⭕ Circle theorems practice

Answer key

1. (a) 24 cm — The line from the centre to the midpoint of a chord is perpendicular to the chord, so triangle OMA has a right angle at M. By Pythagoras' theorem, AM² = OA² − OM² = 169 − 25 = 144, so AM = 12 cm. AB is twice AM, since M is the midpoint: AB = 2 × 12 = 24 cm. Finding AM = 12 cm correctly but forgetting to double it for the full chord gives 12 cm. Working out 169 − 25 = 144 and forgetting to take the square root gives 144 cm. Subtracting first and then doubling the wrong way, (13 − 5) × 2, gives 16 cm. Doubling AM after finding it correctly is the step that's missing from all three — do it, and you get 24 cm.
2. (b) 30 cm — The perpendicular from the centre of a circle to a chord bisects the chord, so this line, half the chord and the radius form a right-angled triangle. Using Pythagoras' theorem, half the chord = √(17² − 8²) = √(289 − 64) = √225 = 15 cm. The full chord AB is twice this length: AB = 2 × 15 = 30 cm. Stopping after finding the half-chord, without doubling it for the whole chord, gives 15 cm. Adding the radius and the perpendicular distance directly, 17 + 8 = 25 cm, ignores that these two lengths are the two shorter sides of a right-angled triangle, not parts of a straight line. Subtracting instead, 17 − 8 = 9 cm, makes the same mistake in the other direction.
3. (b) Yes — OA = OC (radii), so the base angles are equal. — Method: check the definition of a radius and the isosceles triangle property the step relies on. Working: every radius of a circle has the same length, so OA = OC regardless of where A and C sit on the circle — this alone makes triangle OAC isosceles, and the base angles opposite the two equal sides, angle OAC and angle OCA, must be equal. The verdict is Yes, for exactly that reason. Claiming OA and OC are only equal if they are drawn to 'the very same point' misunderstands what a radius is — A and C can be any two points on the circle and OA still equals OC. Claiming the triangle is isosceles because angle AOC is 90° reverses the logic: nothing in the step has fixed angle AOC at 90°, and even if it had, that alone would not explain why OA = OC. Claiming the triangle would need to be equilateral confuses isosceles (two equal sides) with equilateral (three equal sides) — only two sides, OA and OC, are being compared here.
4. (d) 49° — Method: first combine the two given angles at the centre to find the whole central angle FOM, then apply the angle-at-the-centre theorem, which halves the central angle to give the angle at the circumference on the major arc. Working: angle FOM = angle FOP + angle POM = 55 + 43 = 98 degrees. Since S is on the major arc FM, angle FSM = 98 ÷ 2 = 49 degrees. Answer: 49°. Add BOTH given angles to find the whole angle FOM before you halve anything: halving only one of them, doubling the total instead of halving it, or subtracting from 180° all give the wrong angle for the programme.
5. (b) (2x + 10)° — By the angle at the centre theorem, angle ABC is half of angle AOC, because both stand on the same arc AC: angle ABC = (4x + 20)° ÷ 2 = (2x + 10)°. Writing down the centre angle itself, without halving at all, gives (4x + 20)°. Halving only the constant term and leaving the x-term unchanged gives (4x + 10)°. Doubling the centre angle instead of halving it gives (8x + 40)°. Halve every term in the expression, and (2x + 10)° is what you get.
6. (b) 13 — Using the sum of interior angles formula, (n − 2) × 180° = 1980°, so n − 2 = 1980 ÷ 180 = 11, and n = 11 + 2 = 13. 11 stops after the division, forgetting to add 2 back to find n. 15 adds 2 twice by mistake, giving 11 + 2 + 2. 22 divides 1980 by 90 instead of 180.
7. (a) 49° — Method: an exterior angle of a triangle equals the sum of the two interior angles that are not next to it, which here are the angles at A and at C; since those two are equal, the exterior angle is twice the angle at A. Working: 2 × angle A = 98, so angle A = 98 ÷ 2 = 49. Answer: 49°. The distractors: 82° is the interior angle at B, 180 − 98, given in place of the angle at A; 41° comes from finding that interior angle of 82° and halving it, 82 ÷ 2, instead of halving the exterior angle; 98° comes from taking the exterior angle to be equal to the angle at A on its own, with no halving at all.
8. (c) 72° — Method: opposite angles in a cyclic quadrilateral always sum to 180°. Working: angle DAB and angle BCD are opposite angles of the cyclic quadrilateral ABCD, so angle BCD = 180 − 108 = 72 degrees. Answer: 72°. Opposite angles in a cyclic quadrilateral are SUPPLEMENTARY, not equal, so do not simply copy the given angle; and do not subtract from 360°, which is the rule for angles round a point, or confuse this with the angle-in-a-semicircle theorem, which gives a fixed 90° that has nothing to do with this quadrilateral.
9. (b) 63° — Method: a tangent meets the radius drawn to the point of contact at a right angle, so triangle OPT has a 90° angle at T; the three angles of the triangle then sum to 180°. Working: angle OTP = 90°, angle OPT = 27°, so angle POT = 180 − 90 − 27 = 63 degrees. Answer: 63°. The tangent-radius angle is a fixed 90°, not something to assume equal to another angle in the triangle, and the three angles of ANY triangle sum to 180°, never 360°: that total belongs to a quadrilateral, not a triangle.
