⚖️ Foundation to Higher crossover check

Answer key

1. (c) A solid circle at −1 with the arrow pointing right — Method: a number line picture of an inequality carries two decisions: the circle at the boundary says whether the boundary value itself belongs to the solution set, and the arrow says which way the solutions run. Working: the sign is ≥, which includes equality, so x = −1 is itself a solution and the circle drawn at −1 is filled in; testing a value above the boundary, 4 ≥ −1 is true, and testing one below it, −5 ≥ −1 is false, so the solutions lie above −1 and the arrow runs to the right. Answer: a solid circle at −1 with the arrow pointing right. The distractors: an open circle with the arrow pointing right comes from treating ≥ as a strict >, which would shut the boundary value out; a solid circle with the arrow pointing left comes from reading the statement backwards, as if it said −1 ≥ x; an open circle with the arrow pointing left comes from making both of those mistakes at once.
2. (a) 30° — Method: the exterior angles of any convex polygon add up to 360°, and in a regular polygon they are all equal, so divide 360° by the number of sides. Working: 360 ÷ 12 = 30. Answer: 30°. The distractors: 150° is the interior angle, 180 − 30, which answers for the wrong angle at the vertex; 15° comes from dividing 180 by 12, using the angles on a straight line instead of the full turn; 36° comes from dividing 360 by 12 − 2 = 10, carrying the subtraction of 2 out of the interior angle sum formula into a calculation that does not need it.
3. (d) 60 — Method: write the two supplementary angles as x and 2x, since one is twice the other, and solve x + 2x = 180. Working: 3x = 180, so x = 60. Answer: the smaller angle is 60°. A candidate who gives the larger angle, 2x, instead of the smaller angle gets 120. A candidate who uses a complementary sum of 90° instead of a supplementary sum of 180° gets 30. A candidate who divides 180 by 2 instead of by 3 gets 90.
4. (d) 7.7 m — The horizontal distance is adjacent to the 50° angle and the zip wire is the hypotenuse, so horizontal distance = 12 × cos 50° = 12 × 0.6428... = 7.71...≈ 7.7 m. "9.2 m" uses the sine ratio instead of cosine, 12 × sin 50° = 9.19...≈ 9.2 m, which actually finds the vertical drop of the zip wire, not the horizontal distance. "15.7 m" comes from dividing by the sine ratio instead of multiplying by the cosine ratio, 12 ÷ sin 50° = 15.66...≈ 15.7 m, both the wrong operation and the wrong ratio. "12.0 m" simply uses the length of the zip wire itself as the horizontal distance, ignoring the angle of 50° altogether.
5. (c) y = 3x + 1 — Method: a line of known gradient m has equation y = mx + c, and c is found by substituting the coordinates of a point known to lie on it. Working: the gradient is 3, so the line is y = 3x + c; substituting x = 1 and y = 4 gives 4 = 3 × 1 + c, so c = 4 − 3 = 1. Answer: y = 3x + 1. The distractors: y = 3x − 1 comes from working out the constant as mx − y, 3 − 4 = −1, instead of y − mx; y = x + 3 comes from swapping the two numbers over, putting the gradient 3 in the constant position and the x-coordinate 1 in front of x; y = 3x + 4 comes from using the y-coordinate 4 as the constant without substituting.
6. (d) 60° — Method: the six angles at the centre together make one complete turn of 360°, and because the hexagon is regular they are all equal, so divide 360° by 6. Working: 360 ÷ 6 = 60. Answer: 60°. The distractors: 120° is the interior angle of a regular hexagon, 720 ÷ 6, which is the angle at a vertex and not the angle at the centre; 45° comes from dividing 360 by 8, treating the hexagon as though it had eight sides; 30° comes from halving the angle at the centre, as though each of the six triangles were split again by a line of symmetry.
