⚖️ Foundation to Higher crossover check

Answer key

1. (c) 115 — Method: use corresponding angles to carry the 65° angle from the lower rafter up to the upper rafter, then use angles on a straight line to move to the other side of the strut. Working: the angle above the upper rafter and to the left of the strut corresponds to the given angle, so it is 65°; the angle above the upper rafter and to the right of the strut lies on a straight line with it, so it is 180 − 65 = 115. Answer: 115°. A candidate who assumes the angle stays 65° without allowing for the move from the left of the strut to the right of it gives 65. A candidate who uses 90° instead of 180°, working out 90 − 65, gets 25. A candidate who adds instead of subtracting, working out 180 + 65, gets 245.
2. (d) They are always equal to each other — Method: label the four angles a, b, c, d in order around the crossing point, then use the fact that neighbouring angles lie on a straight line. Working: a and b lie on a straight line, so a + b = 180°; b and c also lie on a straight line, so b + c = 180°. Both a and c are therefore 180° minus b, which forces a = c. Answer: a pair of vertically opposite angles is always equal to each other. The distractors: the claim that each is 90° holds only when the two lines happen to be perpendicular, so it is not always true; the claim that they add to 180° confuses the opposite pair with the neighbouring pair that lies along a straight line, and again holds only in the perpendicular case; the claim that they add to 360° uses the total of all four angles at the point rather than of the opposite pair.
3. (b) No — in order the numbers are 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, so the median is 5. — Method: the median is the middle value of the data in order of size, so the data must be sorted before any position is read off. Working: Noah's list 9, 3, 7, 1, 5 is not in order; sorted it becomes 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, and with 5 values the middle position is the third, which now holds 5 rather than 7. Noah has read the third value of the unsorted list. Answer: no — in order the numbers are 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, so the median is 5. The distractors: the reply giving 3 as the median sorts the data correctly but then reads the value in the second place instead of the third; the reply that 7 is the third number he wrote accepts a position in the unsorted list, which is exactly the mistake the question is about; the reply using the mean claims a value of 7 for it, but the mean is 25 ÷ 5 = 5, so that reasoning is false as well.
4. (a) x > 4 — Subtract 2x from both sides: 3x − 3 > 9. Add 3 to both sides: 3x > 12. Divide both sides by 3: x > 4. A candidate who subtracts 3 from 9 instead of adding gets 3x > 6, so x > 2. A candidate who divides correctly but wrongly flips the inequality (as if dividing by a negative) gets x < 4. A candidate who multiplies by 3 instead of dividing gets x > 36.
5. (d) 8(7x − 3) — Method: find the highest common factor of the two terms, write it in front of a bracket and divide each term by it. Working: 56 = 8 × 7 and 24 = 8 × 3, so the highest common factor is 8; dividing gives 56x ÷ 8 = 7x and 24 ÷ 8 = 3, and the subtraction sign stays between them. Answer: 8(7x − 3), which multiplies back out to 56x − 24. The distractors: 8(7x + 3) comes from dropping the minus sign of −24 while dividing; 8(56x − 3) comes from dividing only the number term by 8 and leaving 56x untouched inside the bracket; 8(7x − 16) comes from subtracting 8 from 24 instead of dividing 24 by 8.
6. (d) 7a + 56 — Method: multiplying a single term over a bracket means every term inside the bracket is multiplied by the term outside. Working: 7 × a = 7a and 7 × 8 = 56, and the two products are added because the bracket contains an addition. Answer: 7a + 56. The distractors: 7a + 15 comes from adding 7 and 8 instead of multiplying them; 7a + 8 comes from multiplying only the first term inside the bracket and copying the 8 across unchanged; a + 56 comes from multiplying only the 8 and copying the a across unchanged.
7. (a) y = −3x − 5 — Gradient = (−8 − 4) ÷ (1 − (−3)) = −12 ÷ 4 = −3. Using the point (1, −8): −8 = −3(1) + c, so c = −5, giving y = −3x − 5. A candidate who drops the negative sign on the gradient, using m = 3 instead, would then solve −8 = 3(1) + c to get c = −11, writing y = 3x − 11. A candidate who makes a sign error isolating c, writing c = 5 instead of −5, would write y = −3x + 5. A candidate who mixes up both mistakes — keeping the correct gradient but the wrong, positive value of c from the flipped-gradient calculation — would write y = −3x + 11.
