⚖️ Foundation to Higher crossover check

Answer key

1. (a) 30 — Method: an outlier is a value that lies far away from the pattern set by the rest of the data, so compare each value with the group the others form. Working: five of the counts, 5, 7, 8, 9 and 11, lie within 6 of one another and the steps between them are 2, 1, 1 and 2; the remaining count of 30 is 19 above the nearest of them, so it is the value that does not belong to the pattern. Answer: 30. The distractors: 5 comes from picking the smallest value, on the idea that the odd one out must be at the bottom of the list; 11 comes from ordering the data and stopping one value short, taking the largest of the counts that sit close together; 8.5 comes from working out the median, (8 + 9) ÷ 2, and giving a measure of centre where a value standing apart was asked for.
2. (d) £270 — Method: the £90 is a difference between two shares, so turn it into a number of parts before finding the value of one part. Working: the largest share is 3 parts and the smallest is 1 part, so the difference is 3 − 1 = 2 parts and 2 parts are worth £90; one part = £90 ÷ 2 = £45; the whole amount is 1 + 2 + 3 = 6 parts, so 6 × £45 = £270. Answer: £270. The distractors: £540 comes from treating the £90 as the value of one part and multiplying it by the 6 parts; £180 comes from finding the £45 correctly but adding only the 1-part and 3-part shares and forgetting the middle share; £135 comes from multiplying £45 by 3 and giving the largest share instead of the total.
3. (a) y = −2x + 7 — Using y = −2x + c, and substituting the point (3, 1): 1 = −2(3) + c, so 1 = −6 + c, and c = 7, giving y = −2x + 7. A candidate who uses the y-coordinate of the point directly as the y-intercept, instead of solving for c, would write y = −2x + 1. A candidate who drops the negative sign on the gradient would write y = 2x + 7. A candidate who makes a sign error when isolating c, writing c = 1 − 6 = −5 instead of c = 1 + 6 = 7, would write y = −2x − 5.
4. (d) 25% — Method: percentage decrease = decrease ÷ original amount × 100. Working: the reduction is £60 − £45 = £15, and 15 ÷ 60 = 0.25, so 0.25 × 100 = 25%. Answer: 25%. The distractors: 15% comes from quoting the £15 reduction as though pounds and per cent were the same thing; 33% comes from dividing the £15 by the new price £45 instead of by the original £60, which gives 33% to the nearest per cent; 75% is the new price written as a percentage of the old one, which is what is still paid rather than what has been taken off.
5. (b) x ≤ 5 — Method: divide out the bracket first, then undo the number term; the inequality sign turns round only if both sides are multiplied or divided by a negative number. Working: dividing both sides of 2(x − 1) ≤ 8 by 2 gives x − 1 ≤ 4, and 2 is positive so the ≤ is unchanged; adding 1 to both sides gives x ≤ 5. Answer: x ≤ 5. The distractors: x ≤ 3 comes from subtracting 1 from 4 instead of adding 1 to both sides; x ≤ 4 comes from stopping at 8 ÷ 2 = 4 and never undoing the −1 inside the bracket; x < 5 comes from reading ≤ as a strict inequality, which wrongly leaves the boundary value out of the solution set.
6. (a) £20,000 — Method: add the parts of the ratio, divide the profit by the number of parts to find the value of one part, then multiply by the parts belonging to the partner asked about. Working: 3 + 5 + 4 = 12 parts, £48,000 ÷ 12 = £4,000 for one part, and that partner has 5 parts, so 5 × £4,000 = £20,000. Answer: £20,000. The distractors: £4,000 is the value of one part; £12,000 is the 3-part share; £16,000 is the 4-part share, which is what a candidate reaches by assuming the biggest share must go with the number written last in the ratio.
