⚖️ Foundation to Higher crossover check

Answer key

1. (a) £20,000 — Method: add the parts of the ratio, divide the profit by the number of parts to find the value of one part, then multiply by the parts belonging to the partner asked about. Working: 3 + 5 + 4 = 12 parts, £48,000 ÷ 12 = £4,000 for one part, and that partner has 5 parts, so 5 × £4,000 = £20,000. Answer: £20,000. The distractors: £4,000 is the value of one part; £12,000 is the 3-part share; £16,000 is the 4-part share, which is what a candidate reaches by assuming the biggest share must go with the number written last in the ratio.
2. (c) x ≥ 3 — Method: collect the number terms first; the x term is negative, so the final step multiplies both sides by −1, and that is the one step that turns the inequality sign round. Working: subtracting 5 from both sides of 5 − x ≤ 2 gives −x ≤ −3; multiplying both sides by −1 turns −x into x and −3 into 3, and because the multiplier is negative the ≤ becomes ≥, so x ≥ 3. Answer: x ≥ 3. The distractors: x ≤ 3 comes from multiplying by −1 without turning the sign round, the commonest slip on this type; x ≤ −3 comes from reading −x ≤ −3 as though the minus sign could simply be rubbed off the left-hand side; x ≥ −3 comes from turning the sign round correctly but leaving the right-hand side at −3 instead of multiplying it by −1 as well.
3. (d) 25% — Method: to convert a decimal to a percentage, multiply by 100. Working: 0.25 × 100 = 25. Answer: 25%. The distractors: 0.25% comes from writing a percent sign after the decimal without multiplying; 2.5% comes from multiplying by 10 instead of 100; 250% comes from multiplying by 1000.
4. (b) 4x − 4 = 20 — Method: subtract 2x from both sides of the equation, and simplify each side separately. Working: left side: 6x − 4 − 2x = 4x − 4. Right side: 2x + 20 − 2x = 20. Answer: 4x − 4 = 20. 4x = 20 drops the −4 from the left side, as though subtracting 2x also removes the constant term. 8x − 4 = 20 comes from moving the 2x across to the left without changing its sign: it is taken off the right side correctly, leaving 20, but added to the left side instead of subtracted, giving 6x + 2x = 8x. 4x − 4 = 2x + 20 comes from subtracting 2x from the left-hand side only and leaving the right-hand side unchanged; whatever is done to one side must be done to the other.
5. (c) £478.40 — Method: apply the percentage increase, then apply the percentage decrease to the new price. Working: after the increase, the laptop costs £520 × 1.15. Multiplying this result by 0.80 gives the final price, £478.40. Answer: £478.40. £494 comes from combining the two percentages into a single net change (15% − 20% = −5%) and applying it directly, £520 × 0.95 = £494, instead of applying the two changes one after the other. £416 comes from applying only the 20% decrease to the original price, £520 × 0.80 = £416, forgetting the increase entirely. £598 comes from applying only the 15% increase and stopping there, forgetting to apply the decrease at all.
6. (c) 4 — Method: subtract 3 from both sides, then divide by 4. Working: 4x = 19 − 3 = 16, so x = 16 ÷ 4 = 4. Answer: 4. 4.75 comes from dividing 19 by 4 directly, without subtracting 3 first. 3.75 comes from subtracting 4 instead of 3 before dividing. 5.5 comes from a sign error, adding 3 to 19 instead of subtracting it.
7. (a) 5 — The symbol ≤ means n can equal 5 or any number less than 5, so 5 is included and is the largest integer value. A candidate who treats the inequality as strict, as if it were n < 5, answers 4. A candidate who confuses ≤ with ≥ and looks for a value just above the boundary answers 6. A candidate who makes a sign error and reads the inequality as n ≤ −5 answers −5.
8. (d) £195 — Substituting x = 3 into y = 45x + 60 gives y = 45 × 3 + 60 = 135 + 60 = 195. A candidate who forgets to add the call-out fee would get only 45 × 3 = £135. A candidate who adds the hours to the fee and the rate instead of multiplying would get 45 + 60 + 3 = £108. A candidate who multiplies both the hourly rate and the call-out fee by the number of hours would get 45 × 3 + 60 × 3 = £315.
9. (a) x = 2 — Method: undo the subtraction first, then undo the multiplication, doing the same to both sides each time. Working: adding 2 to both sides gives 2x = 4, and dividing both sides by 2 gives x = 2. Answer: x = 2. The distractors: x = 4 comes from stopping at 2x = 4 and writing 4 as the value of x; x = 0 comes from subtracting 2 from both sides instead of adding it, giving 2x = 0; x = 8 comes from multiplying 4 by 2 instead of dividing by 2.
10. (c) y = 4x − 5 — Parallel lines have the same gradient, so the new line has gradient 4; since it passes through (0, −5), its y-intercept is −5, giving y = 4x − 5. A candidate who drops the negative sign on the y-intercept would write y = 4x + 5. A candidate who changes the sign of the gradient, instead of keeping it the same for a parallel line, would write y = −4x − 5. A candidate who confuses m and c, using the y-intercept of the first line (3) as the gradient of the second, would write y = 3x − 5.
11. (b) £20 — Method: add the parts of the ratio, divide the amount by the number of parts to find the value of one part, then take the parts belonging to the person asked about. Working: 1 + 2 = 3 parts, £60 ÷ 3 = £20 for one part, and Isla has 1 part. Answer: £20. The distractors: £40 is the 2-part share, which belongs to her brother; £30 comes from reading 1:2 as one part out of two and halving the £60; £120 comes from multiplying the £60 by 2 instead of dividing it into 3 parts.
