⚖️ Foundation to Higher crossover check

Answer key

1. (c) a decrease of 25% — Method: use multipliers. An increase of 50% is × 1.5 and a decrease of 50% is × 0.5. Working: 1.5 × 0.5 = 0.75, so the final price is 75% of the original. Answer: a decrease of 25%. The distractors: no change comes from assuming +50% and −50% cancel; a decrease of 50% comes from applying only the second change; an increase of 25% has the direction wrong.
2. (d) 36.9° — sin θ = opposite/hypotenuse = 6/10 = 0.6, so θ = sin⁻¹(0.6) = 36.86...° ≈ 36.9°. "53.1°" finds the OTHER acute angle in the triangle, 90° − 36.9°, instead of θ itself, as if the two acute angles had been swapped. "31.0°" comes from using the tangent ratio instead of sine, working out tan⁻¹(6/10) = 31.0° with the wrong ratio for the two sides given. "36.8°" rounds sin⁻¹(0.6) = 36.86...° down to 36.8° instead of correctly rounding it up to 36.9°.
3. (a) 49° — Method: an exterior angle of a triangle equals the sum of the two interior angles that are not next to it, which here are the angles at A and at C; since those two are equal, the exterior angle is twice the angle at A. Working: 2 × angle A = 98, so angle A = 98 ÷ 2 = 49. Answer: 49°. The distractors: 82° is the interior angle at B, 180 − 98, given in place of the angle at A; 41° comes from finding that interior angle of 82° and halving it, 82 ÷ 2, instead of halving the exterior angle; 98° comes from taking the exterior angle to be equal to the angle at A on its own, with no halving at all.
4. (c) y = 4x − 5 — Parallel lines have the same gradient, so the new line has gradient 4; since it passes through (0, −5), its y-intercept is −5, giving y = 4x − 5. A candidate who drops the negative sign on the y-intercept would write y = 4x + 5. A candidate who changes the sign of the gradient, instead of keeping it the same for a parallel line, would write y = −4x − 5. A candidate who confuses m and c, using the y-intercept of the first line (3) as the gradient of the second, would write y = 3x − 5.
5. (a) 5 — The symbol ≤ means n can equal 5 or any number less than 5, so 5 is included and is the largest integer value. A candidate who treats the inequality as strict, as if it were n < 5, answers 4. A candidate who confuses ≤ with ≥ and looks for a value just above the boundary answers 6. A candidate who makes a sign error and reads the inequality as n ≤ −5 answers −5.
6. (a) 6b − 5 — Method: sort the expression into terms in b and number terms, then collect each kind, keeping the sign in front of every term. Working: the b terms give 2b + 2b + 2b = 6b; the number terms are −1 and −4, and −1 − 4 = −5. Answer: 6b − 5. The distractors: 6b − 3 comes from working out the difference 4 − 1 instead of adding two negative numbers; 6b + 5 comes from adding 1 and 4 while ignoring both minus signs; 8b − 5 comes from multiplying the coefficients 2, 2 and 2 instead of adding them.
7. (d) a/2 — Method: write both terms over the same denominator, subtract the numerators, then cancel the fraction down. Working: 6 is a multiple of 3, so a/3 is rewritten as 2a/6; the calculation becomes 5a/6 − 2a/6 = 3a/6, and dividing numerator and denominator by 3 gives a/2. Answer: a/2. The distractors: 4a/3 comes from subtracting the denominators as well as the numerators, giving (5 − 1)a over (6 − 3); 2a/3 comes from subtracting 1 from 5 without first rewriting a/3 as 2a/6, giving 4a/6; 7a/6 comes from adding the two fractions instead of subtracting them, giving 5a/6 + 2a/6.
8. (d) 9 — Method: expand the brackets fully first, then collect the x-terms and constants before dividing. Working: 4(x − 3) = 4x − 12, so 4x − 12 = 2x + 6; 4x − 2x = 6 + 12; 2x = 18; x = 9. Answer: x = 9. 4.5 comes from expanding only the x-term in the bracket and forgetting to multiply the 3, giving 4x − 3 = 2x + 6, then 2x = 9, x = 4.5. −3 comes from a sign error when expanding, giving 4x + 12 = 2x + 6, then 2x = −6, x = −3. 3 comes from a sign error collecting the x-terms, adding instead of subtracting: 4x + 2x = 6 + 12, so 6x = 18, x = 3.
9. (d) 25 — Method: add the parts of the ratio, divide the total membership by the number of parts to find the value of one part, then multiply by the parts belonging to the group asked for. Working: 3 + 5 = 8 parts, 40 ÷ 8 = 5 members in one part, and the seniors are 5 parts, so 5 × 5 = 25. Answer: 25 seniors. The distractors: 15 is the number of juniors, which is the 3-part group; 5 is the size of one part only; 24 comes from dividing the 40 by 5, the seniors' number in the ratio, to get 8 and then multiplying that by 3.
10. (b) 13 — Using the sum of interior angles formula, (n − 2) × 180° = 1980°, so n − 2 = 1980 ÷ 180 = 11, and n = 11 + 2 = 13. 11 stops after the division, forgetting to add 2 back to find n. 15 adds 2 twice by mistake, giving 11 + 2 + 2. 22 divides 1980 by 90 instead of 180.
