⚖️ Foundation to Higher crossover check

Answer key

1. (c) 33 — Method: multiply the mean by the number of tests to get the total marks, then subtract the marks that are already known. Working: four tests with a mean of 29 give a total of 29 × 4 = 116 marks; the first three marks total 31 + 26 + 26 = 83; so the fourth mark is 116 − 83 = 33. Answer: 33, and checking, (31 + 26 + 26 + 33) ÷ 4 = 116 ÷ 4 = 29. The distractors: 116 comes from stopping at the total for all four tests; 29 comes from assuming the missing mark must be the mean itself; 4 comes from multiplying the mean by 3, the number of marks given, leaving 87 − 83 = 4.
2. (b) 47 — Method: angles on a straight line add up to 180°. Working: 180 − 38 − 95 = 47. Answer: x = 47. A candidate who uses 360° instead of 180° gets 227. A candidate who subtracts only one of the two given angles from 180° gets 142. A candidate who adds the two given angles instead of subtracting them from 180° gets 133.
3. (d) x ≤ 30 — Method: add the fixed cost to the cost of x balloons, set that total against the £150 limit with the sign that 'at most' calls for, then solve. Working: the total spend is 60 + 3x pounds, so 60 + 3x ≤ 150; subtracting 60 from both sides gives 3x ≤ 90; dividing both sides by 3, a positive number, gives x ≤ 30. Answer: x ≤ 30. The distractors: x ≤ 90 comes from taking the cake off the budget and stopping at 3x ≤ 90, reading the 90 as a number of balloons when it is the money left for them; x ≤ 50 comes from dividing the whole £150 by 3 and leaving the cake out of the calculation altogether; x ≥ 30 comes from reading 'at most' as 'at least', which reverses the condition.
4. (d) 7.7 m — The horizontal distance is adjacent to the 50° angle and the zip wire is the hypotenuse, so horizontal distance = 12 × cos 50° = 12 × 0.6428... = 7.71...≈ 7.7 m. "9.2 m" uses the sine ratio instead of cosine, 12 × sin 50° = 9.19...≈ 9.2 m, which actually finds the vertical drop of the zip wire, not the horizontal distance. "15.7 m" comes from dividing by the sine ratio instead of multiplying by the cosine ratio, 12 ÷ sin 50° = 15.66...≈ 15.7 m, both the wrong operation and the wrong ratio. "12.0 m" simply uses the length of the zip wire itself as the horizontal distance, ignoring the angle of 50° altogether.
5. (c) 3x + 4y — Collect the x terms: 5x − 2x = 3x. Collect the y terms: 3y + y = 4y. So 5x + 3y − 2x + y = 3x + 4y. A candidate who subtracts the y terms instead of adding them (3y − y) gets 3x + 2y. A candidate who adds 2x instead of subtracting it (5x + 2x) gets 7x + 4y. A candidate who wrongly combines the x and y terms into a single term gets 6xy.
6. (c) 6x(2x + 3) — The highest common factor of 12x² and 18x is 6x. Dividing each term by 6x gives 12x² ÷ 6x = 2x and 18x ÷ 6x = 3, so 12x² + 18x = 6x(2x + 3). A candidate who only takes out the number 6 (missing the x) gets 6(2x² + 3x), which is not fully factorised. A candidate who only takes out 2x (missing the extra factor of 3 in 6) gets 2x(6x + 9), also not fully factorised — the bracket still shares a common factor. A candidate who takes out 3x instead of the full 6x gets 3x(4x + 6), which again is not fully factorised since 4x + 6 shares a common factor of 2.
7. (a) 20% — Method: a percentage is a number of parts per hundred, so divide the numerator by the denominator and multiply by 100. Working: 1 ÷ 5 = 0.2, and 0.2 × 100 = 20; the same result comes from scaling 1/5 to 20/100. Answer: 20%. The distractors: 5% comes from reading the denominator 5 straight off as the percentage; 25% comes from confusing 1/5 with 1/4, the fraction met most often in percentage work; 50% comes from a place value slip in the division, writing 1 ÷ 5 as 0.5 instead of 0.2.
8. (d) 77 — Method: angles that meet at a point add up to 360°. Working: 82 + 105 + 96 = 283; 360 − 283 = 77. Answer: 77°. A candidate who gives the sum of the three known angles and forgets to subtract it from 360° gets 283. A candidate who leaves out the 105° angle, working out 360 − 82 − 96, gets 182. A candidate who leaves out the 82° angle, working out 360 − 105 − 96, gets 159.
9. (d) 2x + 4 — Method: collect the like terms, which here are the two terms in x, and leave the number term on its own because a number and a term in x are unlike. Working: x + x is one lot of x added to one more lot of x, which is 2x; the 4 has nothing like it to join with, so it is written after the 2x. Answer: 2x + 4. The distractors: x² + 4 comes from multiplying the two x terms instead of adding them; x + 4 comes from treating x + x as a single x, as though the repeated letter counted only once; 6x comes from collecting the unlike terms together, adding 1 + 1 + 4 and attaching the letter to that total.
10. (a) 27 — Method: turn the mean into a total using total = mean × number of values, then subtract the numbers that are already known. Working: four numbers with a mean of 18 have a total of 18 × 4 = 72; the three known numbers give 10 + 15 + 20 = 45; so x = 72 − 45 = 27. Answer: 27, and checking, (10 + 15 + 20 + 27) ÷ 4 = 72 ÷ 4 = 18. The distractors: 72 comes from stopping at the total the four numbers must reach and never subtracting the known three; 18 comes from assuming the missing number must equal the mean; 45 comes from stopping at the total of the three known numbers.