8. (a) 105° — The interior angles of a pentagon add up to (5 − 2) × 180° = 540°. Subtracting the three known angles, 540 − 100 − 110 − 120 = 210°, and this 210° is shared equally between the two angles marked x°, so each one is 210 ÷ 2 = 105°. 210° stops one step early, giving the total of the two unknown angles instead of one of them. 108° is the interior angle of a regular pentagon, which does not apply here since this pentagon's angles are not all equal. 55° comes from halving one of the given angles, 110°, instead of halving the remaining total.
9. (c) 6x(2x + 3) — The highest common factor of 12x² and 18x is 6x. Dividing each term by 6x gives 12x² ÷ 6x = 2x and 18x ÷ 6x = 3, so 12x² + 18x = 6x(2x + 3). A candidate who only takes out the number 6 (missing the x) gets 6(2x² + 3x), which is not fully factorised. A candidate who only takes out 2x (missing the extra factor of 3 in 6) gets 2x(6x + 9), also not fully factorised — the bracket still shares a common factor. A candidate who takes out 3x instead of the full 6x gets 3x(4x + 6), which again is not fully factorised since 4x + 6 shares a common factor of 2.
10. (a) 45% — Method: percentage increase = increase ÷ original amount × 100. Working: the increase is £116 − £80 = £36, and 36 ÷ 80 = 0.45, so 0.45 × 100 = 45%. Answer: 45%. The distractors: 36% comes from quoting the £36 increase as though pounds and per cent were the same thing; 31% comes from dividing the £36 increase by the new price £116 instead of by the original £80, which gives 31% to the nearest per cent; 145% is the new price written as a percentage of the original price, which is the whole of the new price rather than the increase.
11. (a) 70° — Method: the three angles of a triangle add up to 180°, so take the known corner away from 180° to find what is left for the other two corners, then share that remainder equally because those two corners are equal. Working: 180 − 40 = 140, and the two equal corners share that 140° between them, so 140 ÷ 2 = 70. Answer: 70°. The distractors: 140° comes from stopping after 180 − 40 and offering the combined total of the two equal corners as though it were the size of one of them; 20° comes from halving the 40° corner that was given instead of halving the 140° that the other two corners have to share; 50° comes from 90 − 40, using the two acute angles of a right-angled triangle as the fixed total rather than the 180° angle sum of the whole triangle.
12. (b) −5 — Method: a point whose x-coordinate is 0 lies on the y-axis, so its y-coordinate is the constant c; once m and c are both known the equation can be written down and x substituted into it. Working: the line passes through (0, 1), so c = 1 and the equation is y = −3x + 1; substituting x = 2 gives y = −3 × 2 + 1 = −6 + 1 = −5. Answer: −5. The distractors: 7 comes from ignoring the minus sign on the gradient and working out 3 × 2 + 1; 5 comes from working out 3 × 2 = 6 and then using the minus sign to take the constant off the product, 6 − 1 = 5; −7 comes from subtracting the constant instead of adding it, −6 − 1 = −7.
13. (c) 40 cm — Method: split the total length into the number of parts shown by the ratio, then find the value of the shorter share. Working: the ratio 4:5 has 4 + 5 = 9 parts, so one part is 90 ÷ 9 = 10 cm, and the shorter piece is 4 × 10 = 40 cm. So the shorter piece is 40 cm. Distractor 50 cm is the length of the LONGER piece, not the shorter one. Distractor 45 cm comes from splitting the ribbon into two equal halves, ignoring the ratio. Distractor 10 cm is the value of one part, found correctly but never multiplied by 4.
14. (d) 20 — Alternate angles between parallel lines are equal, so 3x + 10 = 5x − 30. Rearranging, 10 + 30 = 5x − 3x, so 40 = 2x, and x = 20. −10 comes from a sign error when rearranging, moving a term to the wrong side and getting −20 = 2x instead. 25 comes from wrongly treating the two angles as co-interior and adding them to 180°: (3x + 10) + (5x − 30) = 180 gives 8x − 20 = 180, so x = 25. 47.5 makes the same co-interior mistake but sets the sum equal to 360° instead of 180°, giving 8x − 20 = 360 and x = 47.5.