7. (c) y = 4x − 5 — Parallel lines have the same gradient, so the new line has gradient 4; since it passes through (0, −5), its y-intercept is −5, giving y = 4x − 5. A candidate who drops the negative sign on the y-intercept would write y = 4x + 5. A candidate who changes the sign of the gradient, instead of keeping it the same for a parallel line, would write y = −4x − 5. A candidate who confuses m and c, using the y-intercept of the first line (3) as the gradient of the second, would write y = 3x − 5.
8. (c) 9.9 cm — Method: the 7 cm side is opposite the 45° angle and the hypotenuse is wanted, so use sin θ = opposite ÷ hypotenuse and rearrange it for the hypotenuse. Working: sin 45° = 7 ÷ h, so h = 7 ÷ sin 45° = 9.899…, which is 9.9 to 1 decimal place. Answer: 9.9 cm. The distractors: 5.0 cm comes from multiplying by sin 45° instead of dividing by it; 14.0 cm comes from doubling the 7 cm side, which is the rule for a side opposite 30° and not one opposite 45°; 7.0 cm comes from reading the two equal sides of a 45° right-angled triangle as including the hypotenuse, when the equal pair is the two shorter sides.
9. (b) 10 — Corresponding angles are equal, so 5x + 4 = 3x + 24. Subtracting 3x from both sides gives 2x + 4 = 24, then subtracting 4 gives 2x = 20, so x = 10. 14 comes from adding the constants, 4 + 24, instead of subtracting them when rearranging. 19 comes from treating the angles as co-interior (summing to 180°): 5x + 4 + 3x + 24 = 180 gives 8x = 152, so x = 19. 20 correctly reaches 2x = 20 but stops without dividing by 2.
10. (d) x ≤ 30 — Method: add the fixed cost to the cost of x balloons, set that total against the £150 limit with the sign that 'at most' calls for, then solve. Working: the total spend is 60 + 3x pounds, so 60 + 3x ≤ 150; subtracting 60 from both sides gives 3x ≤ 90; dividing both sides by 3, a positive number, gives x ≤ 30. Answer: x ≤ 30. The distractors: x ≤ 90 comes from taking the cake off the budget and stopping at 3x ≤ 90, reading the 90 as a number of balloons when it is the money left for them; x ≤ 50 comes from dividing the whole £150 by 3 and leaving the cake out of the calculation altogether; x ≥ 30 comes from reading 'at most' as 'at least', which reverses the condition.
11. (c) 7 — Method: the median is the middle value when the data are written in order of size, and with an odd number of values there is exactly one middle value. Working: the numbers are already in order, 2, 4, 7, 12, 26, and there are 5 of them, so the middle position is the third and the value sitting there is 7. Answer: 7, with two values below it and two above it. The distractors: 10.2 comes from working out the mean, 51 ÷ 5, instead of the median; 14 comes from taking the value halfway between the smallest and the largest, (2 + 26) ÷ 2; 24 comes from working out the range, 26 − 2, which measures spread rather than centre.
12. (d) a/2 — Method: write both terms over the same denominator, subtract the numerators, then cancel the fraction down. Working: 6 is a multiple of 3, so a/3 is rewritten as 2a/6; the calculation becomes 5a/6 − 2a/6 = 3a/6, and dividing numerator and denominator by 3 gives a/2. Answer: a/2. The distractors: 4a/3 comes from subtracting the denominators as well as the numerators, giving (5 − 1)a over (6 − 3); 2a/3 comes from subtracting 1 from 5 without first rewriting a/3 as 2a/6, giving 4a/6; 7a/6 comes from adding the two fractions instead of subtracting them, giving 5a/6 + 2a/6.
13. (d) £195 — Substituting x = 3 into y = 45x + 60 gives y = 45 × 3 + 60 = 135 + 60 = 195. A candidate who forgets to add the call-out fee would get only 45 × 3 = £135. A candidate who adds the hours to the fee and the rate instead of multiplying would get 45 + 60 + 3 = £108. A candidate who multiplies both the hourly rate and the call-out fee by the number of hours would get 45 × 3 + 60 × 3 = £315.
