⚖️ Foundation to Higher crossover check

Answer key

1. (b) 6 cm — Method: the right angle is at A, so BC is the hypotenuse and AC is the side opposite the angle at B; sin B = opposite ÷ hypotenuse therefore gives AC ÷ BC = 3/5. Working: AC ÷ 10 = 3/5, so AC = 10 × 3 ÷ 5 = 6. Answer: 6 cm. The distractors: 8 cm is AB, the side next to the angle at B, which is what cos B = 4/5 produces — the right method used on the wrong side; 3 cm comes from reading the 3 in the ratio as a length and never scaling it up to the 10 cm hypotenuse; 30 cm comes from multiplying by 3 and forgetting to divide by 5.
2. (a) 27 — Method: turn the mean into a total using total = mean × number of values, then subtract the numbers that are already known. Working: four numbers with a mean of 18 have a total of 18 × 4 = 72; the three known numbers give 10 + 15 + 20 = 45; so x = 72 − 45 = 27. Answer: 27, and checking, (10 + 15 + 20 + 27) ÷ 4 = 72 ÷ 4 = 18. The distractors: 72 comes from stopping at the total the four numbers must reach and never subtracting the known three; 18 comes from assuming the missing number must equal the mean; 45 comes from stopping at the total of the three known numbers.
3. (c) 9.9 cm — Method: the 7 cm side is opposite the 45° angle and the hypotenuse is wanted, so use sin θ = opposite ÷ hypotenuse and rearrange it for the hypotenuse. Working: sin 45° = 7 ÷ h, so h = 7 ÷ sin 45° = 9.899…, which is 9.9 to 1 decimal place. Answer: 9.9 cm. The distractors: 5.0 cm comes from multiplying by sin 45° instead of dividing by it; 14.0 cm comes from doubling the 7 cm side, which is the rule for a side opposite 30° and not one opposite 45°; 7.0 cm comes from reading the two equal sides of a 45° right-angled triangle as including the hypotenuse, when the equal pair is the two shorter sides.
4. (d) 4 — Method: collect the x terms on one side and the number terms on the other. Working: subtract 3x from both sides: 4x − 5 = 11. Add 5 to both sides: 4x = 16. Divide by 4: x = 4. Answer: 4. 0.6 comes from adding the x terms instead of subtracting when collecting them, 7x + 3x = 10x, and also subtracting the constants the wrong way round, 11 − 5 = 6, giving 10x = 6. 1.5 comes from correctly collecting the x terms as 4x but subtracting the constants the wrong way round, 11 − 5 instead of 11 + 5. −4 comes from moving the x terms to the wrong side, giving 3x − 7x instead of 7x − 3x, along with a matching sign error on the constants.
5. (a) £20,000 — Method: add the parts of the ratio, divide the profit by the number of parts to find the value of one part, then multiply by the parts belonging to the partner asked about. Working: 3 + 5 + 4 = 12 parts, £48,000 ÷ 12 = £4,000 for one part, and that partner has 5 parts, so 5 × £4,000 = £20,000. Answer: £20,000. The distractors: £4,000 is the value of one part; £12,000 is the 3-part share; £16,000 is the 4-part share, which is what a candidate reaches by assuming the biggest share must go with the number written last in the ratio.
6. (c) The mean, because every value counts towards it, so 100 pulls it from 7 up to about 20.3. — Method: work each measure out before the extra value is added and again afterwards, then compare the size of the two changes. Working: before, the six values total 42, so the mean is 42 ÷ 6 = 7, and the middle pair 6 and 8 give a median of (6 + 8) ÷ 2 = 7; after, the seven values total 142, so the mean is 142 ÷ 7 = 20.29 to 2 decimal places, while the median is now the 4th of the seven ordered values, which is 8; the mean has moved by about 13.3 and the median by 1. Answer: the mean, because every value counts towards it, so 100 pulls it from 7 up to about 20.3 — this is why the median is often preferred when a data set contains an outlier. The distractors: the reply that the mean rises by 100 adds the extra value to the mean instead of adding it to the total; the reply that the median moves to 12 takes the largest of the original values as the new middle instead of counting to the 4th of the seven values; the reply about even and odd counts quotes a rule that does not exist, since the median moved because a very large value was added, not because the count of values changed.
