⭕ Circle theorems practice

Answer key

1. (b) Yes — OA = OC (radii), so the base angles are equal. — Method: check the definition of a radius and the isosceles triangle property the step relies on. Working: every radius of a circle has the same length, so OA = OC regardless of where A and C sit on the circle — this alone makes triangle OAC isosceles, and the base angles opposite the two equal sides, angle OAC and angle OCA, must be equal. The verdict is Yes, for exactly that reason. Claiming OA and OC are only equal if they are drawn to 'the very same point' misunderstands what a radius is — A and C can be any two points on the circle and OA still equals OC. Claiming the triangle is isosceles because angle AOC is 90° reverses the logic: nothing in the step has fixed angle AOC at 90°, and even if it had, that alone would not explain why OA = OC. Claiming the triangle would need to be equilateral confuses isosceles (two equal sides) with equilateral (three equal sides) — only two sides, OA and OC, are being compared here.
2. (a) 225 — Method: find the interior angle of the regular octagon, then subtract it from 360° to find the reflex angle at the same vertex, since the interior angle and the reflex angle together make a full turn. Working: there are 8 − 2 = 6 triangles' worth of angle in the octagon, so the interior angle = 6 × 180 ÷ 8 = 135; reflex angle = 360 − 135 = 225. Answer: 225°. A candidate who stops after finding the interior angle gives 135. A candidate who works out the exterior angle instead, 360 ÷ 8 = 45, gives 45. A candidate who subtracts the exterior angle from 360° instead of the interior angle, working out 360 − 45, gets 315.
3. (b) It is the longest of the three chords — Method: in any circle the length of a chord is decided by how far the chord lies from the centre, because a chord passing nearer the centre cuts further across the circle. Working: the chord through O lies at a distance of zero from the centre, and no chord can lie closer than that, so no chord of the circle can be longer than it; a chord through the centre is a diameter. The other two chords lie at some distance greater than zero, so each of them falls short of that maximum. Answer: It is the longest of the three chords. The distractors: It is the shortest of the three chords comes from reversing the rule and picturing a chord near the centre as a short line tucked inside; It is the same length as the other two chords comes from carrying the fact that all radii of a circle are equal across to chords, which are not all equal; It is half the length of each of the other two chords comes from confusing a chord through the centre with a radius, which really is half a diameter.
4. (d) The angle between a tangent and a radius is 90° — OP is the radius drawn to the point of contact P, and a circle theorem states that a tangent always meets that radius at a right angle, so angle OPQ = 90°. A tangent is not parallel to the radius it touches — at the point of contact it is perpendicular to that radius, not parallel to it. A tangent does not pass through the centre — a straight line through the centre that also touches the circle at one point would have to be a diameter, which is a different line entirely. The angle-in-a-semicircle theorem needs a triangle drawn inside the circle with a diameter as its longest side; there is no such triangle here, just a tangent and a radius.
5. (b) 30 cm — The perpendicular from the centre of a circle to a chord bisects the chord, so this line, half the chord and the radius form a right-angled triangle. Using Pythagoras' theorem, half the chord = √(17² − 8²) = √(289 − 64) = √225 = 15 cm. The full chord AB is twice this length: AB = 2 × 15 = 30 cm. Stopping after finding the half-chord, without doubling it for the whole chord, gives 15 cm. Adding the radius and the perpendicular distance directly, 17 + 8 = 25 cm, ignores that these two lengths are the two shorter sides of a right-angled triangle, not parts of a straight line. Subtracting instead, 17 − 8 = 9 cm, makes the same mistake in the other direction.
6. (a) 104° — Method: find each inscribed angle separately using the angle-at-the-centre theorem: for a point on the arc NOT cut off by the given central angle, halve that central angle; for a point on the OTHER arc, halve the REFLEX central angle instead; then subtract the smaller from the larger. Working: for C on the major arc, angle ACB = 76 ÷ 2 = 38 degrees. For D on the minor arc, D sees the reflex angle at the centre, 360 − 76 = 284 degrees, so angle ADB = 284 ÷ 2 = 142 degrees. The difference is 142 − 38 = 104 degrees. Answer: 104°. Both inscribed angles need the theorem applied separately, using the correct arc's central angle each time (the reflex angle for D), and the question asks for the DIFFERENCE between the two, not either angle on its own and not their sum, 180°, which is simply the opposite-angle total for the cyclic quadrilateral ACBD.
