⚖️ Foundation to Higher crossover check

Answer key

1. (c) x = 5 — Method: every point on a vertical line has the same x-coordinate however far up or down the line it lies, so the equation of a vertical line fixes x at a number and does not involve y at all. Working: of the four equations only x = 5 fixes x; it is satisfied by (5, 0), (5, 1), (5, 7) and by every other point whose x-coordinate is 5, and those points form a vertical line. Answer: x = 5. The distractors: y = 5 fixes the y-coordinate instead of the x-coordinate, which gives a horizontal line; y = 5x is a line through the origin with gradient 5, steep but not vertical, and it has a different y-value for every x; x = y fixes neither coordinate and is the line through the origin with gradient 1.
2. (c) 76 marks — Method: a mean of means only works when the groups are the same size, so rebuild each class's total mark, add the totals and divide by the number of pupils altogether. Working: Class A scored 30 × 72 = 2160 marks and Class B scored 20 × 82 = 1640 marks, giving 2160 + 1640 = 3800 marks between 50 pupils, so the overall mean is 3800 ÷ 50 = 76 marks. Answer: 76 marks. The distractors: 77 marks comes from averaging the two class means, (72 + 82) ÷ 2, which ignores the different class sizes; 78 marks comes from attaching each mean to the other class's size, (30 × 82 + 20 × 72) ÷ 50; 3800 marks comes from stopping at the combined total and never dividing by 50.
3. (a) 40 — Method: the mean is the total divided by how many values there are, so rearranging gives total = mean × number of values. Working: the mean is 8 and there are 5 numbers, so the total is 8 × 5 = 40. Answer: 40, and checking, 40 ÷ 5 = 8, which is the mean given. The distractors: 13 comes from adding the mean and the count, 8 + 5, instead of multiplying them; 1.6 comes from dividing the mean by the count, 8 ÷ 5, which reverses the relationship; 8 comes from quoting the mean itself as the total, which is only true when there is a single number.
4. (c) 21% — Method: an increase of 10% is a multiplier of 1.1, and two successive increases are found by multiplying the multipliers. Working: 1.1 × 1.1 = 1.21, so the rent is 121% of the original, which is an increase of 21%. Answer: 21%. The distractors: 20% comes from adding the two percentages, which ignores that the second 10% is taken of a larger amount; 121% is the multiplier written as the change rather than the change itself; 11% comes from slipping in the multiplication and getting 1.11 instead of 1.21.
5. (b) 80% — Percentage = (40 ÷ 50) × 100 = 80%.
6. (d) (x − 8)(x + 8) — x² − 64 = x² − 8², a difference of two squares, which factorises as (x − 8)(x + 8). A candidate who treats it as a perfect square with a repeated negative factor gets (x − 8)(x − 8), which expands to x² − 16x + 64 — wrong on both the middle and constant terms. A candidate who uses a repeated positive factor gets (x + 8)(x + 8), which expands to x² + 16x + 64. A candidate who picks a different factor pair of 64, such as 4 and 16, without checking that the middle term cancels, gets (x − 4)(x + 16), which expands to x² + 12x − 64 — the wrong middle term.
7. (c) 8 — Method: the exterior angles of a polygon add up to 360°, so divide 360° by the size of one exterior angle. Working: 360 ÷ 45 = 8. Answer: 8 sides. A candidate who divides into a half turn instead of a full turn, working out 180 ÷ 45, gets 4. A candidate who reads off the given exterior angle as if it were the number of sides gets 45. A candidate who subtracts instead of dividing, working out 360 − 45, gets 315.
8. (b) 10 — Corresponding angles are equal, so 5x + 4 = 3x + 24. Subtracting 3x from both sides gives 2x + 4 = 24, then subtracting 4 gives 2x = 20, so x = 10. 14 comes from adding the constants, 4 + 24, instead of subtracting them when rearranging. 19 comes from treating the angles as co-interior (summing to 180°): 5x + 4 + 3x + 24 = 180 gives 8x = 152, so x = 19. 20 correctly reaches 2x = 20 but stops without dividing by 2.
9. (c) £22.50 — Method: find the cost of 1 kg, then multiply by the mass wanted. Working: £36 ÷ 2.4 = £15 per kilogram, and 1.5 × £15 = £22.50. Answer: £22.50. The distractors: £15 is the price of 1 kg, which is the first step and not what the question asks for; £54 comes from multiplying the £36 by 1.5 without first reducing it to a price per kilogram; £57.60 comes from using the scale factor upside down, multiplying £36 by 2.4 ÷ 1.5 = 1.6 instead of by 1.5 ÷ 2.4.
10. (b) 21 cm — By Pythagoras' theorem, the other side = √(29² − 20²) = √(841 − 400) = √441 = 21 cm. "9 cm" comes from subtracting the two given lengths directly, 29 − 20 = 9, instead of subtracting their squares. "441 cm" is the value under the square root sign, correct as far as it goes but with the final square root step left out. "35 cm" comes from adding the squares of the two given lengths instead of subtracting them, √(29² + 20²) = √1241 ≈ 35, treating both given lengths as if they were the two shorter sides rather than a shorter side and the hypotenuse.