12. (c) £3,200 — Method: find the value of one part of the ratio from the first investor's amount, then work out the second investor's share before adding both together. Working: £1,200 is 3 parts, so one part is £1,200 ÷ 3 = £400. The second investor's share is 5 × £400 = £2,000, and the total is £1,200 + £2,000 = £3,200. So the total invested is £3,200. Distractor £2,000 is only the second investor's share, without adding the first investor's £1,200. Distractor £2,400 comes from doubling the first investor's amount instead of using the ratio. Distractor £6,000 comes from multiplying £1,200 by 5 directly instead of first finding the value of one part.
13. (c) 1.05 litres — Method: find the value of one part of the ratio from the total volume, then find the share for pineapple juice. Working: the ratio 5:3:2 has 5 + 3 + 2 = 10 parts, so one part is 3.5 ÷ 10 = 0.35 litres, and the pineapple juice is 3 × 0.35 = 1.05 litres. So 1.05 litres of pineapple juice is needed. Distractor 1.75 litres is the volume of orange juice, not pineapple juice. Distractor 0.7 litres is the volume of lemonade, not pineapple juice. Distractor 0.35 litres is the value of one part, found correctly but never multiplied by 3.
14. (a) 20 cm — Method: match the measurement you are given to its own part of the ratio, use it to find the value of one part, then multiply by the parts belonging to the measurement asked for. Working: the length is the second measurement listed, so it matches 4 parts and one part = 16 ÷ 4 = 4 cm; the height is 5 parts, so 5 × 4 = 20. Answer: 20 cm. The distractors: 12 cm is the width, which is the 3-part measurement; 4 cm is the value of one part only; 80 cm comes from multiplying the 16 cm by 5 without first dividing by the 4 parts the length is worth.
15. (a) x < 7 — Subtract 5 from both sides: x < 12 − 5, so x < 7. A candidate who adds 5 instead of subtracting gets x < 17. A candidate who subtracts the wrong way round gets x < −7. A candidate who correctly finds 7 but wrongly flips the inequality (as if dividing by a negative had happened) writes x > 7.
16. (c) 140 — Method: the mean shares the total equally between the items, so add the values and then divide by how many there are. Working: the total is 120 + 200 + 160 + 80 = 560 pages and there are 4 books, so the mean is 560 ÷ 4 = 140 pages. Answer: 140. The distractors: 560 comes from stopping at the total number of pages and never dividing by 4; 280 comes from dividing the total by 2 instead of by the 4 books; 120 comes from working out the range, 200 − 80, which measures spread instead of centre.
17. (d) £5.40 — Method: work out the reduced price at each shop separately, then subtract the smaller from the larger. Working: Shop A's reduced price is £45 × 0.8 = £36, and Shop B's reduced price is £34 × 0.9 = £30.60, so the difference is £36 − £30.60 = £5.40. Answer: £5.40. £11.00 comes from comparing the two ORIGINAL prices, £45 − £34, without applying either shop's reduction at all. £1.60 comes from finding Shop A's reduced price correctly, £36, but then subtracting Shop B's original (unreduced) price of £34 instead of its reduced price. £66.60 comes from adding the two reduced prices together, £36 + £30.60, instead of subtracting them.
18. (d) (x − 8)(x + 8) — x² − 64 = x² − 8², a difference of two squares, which factorises as (x − 8)(x + 8). A candidate who treats it as a perfect square with a repeated negative factor gets (x − 8)(x − 8), which expands to x² − 16x + 64 — wrong on both the middle and constant terms. A candidate who uses a repeated positive factor gets (x + 8)(x + 8), which expands to x² + 16x + 64. A candidate who picks a different factor pair of 64, such as 4 and 16, without checking that the middle term cancels, gets (x − 4)(x + 16), which expands to x² + 12x − 64 — the wrong middle term.
19. (c) y = 3x + 7 — Method: the gradient is the change in y divided by the change in x with both taken in the same order, and a point whose x-coordinate is 0 gives the constant straight away because it lies on the y-axis. Working: m = (7 − 1) ÷ (0 − (−2)) = 6 ÷ 2 = 3; the point (0, 7) lies on the y-axis, so c = 7 and the line is y = 3x + 7. Answer: y = 3x + 7. The distractors: y = −3x + 7 comes from taking the y-difference as 1 − 7 while taking the x-difference as 0 − (−2), so the two subtractions run in opposite orders; y = 3x + 1 comes from using the y-coordinate of (−2, 1) as the constant instead of the point that actually lies on the y-axis; y = (1/3)x + 7 comes from writing the gradient upside down as the change in x over the change in y, 2 ÷ 6.
20. (c) 45° — Method: the tower, the ground and the line of sight form a right-angled triangle in which the 25 m height is opposite the angle of elevation and the 25 m along the ground is adjacent to it, so use tan θ = opposite ÷ adjacent. Working: tan θ = 25 ÷ 25 = 1, so θ = tan⁻¹(1). Answer: 45°. The distractors: 90° comes from using sin θ = 25 ÷ 25 = 1, which treats the 25 m along the ground as the hypotenuse when it is the side next to the angle; 1° comes from writing down the value of tan θ as though it were the angle itself; 50° comes from adding the two given lengths, 25 + 25, instead of comparing them.