⚖️ Foundation to Higher crossover check

Answer key

1. (a) 105° — The interior angles of a pentagon add up to (5 − 2) × 180° = 540°. Subtracting the three known angles, 540 − 100 − 110 − 120 = 210°, and this 210° is shared equally between the two angles marked x°, so each one is 210 ÷ 2 = 105°. 210° stops one step early, giving the total of the two unknown angles instead of one of them. 108° is the interior angle of a regular pentagon, which does not apply here since this pentagon's angles are not all equal. 55° comes from halving one of the given angles, 110°, instead of halving the remaining total.
2. (c) 6.3 m — By Pythagoras' theorem, the height = √(7² − 3²) = √(49 − 9) = √40 = 6.32...≈ 6.3 m. "6.4 m" rounds 6.32...m up to 6.4 instead of correctly rounding it down to 6.3. "4.0 m" comes from subtracting the two given lengths directly, 7 − 3 = 4, instead of subtracting their squares. "10.0 m" comes from adding the two given lengths, 7 + 3 = 10, instead of using Pythagoras' theorem at all.
3. (c) 15 — The exterior angle is 180° − 156° = 24°, and the number of sides of a regular polygon is 360° divided by the exterior angle, so 360 ÷ 24 = 15. 24° is the exterior angle itself, stopping one step before the final division. 17 comes from finding 15 correctly and then adding 2, muddling the exterior angle rule with the (n − 2) that appears in the interior angle sum formula. 7.5 comes from dividing 180 by the exterior angle instead of 360, using the angles on a straight line rather than the total of the exterior angles of a polygon.
4. (b) x ≥ 5 — Expand the bracket: 2(3x − 1) = 6x − 2, so the inequality is 6x − 2 ≥ 4x + 8. Subtract 4x from both sides and add 2 to both sides: 2x ≥ 10. Divide both sides by 2: x ≥ 5. A candidate who only multiplies the 3x by 2 and forgets to multiply the −1 gets 6x − 1 ≥ 4x + 8, leading to x ≥ 4.5. A candidate who adds 4x instead of subtracting it gets 10x ≥ 10, leading to x ≥ 1. A candidate who multiplies by 2 instead of dividing gets x ≥ 20.
5. (d) 3 — Method: add the constant term to both sides first, then divide by the coefficient of x. Working: 3x = 4 + 5 = 9; x = 9 ÷ 3 = 3. Answer: x = 3. −1/3 comes from a sign error when moving the 5, subtracting instead of adding: 3x = 4 − 5 = −1, then x = −1/3. 6 comes from subtracting the coefficient 3 instead of dividing by it: 9 − 3 = 6. 9 comes from correctly finding 3x = 9 but forgetting to divide by 3.
6. (d) a/2 — Method: write both terms over the same denominator, subtract the numerators, then cancel the fraction down. Working: 6 is a multiple of 3, so a/3 is rewritten as 2a/6; the calculation becomes 5a/6 − 2a/6 = 3a/6, and dividing numerator and denominator by 3 gives a/2. Answer: a/2. The distractors: 4a/3 comes from subtracting the denominators as well as the numerators, giving (5 − 1)a over (6 − 3); 2a/3 comes from subtracting 1 from 5 without first rewriting a/3 as 2a/6, giving 4a/6; 7a/6 comes from adding the two fractions instead of subtracting them, giving 5a/6 + 2a/6.
7. (c) 40 cm — Method: split the total length into the number of parts shown by the ratio, then find the value of the shorter share. Working: the ratio 4:5 has 4 + 5 = 9 parts, so one part is 90 ÷ 9 = 10 cm, and the shorter piece is 4 × 10 = 40 cm. So the shorter piece is 40 cm. Distractor 50 cm is the length of the LONGER piece, not the shorter one. Distractor 45 cm comes from splitting the ribbon into two equal halves, ignoring the ratio. Distractor 10 cm is the value of one part, found correctly but never multiplied by 4.
8. (a) 2x + 24 — Method: multiply each term inside the bracket by the 2 in front of it. Working: 2 × x = 2x and 2 × 12 = 24, and the products are added because the bracket contains an addition. Answer: 2x + 24. The distractors: 2x + 12 comes from multiplying only the x by 2 and copying the 12 across unchanged; 24x comes from multiplying 2 by 12 and then attaching the letter to that product, as though the two terms inside the bracket could be joined into one; 2x + 14 comes from adding 2 and 12 instead of multiplying them.
9. (b) 53.1° — The angle of elevation is opposite the height of the flagpole, 12 m, and adjacent to the distance from its base, 9 m, so tan θ = 12/9 = 1.333..., giving θ = tan⁻¹(1.333...) = 53.13...° ≈ 53.1°. "36.9°" finds the OTHER acute angle of the triangle, 90° − 53.1°, the angle at the top of the flagpole rather than the angle of elevation at Freya's position. "48.6°" comes from wrongly treating 9/12 as a sine ratio and finding sin⁻¹(0.75) = 48.6°, when neither side here is the hypotenuse. "41.4°" comes from wrongly treating 9/12 as a cosine ratio and finding cos⁻¹(0.75) = 41.4°, again without a hypotenuse in the ratio at all.
10. (b) 9 — Subtract 14 from both sides: 4s ≤ 36. Divide both sides by 4: s ≤ 9, so the greatest number of tickets is 9. A candidate who forgets the £14 coach cost solves 4s ≤ 50, getting s ≤ 12.5, rounded down to 12. A candidate who adds the £14 instead of subtracting it solves 4s ≤ 64, getting s = 16. A candidate who miscalculates 50 − 14 as 32 solves 4s ≤ 32, getting s = 8.
