⭕ Circle theorems practice

Answer key

1. (a) 7.2 cm — The distance around the mat is the circumference, π × diameter = 3.14 × 20 = 62.8 cm. Yasmin started with 70 cm, so the ribbon left over is 70 − 62.8 = 7.2 cm. 62.8 cm is the circumference itself, the amount of ribbon used, not what is left over. 50 cm comes from subtracting the diameter instead of the circumference: 70 − 20 = 50. 20 cm is simply the diameter of the mat and involves no calculation with the ribbon length at all.
2. (a) 225 — Method: find the interior angle of the regular octagon, then subtract it from 360° to find the reflex angle at the same vertex, since the interior angle and the reflex angle together make a full turn. Working: there are 8 − 2 = 6 triangles' worth of angle in the octagon, so the interior angle = 6 × 180 ÷ 8 = 135; reflex angle = 360 − 135 = 225. Answer: 225°. A candidate who stops after finding the interior angle gives 135. A candidate who works out the exterior angle instead, 360 ÷ 8 = 45, gives 45. A candidate who subtracts the exterior angle from 360° instead of the interior angle, working out 360 − 45, gets 315.
3. (a) 24 cm — The line from the centre to the midpoint of a chord is perpendicular to the chord, so triangle OMA has a right angle at M. By Pythagoras' theorem, AM² = OA² − OM² = 169 − 25 = 144, so AM = 12 cm. AB is twice AM, since M is the midpoint: AB = 2 × 12 = 24 cm. Finding AM = 12 cm correctly but forgetting to double it for the full chord gives 12 cm. Working out 169 − 25 = 144 and forgetting to take the square root gives 144 cm. Subtracting first and then doubling the wrong way, (13 − 5) × 2, gives 16 cm. Doubling AM after finding it correctly is the step that's missing from all three — do it, and you get 24 cm.
4. (a) 65° — OT and OC are both radii, so triangle OTC is isosceles with OT = OC, and its base angles are equal: angle OTC = angle OCT = (180° − 130°) ÷ 2 = 25°. A tangent is perpendicular to the radius at the point of contact, so angle OTP = 90°. Since C lies inside angle OTP, the chord TC splits this right angle into angle OTC and angle PTC, so angle PTC = angle OTP − angle OTC = 90° − 25° = 65°. Stopping after finding the base angle of the isosceles triangle, without subtracting it from the right angle at T, leaves 25° instead of the angle actually asked for. Adding the base angle to the right angle instead of subtracting it, 90° + 25° = 115°, reverses the direction the two angles combine in. Finding the sum of the two base angles of the isosceles triangle, 180° − 130° = 50°, and stopping there, gives another wrong value entirely.
5. (a) 105° — The interior angles of a pentagon add up to (5 − 2) × 180° = 540°. Subtracting the three known angles, 540 − 100 − 110 − 120 = 210°, and this 210° is shared equally between the two angles marked x°, so each one is 210 ÷ 2 = 105°. 210° stops one step early, giving the total of the two unknown angles instead of one of them. 108° is the interior angle of a regular pentagon, which does not apply here since this pentagon's angles are not all equal. 55° comes from halving one of the given angles, 110°, instead of halving the remaining total.
6. (b) Statement 3 — a triangle's angles are said to sum to 360° — The angles of any triangle sum to 180°, not 360° — Statement 3 uses the wrong total, and that error is what sends its final line to the impossible claim that angle ACB = 180°. The correct working is angle OAC + angle OBC + angle ACB = 180°, and since angle ACB = angle OCA + angle OCB, this gives 2 × angle ACB = 180°, so angle ACB = 90°, which is the actual theorem. Statement 1 correctly identifies OA and OC as equal radii, making triangle OAC isosceles — nothing wrong there. Statement 2 correctly does the same for triangle OBC. Statement 4 correctly states that A, O and B are collinear, since a diameter passes through the centre — also nothing wrong there. Statement 3 is the one to flag: it is the angle sum it quotes that is wrong, not the diagram or the radii.
7. (b) 13 — Using the sum of interior angles formula, (n − 2) × 180° = 1980°, so n − 2 = 1980 ÷ 180 = 11, and n = 11 + 2 = 13. 11 stops after the division, forgetting to add 2 back to find n. 15 adds 2 twice by mistake, giving 11 + 2 + 2. 22 divides 1980 by 90 instead of 180.
8. (c) 5 cm — Diameter = circumference ÷ π, so 31.4 ÷ 3.14 = 10 cm, and the radius is half the diameter, so 10 ÷ 2 = 5 cm. 10 cm is the diameter itself, given as the radius by forgetting the final halving step. 15.7 cm comes from halving the circumference, 31.4 ÷ 2 = 15.7, and stopping there, treating half the circumference as the radius without ever dividing by π. 2.5 cm comes from halving the correct radius again, effectively dividing by 2 twice instead of once.
9. (a) 67° — PA and PB are tangents from the same point, so OAPB is a kite with right angles at A and B, by the tangent–radius theorem. The kite's angles sum to 360°, so angle AOB = 360° − 90° − 90° − 46° = 134°. C is on the major arc AB, so by the angle at the centre theorem, angle ACB = 134° ÷ 2 = 67°. Doubling angle APB instead of first finding angle AOB from the kite gives 46° + 46° = 92°. Using angle APB directly as if it were the centre angle, then halving it, gives 46° ÷ 2 = 23°. Finding angle AOB = 134° correctly but forgetting to halve it for the angle at the circumference gives 134°. Halve angle AOB, once you've found it properly, and you get 67°.