7. (c) 3x + 4y — Collect the x terms: 5x − 2x = 3x. Collect the y terms: 3y + y = 4y. So 5x + 3y − 2x + y = 3x + 4y. A candidate who subtracts the y terms instead of adding them (3y − y) gets 3x + 2y. A candidate who adds 2x instead of subtracting it (5x + 2x) gets 7x + 4y. A candidate who wrongly combines the x and y terms into a single term gets 6xy.
8. (a) 4 — Method: set up the equation 35 + 20h = 115, then subtract the fixed fee and divide by the hourly rate. Working: 20h = 115 − 35 = 80; h = 80 ÷ 20 = 4. Answer: 4 hours. 5.75 comes from dividing the whole £115 by £20 without first subtracting the fixed fee: 115 ÷ 20 = 5.75. 2.71 comes from swapping the fee and the rate round, subtracting £20 and dividing by £35: (115 − 20) ÷ 35 ≈ 2.71. 7.5 comes from adding the fixed fee instead of subtracting it: (115 + 35) ÷ 20 = 7.5.
9. (d) 6 — Method: collect the x-terms on one side and the constants on the other, then divide by the remaining coefficient of x. Working: 6x − 3x = 13 + 5, so 3x = 18, x = 18 ÷ 3 = 6. Answer: x = 6. 2.67 comes from a sign error when moving the 5, subtracting instead of adding: 3x = 13 − 5 = 8, x = 8 ÷ 3 ≈ 2.67. 2 comes from a sign error when moving the x-term, adding instead of subtracting: 9x = 18, x = 2. 18 comes from correctly finding 3x = 18 but forgetting to divide by 3.
10. (c) x = −5 — Method: 4 is being subtracted from x, so add 4 to both sides; adding a positive number to a negative one moves to the right along the number line. Working: adding 4 to both sides gives x = −9 + 4, and −9 + 4 = −5. Answer: x = −5. The distractors: x = −13 comes from subtracting 4 from both sides instead of adding it, giving −9 − 4; x = 5 comes from working out −9 + 4 correctly and then writing the result without its minus sign; x = 13 comes from reading the right-hand side as 9 rather than −9 and adding 4 to it.
11. (a) 7 — Method: multiply both sides by 3 to clear the fraction, then solve the resulting equation. Working: 2x + 1 = 5 × 3 = 15. Subtract 1: 2x = 14. Divide by 2: x = 7. Answer: 7. 2 comes from ignoring the denominator altogether, treating the equation as 2x + 1 = 5 without multiplying by 3 first. 8 comes from a sign error, adding 1 to 15 instead of subtracting it, giving 2x = 16. 14 comes from correctly reaching 2x = 14 but stopping there, without dividing by 2 to find x.
12. (c) y = 2 — Method: substituting Noah's value shows why it fails, and the equation is then solved by undoing the addition. Working: substituting y = 3 gives 3 + 10 = 13, which is not 12, so Noah's value is not a solution; subtracting 10 from both sides of y + 10 = 12 gives y = 2, and substituting back gives 2 + 10 = 12. Answer: y = 2. The distractors: y = 22 comes from adding 10 to both sides instead of subtracting it; y = −2 comes from carrying out the subtraction the wrong way round, 10 − 12 rather than 12 − 10; y = 12 comes from copying the right-hand side as the value of y and ignoring the 10 that is added to it.
13. (d) £200 — Method: add the parts of the ratio, divide the total paid by the number of parts to find the value of one part, then multiply by the parts in the most expensive item. Working: 2 + 3 + 5 = 10 parts, £400 ÷ 10 = £40 for one part, and the most expensive item is 5 parts, so 5 × £40 = £200. Answer: £200. The distractors: £40 is the value of one part; £80 is the 2-part item, the cheapest of the three; £120 is the 3-part item.
14. (a) £102 — Method: find the value of one part of the ratio, then work out each group's share before comparing them. Working: the ratio 5:2 has 5 + 2 = 7 parts, so one part is £238 ÷ 7 = £34. Adults donate 5 × £34 = £170 and children donate 2 × £34 = £68, so adults donate £170 − £68 = £102 more than children. So the difference is £102. Distractor £68 is only the children's donation, without finding the difference. Distractor £170 is only the adults' donation, without finding the difference. Distractor £136 comes from doubling the children's donation instead of subtracting it from the adults' donation.