11. (c) 80 — Method: the range is a measure of spread and is found by subtracting the smallest value from the largest. Working: the largest number sold is 100 and the smallest is 20, so the range is 100 − 20 = 80. Answer: 80. The distractors: 100 comes from writing down the largest value and never subtracting the smallest; 60 comes from working out the median, the middle value of 20, 40, 60, 70, 100, instead of the range; 58 comes from working out the mean, 290 ÷ 5, which measures centre rather than spread.
12. (a) 40 — Method: the mean is the total divided by how many values there are, so rearranging gives total = mean × number of values. Working: the mean is 8 and there are 5 numbers, so the total is 8 × 5 = 40. Answer: 40, and checking, 40 ÷ 5 = 8, which is the mean given. The distractors: 13 comes from adding the mean and the count, 8 + 5, instead of multiplying them; 1.6 comes from dividing the mean by the count, 8 ÷ 5, which reverses the relationship; 8 comes from quoting the mean itself as the total, which is only true when there is a single number.
13. (d) 7.7 m — The horizontal distance is adjacent to the 50° angle and the zip wire is the hypotenuse, so horizontal distance = 12 × cos 50° = 12 × 0.6428... = 7.71...≈ 7.7 m. "9.2 m" uses the sine ratio instead of cosine, 12 × sin 50° = 9.19...≈ 9.2 m, which actually finds the vertical drop of the zip wire, not the horizontal distance. "15.7 m" comes from dividing by the sine ratio instead of multiplying by the cosine ratio, 12 ÷ sin 50° = 15.66...≈ 15.7 m, both the wrong operation and the wrong ratio. "12.0 m" simply uses the length of the zip wire itself as the horizontal distance, ignoring the angle of 50° altogether.
14. (a) y = −2x − 1 — Method: the gradient is the change in y divided by the change in x with both differences taken in the same order, and the constant then comes from substituting either point into y = mx + c. Working: m = (−9 − 3) ÷ (4 − (−2)) = (−12) ÷ 6 = −2, so the line is y = −2x + c; substituting (−2, 3) gives 3 = −2 × (−2) + c = 4 + c, so c = 3 − 4 = −1. Answer: y = −2x − 1. The distractors: y = −2x + 1 comes from rearranging 3 = 4 + c the wrong way round and taking the constant as 4 − 3; y = 2x + 7 comes from losing the minus sign when −12 is divided by 6 and then substituting correctly, 3 = 2 × (−2) + c; y = −(1/2)x + 2 comes from writing the gradient upside down as the change in x over the change in y, 6 ÷ (−12).
15. (b) 3.5 — Method: work out each percentage of its number separately, then subtract the smaller result from the larger one. Working: 45% of 70 = 31.5, and 35% of 80 = 28, so the difference is 31.5 − 28 = 3.5. Answer: 3.5. 11.5 comes from pairing the percentages with the wrong numbers, working out 35% of 70 = 24.5 and 45% of 80 = 36, and finding their difference. 59.5 comes from adding the two correct results, 31.5 + 28, instead of subtracting them. 10 comes from simply subtracting the two percentages themselves, 45 − 35, without applying them to the numbers at all.
16. (d) 2x − 26 — Method: multiply each term inside the bracket by the 2 in front of it, and keep the sign that belongs to each term. Working: 2 × x = 2x and 2 × 13 = 26; the bracket contains a subtraction, so the second term is subtracted. Answer: 2x − 26. The distractors: 2x − 13 comes from multiplying only the x by 2 and copying the 13 across unchanged; 2x + 26 comes from multiplying both terms correctly but losing the minus sign that belongs to the second term; 2x − 11 comes from subtracting 2 from 13 instead of multiplying 13 by 2.
17. (c) 200 students — Method: find the percentage who have a brother or a sister, taking care that the students with both are not counted twice, then take that percentage from 100% and apply the result to the 400 students. Working: 25% + 40% = 65%, but the 15% with both has been counted in each of those figures, so 65% − 15% = 50% have a brother or a sister; that leaves 100% − 50% = 50%, and 50% of 400 = 200. Answer: 200 students. The distractors: 260 students is 65% of 400, the number with a brother or a sister when the 15% overlap is counted twice; 140 students comes from taking that same uncorrected 65% away from the 400; 300 students comes from subtracting only the 25% with a brother and ignoring the sisters altogether.
18. (d) 60 — Method: 75% is three quarters, so divide by 4 to find one quarter and then multiply by 3. Working: 80 ÷ 4 = 20 for one quarter, and 3 × 20 = 60. Answer: 60 milk chocolates. The distractors: 20 is one quarter of 80, which is 25% and not 75%; 55 comes from subtracting 25 from 80 rather than taking 25% of 80 away from it; 75 comes from quoting the percentage itself as a number of chocolates.
19. (c) 8x − 12 — Multiply each term inside the bracket by 4: 4 × 2x = 8x and 4 × (−3) = −12, so 4(2x − 3) = 8x − 12. A candidate who forgets to multiply the second term by 4 gets 8x − 3. A candidate who makes a sign error, treating 4 × (−3) as +12, gets 8x + 12. A candidate who adds 4 to the bracket instead of multiplying gets 2x + 1.
20. (c) 6.3 m — By Pythagoras' theorem, the height = √(7² − 3²) = √(49 − 9) = √40 = 6.32...≈ 6.3 m. "6.4 m" rounds 6.32...m up to 6.4 instead of correctly rounding it down to 6.3. "4.0 m" comes from subtracting the two given lengths directly, 7 − 3 = 4, instead of subtracting their squares. "10.0 m" comes from adding the two given lengths, 7 + 3 = 10, instead of using Pythagoras' theorem at all.