14. (d) 30 — Method: 50% is one half, so 50% of a quantity is the quantity divided by 2. Working: 60 ÷ 2 = 30. Answer: 30. The distractors: 120 comes from multiplying by 2 instead of dividing; 3000 comes from multiplying by 50 without dividing by 100; 6 comes from finding 10% instead of 50%.
15. (b) 6x + 6 — Perimeter = 2[(2x + 5) + (x − 2)] = 2(3x + 3) = 6x + 6. A candidate who adds the length and width but forgets to double for the perimeter gets 3x + 3. A candidate who makes a sign error and adds 2 instead of subtracting it before doubling gets 2[(2x + 5) + (x + 2)] = 6x + 14. A candidate who multiplies the length and width instead of adding them, confusing the perimeter formula with the area formula, and then doubles that product, gets 2(2x + 5)(x − 2) = 4x² + 2x − 20.
16. (b) £50 — Method: add the parts of the ratio, divide the amount by the number of parts to find the value of one part, then multiply by the parts in the largest share. Working: 3 + 4 + 5 = 12 parts, £120 ÷ 12 = £10 for one part, and the largest share is 5 parts, so 5 × £10 = £50. Answer: £50. The distractors: £10 is the value of one part only; £30 is the 3-part share, which is the smallest one; £40 is the 4-part share, the middle one.
17. (d) 6.0 — Subtract 1.8 from both sides: 6.3x ≤ 38.2. Divide both sides by 6.3: x ≤ 6.0634… . The question asks for the greatest value to 1 decimal place that still satisfies the inequality. Testing 6.1: 6.3 × 6.1 + 1.8 = 40.23, which is more than 40, so 6.1 fails. Testing 6.0: 6.3 × 6.0 + 1.8 = 39.6, which is no more than 40, so 6.0 works and is the greatest such value. A candidate who simply rounds 6.0634… to 1 decimal place answers 6.1, without checking that it satisfies the inequality. A candidate who adds 1.8 instead of subtracting works out 41.8 ÷ 6.3 and answers 6.6. A candidate who forgets the 1.8 altogether divides 40 by 6.3 and answers 6.3.
18. (b) £13,860 — Method: apply the first year's percentage decrease, then apply the second year's percentage decrease to the new value. Working: after the first year, the car is worth £17,500 × 0.88. Multiplying this result by 0.90 gives the value at the end of the second year, £13,860. Answer: £13,860. £13,650 comes from adding the two percentages together (12% + 10% = 22%) and applying a single 22% decrease, £17,500 × 0.78 = £13,650, instead of applying the decreases one after the other. £15,750 comes from applying only the second year's 10% decrease to the original price, forgetting the first year's decrease entirely, £17,500 × 0.90 = £15,750. £15,400 comes from applying only the first year's 12% decrease and stopping there, forgetting to apply the second year's decrease at all.
19. (d) 0 — Method: the range is the largest value minus the smallest value, whatever those two values turn out to be. Working: every value is 10, so the largest value is 10 and the smallest value is 10 as well, and the range is 10 − 10 = 0. Answer: 0 — a range of nothing says the data do not vary at all. The distractors: 10 comes from writing down the repeated value itself instead of the difference between the extremes; 20 comes from adding the largest and the smallest, 10 + 10, instead of subtracting; 40 comes from adding all four values, which gives the total sold and not a measure of spread.
20. (a) 44.7 m — Method: the line joining the two tops is the hypotenuse of a right-angled triangle whose horizontal side is the gap between the masts and whose vertical side is the difference in their heights, so Pythagoras' theorem applies. Working: the difference in heights is 50 − 30 = 20 m, so d² = 40² + 20² = 1600 + 400 = 2000 and d = √2000 = 44.721…, which is 44.7 m to 1 decimal place. Answer: 44.7 m. The distractors: 34.6 m comes from subtracting the squares, √(40² − 20²), instead of adding them; 60.0 m comes from adding the two sides of the triangle, 40 + 20, rather than using Pythagoras' theorem; 50.0 m is the height of the taller mast, copied from the question in place of the distance asked for.