⭕ Circle theorems practice

Answer key

1. (b) 62 — Method: co-interior (allied) angles between parallel lines add up to 180°. Working: 180 − 118 = 62. Answer: 62°. A candidate who treats co-interior angles as equal, like corresponding angles, gives 118. A candidate who uses 360° instead of 180°, working out 360 − 118, gets 242. A candidate who subtracts as if the angles were complementary, working out 118 − 90, gets 28.
2. (a) 65° — OT and OC are both radii, so triangle OTC is isosceles with OT = OC, and its base angles are equal: angle OTC = angle OCT = (180° − 130°) ÷ 2 = 25°. A tangent is perpendicular to the radius at the point of contact, so angle OTP = 90°. Since C lies inside angle OTP, the chord TC splits this right angle into angle OTC and angle PTC, so angle PTC = angle OTP − angle OTC = 90° − 25° = 65°. Stopping after finding the base angle of the isosceles triangle, without subtracting it from the right angle at T, leaves 25° instead of the angle actually asked for. Adding the base angle to the right angle instead of subtracting it, 90° + 25° = 115°, reverses the direction the two angles combine in. Finding the sum of the two base angles of the isosceles triangle, 180° − 130° = 50°, and stopping there, gives another wrong value entirely.
3. (d) 20 — Alternate angles between parallel lines are equal, so 3x + 10 = 5x − 30. Rearranging, 10 + 30 = 5x − 3x, so 40 = 2x, and x = 20. −10 comes from a sign error when rearranging, moving a term to the wrong side and getting −20 = 2x instead. 25 comes from wrongly treating the two angles as co-interior and adding them to 180°: (3x + 10) + (5x − 30) = 180 gives 8x − 20 = 180, so x = 25. 47.5 makes the same co-interior mistake but sets the sum equal to 360° instead of 180°, giving 8x − 20 = 360 and x = 47.5.
4. (b) 31.4 cm — Circumference = π × diameter, so 3.14 × 10 = 31.4 cm. 15.7 cm comes from using the radius, 5 cm, in place of the diameter: 3.14 × 5 = 15.7, which is only half the circumference. 78.5 cm comes from using the area formula π × radius² instead of the circumference formula: 3.14 × 5² = 3.14 × 25 = 78.5. 62.8 cm comes from keeping the 2 from the radius form of the formula, C = 2 × π × radius, but putting the full diameter into it: 2 × 3.14 × 10 = 62.8.
5. (b) Minor segment — Method: compare the sizes of the two regions cut off by the chord, and recall the term used for the smaller one. Working: the chord creates two segments; the smaller region is called the minor segment and the larger one the major segment. A student who answers major segment has picked the larger region by mistake instead of the smaller one. A student who answers minor arc has named the curved boundary rather than the two-dimensional region it encloses. A student who answers semicircle has wrongly assumed the chord must pass through the centre. Answer: minor segment.
6. (d) 60° — Method: the six angles at the centre together make one complete turn of 360°, and because the hexagon is regular they are all equal, so divide 360° by 6. Working: 360 ÷ 6 = 60. Answer: 60°. The distractors: 120° is the interior angle of a regular hexagon, 720 ÷ 6, which is the angle at a vertex and not the angle at the centre; 45° comes from dividing 360 by 8, treating the hexagon as though it had eight sides; 30° comes from halving the angle at the centre, as though each of the six triangles were split again by a line of symmetry.
7. (d) 49° — Method: first combine the two given angles at the centre to find the whole central angle FOM, then apply the angle-at-the-centre theorem, which halves the central angle to give the angle at the circumference on the major arc. Working: angle FOM = angle FOP + angle POM = 55 + 43 = 98 degrees. Since S is on the major arc FM, angle FSM = 98 ÷ 2 = 49 degrees. Answer: 49°. Add BOTH given angles to find the whole angle FOM before you halve anything: halving only one of them, doubling the total instead of halving it, or subtracting from 180° all give the wrong angle for the programme.
8. (b) 10 — Corresponding angles are equal, so 5x + 4 = 3x + 24. Subtracting 3x from both sides gives 2x + 4 = 24, then subtracting 4 gives 2x = 20, so x = 10. 14 comes from adding the constants, 4 + 24, instead of subtracting them when rearranging. 19 comes from treating the angles as co-interior (summing to 180°): 5x + 4 + 3x + 24 = 180 gives 8x = 152, so x = 19. 20 correctly reaches 2x = 20 but stops without dividing by 2.
9. (c) 15 — The exterior angle is 180° − 156° = 24°, and the number of sides of a regular polygon is 360° divided by the exterior angle, so 360 ÷ 24 = 15. 24° is the exterior angle itself, stopping one step before the final division. 17 comes from finding 15 correctly and then adding 2, muddling the exterior angle rule with the (n − 2) that appears in the interior angle sum formula. 7.5 comes from dividing 180 by the exterior angle instead of 360, using the angles on a straight line rather than the total of the exterior angles of a polygon.
10. (c) 8 — Method: the exterior angles of a polygon add up to 360°, so divide 360° by the size of one exterior angle. Working: 360 ÷ 45 = 8. Answer: 8 sides. A candidate who divides into a half turn instead of a full turn, working out 180 ÷ 45, gets 4. A candidate who reads off the given exterior angle as if it were the number of sides gets 45. A candidate who subtracts instead of dividing, working out 360 − 45, gets 315.
