⭕ Circle theorems practice

Answer key

1. (d) Opposite angles in a cyclic quadrilateral sum to 180° — ABCD is a cyclic quadrilateral, and angle ABC and angle ADC are a pair of opposite angles in it — they don't sit next to each other around the quadrilateral. The theorem that fixes the sum of a cyclic quadrilateral's opposite angles at 180° is exactly the one needed here. The other three theorems don't apply to this figure at all: the angle-in-a-semicircle theorem gives a 90° angle only when one side is a diameter, and no diameter is mentioned; the angle-at-the-centre theorem needs a centre point and an inscribed angle on the same arc, and no centre is given here; the tangent–radius theorem gives a 90° angle only where a tangent line touches the circle, and there is no tangent in this figure. Only the cyclic-quadrilateral theorem fits what is actually drawn.
2. (b) 61° — Triangle OAT is isosceles because OA = OT, both radii, so its base angles are equal: angle OTA = angle OAT = (180° − 122°) ÷ 2 = 29°. The tangent PT meets the radius OT at 90°, by the tangent–radius theorem, so angle OTP = 90°. Since TA lies between TO and TP, angle OTP splits into angle OTA and angle ATP: angle ATP = 90° − 29° = 61°. Stopping after the isosceles step and reporting the base angle itself gives 29°. Finding the base angles as 180° − 122° without halving, then subtracting from 90°, gives 90° − 58° = 32°. Adding the base angle to 90° instead of subtracting it gives 90° + 29° = 119°. Subtract the base angle from the right angle, and 61° is what's left.
3. (b) 13 — Using the sum of interior angles formula, (n − 2) × 180° = 1980°, so n − 2 = 1980 ÷ 180 = 11, and n = 11 + 2 = 13. 11 stops after the division, forgetting to add 2 back to find n. 15 adds 2 twice by mistake, giving 11 + 2 + 2. 22 divides 1980 by 90 instead of 180.
4. (c) 140° — Method: OAPB is a quadrilateral whose angles sum to 360°; the tangent-radius angles at A and B are each 90°, and angle APB is given, so angle AOB is whatever is left. Working: angle OAP = angle OBP = 90°, so angle AOB = 360 − 90 − 90 − 40 = 140 degrees. Answer: 140°. Both tangent-radius angles are 90° each and must both be subtracted, not just one, and the quadrilateral's angles sum to 360°, not 180°: do not assume angle AOB simply matches angle APB, which is a different angle in a different part of the figure.
5. (b) segment — The region enclosed between a chord and the arc it cuts off is called a segment. A sector is the different region already named in the question, enclosed by the two radii and the arc, not by the chord. A tangent is a straight line that touches the circle at one point, not an enclosed region at all. The circumference is the total distance around the whole circle, a length, not a region.
6. (c) 90° — A tangent to a circle always meets the radius drawn to the point of contact at a right angle, so the angle between the tangent and the radius at P is 90°. 180° confuses the tangent with the diameter through P, as if the radius continued in a straight line into the tangent. 45° halves the true angle by mistake. 60° comes from confusing this fact with the angle of an equilateral triangle.
7. (a) Reflex + non-reflex angle BOD = 360°, so 2a + 2c = 360°. — A correct proof must build in a strictly logical order: the reflex and non-reflex angles at O, which together make a complete turn about the centre, must be added to 360° before 2a and 2c can be combined and divided. The statement 'Reflex + non-reflex angle BOD = 360°, so 2a + 2c = 360°' is the only one that follows directly from having 2a and 2c already established, and it is exactly what is needed before the final division step. Jumping straight to 'Divide by 2 throughout to get a + c = 180°' skips the step that justifies why 2a + 2c equals 360° in the first place — there is nothing yet to divide. Repeating 'Angle BOD is 2a and 2c, by the centre theorem' does not move the proof forward at all, since that fact has already been established in the sentence given. Introducing 'OB = OD are radii, so triangle OBD is isosceles' brings in an unrelated triangle and an unrelated method that plays no part in this particular proof.
8. (d) 63.6 — Method: the three angles inside the triangle formed by the two ladders and the ground add up to 180°. Working: 180 − 58.2 − 58.2 = 63.6. Answer: 63.6°. A candidate who assumes the top angle equals the base angles gives 58.2. A candidate who subtracts only one base angle from 180°, working out 180 − 58.2, gets 121.8. A candidate who doubles the base angle instead of subtracting it twice from 180°, working out 2 × 58.2, gets 116.4.
9. (b) Statement 3 — a triangle's angles are said to sum to 360° — The angles of any triangle sum to 180°, not 360° — Statement 3 uses the wrong total, and that error is what sends its final line to the impossible claim that angle ACB = 180°. The correct working is angle OAC + angle OBC + angle ACB = 180°, and since angle ACB = angle OCA + angle OCB, this gives 2 × angle ACB = 180°, so angle ACB = 90°, which is the actual theorem. Statement 1 correctly identifies OA and OC as equal radii, making triangle OAC isosceles — nothing wrong there. Statement 2 correctly does the same for triangle OBC. Statement 4 correctly states that A, O and B are collinear, since a diameter passes through the centre — also nothing wrong there. Statement 3 is the one to flag: it is the angle sum it quotes that is wrong, not the diagram or the radii.