15. (d) £195 — Substituting x = 3 into y = 45x + 60 gives y = 45 × 3 + 60 = 135 + 60 = 195. A candidate who forgets to add the call-out fee would get only 45 × 3 = £135. A candidate who adds the hours to the fee and the rate instead of multiplying would get 45 + 60 + 3 = £108. A candidate who multiplies both the hourly rate and the call-out fee by the number of hours would get 45 × 3 + 60 × 3 = £315.
16. (b) x ≤ −2 — Method: take the number term off both sides, then divide by the coefficient of x; the sign turns round only when you divide BY a negative number, and here you divide by 3. Working: subtracting 6 from both sides of 3x + 6 ≤ 0 gives 3x ≤ −6; dividing both sides by 3, which is positive, gives x ≤ −2. Answer: x ≤ −2. The distractors: x ≥ −2 comes from turning the sign round because the right-hand side has become negative, which is not the rule; it is the sign of the divisor that matters; x ≤ 2 comes from moving the 6 across without changing its sign, giving 3x ≤ 6; x ≤ −18 comes from multiplying both sides by 3 instead of dividing by it.
17. (c) 450 g — Method: use the amount of butter given to find the value of one part of the ratio, then find the mass of flour, and finally add flour and butter to get the total. Working: 180 g of butter is 2 parts, so one part is 180 ÷ 2 = 90 g. The flour is 3 parts, so 3 × 90 = 270 g, and the total mass is 270 + 180 = 450 g. So the baker can make 450 g of pastry. Distractor 270 g is only the mass of flour, forgetting to add the butter back on. Distractor 300 g comes from treating the 180 g as 3 parts instead of 2, swapping which ratio number matches the butter. Distractor 540 g comes from multiplying 180 by 3 directly instead of first finding the value of one part.
18. (d) 7 — Method: set up the equation 2.50 + 1.80m = 15.10, then subtract the booking fee and divide by the cost per mile. Working: 1.80m = 15.10 − 2.50 = 12.60; m = 12.60 ÷ 1.80 = 7. Answer: 7 miles. 8.39 comes from dividing the whole £15.10 by £1.80 without first subtracting the booking fee: 15.10 ÷ 1.80 ≈ 8.39. 5.32 comes from swapping the two amounts round, subtracting £1.80 and dividing by £2.50: (15.10 − 1.80) ÷ 2.50 ≈ 5.32. 9.78 comes from adding the booking fee instead of subtracting it: (15.10 + 2.50) ÷ 1.80 ≈ 9.78.
19. (d) 63.6 — Method: the three angles inside the triangle formed by the two ladders and the ground add up to 180°. Working: 180 − 58.2 − 58.2 = 63.6. Answer: 63.6°. A candidate who assumes the top angle equals the base angles gives 58.2. A candidate who subtracts only one base angle from 180°, working out 180 − 58.2, gets 121.8. A candidate who doubles the base angle instead of subtracting it twice from 180°, working out 2 × 58.2, gets 116.4.
20. (c) x ≥ 3 — Method: collect the number terms first; the x term is negative, so the final step multiplies both sides by −1, and that is the one step that turns the inequality sign round. Working: subtracting 5 from both sides of 5 − x ≤ 2 gives −x ≤ −3; multiplying both sides by −1 turns −x into x and −3 into 3, and because the multiplier is negative the ≤ becomes ≥, so x ≥ 3. Answer: x ≥ 3. The distractors: x ≤ 3 comes from multiplying by −1 without turning the sign round, the commonest slip on this type; x ≤ −3 comes from reading −x ≤ −3 as though the minus sign could simply be rubbed off the left-hand side; x ≥ −3 comes from turning the sign round correctly but leaving the right-hand side at −3 instead of multiplying it by −1 as well.