⭕ Circle theorems practice

Answer key

1. (a) 80° — In triangle ABD, the three angles sum to 180°: angle BAD = 180° − 35° − 65° = 80°. ABCD is a cyclic quadrilateral, so the exterior angle at C, angle BCE, is equal to the interior angle at the opposite vertex, angle BAD: angle BCE = 80°. Adding the two given angles in triangle ABD instead of subtracting them from 180°, 35° + 65° = 100°, and then applying the exterior-angle rule correctly still gives the wrong angle BAD and so the wrong exterior angle, 100°. Halving the correct angle BAD, 80° ÷ 2 = 40°, confuses the exterior-angle rule with a different circle theorem in which one angle is half of another. Doubling it instead, 80° × 2 = 160°, makes the same kind of confusion in the other direction.
2. (c) 15 — The exterior angle is 180° − 156° = 24°, and the number of sides of a regular polygon is 360° divided by the exterior angle, so 360 ÷ 24 = 15. 24° is the exterior angle itself, stopping one step before the final division. 17 comes from finding 15 correctly and then adding 2, muddling the exterior angle rule with the (n − 2) that appears in the interior angle sum formula. 7.5 comes from dividing 180 by the exterior angle instead of 360, using the angles on a straight line rather than the total of the exterior angles of a polygon.
3. (b) 62 — Method: co-interior (allied) angles between parallel lines add up to 180°. Working: 180 − 118 = 62. Answer: 62°. A candidate who treats co-interior angles as equal, like corresponding angles, gives 118. A candidate who uses 360° instead of 180°, working out 360 − 118, gets 242. A candidate who subtracts as if the angles were complementary, working out 118 − 90, gets 28.
4. (a) 67° — PA and PB are tangents from the same point, so OAPB is a kite with right angles at A and B, by the tangent–radius theorem. The kite's angles sum to 360°, so angle AOB = 360° − 90° − 90° − 46° = 134°. C is on the major arc AB, so by the angle at the centre theorem, angle ACB = 134° ÷ 2 = 67°. Doubling angle APB instead of first finding angle AOB from the kite gives 46° + 46° = 92°. Using angle APB directly as if it were the centre angle, then halving it, gives 46° ÷ 2 = 23°. Finding angle AOB = 134° correctly but forgetting to halve it for the angle at the circumference gives 134°. Halve angle AOB, once you've found it properly, and you get 67°.
5. (a) 104° — Method: find each inscribed angle separately using the angle-at-the-centre theorem: for a point on the arc NOT cut off by the given central angle, halve that central angle; for a point on the OTHER arc, halve the REFLEX central angle instead; then subtract the smaller from the larger. Working: for C on the major arc, angle ACB = 76 ÷ 2 = 38 degrees. For D on the minor arc, D sees the reflex angle at the centre, 360 − 76 = 284 degrees, so angle ADB = 284 ÷ 2 = 142 degrees. The difference is 142 − 38 = 104 degrees. Answer: 104°. Both inscribed angles need the theorem applied separately, using the correct arc's central angle each time (the reflex angle for D), and the question asks for the DIFFERENCE between the two, not either angle on its own and not their sum, 180°, which is simply the opposite-angle total for the cyclic quadrilateral ACBD.
6. (b) 10 — Corresponding angles are equal, so 5x + 4 = 3x + 24. Subtracting 3x from both sides gives 2x + 4 = 24, then subtracting 4 gives 2x = 20, so x = 10. 14 comes from adding the constants, 4 + 24, instead of subtracting them when rearranging. 19 comes from treating the angles as co-interior (summing to 180°): 5x + 4 + 3x + 24 = 180 gives 8x = 152, so x = 19. 20 correctly reaches 2x = 20 but stops without dividing by 2.
7. (c) 140° — Method: OAPB is a quadrilateral whose angles sum to 360°; the tangent-radius angles at A and B are each 90°, and angle APB is given, so angle AOB is whatever is left. Working: angle OAP = angle OBP = 90°, so angle AOB = 360 − 90 − 90 − 40 = 140 degrees. Answer: 140°. Both tangent-radius angles are 90° each and must both be subtracted, not just one, and the quadrilateral's angles sum to 360°, not 180°: do not assume angle AOB simply matches angle APB, which is a different angle in a different part of the figure.
8. (a) Reflex + non-reflex angle BOD = 360°, so 2a + 2c = 360°. — A correct proof must build in a strictly logical order: the reflex and non-reflex angles at O, which together make a complete turn about the centre, must be added to 360° before 2a and 2c can be combined and divided. The statement 'Reflex + non-reflex angle BOD = 360°, so 2a + 2c = 360°' is the only one that follows directly from having 2a and 2c already established, and it is exactly what is needed before the final division step. Jumping straight to 'Divide by 2 throughout to get a + c = 180°' skips the step that justifies why 2a + 2c equals 360° in the first place — there is nothing yet to divide. Repeating 'Angle BOD is 2a and 2c, by the centre theorem' does not move the proof forward at all, since that fact has already been established in the sentence given. Introducing 'OB = OD are radii, so triangle OBD is isosceles' brings in an unrelated triangle and an unrelated method that plays no part in this particular proof.
9. (d) Opposite angles in a cyclic quadrilateral sum to 180° — ABCD is a cyclic quadrilateral, and angle ABC and angle ADC are a pair of opposite angles in it — they don't sit next to each other around the quadrilateral. The theorem that fixes the sum of a cyclic quadrilateral's opposite angles at 180° is exactly the one needed here. The other three theorems don't apply to this figure at all: the angle-in-a-semicircle theorem gives a 90° angle only when one side is a diameter, and no diameter is mentioned; the angle-at-the-centre theorem needs a centre point and an inscribed angle on the same arc, and no centre is given here; the tangent–radius theorem gives a 90° angle only where a tangent line touches the circle, and there is no tangent in this figure. Only the cyclic-quadrilateral theorem fits what is actually drawn.
