⭕ Circle theorems practice

Answer key

1. (c) 15 — The exterior angle is 180° − 156° = 24°, and the number of sides of a regular polygon is 360° divided by the exterior angle, so 360 ÷ 24 = 15. 24° is the exterior angle itself, stopping one step before the final division. 17 comes from finding 15 correctly and then adding 2, muddling the exterior angle rule with the (n − 2) that appears in the interior angle sum formula. 7.5 comes from dividing 180 by the exterior angle instead of 360, using the angles on a straight line rather than the total of the exterior angles of a polygon.
2. (a) 31.4 — Method: first find the circumference of one turn using π × diameter, then multiply by the number of turns. Working: circumference = 3.14 × 0.5 = 1.57 m; total distance = 1.57 × 20 = 31.4 m. A student who answers 15.7 has mistakenly halved the diameter again before multiplying, using 0.25 m instead of 0.5 m. A student who answers 3.14 has simply written down π itself, without completing the circumference or multiplying by the number of turns. A student who answers 62.8 has mistakenly doubled the diameter to 1 m before multiplying, treating the given length as a radius. Answer: 31.4 m.
3. (d) Minor arc — Method: compare the lengths of the two arcs formed by the two points, and recall the term for the shorter one. Working: the two points split the circumference into two arcs; the shorter one is the minor arc and the longer one is the major arc. A student who answers major arc has picked the longer arc by mistake. A student who answers minor segment has confused the curved boundary with the enclosed two-dimensional region. A student who answers chord has named the straight line joining the two points instead of the curved arc. Answer: minor arc.
4. (c) 32 — Method: alternate angles between parallel lines are equal, so 2x + 10 = 74. Working: subtracting 10 from both sides gives 2x = 64; dividing by 2 gives x = 32. Answer: x = 32. A candidate who forgets to subtract 10 first and divides 74 by 2 directly gets 37. A candidate who treats the angles as co-interior instead of alternate, so that the two expressions add to 180° rather than being equal, gets 48 after solving. A candidate who makes a sign error and treats the equation as 2x equalling 10 minus 74 instead of 74 minus 10 gets −32.
5. (d) Concentric circles — Method: focus on what the two circles have in common — their centre, not their size. Working: both circles share exactly the same centre point but have different radii, which is the defining feature of this pair of circles. A student who answers congruent circles has confused 'same centre' with 'same size', but congruent circles simply have equal radii and need not share a centre. A student who answers tangential circles has confused circles that touch each other at one point with ones that share a centre. A student who answers similar circles has used the general term for the same shape at different sizes, missing the specific 'same centre' fact. Answer: concentric circles.
6. (b) 30 cm — The perpendicular from the centre of a circle to a chord bisects the chord, so this line, half the chord and the radius form a right-angled triangle. Using Pythagoras' theorem, half the chord = √(17² − 8²) = √(289 − 64) = √225 = 15 cm. The full chord AB is twice this length: AB = 2 × 15 = 30 cm. Stopping after finding the half-chord, without doubling it for the whole chord, gives 15 cm. Adding the radius and the perpendicular distance directly, 17 + 8 = 25 cm, ignores that these two lengths are the two shorter sides of a right-angled triangle, not parts of a straight line. Subtracting instead, 17 − 8 = 9 cm, makes the same mistake in the other direction.
7. (a) 25° — PA and PB are tangents from the same external point, so PA = PB and OAPB is a kite with right angles at A and B, by the tangent–radius theorem: angle OAP = angle OBP = 90°. The four angles of the kite sum to 360°, so angle AOB = 360° − 90° − 90° − 50° = 130°. Triangle OAB is isosceles because OA = OB, both radii, so its base angles are equal: angle OAB = (180° − 130°) ÷ 2 = 25°. Using angle APB itself as the apex angle of triangle OAB instead of angle AOB gives (180° − 50°) ÷ 2 = 65°. Using a triangle's angle sum on the four-sided kite, and so counting only one of its two right angles, treats angle AOB as 180° − 90° − 50° = 40°, and halving what is then left of triangle OAB gives (180° − 40°) ÷ 2 = 70°. Finding angle AOB = 130° correctly but forgetting to halve for the isosceles base angle gives 180° − 130° = 50°. Halve that remaining angle, and 25° is what's left for angle OAB.
8. (a) 80° — In triangle ABD, the three angles sum to 180°: angle BAD = 180° − 35° − 65° = 80°. ABCD is a cyclic quadrilateral, so the exterior angle at C, angle BCE, is equal to the interior angle at the opposite vertex, angle BAD: angle BCE = 80°. Adding the two given angles in triangle ABD instead of subtracting them from 180°, 35° + 65° = 100°, and then applying the exterior-angle rule correctly still gives the wrong angle BAD and so the wrong exterior angle, 100°. Halving the correct angle BAD, 80° ÷ 2 = 40°, confuses the exterior-angle rule with a different circle theorem in which one angle is half of another. Doubling it instead, 80° × 2 = 160°, makes the same kind of confusion in the other direction.
9. (a) Reflex + non-reflex angle BOD = 360°, so 2a + 2c = 360°. — A correct proof must build in a strictly logical order: the reflex and non-reflex angles at O, which together make a complete turn about the centre, must be added to 360° before 2a and 2c can be combined and divided. The statement 'Reflex + non-reflex angle BOD = 360°, so 2a + 2c = 360°' is the only one that follows directly from having 2a and 2c already established, and it is exactly what is needed before the final division step. Jumping straight to 'Divide by 2 throughout to get a + c = 180°' skips the step that justifies why 2a + 2c equals 360° in the first place — there is nothing yet to divide. Repeating 'Angle BOD is 2a and 2c, by the centre theorem' does not move the proof forward at all, since that fact has already been established in the sentence given. Introducing 'OB = OD are radii, so triangle OBD is isosceles' brings in an unrelated triangle and an unrelated method that plays no part in this particular proof.
