⭕ Circle theorems practice

Answer key

1. (d) 13 — Method: OP and PQ meet at a right angle because of the tangent–radius fact, so triangle OPQ is right-angled at P; use Pythagoras' theorem. Working: OQ² = OP² + PQ² = 5² + 12² = 25 + 144 = 169; OQ = √169 = 13. A student who answers 17 has simply added the two given lengths (5 + 12) instead of using Pythagoras' theorem. A student who answers 7 has subtracted the two given lengths (12 − 5) instead of using Pythagoras' theorem. A student who answers 144 has correctly squared 12 but stopped there, forgetting to add 5² and take the square root. Answer: 13 cm.
2. (d) 20 — Alternate angles between parallel lines are equal, so 3x + 10 = 5x − 30. Rearranging, 10 + 30 = 5x − 3x, so 40 = 2x, and x = 20. −10 comes from a sign error when rearranging, moving a term to the wrong side and getting −20 = 2x instead. 25 comes from wrongly treating the two angles as co-interior and adding them to 180°: (3x + 10) + (5x − 30) = 180 gives 8x − 20 = 180, so x = 25. 47.5 makes the same co-interior mistake but sets the sum equal to 360° instead of 180°, giving 8x − 20 = 360 and x = 47.5.
3. (b) 31.4 cm — Circumference = π × diameter, so 3.14 × 10 = 31.4 cm. 15.7 cm comes from using the radius, 5 cm, in place of the diameter: 3.14 × 5 = 15.7, which is only half the circumference. 78.5 cm comes from using the area formula π × radius² instead of the circumference formula: 3.14 × 5² = 3.14 × 25 = 78.5. 62.8 cm comes from keeping the 2 from the radius form of the formula, C = 2 × π × radius, but putting the full diameter into it: 2 × 3.14 × 10 = 62.8.
4. (c) 140° — Method: OAPB is a quadrilateral whose angles sum to 360°; the tangent-radius angles at A and B are each 90°, and angle APB is given, so angle AOB is whatever is left. Working: angle OAP = angle OBP = 90°, so angle AOB = 360 − 90 − 90 − 40 = 140 degrees. Answer: 140°. Both tangent-radius angles are 90° each and must both be subtracted, not just one, and the quadrilateral's angles sum to 360°, not 180°: do not assume angle AOB simply matches angle APB, which is a different angle in a different part of the figure.
5. (d) tangent — A line that touches a circle at exactly one point, without crossing into the circle, is called a tangent. A chord is a straight line joining two points ON the circle, so it touches at two points, not one. A radius runs from the centre to the circle's edge, not along the outside of it. A diameter is a chord that passes through the centre, also touching the circle at two points.
6. (c) 15 — The exterior angle is 180° − 156° = 24°, and the number of sides of a regular polygon is 360° divided by the exterior angle, so 360 ÷ 24 = 15. 24° is the exterior angle itself, stopping one step before the final division. 17 comes from finding 15 correctly and then adding 2, muddling the exterior angle rule with the (n − 2) that appears in the interior angle sum formula. 7.5 comes from dividing 180 by the exterior angle instead of 360, using the angles on a straight line rather than the total of the exterior angles of a polygon.
7. (c) 115 — Method: use corresponding angles to carry the 65° angle from the lower rafter up to the upper rafter, then use angles on a straight line to move to the other side of the strut. Working: the angle above the upper rafter and to the left of the strut corresponds to the given angle, so it is 65°; the angle above the upper rafter and to the right of the strut lies on a straight line with it, so it is 180 − 65 = 115. Answer: 115°. A candidate who assumes the angle stays 65° without allowing for the move from the left of the strut to the right of it gives 65. A candidate who uses 90° instead of 180°, working out 90 − 65, gets 25. A candidate who adds instead of subtracting, working out 180 + 65, gets 245.
8. (a) 31.4 — Method: first find the circumference of one turn using π × diameter, then multiply by the number of turns. Working: circumference = 3.14 × 0.5 = 1.57 m; total distance = 1.57 × 20 = 31.4 m. A student who answers 15.7 has mistakenly halved the diameter again before multiplying, using 0.25 m instead of 0.5 m. A student who answers 3.14 has simply written down π itself, without completing the circumference or multiplying by the number of turns. A student who answers 62.8 has mistakenly doubled the diameter to 1 m before multiplying, treating the given length as a radius. Answer: 31.4 m.
9. (c) Tangent-chord angle = angle in the alternate segment. — This diagram has a diameter AC, a centre O, and a cyclic quadrilateral ABCD, but no tangent anywhere in it. 'Angle in a semicircle = 90°' applies directly, because AC is a diameter. 'Opposite angles of a cyclic quadrilateral sum to 180°' applies directly, because ABCD is a cyclic quadrilateral. 'Angle at the centre = twice angle at circumference' applies directly, because O is given as the centre of the circle. The tangent-chord fact relates the angle between a tangent and a chord to an angle elsewhere in the circle, and since this diagram has no tangent, there is nothing in it for that fact to describe — so it is the one theorem that does not apply here.
10. (b) Yes — OA = OC (radii), so the base angles are equal. — Method: check the definition of a radius and the isosceles triangle property the step relies on. Working: every radius of a circle has the same length, so OA = OC regardless of where A and C sit on the circle — this alone makes triangle OAC isosceles, and the base angles opposite the two equal sides, angle OAC and angle OCA, must be equal. The verdict is Yes, for exactly that reason. Claiming OA and OC are only equal if they are drawn to 'the very same point' misunderstands what a radius is — A and C can be any two points on the circle and OA still equals OC. Claiming the triangle is isosceles because angle AOC is 90° reverses the logic: nothing in the step has fixed angle AOC at 90°, and even if it had, that alone would not explain why OA = OC. Claiming the triangle would need to be equilateral confuses isosceles (two equal sides) with equilateral (three equal sides) — only two sides, OA and OC, are being compared here.