7. (b) 61° — Triangle OAT is isosceles because OA = OT, both radii, so its base angles are equal: angle OTA = angle OAT = (180° − 122°) ÷ 2 = 29°. The tangent PT meets the radius OT at 90°, by the tangent–radius theorem, so angle OTP = 90°. Since TA lies between TO and TP, angle OTP splits into angle OTA and angle ATP: angle ATP = 90° − 29° = 61°. Stopping after the isosceles step and reporting the base angle itself gives 29°. Finding the base angles as 180° − 122° without halving, then subtracting from 90°, gives 90° − 58° = 32°. Adding the base angle to 90° instead of subtracting it gives 90° + 29° = 119°. Subtract the base angle from the right angle, and 61° is what's left.
8. (d) 60° — Method: the six angles at the centre together make one complete turn of 360°, and because the hexagon is regular they are all equal, so divide 360° by 6. Working: 360 ÷ 6 = 60. Answer: 60°. The distractors: 120° is the interior angle of a regular hexagon, 720 ÷ 6, which is the angle at a vertex and not the angle at the centre; 45° comes from dividing 360 by 8, treating the hexagon as though it had eight sides; 30° comes from halving the angle at the centre, as though each of the six triangles were split again by a line of symmetry.
9. (c) 8 — Method: the exterior angles of a polygon add up to 360°, so divide 360° by the size of one exterior angle. Working: 360 ÷ 45 = 8. Answer: 8 sides. A candidate who divides into a half turn instead of a full turn, working out 180 ÷ 45, gets 4. A candidate who reads off the given exterior angle as if it were the number of sides gets 45. A candidate who subtracts instead of dividing, working out 360 − 45, gets 315.
10. (c) 5 cm — Diameter = circumference ÷ π, so 31.4 ÷ 3.14 = 10 cm, and the radius is half the diameter, so 10 ÷ 2 = 5 cm. 10 cm is the diameter itself, given as the radius by forgetting the final halving step. 15.7 cm comes from halving the circumference, 31.4 ÷ 2 = 15.7, and stopping there, treating half the circumference as the radius without ever dividing by π. 2.5 cm comes from halving the correct radius again, effectively dividing by 2 twice instead of once.
11. (b) 80° — Method: opposite angles of a cyclic quadrilateral sum to 180°, so form and solve an equation for x, then substitute back to find angle DAB. Working: (2x + 10) + (3x − 5) = 180, so 5x + 5 = 180, x = 35, and angle DAB = 2(35) + 10 = 80°. Using 360° instead of 180° as the total (as if the two angles were the whole circle rather than a pair of opposite angles) gives x = 71 and angle DAB = 152°; solving correctly for x but reporting x itself instead of substituting it back into 2x + 10 gives 35°; and mishandling the signs when combining the two expressions, using (2x + 10) + (3x + 5) = 180 instead of (2x + 10) + (3x − 5) = 180, gives x = 33 and angle DAB = 76°. Opposite angles of a cyclic quadrilateral — not adjacent ones — are the pair that sums to 180°.
12. (a) 105° — The interior angles of a pentagon add up to (5 − 2) × 180° = 540°. Subtracting the three known angles, 540 − 100 − 110 − 120 = 210°, and this 210° is shared equally between the two angles marked x°, so each one is 210 ÷ 2 = 105°. 210° stops one step early, giving the total of the two unknown angles instead of one of them. 108° is the interior angle of a regular pentagon, which does not apply here since this pentagon's angles are not all equal. 55° comes from halving one of the given angles, 110°, instead of halving the remaining total.