10. (d) The angle between a tangent and a radius is 90° — OP is the radius drawn to the point of contact P, and a circle theorem states that a tangent always meets that radius at a right angle, so angle OPQ = 90°. A tangent is not parallel to the radius it touches — at the point of contact it is perpendicular to that radius, not parallel to it. A tangent does not pass through the centre — a straight line through the centre that also touches the circle at one point would have to be a diameter, which is a different line entirely. The angle-in-a-semicircle theorem needs a triangle drawn inside the circle with a diameter as its longest side; there is no such triangle here, just a tangent and a radius.
11. (c) chord — A diameter is a straight line joining two points on the circle that happens to pass through the centre. The general term for any straight line joining two points on a circle is a chord — every diameter is a chord, but not every chord is a diameter. Calling it a radius is wrong because a radius runs from the centre to just ONE point on the circle, not between two points on the circle. A tangent touches the circle at only one point, so it cannot be a diameter at all. An arc is a curved part of the circle's edge, not a straight line.
12. (b) 62° — Because AT is a diameter, the radius OT lies along AT, and the tangent PT meets every radius at 90°, by the tangent–radius theorem. So PT meets AT at T at a right angle: angle ATP = 90°. The angles of triangle APT sum to 180°, so angle APT = 180° − 90° − 28° = 62°. Copying the given angle PAT straight across, as though the triangle were isosceles, gives 28°. Adding the two known angles instead of subtracting them from 180° gives 90° + 28° = 118°. Naming the right angle itself, angle ATP, instead of the angle that was actually asked for gives 90°. Subtract both known angles from 180°, and 62° is angle APT.
13. (a) 65° — OT and OC are both radii, so triangle OTC is isosceles with OT = OC, and its base angles are equal: angle OTC = angle OCT = (180° − 130°) ÷ 2 = 25°. A tangent is perpendicular to the radius at the point of contact, so angle OTP = 90°. Since C lies inside angle OTP, the chord TC splits this right angle into angle OTC and angle PTC, so angle PTC = angle OTP − angle OTC = 90° − 25° = 65°. Stopping after finding the base angle of the isosceles triangle, without subtracting it from the right angle at T, leaves 25° instead of the angle actually asked for. Adding the base angle to the right angle instead of subtracting it, 90° + 25° = 115°, reverses the direction the two angles combine in. Finding the sum of the two base angles of the isosceles triangle, 180° − 130° = 50°, and stopping there, gives another wrong value entirely.
14. (b) Statement 3 — a triangle's angles are said to sum to 360° — The angles of any triangle sum to 180°, not 360° — Statement 3 uses the wrong total, and that error is what sends its final line to the impossible claim that angle ACB = 180°. The correct working is angle OAC + angle OBC + angle ACB = 180°, and since angle ACB = angle OCA + angle OCB, this gives 2 × angle ACB = 180°, so angle ACB = 90°, which is the actual theorem. Statement 1 correctly identifies OA and OC as equal radii, making triangle OAC isosceles — nothing wrong there. Statement 2 correctly does the same for triangle OBC. Statement 4 correctly states that A, O and B are collinear, since a diameter passes through the centre — also nothing wrong there. Statement 3 is the one to flag: it is the angle sum it quotes that is wrong, not the diagram or the radii.
15. (c) 5 cm — Diameter = circumference ÷ π, so 31.4 ÷ 3.14 = 10 cm, and the radius is half the diameter, so 10 ÷ 2 = 5 cm. 10 cm is the diameter itself, given as the radius by forgetting the final halving step. 15.7 cm comes from halving the circumference, 31.4 ÷ 2 = 15.7, and stopping there, treating half the circumference as the radius without ever dividing by π. 2.5 cm comes from halving the correct radius again, effectively dividing by 2 twice instead of once.
16. (d) 20 — Alternate angles between parallel lines are equal, so 3x + 10 = 5x − 30. Rearranging, 10 + 30 = 5x − 3x, so 40 = 2x, and x = 20. −10 comes from a sign error when rearranging, moving a term to the wrong side and getting −20 = 2x instead. 25 comes from wrongly treating the two angles as co-interior and adding them to 180°: (3x + 10) + (5x − 30) = 180 gives 8x − 20 = 180, so x = 25. 47.5 makes the same co-interior mistake but sets the sum equal to 360° instead of 180°, giving 8x − 20 = 360 and x = 47.5.
17. (d) Opposite angles in a cyclic quadrilateral sum to 180° — ABCD is a cyclic quadrilateral, and angle ABC and angle ADC are a pair of opposite angles in it — they don't sit next to each other around the quadrilateral. The theorem that fixes the sum of a cyclic quadrilateral's opposite angles at 180° is exactly the one needed here. The other three theorems don't apply to this figure at all: the angle-in-a-semicircle theorem gives a 90° angle only when one side is a diameter, and no diameter is mentioned; the angle-at-the-centre theorem needs a centre point and an inscribed angle on the same arc, and no centre is given here; the tangent–radius theorem gives a 90° angle only where a tangent line touches the circle, and there is no tangent in this figure. Only the cyclic-quadrilateral theorem fits what is actually drawn.
18. (b) 10 — Corresponding angles are equal, so 5x + 4 = 3x + 24. Subtracting 3x from both sides gives 2x + 4 = 24, then subtracting 4 gives 2x = 20, so x = 10. 14 comes from adding the constants, 4 + 24, instead of subtracting them when rearranging. 19 comes from treating the angles as co-interior (summing to 180°): 5x + 4 + 3x + 24 = 180 gives 8x = 152, so x = 19. 20 correctly reaches 2x = 20 but stops without dividing by 2.