11. (b) 160° — B is on the minor arc AC, so the angle at the centre theorem applies to the reflex angle AOC: reflex angle AOC = 2 × 100° = 200°. The non-reflex angle AOC is the rest of the full turn: 360° − 200° = 160°. Reporting the reflex angle itself, without subtracting it from 360°, gives 200°. Subtracting angle ABC from 180° instead, as if this were a cyclic quadrilateral, gives 80°. Halving angle ABC instead of doubling it gives 50°. Double first, then take the angle away from a full turn, and 160° is what's left.
12. (d) Opposite angles in a cyclic quadrilateral sum to 180° — ABCD is a cyclic quadrilateral, and angle ABC and angle ADC are a pair of opposite angles in it — they don't sit next to each other around the quadrilateral. The theorem that fixes the sum of a cyclic quadrilateral's opposite angles at 180° is exactly the one needed here. The other three theorems don't apply to this figure at all: the angle-in-a-semicircle theorem gives a 90° angle only when one side is a diameter, and no diameter is mentioned; the angle-at-the-centre theorem needs a centre point and an inscribed angle on the same arc, and no centre is given here; the tangent–radius theorem gives a 90° angle only where a tangent line touches the circle, and there is no tangent in this figure. Only the cyclic-quadrilateral theorem fits what is actually drawn.
13. (d) 63.6 — Method: the three angles inside the triangle formed by the two ladders and the ground add up to 180°. Working: 180 − 58.2 − 58.2 = 63.6. Answer: 63.6°. A candidate who assumes the top angle equals the base angles gives 58.2. A candidate who subtracts only one base angle from 180°, working out 180 − 58.2, gets 121.8. A candidate who doubles the base angle instead of subtracting it twice from 180°, working out 2 × 58.2, gets 116.4.
14. (b) 58° — Method: the angle at the centre is TWICE the angle at the circumference when both stand on the same arc. Working: angle AOC is the angle at the centre standing on arc AC, and angle ABC is the angle at the circumference standing on the same arc AC, with B on the major arc, so angle AOC = 2 × angle ABC. Rearranging, angle ABC = 116 ÷ 2 = 58 degrees. Answer: 58°. Halve the centre angle, do not double it, and use the angle AOC exactly as given, 116°: you do not need its reflex angle here, because B sits on the major arc, which is precisely the arrangement the theorem is stated for.
15. (a) 104° — Method: find each inscribed angle separately using the angle-at-the-centre theorem: for a point on the arc NOT cut off by the given central angle, halve that central angle; for a point on the OTHER arc, halve the REFLEX central angle instead; then subtract the smaller from the larger. Working: for C on the major arc, angle ACB = 76 ÷ 2 = 38 degrees. For D on the minor arc, D sees the reflex angle at the centre, 360 − 76 = 284 degrees, so angle ADB = 284 ÷ 2 = 142 degrees. The difference is 142 − 38 = 104 degrees. Answer: 104°. Both inscribed angles need the theorem applied separately, using the correct arc's central angle each time (the reflex angle for D), and the question asks for the DIFFERENCE between the two, not either angle on its own and not their sum, 180°, which is simply the opposite-angle total for the cyclic quadrilateral ACBD.
16. (a) Reflex + non-reflex angle BOD = 360°, so 2a + 2c = 360°. — A correct proof must build in a strictly logical order: the reflex and non-reflex angles at O, which together make a complete turn about the centre, must be added to 360° before 2a and 2c can be combined and divided. The statement 'Reflex + non-reflex angle BOD = 360°, so 2a + 2c = 360°' is the only one that follows directly from having 2a and 2c already established, and it is exactly what is needed before the final division step. Jumping straight to 'Divide by 2 throughout to get a + c = 180°' skips the step that justifies why 2a + 2c equals 360° in the first place — there is nothing yet to divide. Repeating 'Angle BOD is 2a and 2c, by the centre theorem' does not move the proof forward at all, since that fact has already been established in the sentence given. Introducing 'OB = OD are radii, so triangle OBD is isosceles' brings in an unrelated triangle and an unrelated method that plays no part in this particular proof.
17. (b) 10 — Corresponding angles are equal, so 5x + 4 = 3x + 24. Subtracting 3x from both sides gives 2x + 4 = 24, then subtracting 4 gives 2x = 20, so x = 10. 14 comes from adding the constants, 4 + 24, instead of subtracting them when rearranging. 19 comes from treating the angles as co-interior (summing to 180°): 5x + 4 + 3x + 24 = 180 gives 8x = 152, so x = 19. 20 correctly reaches 2x = 20 but stops without dividing by 2.
18. (b) Statement 3 — a triangle's angles are said to sum to 360° — The angles of any triangle sum to 180°, not 360° — Statement 3 uses the wrong total, and that error is what sends its final line to the impossible claim that angle ACB = 180°. The correct working is angle OAC + angle OBC + angle ACB = 180°, and since angle ACB = angle OCA + angle OCB, this gives 2 × angle ACB = 180°, so angle ACB = 90°, which is the actual theorem. Statement 1 correctly identifies OA and OC as equal radii, making triangle OAC isosceles — nothing wrong there. Statement 2 correctly does the same for triangle OBC. Statement 4 correctly states that A, O and B are collinear, since a diameter passes through the centre — also nothing wrong there. Statement 3 is the one to flag: it is the angle sum it quotes that is wrong, not the diagram or the radii.