⚖️ Foundation to Higher crossover check

Answer key

1. (a) 7 — Subtract 4 from both sides: 3h ≤ 21. Divide both sides by 3: h ≤ 7, so the greatest whole number of hours is 7. A candidate who forgets the £4 fixed fee solves 3h ≤ 25, getting h ≤ 8.33, rounded down to 8. A candidate who adds the £4 instead of subtracting it solves 3h ≤ 29, getting h ≤ 9.67, rounded down to 9. A candidate who reaches h ≤ 7 but wrongly assumes the boundary value cannot be used, thinking that spending the whole £25 is not allowed, answers 6.
2. (b) 4% — Method: find the total interest earned, share it equally across the number of years to find one year's interest, then write it as a percentage of the amount invested. Working: total interest = £840 − £750 = £90, so one year's interest is £90 ÷ 3 = £30, and £30 as a percentage of £750 is (£30 ÷ £750) × 100 = 4%. Answer: 4%. 12% comes from treating the total interest of £90 as if it were earned in a single year, (£90 ÷ £750) × 100 = 12%, forgetting to divide by 3 years. 0.04% comes from finding the correct decimal, £30 ÷ £750 = 0.04, but forgetting to multiply by 100 to convert it into a percentage. 112% comes from writing the final amount, £840, as a percentage of the amount invested, £750, without first subtracting the £750 to find the interest alone.
3. (c) tan θ = opposite/adjacent — The tangent ratio is defined as tan θ = opposite/adjacent, so this is the ratio that connects the opposite and adjacent sides. "sin θ = opposite/adjacent" wrongly labels this ratio as sine, when sine actually connects the opposite side and the hypotenuse. "cos θ = opposite/adjacent" wrongly labels it as cosine, when cosine connects the adjacent side and the hypotenuse. "tan θ = adjacent/opposite" uses the correct ratio name but has the opposite and adjacent sides the wrong way round.
4. (d) Line 3 — Method: check each line of Chloe's working against the correct algebraic step. Working: Line 1 to Line 2 is correct, subtracting 2x from both sides gives 3x − 4 = 8. But Line 2 to Line 3 should add 4 to both sides, giving 3x = 12, not 3x = 4 — the constant −4 has been dropped rather than removed correctly. Line 4 follows correctly from Chloe's own, incorrect, Line 3. Answer: Line 3. Line 1 is simply the original equation, copied out correctly. Line 2 correctly subtracts 2x from both sides of Line 1. Line 4 divides Chloe's own Line 3 by 3 correctly — the arithmetic there is fine, the mistake happened one line earlier.
5. (c) 13 cm — Method: the two given sides meet at the right angle, so they are the shorter pair and the hypotenuse comes from Pythagoras' theorem, a² + b² = c². Working: c² = 5² + 12² = 25 + 144 = 169, so c = √169 = 13. Answer: 13 cm. The distractors: 17 cm comes from adding the two sides, 5 + 12, rather than adding their squares; 60 cm comes from multiplying them, 5 × 12, which is twice the area of the triangle and not a length; 7 cm comes from subtracting, 12 − 5, as though the hypotenuse were the difference of the two shorter sides.
6. (c) 6.3 m — By Pythagoras' theorem, the height = √(7² − 3²) = √(49 − 9) = √40 = 6.32...≈ 6.3 m. "6.4 m" rounds 6.32...m up to 6.4 instead of correctly rounding it down to 6.3. "4.0 m" comes from subtracting the two given lengths directly, 7 − 3 = 4, instead of subtracting their squares. "10.0 m" comes from adding the two given lengths, 7 + 3 = 10, instead of using Pythagoras' theorem at all.
7. (d) (x − 8)(x + 8) — x² − 64 = x² − 8², a difference of two squares, which factorises as (x − 8)(x + 8). A candidate who treats it as a perfect square with a repeated negative factor gets (x − 8)(x − 8), which expands to x² − 16x + 64 — wrong on both the middle and constant terms. A candidate who uses a repeated positive factor gets (x + 8)(x + 8), which expands to x² + 16x + 64. A candidate who picks a different factor pair of 64, such as 4 and 16, without checking that the middle term cancels, gets (x − 4)(x + 16), which expands to x² + 12x − 64 — the wrong middle term.