7. (b) 12 — The difference between the parts of the ratio is 5 − 2 = 3 parts, and this is worth 18. Divide to find one part: 18 ÷ 3 = 6. Cats have 2 parts: 2 × 6 = 12. (30 is the number of dogs, using 5 parts instead of 2. 6 is the value of one part — the number of cats is 2 lots of this, not just one. 9 comes from dividing 18 by 2 and stopping there, instead of dividing by the difference in parts, 3, and then multiplying by 2.)
8. (d) 60 — Method: write the two supplementary angles as x and 2x, since one is twice the other, and solve x + 2x = 180. Working: 3x = 180, so x = 60. Answer: the smaller angle is 60°. A candidate who gives the larger angle, 2x, instead of the smaller angle gets 120. A candidate who uses a complementary sum of 90° instead of a supplementary sum of 180° gets 30. A candidate who divides 180 by 2 instead of by 3 gets 90.
9. (d) 25% — Method: percentage decrease = decrease ÷ original amount × 100. Working: the reduction is £60 − £45 = £15, and 15 ÷ 60 = 0.25, so 0.25 × 100 = 25%. Answer: 25%. The distractors: 15% comes from quoting the £15 reduction as though pounds and per cent were the same thing; 33% comes from dividing the £15 by the new price £45 instead of by the original £60, which gives 33% to the nearest per cent; 75% is the new price written as a percentage of the old one, which is what is still paid rather than what has been taken off.
10. (b) 55° — Method: complementary angles are a pair that add up to 90°, so subtract the known angle from 90°. Working: 90 − 35 = 55. Answer: 55°. The distractors: 145° comes from subtracting from 180°, which is the rule for supplementary angles and not for complementary ones; 325° comes from subtracting from 360°, the total of the angles at a point; 90° is the total that the pair must make, written down in place of the missing angle.
11. (a) 45% — Method: percentage increase = increase ÷ original amount × 100. Working: the increase is £116 − £80 = £36, and 36 ÷ 80 = 0.45, so 0.45 × 100 = 45%. Answer: 45%. The distractors: 36% comes from quoting the £36 increase as though pounds and per cent were the same thing; 31% comes from dividing the £36 increase by the new price £116 instead of by the original £80, which gives 31% to the nearest per cent; 145% is the new price written as a percentage of the original price, which is the whole of the new price rather than the increase.
12. (c) 45° — Method: the tower, the ground and the line of sight form a right-angled triangle in which the 25 m height is opposite the angle of elevation and the 25 m along the ground is adjacent to it, so use tan θ = opposite ÷ adjacent. Working: tan θ = 25 ÷ 25 = 1, so θ = tan⁻¹(1). Answer: 45°. The distractors: 90° comes from using sin θ = 25 ÷ 25 = 1, which treats the 25 m along the ground as the hypotenuse when it is the side next to the angle; 1° comes from writing down the value of tan θ as though it were the angle itself; 50° comes from adding the two given lengths, 25 + 25, instead of comparing them.
13. (d) £200 — Method: add the parts of the ratio, divide the total paid by the number of parts to find the value of one part, then multiply by the parts in the most expensive item. Working: 2 + 3 + 5 = 10 parts, £400 ÷ 10 = £40 for one part, and the most expensive item is 5 parts, so 5 × £40 = £200. Answer: £200. The distractors: £40 is the value of one part; £80 is the 2-part item, the cheapest of the three; £120 is the 3-part item.
14. (c) y = 9x + 3 — Method: in a linear cost model the charge that is paid once is the constant term and the charge made for each item is the coefficient of x. Working: each pizza costs £9, so x pizzas cost 9x pounds; the £3 delivery fee is paid once whatever the value of x, so it is added on as a constant and the total cost is y = 9x + 3. Answer: y = 9x + 3. The distractors: y = 3x + 9 comes from swapping the two charges over, treating the £3 delivery as a per-pizza cost and the £9 as the one-off charge; y = 9x leaves out the delivery fee altogether, which undercharges every order by £3; y = 12x comes from adding the delivery fee to the price of each pizza, £9 + £3 = £12 each, so the fee is charged once per pizza instead of once per order.
