as 'nearest the middle of the list of lengths' and picking a middling value.
4. (d) The angle between a tangent and a radius is 90° — OP is the radius drawn to the point of contact P, and a circle theorem states that a tangent always meets that radius at a right angle, so angle OPQ = 90°. A tangent is not parallel to the radius it touches — at the point of contact it is perpendicular to that radius, not parallel to it. A tangent does not pass through the centre — a straight line through the centre that also touches the circle at one point would have to be a diameter, which is a different line entirely. The angle-in-a-semicircle theorem needs a triangle drawn inside the circle with a diameter as its longest side; there is no such triangle here, just a tangent and a radius.
5. (c) 90° — A tangent to a circle always meets the radius drawn to the point of contact at a right angle, so the angle between the tangent and the radius at P is 90°. 180° confuses the tangent with the diameter through P, as if the radius continued in a straight line into the tangent. 45° halves the true angle by mistake. 60° comes from confusing this fact with the angle of an equilateral triangle.
6. (a) 46° — Method: use the angle at the centre, then the cyclic quadrilateral, then the angle sum of a triangle. Working: angle ABC = 152° ÷ 2 = 76° (angle at the centre is twice the angle at the circumference); angle ADC = 180° − 76° = 104° (opposite angles of a cyclic quadrilateral sum to 180°); angle DAC = 180° − 104° − 30° = 46° (angle sum of triangle ACD). Skipping the halving step and taking angle ABC = 152° gives angle ADC = 180° − 152° = 28° and then angle DAC = 122°; using angle ABC = 76° directly as angle ADC, skipping the cyclic quadrilateral step, gives 74°; and finding angle DAC as 180° − 104° without subtracting the given 30° gives 76°. Each of the three steps must be carried through in order — halve, then subtract from 180°, then subtract from 180° again with the extra angle.
7. (a) 80° — In triangle ABD, the three angles sum to 180°: angle BAD = 180° − 35° − 65° = 80°. ABCD is a cyclic quadrilateral, so the exterior angle at C, angle BCE, is equal to the interior angle at the opposite vertex, angle BAD: angle BCE = 80°. Adding the two given angles in triangle ABD instead of subtracting them from 180°, 35° + 65° = 100°, and then applying the exterior-angle rule correctly still gives the wrong angle BAD and so the wrong exterior angle, 100°. Halving the correct angle BAD, 80° ÷ 2 = 40°, confuses the exterior-angle rule with a different circle theorem in which one angle is half of another. Doubling it instead, 80° × 2 = 160°, makes the same kind of confusion in the other direction.
8. (c) 32 — Method: alternate angles between parallel lines are equal, so 2x + 10 = 74. Working: subtracting 10 from both sides gives 2x = 64; dividing by 2 gives x = 32. Answer: x = 32. A candidate who forgets to subtract 10 first and divides 74 by 2 directly gets 37. A candidate who treats the angles as co-interior instead of alternate, so that the two expressions add to 180° rather than being equal, gets 48 after solving. A candidate who makes a sign error and treats the equation as 2x equalling 10 minus 74 instead of 74 minus 10 gets −32.
9. (b) 61° — Triangle OAT is isosceles because OA = OT, both radii, so its base angles are equal: angle OTA = angle OAT = (180° − 122°) ÷ 2 = 29°. The tangent PT meets the radius OT at 90°, by the tangent–radius theorem, so angle OTP = 90°. Since TA lies between TO and TP, angle OTP splits into angle OTA and angle ATP: angle ATP = 90° − 29° = 61°. Stopping after the isosceles step and reporting the base angle itself gives 29°. Finding the base angles as 180° − 122° without halving, then subtracting from 90°, gives 90° − 58° = 32°. Adding the base angle to 90° instead of subtracting it gives 90° + 29° = 119°. Subtract the base angle from the right angle, and 61° is what's left.
10. (b) 13 — Using the sum of interior angles formula, (n − 2) × 180° = 1980°, so n − 2 = 1980 ÷ 180 = 11, and n = 11 + 2 = 13. 11 stops after the division, forgetting to add 2 back to find n. 15 adds 2 twice by mistake, giving 11 + 2 + 2. 22 divides 1980 by 90 instead of 180.
11. (a) 105° — The interior angles of a pentagon add up to (5 − 2) × 180° = 540°. Subtracting the three known angles, 540 − 100 − 110 − 120 = 210°, and this 210° is shared equally between the two angles marked x°, so each one is 210 ÷ 2 = 105°. 210° stops one step early, giving the total of the two unknown angles instead of one of them. 108° is the interior angle of a regular pentagon, which does not apply here since this pentagon's angles are not all equal. 55° comes from halving one of the given angles, 110°, instead of halving the remaining total.