8. (d) 3 — Method: add the constant term to both sides first, then divide by the coefficient of x. Working: 3x = 4 + 5 = 9; x = 9 ÷ 3 = 3. Answer: x = 3. −1/3 comes from a sign error when moving the 5, subtracting instead of adding: 3x = 4 − 5 = −1, then x = −1/3. 6 comes from subtracting the coefficient 3 instead of dividing by it: 9 − 3 = 6. 9 comes from correctly finding 3x = 9 but forgetting to divide by 3.
9. (c) £478.40 — Method: apply the percentage increase, then apply the percentage decrease to the new price. Working: after the increase, the laptop costs £520 × 1.15. Multiplying this result by 0.80 gives the final price, £478.40. Answer: £478.40. £494 comes from combining the two percentages into a single net change (15% − 20% = −5%) and applying it directly, £520 × 0.95 = £494, instead of applying the two changes one after the other. £416 comes from applying only the 20% decrease to the original price, £520 × 0.80 = £416, forgetting the increase entirely. £598 comes from applying only the 15% increase and stopping there, forgetting to apply the decrease at all.
10. (c) A solid circle at −1 with the arrow pointing right — Method: a number line picture of an inequality carries two decisions: the circle at the boundary says whether the boundary value itself belongs to the solution set, and the arrow says which way the solutions run. Working: the sign is ≥, which includes equality, so x = −1 is itself a solution and the circle drawn at −1 is filled in; testing a value above the boundary, 4 ≥ −1 is true, and testing one below it, −5 ≥ −1 is false, so the solutions lie above −1 and the arrow runs to the right. Answer: a solid circle at −1 with the arrow pointing right. The distractors: an open circle with the arrow pointing right comes from treating ≥ as a strict >, which would shut the boundary value out; a solid circle with the arrow pointing left comes from reading the statement backwards, as if it said −1 ≥ x; an open circle with the arrow pointing left comes from making both of those mistakes at once.
11. (a) 1260° — The sum of the interior angles of a polygon with n sides is (n − 2) × 180°. For a nonagon, n = 9, so the sum is (9 − 2) × 180° = 7 × 180° = 1260°. 1620° uses 9 × 180° without subtracting 2 from n first. 140° is the size of a single interior angle of a regular nonagon (1260° ÷ 9), not the sum of all nine. 1440° uses (n − 1) × 180° = 8 × 180° instead of (n − 2) × 180°.
12. (a) 4 — Method: set up the equation 35 + 20h = 115, then subtract the fixed fee and divide by the hourly rate. Working: 20h = 115 − 35 = 80; h = 80 ÷ 20 = 4. Answer: 4 hours. 5.75 comes from dividing the whole £115 by £20 without first subtracting the fixed fee: 115 ÷ 20 = 5.75. 2.71 comes from swapping the fee and the rate round, subtracting £20 and dividing by £35: (115 − 20) ÷ 35 ≈ 2.71. 7.5 comes from adding the fixed fee instead of subtracting it: (115 + 35) ÷ 20 = 7.5.
13. (d) 6.0 — Subtract 1.8 from both sides: 6.3x ≤ 38.2. Divide both sides by 6.3: x ≤ 6.0634… . The question asks for the greatest value to 1 decimal place that still satisfies the inequality. Testing 6.1: 6.3 × 6.1 + 1.8 = 40.23, which is more than 40, so 6.1 fails. Testing 6.0: 6.3 × 6.0 + 1.8 = 39.6, which is no more than 40, so 6.0 works and is the greatest such value. A candidate who simply rounds 6.0634… to 1 decimal place answers 6.1, without checking that it satisfies the inequality. A candidate who adds 1.8 instead of subtracting works out 41.8 ÷ 6.3 and answers 6.6. A candidate who forgets the 1.8 altogether divides 40 by 6.3 and answers 6.3.
14. (b) 4 — Method: subtract the constant term from both sides first, then divide by the coefficient of x. Working: 4x = 24 − 8 = 16; x = 16 ÷ 4 = 4. Answer: x = 4. Priya's 6 comes from dividing 24 by 4 without first subtracting the 8, ignoring the constant term; substituting it back gives 4 × 6 + 8 = 32, not 24, which is why she is wrong. 16 comes from correctly finding 4x = 16 but forgetting to divide by 4. 12 comes from subtracting the coefficient 4 instead of dividing by it: 16 − 4 = 12. 8 comes from correctly finding 4x = 16 but then halving instead of dividing by 4.