11. (a) 40 — Method: the mean is the total divided by how many values there are, so rearranging gives total = mean × number of values. Working: the mean is 8 and there are 5 numbers, so the total is 8 × 5 = 40. Answer: 40, and checking, 40 ÷ 5 = 8, which is the mean given. The distractors: 13 comes from adding the mean and the count, 8 + 5, instead of multiplying them; 1.6 comes from dividing the mean by the count, 8 ÷ 5, which reverses the relationship; 8 comes from quoting the mean itself as the total, which is only true when there is a single number.
12. (c) £3,200 — Method: find the value of one part of the ratio from the first investor's amount, then work out the second investor's share before adding both together. Working: £1,200 is 3 parts, so one part is £1,200 ÷ 3 = £400. The second investor's share is 5 × £400 = £2,000, and the total is £1,200 + £2,000 = £3,200. So the total invested is £3,200. Distractor £2,000 is only the second investor's share, without adding the first investor's £1,200. Distractor £2,400 comes from doubling the first investor's amount instead of using the ratio. Distractor £6,000 comes from multiplying £1,200 by 5 directly instead of first finding the value of one part.
13. (d) 7 — Method: set up the equation 2.50 + 1.80m = 15.10, then subtract the booking fee and divide by the cost per mile. Working: 1.80m = 15.10 − 2.50 = 12.60; m = 12.60 ÷ 1.80 = 7. Answer: 7 miles. 8.39 comes from dividing the whole £15.10 by £1.80 without first subtracting the booking fee: 15.10 ÷ 1.80 ≈ 8.39. 5.32 comes from swapping the two amounts round, subtracting £1.80 and dividing by £2.50: (15.10 − 1.80) ÷ 2.50 ≈ 5.32. 9.78 comes from adding the booking fee instead of subtracting it: (15.10 + 2.50) ÷ 1.80 ≈ 9.78.
14. (d) 0 — Method: the range is the largest value minus the smallest value, whatever those two values turn out to be. Working: every value is 10, so the largest value is 10 and the smallest value is 10 as well, and the range is 10 − 10 = 0. Answer: 0 — a range of nothing says the data do not vary at all. The distractors: 10 comes from writing down the repeated value itself instead of the difference between the extremes; 20 comes from adding the largest and the smallest, 10 + 10, instead of subtracting; 40 comes from adding all four values, which gives the total sold and not a measure of spread.
15. (a) 7 — Subtract 4 from both sides: 3h ≤ 21. Divide both sides by 3: h ≤ 7, so the greatest whole number of hours is 7. A candidate who forgets the £4 fixed fee solves 3h ≤ 25, getting h ≤ 8.33, rounded down to 8. A candidate who adds the £4 instead of subtracting it solves 3h ≤ 29, getting h ≤ 9.67, rounded down to 9. A candidate who reaches h ≤ 7 but wrongly assumes the boundary value cannot be used, thinking that spending the whole £25 is not allowed, answers 6.
16. (a) £1,000 — Method: find the increase, then add it to the original price; the multiplier 1.25 does both steps at once. Working: 25% is one quarter, so 25% of £800 = £800 ÷ 4 = £200, and £800 + £200 = £1,000. Answer: £1,000. The distractors: £200 is the increase on its own, not the new price; £825 comes from adding £25 to £800, treating the 25% as £25; £600 comes from taking the 25% off the price instead of adding it on.
17. (c) 62° — Co-interior (allied) angles on parallel lines sum to 180°, so the co-interior angle is 180° − 118° = 62°. 118° comes from treating the angles as corresponding angles, which are equal, instead of co-interior angles, which sum to 180°. 59° comes from halving the given angle. 236° comes from doubling the given angle.
18. (c) 5(x + y − 1) — Method: take out the highest common factor of all three terms and divide every term by it, the number term included. Working: the highest common factor of 5x, 5y and −5 is 5; dividing gives 5x ÷ 5 = x, 5y ÷ 5 = y and −5 ÷ 5 = −1, so the bracket holds x + y − 1. Answer: 5(x + y − 1), which multiplies back out to 5x + 5y − 5. The distractors: 5(x + y + 1) comes from dividing −5 by 5 and losing the minus sign; 5(x + y − 5) comes from dividing only the terms containing a letter by 5 and carrying the −5 into the bracket unchanged; 5(xy − 1) comes from collecting the unlike terms 5x and 5y as 5xy before factorising.
19. (c) 45° — Method: the tower, the ground and the line of sight form a right-angled triangle in which the 25 m height is opposite the angle of elevation and the 25 m along the ground is adjacent to it, so use tan θ = opposite ÷ adjacent. Working: tan θ = 25 ÷ 25 = 1, so θ = tan⁻¹(1). Answer: 45°. The distractors: 90° comes from using sin θ = 25 ÷ 25 = 1, which treats the 25 m along the ground as the hypotenuse when it is the side next to the angle; 1° comes from writing down the value of tan θ as though it were the angle itself; 50° comes from adding the two given lengths, 25 + 25, instead of comparing them.
20. (d) 63.6 — Method: the three angles inside the triangle formed by the two ladders and the ground add up to 180°. Working: 180 − 58.2 − 58.2 = 63.6. Answer: 63.6°. A candidate who assumes the top angle equals the base angles gives 58.2. A candidate who subtracts only one base angle from 180°, working out 180 − 58.2, gets 121.8. A candidate who doubles the base angle instead of subtracting it twice from 180°, working out 2 × 58.2, gets 116.4.