10. (a) Reflex + non-reflex angle BOD = 360°, so 2a + 2c = 360°. — A correct proof must build in a strictly logical order: the reflex and non-reflex angles at O, which together make a complete turn about the centre, must be added to 360° before 2a and 2c can be combined and divided. The statement 'Reflex + non-reflex angle BOD = 360°, so 2a + 2c = 360°' is the only one that follows directly from having 2a and 2c already established, and it is exactly what is needed before the final division step. Jumping straight to 'Divide by 2 throughout to get a + c = 180°' skips the step that justifies why 2a + 2c equals 360° in the first place — there is nothing yet to divide. Repeating 'Angle BOD is 2a and 2c, by the centre theorem' does not move the proof forward at all, since that fact has already been established in the sentence given. Introducing 'OB = OD are radii, so triangle OBD is isosceles' brings in an unrelated triangle and an unrelated method that plays no part in this particular proof.
11. (c) 15 — The exterior angle is 180° − 156° = 24°, and the number of sides of a regular polygon is 360° divided by the exterior angle, so 360 ÷ 24 = 15. 24° is the exterior angle itself, stopping one step before the final division. 17 comes from finding 15 correctly and then adding 2, muddling the exterior angle rule with the (n − 2) that appears in the interior angle sum formula. 7.5 comes from dividing 180 by the exterior angle instead of 360, using the angles on a straight line rather than the total of the exterior angles of a polygon.
12. (b) Statement 3 — a triangle's angles are said to sum to 360° — The angles of any triangle sum to 180°, not 360° — Statement 3 uses the wrong total, and that error is what sends its final line to the impossible claim that angle ACB = 180°. The correct working is angle OAC + angle OBC + angle ACB = 180°, and since angle ACB = angle OCA + angle OCB, this gives 2 × angle ACB = 180°, so angle ACB = 90°, which is the actual theorem. Statement 1 correctly identifies OA and OC as equal radii, making triangle OAC isosceles — nothing wrong there. Statement 2 correctly does the same for triangle OBC. Statement 4 correctly states that A, O and B are collinear, since a diameter passes through the centre — also nothing wrong there. Statement 3 is the one to flag: it is the angle sum it quotes that is wrong, not the diagram or the radii.
13. (a) 1260° — The sum of the interior angles of a polygon with n sides is (n − 2) × 180°. For a nonagon, n = 9, so the sum is (9 − 2) × 180° = 7 × 180° = 1260°. 1620° uses 9 × 180° without subtracting 2 from n first. 140° is the size of a single interior angle of a regular nonagon (1260° ÷ 9), not the sum of all nine. 1440° uses (n − 1) × 180° = 8 × 180° instead of (n − 2) × 180°.
14. (a) 90° — Method: the angle in a semicircle theorem states that the angle subtended at the circumference by a diameter is always a right angle, whatever the circle's size. Working: since AC is a diameter, the angle ABC subtended at the circumference by AC is 90 degrees, regardless of the circle's radius. Answer: 90°. This result holds for every position of B on the circle and for every size of circle, so no length or radius is ever needed: do not confuse angle ABC with the straight angle along the diameter itself, which is 180°, and do not halve the right angle again.
15. (c) chord — A diameter is a straight line joining two points on the circle that happens to pass through the centre. The general term for any straight line joining two points on a circle is a chord — every diameter is a chord, but not every chord is a diameter. Calling it a radius is wrong because a radius runs from the centre to just ONE point on the circle, not between two points on the circle. A tangent touches the circle at only one point, so it cannot be a diameter at all. An arc is a curved part of the circle's edge, not a straight line.
16. (c) 140° — Method: OAPB is a quadrilateral whose angles sum to 360°; the tangent-radius angles at A and B are each 90°, and angle APB is given, so angle AOB is whatever is left. Working: angle OAP = angle OBP = 90°, so angle AOB = 360 − 90 − 90 − 40 = 140 degrees. Answer: 140°. Both tangent-radius angles are 90° each and must both be subtracted, not just one, and the quadrilateral's angles sum to 360°, not 180°: do not assume angle AOB simply matches angle APB, which is a different angle in a different part of the figure.
17. (d) Concentric circles — Method: focus on what the two circles have in common — their centre, not their size. Working: both circles share exactly the same centre point but have different radii, which is the defining feature of this pair of circles. A student who answers congruent circles has confused 'same centre' with 'same size', but congruent circles simply have equal radii and need not share a centre. A student who answers tangential circles has confused circles that touch each other at one point with ones that share a centre. A student who answers similar circles has used the general term for the same shape at different sizes, missing the specific 'same centre' fact. Answer: concentric circles.
18. (a) 31.4 — Method: first find the circumference of one turn using π × diameter, then multiply by the number of turns. Working: circumference = 3.14 × 0.5 = 1.57 m; total distance = 1.57 × 20 = 31.4 m. A student who answers 15.7 has mistakenly halved the diameter again before multiplying, using 0.25 m instead of 0.5 m. A student who answers 3.14 has simply written down π itself, without completing the circumference or multiplying by the number of turns. A student who answers 62.8 has mistakenly doubled the diameter to 1 m before multiplying, treating the given length as a radius. Answer: 31.4 m.