⚖️ Foundation to Higher crossover check

Answer key

1. (c) x ≤ 4 — Subtract 9 from both sides: −2x ≥ 1 − 9 = −8. Divide both sides by −2, flipping the inequality: x ≤ 4. A candidate who divides by −2 but forgets to flip the inequality gets x ≥ 4. A candidate who divides −8 by −2 but keeps a negative sign gets x ≤ −4. A candidate who miscalculates 1 − 9 as −10 gets x ≤ 5.
2. (d) x ≤ 30 — Method: add the fixed cost to the cost of x balloons, set that total against the £150 limit with the sign that 'at most' calls for, then solve. Working: the total spend is 60 + 3x pounds, so 60 + 3x ≤ 150; subtracting 60 from both sides gives 3x ≤ 90; dividing both sides by 3, a positive number, gives x ≤ 30. Answer: x ≤ 30. The distractors: x ≤ 90 comes from taking the cake off the budget and stopping at 3x ≤ 90, reading the 90 as a number of balloons when it is the money left for them; x ≤ 50 comes from dividing the whole £150 by 3 and leaving the cake out of the calculation altogether; x ≥ 30 comes from reading 'at most' as 'at least', which reverses the condition.
3. (d) 60 — Method: 75% is three quarters, so divide by 4 to find one quarter and then multiply by 3. Working: 80 ÷ 4 = 20 for one quarter, and 3 × 20 = 60. Answer: 60 milk chocolates. The distractors: 20 is one quarter of 80, which is 25% and not 75%; 55 comes from subtracting 25 from 80 rather than taking 25% of 80 away from it; 75 comes from quoting the percentage itself as a number of chocolates.
4. (a) x < 7 — Subtract 5 from both sides: x < 12 − 5, so x < 7. A candidate who adds 5 instead of subtracting gets x < 17. A candidate who subtracts the wrong way round gets x < −7. A candidate who correctly finds 7 but wrongly flips the inequality (as if dividing by a negative had happened) writes x > 7.
5. (c) 9.9 cm — Method: the 7 cm side is opposite the 45° angle and the hypotenuse is wanted, so use sin θ = opposite ÷ hypotenuse and rearrange it for the hypotenuse. Working: sin 45° = 7 ÷ h, so h = 7 ÷ sin 45° = 9.899…, which is 9.9 to 1 decimal place. Answer: 9.9 cm. The distractors: 5.0 cm comes from multiplying by sin 45° instead of dividing by it; 14.0 cm comes from doubling the 7 cm side, which is the rule for a side opposite 30° and not one opposite 45°; 7.0 cm comes from reading the two equal sides of a 45° right-angled triangle as including the hypotenuse, when the equal pair is the two shorter sides.
6. (c) 7 — Method: the median is the middle value when the data are written in order of size, and with an odd number of values there is exactly one middle value. Working: the numbers are already in order, 2, 4, 7, 12, 26, and there are 5 of them, so the middle position is the third and the value sitting there is 7. Answer: 7, with two values below it and two above it. The distractors: 10.2 comes from working out the mean, 51 ÷ 5, instead of the median; 14 comes from taking the value halfway between the smallest and the largest, (2 + 26) ÷ 2; 24 comes from working out the range, 26 − 2, which measures spread rather than centre.
7. (d) 23.57 °C — Method: add all seven temperatures, divide by the number of readings and round only at the end. Working: 22 + 24 + 23 + 25 + 26 + 21 + 24 = 165, and 165 ÷ 7 = 23.5714…, which rounds to 23.57 to 2 decimal places. Answer: 23.57 °C. The distractors: 24 °C comes from writing down the mode, the only temperature recorded twice, instead of the mean; 27.5 °C comes from dividing the total by 6 instead of by the 7 days recorded; 5 °C comes from working out the range, 26 − 21, which is a measure of spread and not an average.
8. (b) £52 — Method: the difference between the two ratio numbers tells you how many parts the £39 difference represents. Working: the difference in parts is 7 − 4 = 3, and this represents £39, so one part is £39 ÷ 3 = £13. Josh's savings are 4 × £13 = £52. So Josh has £52. Distractor £91 is Mia's savings, not Josh's. Distractor £39 comes from using the given £39 difference as the final answer, without scaling it to Josh's number of parts. Distractor £13 is the value of one part, found correctly but never multiplied by 4.
9. (c) 200 students — Method: find the percentage who have a brother or a sister, taking care that the students with both are not counted twice, then take that percentage from 100% and apply the result to the 400 students. Working: 25% + 40% = 65%, but the 15% with both has been counted in each of those figures, so 65% − 15% = 50% have a brother or a sister; that leaves 100% − 50% = 50%, and 50% of 400 = 200. Answer: 200 students. The distractors: 260 students is 65% of 400, the number with a brother or a sister when the 15% overlap is counted twice; 140 students comes from taking that same uncorrected 65% away from the 400; 300 students comes from subtracting only the 25% with a brother and ignoring the sisters altogether.
10. (d) Alternate angles are equal — The two 65° angles are on opposite sides of the line that crosses the parallel lines, in the shape of a Z, so they are alternate angles, and alternate angles between parallel lines are always equal. Corresponding angles are equal too, but they sit in matching positions at each crossing point, in the shape of an F — a different pair from the one shown here. Co-interior angles add up to 180°, not to each other's value, and they lie between the parallel lines on the same side, in the shape of a C. Angles on a straight line add up to 180°, but that rule is about two angles at a single point on one line, not about a pair of angles formed where a line crosses two parallel lines.