10. (b) 63° — Method: a tangent meets the radius drawn to the point of contact at a right angle, so triangle OPT has a 90° angle at T; the three angles of the triangle then sum to 180°. Working: angle OTP = 90°, angle OPT = 27°, so angle POT = 180 − 90 − 27 = 63 degrees. Answer: 63°. The tangent-radius angle is a fixed 90°, not something to assume equal to another angle in the triangle, and the three angles of ANY triangle sum to 180°, never 360°: that total belongs to a quadrilateral, not a triangle.
11. (b) 31.4 cm — Circumference = π × diameter, so 3.14 × 10 = 31.4 cm. 15.7 cm comes from using the radius, 5 cm, in place of the diameter: 3.14 × 5 = 15.7, which is only half the circumference. 78.5 cm comes from using the area formula π × radius² instead of the circumference formula: 3.14 × 5² = 3.14 × 25 = 78.5. 62.8 cm comes from keeping the 2 from the radius form of the formula, C = 2 × π × radius, but putting the full diameter into it: 2 × 3.14 × 10 = 62.8.
12. (d) tangent — A line that touches a circle at exactly one point, without crossing into the circle, is called a tangent. A chord is a straight line joining two points ON the circle, so it touches at two points, not one. A radius runs from the centre to the circle's edge, not along the outside of it. A diameter is a chord that passes through the centre, also touching the circle at two points.
13. (d) 60° — Method: the six angles at the centre together make one complete turn of 360°, and because the hexagon is regular they are all equal, so divide 360° by 6. Working: 360 ÷ 6 = 60. Answer: 60°. The distractors: 120° is the interior angle of a regular hexagon, 720 ÷ 6, which is the angle at a vertex and not the angle at the centre; 45° comes from dividing 360 by 8, treating the hexagon as though it had eight sides; 30° comes from halving the angle at the centre, as though each of the six triangles were split again by a line of symmetry.
14. (a) 24 cm — The line from the centre to the midpoint of a chord is perpendicular to the chord, so triangle OMA has a right angle at M. By Pythagoras' theorem, AM² = OA² − OM² = 169 − 25 = 144, so AM = 12 cm. AB is twice AM, since M is the midpoint: AB = 2 × 12 = 24 cm. Finding AM = 12 cm correctly but forgetting to double it for the full chord gives 12 cm. Working out 169 − 25 = 144 and forgetting to take the square root gives 144 cm. Subtracting first and then doubling the wrong way, (13 − 5) × 2, gives 16 cm. Doubling AM after finding it correctly is the step that's missing from all three — do it, and you get 24 cm.
15. (d) 49° — Method: first combine the two given angles at the centre to find the whole central angle FOM, then apply the angle-at-the-centre theorem, which halves the central angle to give the angle at the circumference on the major arc. Working: angle FOM = angle FOP + angle POM = 55 + 43 = 98 degrees. Since S is on the major arc FM, angle FSM = 98 ÷ 2 = 49 degrees. Answer: 49°. Add BOTH given angles to find the whole angle FOM before you halve anything: halving only one of them, doubling the total instead of halving it, or subtracting from 180° all give the wrong angle for the programme.
16. (b) 62° — Because AT is a diameter, the radius OT lies along AT, and the tangent PT meets every radius at 90°, by the tangent–radius theorem. So PT meets AT at T at a right angle: angle ATP = 90°. The angles of triangle APT sum to 180°, so angle APT = 180° − 90° − 28° = 62°. Copying the given angle PAT straight across, as though the triangle were isosceles, gives 28°. Adding the two known angles instead of subtracting them from 180° gives 90° + 28° = 118°. Naming the right angle itself, angle ATP, instead of the angle that was actually asked for gives 90°. Subtract both known angles from 180°, and 62° is angle APT.
17. (c) 1/4 — A full turn at the centre of a circle is 360°, so a sector's fraction of the circle is its angle divided by 360°: 90 ÷ 360 = 1/4. 1/2 would be the fraction for a sector with an angle of 180°, not 90°. 3/4 is the fraction of the rest of the circle, the major sector left over from the 270° that is not part of this sector. 1/8 would be the fraction for a sector with an angle of 45°, half of 90°.
18. (b) 62 — Method: co-interior (allied) angles between parallel lines add up to 180°. Working: 180 − 118 = 62. Answer: 62°. A candidate who treats co-interior angles as equal, like corresponding angles, gives 118. A candidate who uses 360° instead of 180°, working out 360 − 118, gets 242. A candidate who subtracts as if the angles were complementary, working out 118 − 90, gets 28.