⭕ Circle theorems practice

Answer key

1. (b) 2x + 2y = 180° — Method: use the fact that OA, OB and OC are all radii, so triangles OAC and OBC are each isosceles, and set up the angle sum of triangle ABC as a whole. Working: since OA = OC, triangle OAC is isosceles, so angle OAC = angle OCA = x. Since OB = OC, triangle OBC is isosceles, so angle OBC = angle OCB = y. The angle at A in triangle ABC is x, the angle at B is y, and the angle at C is angle OCA plus angle OCB, which is x + y. The three angles of triangle ABC sum to 180°, giving x + y + (x + y) = 180°, which is 2x + 2y = 180°. Answer: 2x + 2y = 180°. Dividing this by 2 gives x + y = 90°, and since angle ACB = x + y, this proves angle ACB = 90°: the point C was never restricted to any particular position on the circle, so the proof holds for every choice of C. Include ALL THREE angles of the triangle in the sum, do not use a quadrilateral's 360° total, and remember angle ACB is the SUM x + y, not x alone.
2. (a) 7.2 cm — The distance around the mat is the circumference, π × diameter = 3.14 × 20 = 62.8 cm. Yasmin started with 70 cm, so the ribbon left over is 70 − 62.8 = 7.2 cm. 62.8 cm is the circumference itself, the amount of ribbon used, not what is left over. 50 cm comes from subtracting the diameter instead of the circumference: 70 − 20 = 50. 20 cm is simply the diameter of the mat and involves no calculation with the ribbon length at all.
3. (a) Reflex + non-reflex angle BOD = 360°, so 2a + 2c = 360°. — A correct proof must build in a strictly logical order: the reflex and non-reflex angles at O, which together make a complete turn about the centre, must be added to 360° before 2a and 2c can be combined and divided. The statement 'Reflex + non-reflex angle BOD = 360°, so 2a + 2c = 360°' is the only one that follows directly from having 2a and 2c already established, and it is exactly what is needed before the final division step. Jumping straight to 'Divide by 2 throughout to get a + c = 180°' skips the step that justifies why 2a + 2c equals 360° in the first place — there is nothing yet to divide. Repeating 'Angle BOD is 2a and 2c, by the centre theorem' does not move the proof forward at all, since that fact has already been established in the sentence given. Introducing 'OB = OD are radii, so triangle OBD is isosceles' brings in an unrelated triangle and an unrelated method that plays no part in this particular proof.
4. (c) 32 — Method: alternate angles between parallel lines are equal, so 2x + 10 = 74. Working: subtracting 10 from both sides gives 2x = 64; dividing by 2 gives x = 32. Answer: x = 32. A candidate who forgets to subtract 10 first and divides 74 by 2 directly gets 37. A candidate who treats the angles as co-interior instead of alternate, so that the two expressions add to 180° rather than being equal, gets 48 after solving. A candidate who makes a sign error and treats the equation as 2x equalling 10 minus 74 instead of 74 minus 10 gets −32.
5. (c) 8 — Method: the exterior angles of a polygon add up to 360°, so divide 360° by the size of one exterior angle. Working: 360 ÷ 45 = 8. Answer: 8 sides. A candidate who divides into a half turn instead of a full turn, working out 180 ÷ 45, gets 4. A candidate who reads off the given exterior angle as if it were the number of sides gets 45. A candidate who subtracts instead of dividing, working out 360 − 45, gets 315.
6. (d) sector — The region enclosed by two radii and the arc between them is called a sector. A segment is a different region, enclosed by a CHORD and an arc — it does not touch the centre at all. A chord is a straight line, not a region, so it cannot be the answer to a question asking for a region. A semicircle is only correct when the angle between the two radii is exactly 180°, which is not stated here, so it is too specific to be the general answer.
7. (b) Yes — OA = OC (radii), so the base angles are equal. — Method: check the definition of a radius and the isosceles triangle property the step relies on. Working: every radius of a circle has the same length, so OA = OC regardless of where A and C sit on the circle — this alone makes triangle OAC isosceles, and the base angles opposite the two equal sides, angle OAC and angle OCA, must be equal. The verdict is Yes, for exactly that reason. Claiming OA and OC are only equal if they are drawn to 'the very same point' misunderstands what a radius is — A and C can be any two points on the circle and OA still equals OC. Claiming the triangle is isosceles because angle AOC is 90° reverses the logic: nothing in the step has fixed angle AOC at 90°, and even if it had, that alone would not explain why OA = OC. Claiming the triangle would need to be equilateral confuses isosceles (two equal sides) with equilateral (three equal sides) — only two sides, OA and OC, are being compared here.
8. (c) Tangent-chord angle = angle in the alternate segment. — This diagram has a diameter AC, a centre O, and a cyclic quadrilateral ABCD, but no tangent anywhere in it. 'Angle in a semicircle = 90°' applies directly, because AC is a diameter. 'Opposite angles of a cyclic quadrilateral sum to 180°' applies directly, because ABCD is a cyclic quadrilateral. 'Angle at the centre = twice angle at circumference' applies directly, because O is given as the centre of the circle. The tangent-chord fact relates the angle between a tangent and a chord to an angle elsewhere in the circle, and since this diagram has no tangent, there is nothing in it for that fact to describe — so it is the one theorem that does not apply here.
9. (b) 10 — Corresponding angles are equal, so 5x + 4 = 3x + 24. Subtracting 3x from both sides gives 2x + 4 = 24, then subtracting 4 gives 2x = 20, so x = 10. 14 comes from adding the constants, 4 + 24, instead of subtracting them when rearranging. 19 comes from treating the angles as co-interior (summing to 180°): 5x + 4 + 3x + 24 = 180 gives 8x = 152, so x = 19. 20 correctly reaches 2x = 20 but stops without dividing by 2.
