⭕ Circle theorems practice

Answer key

1. (c) 115 — Method: use corresponding angles to carry the 65° angle from the lower rafter up to the upper rafter, then use angles on a straight line to move to the other side of the strut. Working: the angle above the upper rafter and to the left of the strut corresponds to the given angle, so it is 65°; the angle above the upper rafter and to the right of the strut lies on a straight line with it, so it is 180 − 65 = 115. Answer: 115°. A candidate who assumes the angle stays 65° without allowing for the move from the left of the strut to the right of it gives 65. A candidate who uses 90° instead of 180°, working out 90 − 65, gets 25. A candidate who adds instead of subtracting, working out 180 + 65, gets 245.
2. (d) 13 — Method: OP and PQ meet at a right angle because of the tangent–radius fact, so triangle OPQ is right-angled at P; use Pythagoras' theorem. Working: OQ² = OP² + PQ² = 5² + 12² = 25 + 144 = 169; OQ = √169 = 13. A student who answers 17 has simply added the two given lengths (5 + 12) instead of using Pythagoras' theorem. A student who answers 7 has subtracted the two given lengths (12 − 5) instead of using Pythagoras' theorem. A student who answers 144 has correctly squared 12 but stopped there, forgetting to add 5² and take the square root. Answer: 13 cm.
3. (b) 80° — Method: opposite angles of a cyclic quadrilateral sum to 180°, so form and solve an equation for x, then substitute back to find angle DAB. Working: (2x + 10) + (3x − 5) = 180, so 5x + 5 = 180, x = 35, and angle DAB = 2(35) + 10 = 80°. Using 360° instead of 180° as the total (as if the two angles were the whole circle rather than a pair of opposite angles) gives x = 71 and angle DAB = 152°; solving correctly for x but reporting x itself instead of substituting it back into 2x + 10 gives 35°; and mishandling the signs when combining the two expressions, using (2x + 10) + (3x + 5) = 180 instead of (2x + 10) + (3x − 5) = 180, gives x = 33 and angle DAB = 76°. Opposite angles of a cyclic quadrilateral — not adjacent ones — are the pair that sums to 180°.
4. (b) 62 — Method: co-interior (allied) angles between parallel lines add up to 180°. Working: 180 − 118 = 62. Answer: 62°. A candidate who treats co-interior angles as equal, like corresponding angles, gives 118. A candidate who uses 360° instead of 180°, working out 360 − 118, gets 242. A candidate who subtracts as if the angles were complementary, working out 118 − 90, gets 28.
5. (d) sector — The region enclosed by two radii and the arc between them is called a sector. A segment is a different region, enclosed by a CHORD and an arc — it does not touch the centre at all. A chord is a straight line, not a region, so it cannot be the answer to a question asking for a region. A semicircle is only correct when the angle between the two radii is exactly 180°, which is not stated here, so it is too specific to be the general answer.
6. (b) 63° — Method: a tangent meets the radius drawn to the point of contact at a right angle, so triangle OPT has a 90° angle at T; the three angles of the triangle then sum to 180°. Working: angle OTP = 90°, angle OPT = 27°, so angle POT = 180 − 90 − 27 = 63 degrees. Answer: 63°. The tangent-radius angle is a fixed 90°, not something to assume equal to another angle in the triangle, and the three angles of ANY triangle sum to 180°, never 360°: that total belongs to a quadrilateral, not a triangle.
7. (b) 13 — Using the sum of interior angles formula, (n − 2) × 180° = 1980°, so n − 2 = 1980 ÷ 180 = 11, and n = 11 + 2 = 13. 11 stops after the division, forgetting to add 2 back to find n. 15 adds 2 twice by mistake, giving 11 + 2 + 2. 22 divides 1980 by 90 instead of 180.
8. (a) 71° — Method: first use the straight line through T to find the tangent-chord angle RTC, then apply the alternate segment theorem, which states that this angle equals the angle subtended by the chord in the alternate segment. Working: the two rails form a straight line through T, so angle RTC = 180 − 109 = 71 degrees. D lies in the alternate segment of the chord TC, so angle TDC = angle RTC = 71°. Answer: 71°. Find angle RTC FIRST from the straight line before applying the theorem: using the given 109° directly, doubling the tangent-chord angle, or taking its complement from 90° all give the wrong angle at D.
9. (a) 67° — PA and PB are tangents from the same point, so OAPB is a kite with right angles at A and B, by the tangent–radius theorem. The kite's angles sum to 360°, so angle AOB = 360° − 90° − 90° − 46° = 134°. C is on the major arc AB, so by the angle at the centre theorem, angle ACB = 134° ÷ 2 = 67°. Doubling angle APB instead of first finding angle AOB from the kite gives 46° + 46° = 92°. Using angle APB directly as if it were the centre angle, then halving it, gives 46° ÷ 2 = 23°. Finding angle AOB = 134° correctly but forgetting to halve it for the angle at the circumference gives 134°. Halve angle AOB, once you've found it properly, and you get 67°.
10. (a) 24 cm — The line from the centre to the midpoint of a chord is perpendicular to the chord, so triangle OMA has a right angle at M. By Pythagoras' theorem, AM² = OA² − OM² = 169 − 25 = 144, so AM = 12 cm. AB is twice AM, since M is the midpoint: AB = 2 × 12 = 24 cm. Finding AM = 12 cm correctly but forgetting to double it for the full chord gives 12 cm. Working out 169 − 25 = 144 and forgetting to take the square root gives 144 cm. Subtracting first and then doubling the wrong way, (13 − 5) × 2, gives 16 cm. Doubling AM after finding it correctly is the step that's missing from all three — do it, and you get 24 cm.