10. (c) 32 — Method: alternate angles between parallel lines are equal, so 2x + 10 = 74. Working: subtracting 10 from both sides gives 2x = 64; dividing by 2 gives x = 32. Answer: x = 32. A candidate who forgets to subtract 10 first and divides 74 by 2 directly gets 37. A candidate who treats the angles as co-interior instead of alternate, so that the two expressions add to 180° rather than being equal, gets 48 after solving. A candidate who makes a sign error and treats the equation as 2x equalling 10 minus 74 instead of 74 minus 10 gets −32.
11. (b) Yes — OA = OC (radii), so the base angles are equal. — Method: check the definition of a radius and the isosceles triangle property the step relies on. Working: every radius of a circle has the same length, so OA = OC regardless of where A and C sit on the circle — this alone makes triangle OAC isosceles, and the base angles opposite the two equal sides, angle OAC and angle OCA, must be equal. The verdict is Yes, for exactly that reason. Claiming OA and OC are only equal if they are drawn to 'the very same point' misunderstands what a radius is — A and C can be any two points on the circle and OA still equals OC. Claiming the triangle is isosceles because angle AOC is 90° reverses the logic: nothing in the step has fixed angle AOC at 90°, and even if it had, that alone would not explain why OA = OC. Claiming the triangle would need to be equilateral confuses isosceles (two equal sides) with equilateral (three equal sides) — only two sides, OA and OC, are being compared here.
12. (b) 63° — Method: a tangent meets the radius drawn to the point of contact at a right angle, so triangle OPT has a 90° angle at T; the three angles of the triangle then sum to 180°. Working: angle OTP = 90°, angle OPT = 27°, so angle POT = 180 − 90 − 27 = 63 degrees. Answer: 63°. The tangent-radius angle is a fixed 90°, not something to assume equal to another angle in the triangle, and the three angles of ANY triangle sum to 180°, never 360°: that total belongs to a quadrilateral, not a triangle.
13. (b) 58° — Method: the angle at the centre is TWICE the angle at the circumference when both stand on the same arc. Working: angle AOC is the angle at the centre standing on arc AC, and angle ABC is the angle at the circumference standing on the same arc AC, with B on the major arc, so angle AOC = 2 × angle ABC. Rearranging, angle ABC = 116 ÷ 2 = 58 degrees. Answer: 58°. Halve the centre angle, do not double it, and use the angle AOC exactly as given, 116°: you do not need its reflex angle here, because B sits on the major arc, which is precisely the arrangement the theorem is stated for.
14. (a) 68° — Method: a tangent meets a radius at 90°, so quadrilateral OAPB has two right angles at A and B; its four angles sum to 360°, so angle APB = 360° − 90° − 90° − angle AOB. Working: angle APB = 360° − 90° − 90° − 112° = 68°. Halving angle AOB, confusing this with the angle-at-centre theorem for a chord, gives 56°; assuming the angle between two tangents is always 90° (true only for the angles at A and B, not at P) gives 90°; and assuming angle APB simply equals angle AOB by symmetry gives 112°. The two right angles at A and B, from the tangent-radius property, are what link angle AOB and angle APB.
15. (b) 13 — Using the sum of interior angles formula, (n − 2) × 180° = 1980°, so n − 2 = 1980 ÷ 180 = 11, and n = 11 + 2 = 13. 11 stops after the division, forgetting to add 2 back to find n. 15 adds 2 twice by mistake, giving 11 + 2 + 2. 22 divides 1980 by 90 instead of 180.
16. (d) sector — The region enclosed by two radii and the arc between them is called a sector. A segment is a different region, enclosed by a CHORD and an arc — it does not touch the centre at all. A chord is a straight line, not a region, so it cannot be the answer to a question asking for a region. A semicircle is only correct when the angle between the two radii is exactly 180°, which is not stated here, so it is too specific to be the general answer.
17. (b) Statement 3 — a triangle's angles are said to sum to 360° — The angles of any triangle sum to 180°, not 360° — Statement 3 uses the wrong total, and that error is what sends its final line to the impossible claim that angle ACB = 180°. The correct working is angle OAC + angle OBC + angle ACB = 180°, and since angle ACB = angle OCA + angle OCB, this gives 2 × angle ACB = 180°, so angle ACB = 90°, which is the actual theorem. Statement 1 correctly identifies OA and OC as equal radii, making triangle OAC isosceles — nothing wrong there. Statement 2 correctly does the same for triangle OBC. Statement 4 correctly states that A, O and B are collinear, since a diameter passes through the centre — also nothing wrong there. Statement 3 is the one to flag: it is the angle sum it quotes that is wrong, not the diagram or the radii.
18. (a) 60° — Method: the angles of a triangle add up to 180°, so add the three expressions, solve for x and then substitute back into the expression for angle B. Working: 2x + 3x + 4x = 9x, so 9x = 180 and x = 20. Angle B is 3x, so angle B = 3 × 20 = 60. Answer: 60°. The distractors: 20° is the value of x, from stopping as soon as the equation is solved instead of substituting back; 120° comes from using 360° as the angle sum, which gives x = 40 and 3x = 120; 80° is 4x, the angle at C, from substituting into the wrong expression.