11. (a) Reflex + non-reflex angle BOD = 360°, so 2a + 2c = 360°. — A correct proof must build in a strictly logical order: the reflex and non-reflex angles at O, which together make a complete turn about the centre, must be added to 360° before 2a and 2c can be combined and divided. The statement 'Reflex + non-reflex angle BOD = 360°, so 2a + 2c = 360°' is the only one that follows directly from having 2a and 2c already established, and it is exactly what is needed before the final division step. Jumping straight to 'Divide by 2 throughout to get a + c = 180°' skips the step that justifies why 2a + 2c equals 360° in the first place — there is nothing yet to divide. Repeating 'Angle BOD is 2a and 2c, by the centre theorem' does not move the proof forward at all, since that fact has already been established in the sentence given. Introducing 'OB = OD are radii, so triangle OBD is isosceles' brings in an unrelated triangle and an unrelated method that plays no part in this particular proof.
12. (b) (2x + 10)° — By the angle at the centre theorem, angle ABC is half of angle AOC, because both stand on the same arc AC: angle ABC = (4x + 20)° ÷ 2 = (2x + 10)°. Writing down the centre angle itself, without halving at all, gives (4x + 20)°. Halving only the constant term and leaving the x-term unchanged gives (4x + 10)°. Doubling the centre angle instead of halving it gives (8x + 40)°. Halve every term in the expression, and (2x + 10)° is what you get.
13. (b) Yes — OA = OC (radii), so the base angles are equal. — Method: check the definition of a radius and the isosceles triangle property the step relies on. Working: every radius of a circle has the same length, so OA = OC regardless of where A and C sit on the circle — this alone makes triangle OAC isosceles, and the base angles opposite the two equal sides, angle OAC and angle OCA, must be equal. The verdict is Yes, for exactly that reason. Claiming OA and OC are only equal if they are drawn to 'the very same point' misunderstands what a radius is — A and C can be any two points on the circle and OA still equals OC. Claiming the triangle is isosceles because angle AOC is 90° reverses the logic: nothing in the step has fixed angle AOC at 90°, and even if it had, that alone would not explain why OA = OC. Claiming the triangle would need to be equilateral confuses isosceles (two equal sides) with equilateral (three equal sides) — only two sides, OA and OC, are being compared here.
14. (d) 77 — Method: angles that meet at a point add up to 360°. Working: 82 + 105 + 96 = 283; 360 − 283 = 77. Answer: 77°. A candidate who gives the sum of the three known angles and forgets to subtract it from 360° gets 283. A candidate who leaves out the 105° angle, working out 360 − 82 − 96, gets 182. A candidate who leaves out the 82° angle, working out 360 − 105 − 96, gets 159.
15. (a) 67° — PA and PB are tangents from the same point, so OAPB is a kite with right angles at A and B, by the tangent–radius theorem. The kite's angles sum to 360°, so angle AOB = 360° − 90° − 90° − 46° = 134°. C is on the major arc AB, so by the angle at the centre theorem, angle ACB = 134° ÷ 2 = 67°. Doubling angle APB instead of first finding angle AOB from the kite gives 46° + 46° = 92°. Using angle APB directly as if it were the centre angle, then halving it, gives 46° ÷ 2 = 23°. Finding angle AOB = 134° correctly but forgetting to halve it for the angle at the circumference gives 134°. Halve angle AOB, once you've found it properly, and you get 67°.
16. (d) tangent — A line that touches a circle at exactly one point, without crossing into the circle, is called a tangent. A chord is a straight line joining two points ON the circle, so it touches at two points, not one. A radius runs from the centre to the circle's edge, not along the outside of it. A diameter is a chord that passes through the centre, also touching the circle at two points.
17. (b) 30 cm — The perpendicular from the centre of a circle to a chord bisects the chord, so this line, half the chord and the radius form a right-angled triangle. Using Pythagoras' theorem, half the chord = √(17² − 8²) = √(289 − 64) = √225 = 15 cm. The full chord AB is twice this length: AB = 2 × 15 = 30 cm. Stopping after finding the half-chord, without doubling it for the whole chord, gives 15 cm. Adding the radius and the perpendicular distance directly, 17 + 8 = 25 cm, ignores that these two lengths are the two shorter sides of a right-angled triangle, not parts of a straight line. Subtracting instead, 17 − 8 = 9 cm, makes the same mistake in the other direction.
18. (d) 13 — Method: OP and PQ meet at a right angle because of the tangent–radius fact, so triangle OPQ is right-angled at P; use Pythagoras' theorem. Working: OQ² = OP² + PQ² = 5² + 12² = 25 + 144 = 169; OQ = √169 = 13. A student who answers 17 has simply added the two given lengths (5 + 12) instead of using Pythagoras' theorem. A student who answers 7 has subtracted the two given lengths (12 − 5) instead of using Pythagoras' theorem. A student who answers 144 has correctly squared 12 but stopped there, forgetting to add 5² and take the square root. Answer: 13 cm.