10. (a) Reflex + non-reflex angle BOD = 360°, so 2a + 2c = 360°. — A correct proof must build in a strictly logical order: the reflex and non-reflex angles at O, which together make a complete turn about the centre, must be added to 360° before 2a and 2c can be combined and divided. The statement 'Reflex + non-reflex angle BOD = 360°, so 2a + 2c = 360°' is the only one that follows directly from having 2a and 2c already established, and it is exactly what is needed before the final division step. Jumping straight to 'Divide by 2 throughout to get a + c = 180°' skips the step that justifies why 2a + 2c equals 360° in the first place — there is nothing yet to divide. Repeating 'Angle BOD is 2a and 2c, by the centre theorem' does not move the proof forward at all, since that fact has already been established in the sentence given. Introducing 'OB = OD are radii, so triangle OBD is isosceles' brings in an unrelated triangle and an unrelated method that plays no part in this particular proof.
11. (a) 60° — Method: the angles of a triangle add up to 180°, so add the three expressions, solve for x and then substitute back into the expression for angle B. Working: 2x + 3x + 4x = 9x, so 9x = 180 and x = 20. Angle B is 3x, so angle B = 3 × 20 = 60. Answer: 60°. The distractors: 20° is the value of x, from stopping as soon as the equation is solved instead of substituting back; 120° comes from using 360° as the angle sum, which gives x = 40 and 3x = 120; 80° is 4x, the angle at C, from substituting into the wrong expression.
12. (b) Yes — OA = OC (radii), so the base angles are equal. — Method: check the definition of a radius and the isosceles triangle property the step relies on. Working: every radius of a circle has the same length, so OA = OC regardless of where A and C sit on the circle — this alone makes triangle OAC isosceles, and the base angles opposite the two equal sides, angle OAC and angle OCA, must be equal. The verdict is Yes, for exactly that reason. Claiming OA and OC are only equal if they are drawn to 'the very same point' misunderstands what a radius is — A and C can be any two points on the circle and OA still equals OC. Claiming the triangle is isosceles because angle AOC is 90° reverses the logic: nothing in the step has fixed angle AOC at 90°, and even if it had, that alone would not explain why OA = OC. Claiming the triangle would need to be equilateral confuses isosceles (two equal sides) with equilateral (three equal sides) — only two sides, OA and OC, are being compared here.
13. (a) 31.4 — Method: first find the circumference of one turn using π × diameter, then multiply by the number of turns. Working: circumference = 3.14 × 0.5 = 1.57 m; total distance = 1.57 × 20 = 31.4 m. A student who answers 15.7 has mistakenly halved the diameter again before multiplying, using 0.25 m instead of 0.5 m. A student who answers 3.14 has simply written down π itself, without completing the circumference or multiplying by the number of turns. A student who answers 62.8 has mistakenly doubled the diameter to 1 m before multiplying, treating the given length as a radius. Answer: 31.4 m.
14. (b) 62 — Method: co-interior (allied) angles between parallel lines add up to 180°. Working: 180 − 118 = 62. Answer: 62°. A candidate who treats co-interior angles as equal, like corresponding angles, gives 118. A candidate who uses 360° instead of 180°, working out 360 − 118, gets 242. A candidate who subtracts as if the angles were complementary, working out 118 − 90, gets 28.
15. (c) 15 — The exterior angle is 180° − 156° = 24°, and the number of sides of a regular polygon is 360° divided by the exterior angle, so 360 ÷ 24 = 15. 24° is the exterior angle itself, stopping one step before the final division. 17 comes from finding 15 correctly and then adding 2, muddling the exterior angle rule with the (n − 2) that appears in the interior angle sum formula. 7.5 comes from dividing 180 by the exterior angle instead of 360, using the angles on a straight line rather than the total of the exterior angles of a polygon.
16. (b) 63° — Method: a tangent meets the radius drawn to the point of contact at a right angle, so triangle OPT has a 90° angle at T; the three angles of the triangle then sum to 180°. Working: angle OTP = 90°, angle OPT = 27°, so angle POT = 180 − 90 − 27 = 63 degrees. Answer: 63°. The tangent-radius angle is a fixed 90°, not something to assume equal to another angle in the triangle, and the three angles of ANY triangle sum to 180°, never 360°: that total belongs to a quadrilateral, not a triangle.
17. (d) 49° — Method: first combine the two given angles at the centre to find the whole central angle FOM, then apply the angle-at-the-centre theorem, which halves the central angle to give the angle at the circumference on the major arc. Working: angle FOM = angle FOP + angle POM = 55 + 43 = 98 degrees. Since S is on the major arc FM, angle FSM = 98 ÷ 2 = 49 degrees. Answer: 49°. Add BOTH given angles to find the whole angle FOM before you halve anything: halving only one of them, doubling the total instead of halving it, or subtracting from 180° all give the wrong angle for the programme.
18. (d) Opposite angles in a cyclic quadrilateral sum to 180° — ABCD is a cyclic quadrilateral, and angle ABC and angle ADC are a pair of opposite angles in it — they don't sit next to each other around the quadrilateral. The theorem that fixes the sum of a cyclic quadrilateral's opposite angles at 180° is exactly the one needed here. The other three theorems don't apply to this figure at all: the angle-in-a-semicircle theorem gives a 90° angle only when one side is a diameter, and no diameter is mentioned; the angle-at-the-centre theorem needs a centre point and an inscribed angle on the same arc, and no centre is given here; the tangent–radius theorem gives a 90° angle only where a tangent line touches the circle, and there is no tangent in this figure. Only the cyclic-quadrilateral theorem fits what is actually drawn.