11. (c) 45% — Method: adding water changes the total volume but not the amount of fruit juice, so find the juice, find the new total volume, and write the first as a percentage of the second. Working: 3 × 0.6 = 1.8 litres of fruit juice; the new volume is 3 + 1 = 4 litres; 1.8 ÷ 4 = 0.45, which is 45%. Answer: 45%. The distractors: 60% is the strength before the water goes in, and assumes that adding water leaves the strength unchanged; 15% comes from dividing the 60% by the 4 litres of mixture instead of dividing the 1.8 litres of juice by the 4 litres; 75% is the fraction of the new mixture that came out of the original jug, 3 litres out of 4, which ignores that only 60% of that 3 litres was juice.
12. (b) 5 — Method: add 9 to both sides, then divide by 5. Working: 5x = 16 + 9 = 25, so x = 25 ÷ 5 = 5. Answer: 5. 3.2 comes from dividing 16 by 5 directly, without adding 9 first. 1.4 comes from a sign error, subtracting 9 from 16 instead of adding it, then dividing by 5. 25 comes from correctly working out 5x = 25 but stopping there, without dividing by 5 to find x.
13. (b) £20 — Method: add the parts of the ratio, divide the amount by the number of parts to find the value of one part, then take the parts belonging to the person asked about. Working: 1 + 2 = 3 parts, £60 ÷ 3 = £20 for one part, and Isla has 1 part. Answer: £20. The distractors: £40 is the 2-part share, which belongs to her brother; £30 comes from reading 1:2 as one part out of two and halving the £60; £120 comes from multiplying the £60 by 2 instead of dividing it into 3 parts.
14. (a) 7 — Method: multiply both sides by 3 to clear the fraction, then solve the resulting equation. Working: 2x + 1 = 5 × 3 = 15. Subtract 1: 2x = 14. Divide by 2: x = 7. Answer: 7. 2 comes from ignoring the denominator altogether, treating the equation as 2x + 1 = 5 without multiplying by 3 first. 8 comes from a sign error, adding 1 to 15 instead of subtracting it, giving 2x = 16. 14 comes from correctly reaching 2x = 14 but stopping there, without dividing by 2 to find x.
15. (a) 4 — Method: set up the equation 35 + 20h = 115, then subtract the fixed fee and divide by the hourly rate. Working: 20h = 115 − 35 = 80; h = 80 ÷ 20 = 4. Answer: 4 hours. 5.75 comes from dividing the whole £115 by £20 without first subtracting the fixed fee: 115 ÷ 20 = 5.75. 2.71 comes from swapping the fee and the rate round, subtracting £20 and dividing by £35: (115 − 20) ÷ 35 ≈ 2.71. 7.5 comes from adding the fixed fee instead of subtracting it: (115 + 35) ÷ 20 = 7.5.
16. (a) 65° — Method: a line that divides an angle into two equal parts gives each part half of the original angle, so halve 130°. Working: 130 ÷ 2 = 65. Answer: 65°. The distractors: 130° is the whole of angle ABC, written down without halving it; 50° comes from working out 180 − 130, using the angles on a straight line instead of dividing the angle in two; 32.5° comes from dividing by 4 instead of by 2, as though the line split the angle into four equal parts.
17. (a) x = 2 — Method: undo the subtraction first, then undo the multiplication, doing the same to both sides each time. Working: adding 2 to both sides gives 2x = 4, and dividing both sides by 2 gives x = 2. Answer: x = 2. The distractors: x = 4 comes from stopping at 2x = 4 and writing 4 as the value of x; x = 0 comes from subtracting 2 from both sides instead of adding it, giving 2x = 0; x = 8 comes from multiplying 4 by 2 instead of dividing by 2.
18. (c) y = 9x + 3 — Method: in a linear cost model the charge that is paid once is the constant term and the charge made for each item is the coefficient of x. Working: each pizza costs £9, so x pizzas cost 9x pounds; the £3 delivery fee is paid once whatever the value of x, so it is added on as a constant and the total cost is y = 9x + 3. Answer: y = 9x + 3. The distractors: y = 3x + 9 comes from swapping the two charges over, treating the £3 delivery as a per-pizza cost and the £9 as the one-off charge; y = 9x leaves out the delivery fee altogether, which undercharges every order by £3; y = 12x comes from adding the delivery fee to the price of each pizza, £9 + £3 = £12 each, so the fee is charged once per pizza instead of once per order.
19. (c) 12 m — Method: the perimeter of a rectangle is twice the sum of the length and the width, so half the perimeter is one length plus one width; split that half using the ratio. Working: half of 64 is 64 ÷ 2 = 32 m, the ratio 5:3 has 5 + 3 = 8 parts, so one part is 32 ÷ 8 = 4 m, and the width is 3 × 4 = 12 m. So the width is 12 m. Distractor 20 m is the length, 5 parts, not the width. Distractor 24 m comes from splitting the whole perimeter, 64 m, into 8 parts and multiplying by 3, forgetting to halve the perimeter first. Distractor 8 m comes from the same slip stopped one step earlier: splitting the whole perimeter into 8 parts, 64 ÷ 8 = 8, and giving that instead of the width.
20. (b) 117 — Method: two angles meeting at a point on a straight line add up to 180°. Working: 180 − 63 = 117. Answer: 117°. A candidate who thinks the two angles on a straight line must be equal gives 63. A candidate who uses 90° instead of 180°, working out 90 − 63, gets 27. A candidate who uses 360° instead of 180°, working out 360 − 63, gets 297.