15. (a) 1.5 — Method: with an even number of values the median is the mean of the two middle values, which for 12 values are the 6th and the 7th once the data are in order. Working: the results are already in order, and 12 ÷ 2 = 6, so the middle pair are the 6th value, 1, and the 7th value, 2; the median is (1 + 2) ÷ 2 = 1.5. Answer: 1.5 brothers and sisters. The distractors: 1 comes from reading the 6th value and stopping there instead of averaging the middle pair; 2 comes from working out the mean, 24 ÷ 12, instead of the median; 6 comes from working out the range, 6 − 0, which measures spread rather than centre.
16. (d) 6 — Method: a value satisfies x ≥ 7 when it is greater than 7 or exactly equal to 7, so test each value against the boundary. Working: 8 is greater than 7 and 100 is greater than 7, so both satisfy the inequality; 7 is equal to the boundary and ≥ includes equality, so 7 satisfies it as well; 6 is less than 7, so 6 is the one value that fails. Answer: 6. The distractors: 7 is chosen by candidates who read ≥ as a strict 'greater than' and so shut the boundary value out of the solution set; 8 is chosen by reading the question as asking which value DOES satisfy the inequality and taking the smallest such value; 100 is chosen by the same misreading, taking instead the value furthest above the boundary.
17. (c) £840 — Method: find the total amount raised using the reverse percentage, then subtract the entry fees to find the donations. Working: £1,260 is 60% of the total, so the total is £1,260 ÷ 0.6, and subtracting the entry fees from this total leaves £840 raised through donations. Answer: £840. £2,100 comes from correctly finding the total amount raised but then forgetting to subtract the entry fees, giving the total instead of the donations alone. £504 comes from working out 40% of the entry fees themselves, £1,260 × 0.4 = £504, instead of first finding the total amount raised. £1,890 comes from treating £1,260 as 40% of the total instead of 60%, dividing by 0.4 to get a total of £3,150, and then subtracting the entry fees from that incorrect total.
18. (d) x > 4 — Method: collect the x terms on one side and the numbers on the other, then divide by the coefficient of x; dividing by a positive number leaves the sign as it is. Working: subtracting 2x from both sides of 4x + 1 > 2x + 9 gives 2x + 1 > 9; subtracting 1 from both sides gives 2x > 8; dividing both sides by 2 gives x > 4. Answer: x > 4. The distractors: x < 4 comes from turning the sign round while dividing by 2; x > 5 comes from adding the 1 to the 9 instead of subtracting it, giving 2x > 10; x < 5 comes from making both of those mistakes together.
19. (c) y = 3x + 1 — Method: a line of known gradient m has equation y = mx + c, and c is found by substituting the coordinates of a point known to lie on it. Working: the gradient is 3, so the line is y = 3x + c; substituting x = 1 and y = 4 gives 4 = 3 × 1 + c, so c = 4 − 3 = 1. Answer: y = 3x + 1. The distractors: y = 3x − 1 comes from working out the constant as mx − y, 3 − 4 = −1, instead of y − mx; y = x + 3 comes from swapping the two numbers over, putting the gradient 3 in the constant position and the x-coordinate 1 in front of x; y = 3x + 4 comes from using the y-coordinate 4 as the constant without substituting.
20. (d) x² − 49 — Area = length × width = (x + 7)(x − 7). Expanding: x × x = x², x × (−7) = −7x, 7 × x = 7x, 7 × (−7) = −49. The two middle terms −7x and 7x cancel, leaving x² − 49. A candidate who misremembers the difference-of-two-squares result as a sum gets x² + 49. A candidate who makes a sign error and treats both middle terms as −7x instead of cancelling gets x² − 14x − 49. A candidate who confuses area with perimeter and simply adds the length and width gets 2x.