11. (b) 5 — Method: expand the bracket first, then solve the resulting linear equation. Working: 3(2x − 1) = 6x − 3, so 6x − 3 = 27. Add 3 to both sides: 6x = 30. Divide by 6: x = 5. Answer: 5. 4 2/3 comes from multiplying only the 2x inside the bracket by 3 and forgetting to multiply the −1 as well, giving 6x − 1 = 27. 4 comes from a sign error when expanding, writing 6x + 3 instead of 6x − 3. 4.5 comes from dividing 27 by 3 to get 2x − 1 = 9, then forgetting to add 1 back before dividing by 2, using 2x = 9 instead of 2x = 10.
12. (b) 62 — Method: co-interior (allied) angles between parallel lines add up to 180°. Working: 180 − 118 = 62. Answer: 62°. A candidate who treats co-interior angles as equal, like corresponding angles, gives 118. A candidate who uses 360° instead of 180°, working out 360 − 118, gets 242. A candidate who subtracts as if the angles were complementary, working out 118 − 90, gets 28.
13. (d) £5.40 — Method: work out the reduced price at each shop separately, then subtract the smaller from the larger. Working: Shop A's reduced price is £45 × 0.8 = £36, and Shop B's reduced price is £34 × 0.9 = £30.60, so the difference is £36 − £30.60 = £5.40. Answer: £5.40. £11.00 comes from comparing the two ORIGINAL prices, £45 − £34, without applying either shop's reduction at all. £1.60 comes from finding Shop A's reduced price correctly, £36, but then subtracting Shop B's original (unreduced) price of £34 instead of its reduced price. £66.60 comes from adding the two reduced prices together, £36 + £30.60, instead of subtracting them.
14. (d) 63.6 — Method: the three angles inside the triangle formed by the two ladders and the ground add up to 180°. Working: 180 − 58.2 − 58.2 = 63.6. Answer: 63.6°. A candidate who assumes the top angle equals the base angles gives 58.2. A candidate who subtracts only one base angle from 180°, working out 180 − 58.2, gets 121.8. A candidate who doubles the base angle instead of subtracting it twice from 180°, working out 2 × 58.2, gets 116.4.
15. (d) 19% — Method: write each decrease as a multiplier, multiply the multipliers, then compare the result with 100%. Working: a 10% decrease is a multiplier of 0.9, so the two reductions together give 0.9 × 0.9 = 0.81; the final price is 81% of the original, so the price has fallen by 100% − 81% = 19%. Answer: an overall decrease of 19%. The distractors: 20% comes from adding the two reductions, 10% + 10%, which charges the second 10% against the original price instead of against the already reduced price; 21% comes from using the increase multiplier by mistake, since 1.1 × 1.1 = 1.21, and reading that 21% as a decrease; 81% is the percentage of the original price still being paid, not the percentage taken off.
16. (a) £20,000 — Method: add the parts of the ratio, divide the profit by the number of parts to find the value of one part, then multiply by the parts belonging to the partner asked about. Working: 3 + 5 + 4 = 12 parts, £48,000 ÷ 12 = £4,000 for one part, and that partner has 5 parts, so 5 × £4,000 = £20,000. Answer: £20,000. The distractors: £4,000 is the value of one part; £12,000 is the 3-part share; £16,000 is the 4-part share, which is what a candidate reaches by assuming the biggest share must go with the number written last in the ratio.
17. (b) −1% — Method: write each change as a multiplier and multiply them. A 10% fall is × 0.9 and a 10% rise is × 1.1. Working: 0.9 × 1.1 = 0.99, so the final price is 99% of the original, which is 1% less. Answer: an overall change of −1%. The distractors: 0% comes from assuming a 10% fall and a 10% rise cancel — they do not, because the rise is 10% of a smaller amount; +1% has the size right but the sign wrong, from reading the multiplier 0.99 as 1% above 1 instead of 1% below it; −2% comes from finding the 1% fall and then counting it once for each of the two changes.
18. (b) y = 84 − 14x — Method: the distance still to go is the whole route minus the distance already covered, and at a steady speed the distance covered after x hours is the speed multiplied by x. Working: after x hours Freya has cycled 14x km, so the distance remaining is the 84 km route take away 14x, giving y = 84 − 14x, a straight line with intercept 84 and gradient −14. Answer: y = 84 − 14x. The distractors: y = 84 + 14x comes from adding the distance cycled to the length of the route rather than taking it away, so the ride would grow longer the further she goes; y = 14x − 84 comes from carrying out the subtraction the wrong way round, which is negative for the whole of the ride; y = 14 − 84x comes from swapping the two numbers over, treating 84 km as the hourly speed and 14 km as the length of the route.
19. (c) 6.3 m — By Pythagoras' theorem, the height = √(7² − 3²) = √(49 − 9) = √40 = 6.32...≈ 6.3 m. "6.4 m" rounds 6.32...m up to 6.4 instead of correctly rounding it down to 6.3. "4.0 m" comes from subtracting the two given lengths directly, 7 − 3 = 4, instead of subtracting their squares. "10.0 m" comes from adding the two given lengths, 7 + 3 = 10, instead of using Pythagoras' theorem at all.
20. (a) 3/8, 41%, 0.43 — Method: convert every value to a decimal so they can be compared on the same scale, then order them. Working: 3/8 = 0.375, 41% = 0.41, and 0.43 stays as 0.43, so from smallest to largest the decimals are 0.375, 0.41, 0.43, giving the order 3/8, 41%, 0.43. Answer: 3/8, 41%, 0.43. The order 3/8, 0.43, 41% comes from comparing 0.43 and 41% as raw digits (43 versus 41) without converting 41% into the decimal 0.41 first, wrongly placing 0.43 before 41%. The order 0.43, 41%, 3/8 comes from placing the values in completely reversed order, from largest to smallest instead of smallest to largest. The order 41%, 0.43, 3/8 comes from ordering the values by their TYPE (percentage, then decimal, then fraction) rather than by their actual size.