11. (a) Reflex + non-reflex angle BOD = 360°, so 2a + 2c = 360°. — A correct proof must build in a strictly logical order: the reflex and non-reflex angles at O, which together make a complete turn about the centre, must be added to 360° before 2a and 2c can be combined and divided. The statement 'Reflex + non-reflex angle BOD = 360°, so 2a + 2c = 360°' is the only one that follows directly from having 2a and 2c already established, and it is exactly what is needed before the final division step. Jumping straight to 'Divide by 2 throughout to get a + c = 180°' skips the step that justifies why 2a + 2c equals 360° in the first place — there is nothing yet to divide. Repeating 'Angle BOD is 2a and 2c, by the centre theorem' does not move the proof forward at all, since that fact has already been established in the sentence given. Introducing 'OB = OD are radii, so triangle OBD is isosceles' brings in an unrelated triangle and an unrelated method that plays no part in this particular proof.
12. (c) 140° — Method: OAPB is a quadrilateral whose angles sum to 360°; the tangent-radius angles at A and B are each 90°, and angle APB is given, so angle AOB is whatever is left. Working: angle OAP = angle OBP = 90°, so angle AOB = 360 − 90 − 90 − 40 = 140 degrees. Answer: 140°. Both tangent-radius angles are 90° each and must both be subtracted, not just one, and the quadrilateral's angles sum to 360°, not 180°: do not assume angle AOB simply matches angle APB, which is a different angle in a different part of the figure.
13. (b) Yes — OA = OC (radii), so the base angles are equal. — Method: check the definition of a radius and the isosceles triangle property the step relies on. Working: every radius of a circle has the same length, so OA = OC regardless of where A and C sit on the circle — this alone makes triangle OAC isosceles, and the base angles opposite the two equal sides, angle OAC and angle OCA, must be equal. The verdict is Yes, for exactly that reason. Claiming OA and OC are only equal if they are drawn to 'the very same point' misunderstands what a radius is — A and C can be any two points on the circle and OA still equals OC. Claiming the triangle is isosceles because angle AOC is 90° reverses the logic: nothing in the step has fixed angle AOC at 90°, and even if it had, that alone would not explain why OA = OC. Claiming the triangle would need to be equilateral confuses isosceles (two equal sides) with equilateral (three equal sides) — only two sides, OA and OC, are being compared here.
14. (d) 77 — Method: angles that meet at a point add up to 360°. Working: 82 + 105 + 96 = 283; 360 − 283 = 77. Answer: 77°. A candidate who gives the sum of the three known angles and forgets to subtract it from 360° gets 283. A candidate who leaves out the 105° angle, working out 360 − 82 − 96, gets 182. A candidate who leaves out the 82° angle, working out 360 − 105 − 96, gets 159.
15. (c) Tangent-chord angle = angle in the alternate segment. — This diagram has a diameter AC, a centre O, and a cyclic quadrilateral ABCD, but no tangent anywhere in it. 'Angle in a semicircle = 90°' applies directly, because AC is a diameter. 'Opposite angles of a cyclic quadrilateral sum to 180°' applies directly, because ABCD is a cyclic quadrilateral. 'Angle at the centre = twice angle at circumference' applies directly, because O is given as the centre of the circle. The tangent-chord fact relates the angle between a tangent and a chord to an angle elsewhere in the circle, and since this diagram has no tangent, there is nothing in it for that fact to describe — so it is the one theorem that does not apply here.
16. (b) 30 cm — The perpendicular from the centre of a circle to a chord bisects the chord, so this line, half the chord and the radius form a right-angled triangle. Using Pythagoras' theorem, half the chord = √(17² − 8²) = √(289 − 64) = √225 = 15 cm. The full chord AB is twice this length: AB = 2 × 15 = 30 cm. Stopping after finding the half-chord, without doubling it for the whole chord, gives 15 cm. Adding the radius and the perpendicular distance directly, 17 + 8 = 25 cm, ignores that these two lengths are the two shorter sides of a right-angled triangle, not parts of a straight line. Subtracting instead, 17 − 8 = 9 cm, makes the same mistake in the other direction.
17. (a) 68° — Method: a tangent meets a radius at 90°, so quadrilateral OAPB has two right angles at A and B; its four angles sum to 360°, so angle APB = 360° − 90° − 90° − angle AOB. Working: angle APB = 360° − 90° − 90° − 112° = 68°. Halving angle AOB, confusing this with the angle-at-centre theorem for a chord, gives 56°; assuming the angle between two tangents is always 90° (true only for the angles at A and B, not at P) gives 90°; and assuming angle APB simply equals angle AOB by symmetry gives 112°. The two right angles at A and B, from the tangent-radius property, are what link angle AOB and angle APB.
18. (b) Statement 3 — a triangle's angles are said to sum to 360° — The angles of any triangle sum to 180°, not 360° — Statement 3 uses the wrong total, and that error is what sends its final line to the impossible claim that angle ACB = 180°. The correct working is angle OAC + angle OBC + angle ACB = 180°, and since angle ACB = angle OCA + angle OCB, this gives 2 × angle ACB = 180°, so angle ACB = 90°, which is the actual theorem. Statement 1 correctly identifies OA and OC as equal radii, making triangle OAC isosceles — nothing wrong there. Statement 2 correctly does the same for triangle OBC. Statement 4 correctly states that A, O and B are collinear, since a diameter passes through the centre — also nothing wrong there. Statement 3 is the one to flag: it is the angle sum it quotes that is wrong, not the diagram or the radii.