12. (a) Reflex + non-reflex angle BOD = 360°, so 2a + 2c = 360°. — A correct proof must build in a strictly logical order: the reflex and non-reflex angles at O, which together make a complete turn about the centre, must be added to 360° before 2a and 2c can be combined and divided. The statement 'Reflex + non-reflex angle BOD = 360°, so 2a + 2c = 360°' is the only one that follows directly from having 2a and 2c already established, and it is exactly what is needed before the final division step. Jumping straight to 'Divide by 2 throughout to get a + c = 180°' skips the step that justifies why 2a + 2c equals 360° in the first place — there is nothing yet to divide. Repeating 'Angle BOD is 2a and 2c, by the centre theorem' does not move the proof forward at all, since that fact has already been established in the sentence given. Introducing 'OB = OD are radii, so triangle OBD is isosceles' brings in an unrelated triangle and an unrelated method that plays no part in this particular proof.
13. (b) Minor segment — Method: compare the sizes of the two regions cut off by the chord, and recall the term used for the smaller one. Working: the chord creates two segments; the smaller region is called the minor segment and the larger one the major segment. A student who answers major segment has picked the larger region by mistake instead of the smaller one. A student who answers minor arc has named the curved boundary rather than the two-dimensional region it encloses. A student who answers semicircle has wrongly assumed the chord must pass through the centre. Answer: minor segment.
14. (b) 62 — Method: co-interior (allied) angles between parallel lines add up to 180°. Working: 180 − 118 = 62. Answer: 62°. A candidate who treats co-interior angles as equal, like corresponding angles, gives 118. A candidate who uses 360° instead of 180°, working out 360 − 118, gets 242. A candidate who subtracts as if the angles were complementary, working out 118 − 90, gets 28.
15. (a) 31.4 — Method: first find the circumference of one turn using π × diameter, then multiply by the number of turns. Working: circumference = 3.14 × 0.5 = 1.57 m; total distance = 1.57 × 20 = 31.4 m. A student who answers 15.7 has mistakenly halved the diameter again before multiplying, using 0.25 m instead of 0.5 m. A student who answers 3.14 has simply written down π itself, without completing the circumference or multiplying by the number of turns. A student who answers 62.8 has mistakenly doubled the diameter to 1 m before multiplying, treating the given length as a radius. Answer: 31.4 m.
16. (b) Yes — OA = OC (radii), so the base angles are equal. — Method: check the definition of a radius and the isosceles triangle property the step relies on. Working: every radius of a circle has the same length, so OA = OC regardless of where A and C sit on the circle — this alone makes triangle OAC isosceles, and the base angles opposite the two equal sides, angle OAC and angle OCA, must be equal. The verdict is Yes, for exactly that reason. Claiming OA and OC are only equal if they are drawn to 'the very same point' misunderstands what a radius is — A and C can be any two points on the circle and OA still equals OC. Claiming the triangle is isosceles because angle AOC is 90° reverses the logic: nothing in the step has fixed angle AOC at 90°, and even if it had, that alone would not explain why OA = OC. Claiming the triangle would need to be equilateral confuses isosceles (two equal sides) with equilateral (three equal sides) — only two sides, OA and OC, are being compared here.
17. (d) 60° — Method: the six angles at the centre together make one complete turn of 360°, and because the hexagon is regular they are all equal, so divide 360° by 6. Working: 360 ÷ 6 = 60. Answer: 60°. The distractors: 120° is the interior angle of a regular hexagon, 720 ÷ 6, which is the angle at a vertex and not the angle at the centre; 45° comes from dividing 360 by 8, treating the hexagon as though it had eight sides; 30° comes from halving the angle at the centre, as though each of the six triangles were split again by a line of symmetry.
18. (b) Statement 3 — a triangle's angles are said to sum to 360° — The angles of any triangle sum to 180°, not 360° — Statement 3 uses the wrong total, and that error is what sends its final line to the impossible claim that angle ACB = 180°. The correct working is angle OAC + angle OBC + angle ACB = 180°, and since angle ACB = angle OCA + angle OCB, this gives 2 × angle ACB = 180°, so angle ACB = 90°, which is the actual theorem. Statement 1 correctly identifies OA and OC as equal radii, making triangle OAC isosceles — nothing wrong there. Statement 2 correctly does the same for triangle OBC. Statement 4 correctly states that A, O and B are collinear, since a diameter passes through the centre — also nothing wrong there. Statement 3 is the one to flag: it is the angle sum it quotes that is wrong, not the diagram or the radii.