15. (c) y = 3x + 1 — Method: a line of known gradient m has equation y = mx + c, and c is found by substituting the coordinates of a point known to lie on it. Working: the gradient is 3, so the line is y = 3x + c; substituting x = 1 and y = 4 gives 4 = 3 × 1 + c, so c = 4 − 3 = 1. Answer: y = 3x + 1. The distractors: y = 3x − 1 comes from working out the constant as mx − y, 3 − 4 = −1, instead of y − mx; y = x + 3 comes from swapping the two numbers over, putting the gradient 3 in the constant position and the x-coordinate 1 in front of x; y = 3x + 4 comes from using the y-coordinate 4 as the constant without substituting.
16. (b) y = 84 − 14x — Method: the distance still to go is the whole route minus the distance already covered, and at a steady speed the distance covered after x hours is the speed multiplied by x. Working: after x hours Freya has cycled 14x km, so the distance remaining is the 84 km route take away 14x, giving y = 84 − 14x, a straight line with intercept 84 and gradient −14. Answer: y = 84 − 14x. The distractors: y = 84 + 14x comes from adding the distance cycled to the length of the route rather than taking it away, so the ride would grow longer the further she goes; y = 14x − 84 comes from carrying out the subtraction the wrong way round, which is negative for the whole of the ride; y = 14 − 84x comes from swapping the two numbers over, treating 84 km as the hourly speed and 14 km as the length of the route.
17. (a) 7 — Method: multiply both sides by 3 to clear the fraction, then solve the resulting equation. Working: 2x + 1 = 5 × 3 = 15. Subtract 1: 2x = 14. Divide by 2: x = 7. Answer: 7. 2 comes from ignoring the denominator altogether, treating the equation as 2x + 1 = 5 without multiplying by 3 first. 8 comes from a sign error, adding 1 to 15 instead of subtracting it, giving 2x = 16. 14 comes from correctly reaching 2x = 14 but stopping there, without dividing by 2 to find x.
18. (b) x ≤ 5 — Method: divide out the bracket first, then undo the number term; the inequality sign turns round only if both sides are multiplied or divided by a negative number. Working: dividing both sides of 2(x − 1) ≤ 8 by 2 gives x − 1 ≤ 4, and 2 is positive so the ≤ is unchanged; adding 1 to both sides gives x ≤ 5. Answer: x ≤ 5. The distractors: x ≤ 3 comes from subtracting 1 from 4 instead of adding 1 to both sides; x ≤ 4 comes from stopping at 8 ÷ 2 = 4 and never undoing the −1 inside the bracket; x < 5 comes from reading ≤ as a strict inequality, which wrongly leaves the boundary value out of the solution set.
19. (b) 5 — Method: expand the bracket first, then solve the resulting linear equation. Working: 3(2x − 1) = 6x − 3, so 6x − 3 = 27. Add 3 to both sides: 6x = 30. Divide by 6: x = 5. Answer: 5. 4 2/3 comes from multiplying only the 2x inside the bracket by 3 and forgetting to multiply the −1 as well, giving 6x − 1 = 27. 4 comes from a sign error when expanding, writing 6x + 3 instead of 6x − 3. 4.5 comes from dividing 27 by 3 to get 2x − 1 = 9, then forgetting to add 1 back before dividing by 2, using 2x = 9 instead of 2x = 10.
20. (d) 19% — Method: write each decrease as a multiplier, multiply the multipliers, then compare the result with 100%. Working: a 10% decrease is a multiplier of 0.9, so the two reductions together give 0.9 × 0.9 = 0.81; the final price is 81% of the original, so the price has fallen by 100% − 81% = 19%. Answer: an overall decrease of 19%. The distractors: 20% comes from adding the two reductions, 10% + 10%, which charges the second 10% against the original price instead of against the already reduced price; 21% comes from using the increase multiplier by mistake, since 1.1 × 1.1 = 1.21, and reading that 21% as a decrease; 81% is the percentage of the original price still being paid, not the percentage taken off.