15. (d) 20 — Alternate angles between parallel lines are equal, so 3x + 10 = 5x − 30. Rearranging, 10 + 30 = 5x − 3x, so 40 = 2x, and x = 20. −10 comes from a sign error when rearranging, moving a term to the wrong side and getting −20 = 2x instead. 25 comes from wrongly treating the two angles as co-interior and adding them to 180°: (3x + 10) + (5x − 30) = 180 gives 8x − 20 = 180, so x = 25. 47.5 makes the same co-interior mistake but sets the sum equal to 360° instead of 180°, giving 8x − 20 = 360 and x = 47.5.
16. (d) 3x² + 4x − 7 — Method: the minus sign in front of the second bracket changes the sign of every term inside it; then collect like terms. Working: removing the brackets gives 5x² + 3x − 2 − 2x² + x − 5; the squared terms give 5x² − 2x² = 3x², the x terms give 3x + x = 4x, and the number terms give −2 − 5 = −7. Answer: 3x² + 4x − 7. The distractors: 7x² + 2x + 3 comes from adding the two brackets instead of subtracting, giving 5x² + 2x², 3x − x and −2 + 5; 3x² + 2x + 3 comes from applying the minus sign to 2x² only, leaving −x and +5 unchanged so that 3x − x = 2x and −2 + 5 = 3; 3x² + 4x + 3 comes from changing the signs of the terms with letters but leaving +5 as it stood, so the number terms give −2 + 5 = 3.
17. (d) 19% — Method: write each decrease as a multiplier, multiply the multipliers, then compare the result with 100%. Working: a 10% decrease is a multiplier of 0.9, so the two reductions together give 0.9 × 0.9 = 0.81; the final price is 81% of the original, so the price has fallen by 100% − 81% = 19%. Answer: an overall decrease of 19%. The distractors: 20% comes from adding the two reductions, 10% + 10%, which charges the second 10% against the original price instead of against the already reduced price; 21% comes from using the increase multiplier by mistake, since 1.1 × 1.1 = 1.21, and reading that 21% as a decrease; 81% is the percentage of the original price still being paid, not the percentage taken off.
18. (c) 22 kg — Method: multiply the mean by the number of parcels to rebuild the total mass, then subtract the masses that are known. Working: four parcels with a mean mass of 17 kg have a total mass of 17 × 4 = 68 kg; the three known parcels total 12 + 16 + 18 = 46 kg; so the fourth parcel has mass 68 − 46 = 22 kg. Answer: 22 kg. The distractors: 68 kg comes from stopping at the total mass of all four parcels; 17 kg comes from assuming the missing parcel must have the mean mass; 5 kg comes from multiplying the mean by 3, the number of parcels whose mass is given, leaving 51 − 46 = 5.
19. (b) x ≤ −2 — Method: take the number term off both sides, then divide by the coefficient of x; the sign turns round only when you divide BY a negative number, and here you divide by 3. Working: subtracting 6 from both sides of 3x + 6 ≤ 0 gives 3x ≤ −6; dividing both sides by 3, which is positive, gives x ≤ −2. Answer: x ≤ −2. The distractors: x ≥ −2 comes from turning the sign round because the right-hand side has become negative, which is not the rule; it is the sign of the divisor that matters; x ≤ 2 comes from moving the 6 across without changing its sign, giving 3x ≤ 6; x ≤ −18 comes from multiplying both sides by 3 instead of dividing by it.
20. (d) 21.2 m — Method: the cable is the hypotenuse of a right-angled triangle whose vertical side is the drop from the roof to the bracket and whose horizontal side is 15 m, so use Pythagoras' theorem. Working: the drop is 20 − 5 = 15 m, so c² = 15² + 15² = 225 + 225 = 450 and c = √450 = 21.213…, which is 21.2 m to 1 decimal place. Answer: 21.2 m. The distractors: 25.0 m comes from using the whole 20 m height of the roof as the vertical side and forgetting that the bracket is already 5 m up; 30.0 m comes from adding the two sides of the triangle, 15 + 15, instead of using Pythagoras' theorem; 15.0 m is the horizontal distance on its own, which would be the length of the cable only if it ran level.