11. (c) £478.40 — Method: apply the percentage increase, then apply the percentage decrease to the new price. Working: after the increase, the laptop costs £520 × 1.15. Multiplying this result by 0.80 gives the final price, £478.40. Answer: £478.40. £494 comes from combining the two percentages into a single net change (15% − 20% = −5%) and applying it directly, £520 × 0.95 = £494, instead of applying the two changes one after the other. £416 comes from applying only the 20% decrease to the original price, £520 × 0.80 = £416, forgetting the increase entirely. £598 comes from applying only the 15% increase and stopping there, forgetting to apply the decrease at all.
12. (d) Line 3 — Method: check each line of Chloe's working against the correct algebraic step. Working: Line 1 to Line 2 is correct, subtracting 2x from both sides gives 3x − 4 = 8. But Line 2 to Line 3 should add 4 to both sides, giving 3x = 12, not 3x = 4 — the constant −4 has been dropped rather than removed correctly. Line 4 follows correctly from Chloe's own, incorrect, Line 3. Answer: Line 3. Line 1 is simply the original equation, copied out correctly. Line 2 correctly subtracts 2x from both sides of Line 1. Line 4 divides Chloe's own Line 3 by 3 correctly — the arithmetic there is fine, the mistake happened one line earlier.
13. (b) £20 — Method: add the parts of the ratio, divide the amount by the number of parts to find the value of one part, then take the parts belonging to the person asked about. Working: 1 + 2 = 3 parts, £60 ÷ 3 = £20 for one part, and Isla has 1 part. Answer: £20. The distractors: £40 is the 2-part share, which belongs to her brother; £30 comes from reading 1:2 as one part out of two and halving the £60; £120 comes from multiplying the £60 by 2 instead of dividing it into 3 parts.
14. (d) 15 — Substituting x = 3 into y = 5x gives y = 5 × 3 = 15. A candidate who adds instead of multiplying would get 5 + 3 = 8. A candidate who ignores the coefficient 5 and just copies the value of x would write y = 3. A candidate who multiplies correctly but treats x as −3 by mistake would get y = 5 × (−3) = −15.
15. (a) x = 2 — Method: undo the subtraction first, then undo the multiplication, doing the same to both sides each time. Working: adding 2 to both sides gives 2x = 4, and dividing both sides by 2 gives x = 2. Answer: x = 2. The distractors: x = 4 comes from stopping at 2x = 4 and writing 4 as the value of x; x = 0 comes from subtracting 2 from both sides instead of adding it, giving 2x = 0; x = 8 comes from multiplying 4 by 2 instead of dividing by 2.
16. (b) 47 — Method: angles on a straight line add up to 180°. Working: 180 − 38 − 95 = 47. Answer: x = 47. A candidate who uses 360° instead of 180° gets 227. A candidate who subtracts only one of the two given angles from 180° gets 142. A candidate who adds the two given angles instead of subtracting them from 180° gets 133.
17. (c) x = −5 — Method: 4 is being subtracted from x, so add 4 to both sides; adding a positive number to a negative one moves to the right along the number line. Working: adding 4 to both sides gives x = −9 + 4, and −9 + 4 = −5. Answer: x = −5. The distractors: x = −13 comes from subtracting 4 from both sides instead of adding it, giving −9 − 4; x = 5 comes from working out −9 + 4 correctly and then writing the result without its minus sign; x = 13 comes from reading the right-hand side as 9 rather than −9 and adding 4 to it.
18. (a) 6b − 5 — Method: sort the expression into terms in b and number terms, then collect each kind, keeping the sign in front of every term. Working: the b terms give 2b + 2b + 2b = 6b; the number terms are −1 and −4, and −1 − 4 = −5. Answer: 6b − 5. The distractors: 6b − 3 comes from working out the difference 4 − 1 instead of adding two negative numbers; 6b + 5 comes from adding 1 and 4 while ignoring both minus signs; 8b − 5 comes from multiplying the coefficients 2, 2 and 2 instead of adding them.
19. (a) 20% — Method: a percentage is a number of parts per hundred, so divide the numerator by the denominator and multiply by 100. Working: 1 ÷ 5 = 0.2, and 0.2 × 100 = 20; the same result comes from scaling 1/5 to 20/100. Answer: 20%. The distractors: 5% comes from reading the denominator 5 straight off as the percentage; 25% comes from confusing 1/5 with 1/4, the fraction met most often in percentage work; 50% comes from a place value slip in the division, writing 1 ÷ 5 as 0.5 instead of 0.2.
20. (a) 100 — The difference between the parts of the ratio is 7 − 3 = 4 parts, and this is worth 40 beads. Divide to find one part: 40 ÷ 4 = 10. The total number of parts is 7 + 3 = 10, so the total number of beads is 10 × 10 = 100. (40 is just the given difference between gold and silver, not the total. 70 is the number of gold beads only, using 7 parts. 30 is the number of silver beads only, using 3 parts.)