13. (b) Statement 3 — a triangle's angles are said to sum to 360° — The angles of any triangle sum to 180°, not 360° — Statement 3 uses the wrong total, and that error is what sends its final line to the impossible claim that angle ACB = 180°. The correct working is angle OAC + angle OBC + angle ACB = 180°, and since angle ACB = angle OCA + angle OCB, this gives 2 × angle ACB = 180°, so angle ACB = 90°, which is the actual theorem. Statement 1 correctly identifies OA and OC as equal radii, making triangle OAC isosceles — nothing wrong there. Statement 2 correctly does the same for triangle OBC. Statement 4 correctly states that A, O and B are collinear, since a diameter passes through the centre — also nothing wrong there. Statement 3 is the one to flag: it is the angle sum it quotes that is wrong, not the diagram or the radii.
14. (a) Reflex + non-reflex angle BOD = 360°, so 2a + 2c = 360°. — A correct proof must build in a strictly logical order: the reflex and non-reflex angles at O, which together make a complete turn about the centre, must be added to 360° before 2a and 2c can be combined and divided. The statement 'Reflex + non-reflex angle BOD = 360°, so 2a + 2c = 360°' is the only one that follows directly from having 2a and 2c already established, and it is exactly what is needed before the final division step. Jumping straight to 'Divide by 2 throughout to get a + c = 180°' skips the step that justifies why 2a + 2c equals 360° in the first place — there is nothing yet to divide. Repeating 'Angle BOD is 2a and 2c, by the centre theorem' does not move the proof forward at all, since that fact has already been established in the sentence given. Introducing 'OB = OD are radii, so triangle OBD is isosceles' brings in an unrelated triangle and an unrelated method that plays no part in this particular proof.
15. (c) 68° — Since PA and PB are both tangents from the external point P, PA = PB, so triangle PAB is isosceles with equal base angles at A and B. The angles of triangle PAB sum to 180°, so angle PAB + angle PBA = 180° − 44° = 136°, and since the two base angles are equal, angle PAB = 136° ÷ 2 = 68°. Angle PAB is the angle between the tangent at A and the chord AB, so by the alternate segment theorem it equals the angle in the alternate segment, angle ACB = 68°. Using angle APB directly as angle ACB, without using the isosceles triangle to find angle PAB first, gives 44°. Halving angle APB directly, rather than subtracting it from 180° before halving, gives 22°. Finding 180° − 44° = 136° correctly but forgetting to divide by 2 for one base angle leaves 136°.
16. (b) (2x + 10)° — By the angle at the centre theorem, angle ABC is half of angle AOC, because both stand on the same arc AC: angle ABC = (4x + 20)° ÷ 2 = (2x + 10)°. Writing down the centre angle itself, without halving at all, gives (4x + 20)°. Halving only the constant term and leaving the x-term unchanged gives (4x + 10)°. Doubling the centre angle instead of halving it gives (8x + 40)°. Halve every term in the expression, and (2x + 10)° is what you get.
17. (b) 58° — Method: the angle at the centre is TWICE the angle at the circumference when both stand on the same arc. Working: angle AOC is the angle at the centre standing on arc AC, and angle ABC is the angle at the circumference standing on the same arc AC, with B on the major arc, so angle AOC = 2 × angle ABC. Rearranging, angle ABC = 116 ÷ 2 = 58 degrees. Answer: 58°. Halve the centre angle, do not double it, and use the angle AOC exactly as given, 116°: you do not need its reflex angle here, because B sits on the major arc, which is precisely the arrangement the theorem is stated for.
18. (a) 80° — In triangle ABD, the three angles sum to 180°: angle BAD = 180° − 35° − 65° = 80°. ABCD is a cyclic quadrilateral, so the exterior angle at C, angle BCE, is equal to the interior angle at the opposite vertex, angle BAD: angle BCE = 80°. Adding the two given angles in triangle ABD instead of subtracting them from 180°, 35° + 65° = 100°, and then applying the exterior-angle rule correctly still gives the wrong angle BAD and so the wrong exterior angle, 100°. Halving the correct angle BAD, 80° ÷ 2 = 40°, confuses the exterior-angle rule with a different circle theorem in which one angle is half of another. Doubling it instead, 80° × 2 = 160°, makes the same kind of confusion in the other direction.