10. (c) 90° — A tangent to a circle always meets the radius drawn to the point of contact at a right angle, so the angle between the tangent and the radius at P is 90°. 180° confuses the tangent with the diameter through P, as if the radius continued in a straight line into the tangent. 45° halves the true angle by mistake. 60° comes from confusing this fact with the angle of an equilateral triangle.
11. (b) segment — The region enclosed between a chord and the arc it cuts off is called a segment. A sector is the different region already named in the question, enclosed by the two radii and the arc, not by the chord. A tangent is a straight line that touches the circle at one point, not an enclosed region at all. The circumference is the total distance around the whole circle, a length, not a region.
12. (b) 35° — Method: angle CBE and angle ABC lie on a straight line at B, so they are supplementary; angle ABC then equals angle ADC because B and D are both on the major arc AC (angles in the same segment). Working: angle ABC = 180 − 145 = 35 degrees, using angles on a straight line. Since B and D are both on the major arc AC, angle ADC = angle ABC = 35°. Answer: 35°. Find angle ABC FIRST from the straight line at B before applying the circle theorem: using the given 145° directly, doubling or halving it, or subtracting it from 180° a second time all give the wrong angle.
13. (d) Minor arc — Method: compare the lengths of the two arcs formed by the two points, and recall the term for the shorter one. Working: the two points split the circumference into two arcs; the shorter one is the minor arc and the longer one is the major arc. A student who answers major arc has picked the longer arc by mistake. A student who answers minor segment has confused the curved boundary with the enclosed two-dimensional region. A student who answers chord has named the straight line joining the two points instead of the curved arc. Answer: minor arc.
14. (c) 72° — Method: opposite angles in a cyclic quadrilateral always sum to 180°. Working: angle DAB and angle BCD are opposite angles of the cyclic quadrilateral ABCD, so angle BCD = 180 − 108 = 72 degrees. Answer: 72°. Opposite angles in a cyclic quadrilateral are SUPPLEMENTARY, not equal, so do not simply copy the given angle; and do not subtract from 360°, which is the rule for angles round a point, or confuse this with the angle-in-a-semicircle theorem, which gives a fixed 90° that has nothing to do with this quadrilateral.
15. (d) Opposite angles in a cyclic quadrilateral sum to 180° — ABCD is a cyclic quadrilateral, and angle ABC and angle ADC are a pair of opposite angles in it — they don't sit next to each other around the quadrilateral. The theorem that fixes the sum of a cyclic quadrilateral's opposite angles at 180° is exactly the one needed here. The other three theorems don't apply to this figure at all: the angle-in-a-semicircle theorem gives a 90° angle only when one side is a diameter, and no diameter is mentioned; the angle-at-the-centre theorem needs a centre point and an inscribed angle on the same arc, and no centre is given here; the tangent–radius theorem gives a 90° angle only where a tangent line touches the circle, and there is no tangent in this figure. Only the cyclic-quadrilateral theorem fits what is actually drawn.
16. (a) 25° — PA and PB are tangents from the same external point, so PA = PB and OAPB is a kite with right angles at A and B, by the tangent–radius theorem: angle OAP = angle OBP = 90°. The four angles of the kite sum to 360°, so angle AOB = 360° − 90° − 90° − 50° = 130°. Triangle OAB is isosceles because OA = OB, both radii, so its base angles are equal: angle OAB = (180° − 130°) ÷ 2 = 25°. Using angle APB itself as the apex angle of triangle OAB instead of angle AOB gives (180° − 50°) ÷ 2 = 65°. Using a triangle's angle sum on the four-sided kite, and so counting only one of its two right angles, treats angle AOB as 180° − 90° − 50° = 40°, and halving what is then left of triangle OAB gives (180° − 40°) ÷ 2 = 70°. Finding angle AOB = 130° correctly but forgetting to halve for the isosceles base angle gives 180° − 130° = 50°. Halve that remaining angle, and 25° is what's left for angle OAB.
17. (b) Statement 3 — a triangle's angles are said to sum to 360° — The angles of any triangle sum to 180°, not 360° — Statement 3 uses the wrong total, and that error is what sends its final line to the impossible claim that angle ACB = 180°. The correct working is angle OAC + angle OBC + angle ACB = 180°, and since angle ACB = angle OCA + angle OCB, this gives 2 × angle ACB = 180°, so angle ACB = 90°, which is the actual theorem. Statement 1 correctly identifies OA and OC as equal radii, making triangle OAC isosceles — nothing wrong there. Statement 2 correctly does the same for triangle OBC. Statement 4 correctly states that A, O and B are collinear, since a diameter passes through the centre — also nothing wrong there. Statement 3 is the one to flag: it is the angle sum it quotes that is wrong, not the diagram or the radii.
18. (b) 80° — Method: opposite angles of a cyclic quadrilateral sum to 180°, so form and solve an equation for x, then substitute back to find angle DAB. Working: (2x + 10) + (3x − 5) = 180, so 5x + 5 = 180, x = 35, and angle DAB = 2(35) + 10 = 80°. Using 360° instead of 180° as the total (as if the two angles were the whole circle rather than a pair of opposite angles) gives x = 71 and angle DAB = 152°; solving correctly for x but reporting x itself instead of substituting it back into 2x + 10 gives 35°; and mishandling the signs when combining the two expressions, using (2x + 10) + (3x + 5) = 180 instead of (2x + 10) + (3x − 5) = 180, gives x = 33 and angle DAB = 76°. Opposite angles of a cyclic quadrilateral — not adjacent ones — are the pair that sums to 180°.