⚖️ Foundation to Higher crossover check

Answer key

1. (b) 5 — Method: expand the bracket first, then solve the resulting linear equation. Working: 3(2x − 1) = 6x − 3, so 6x − 3 = 27. Add 3 to both sides: 6x = 30. Divide by 6: x = 5. Answer: 5. 4 2/3 comes from multiplying only the 2x inside the bracket by 3 and forgetting to multiply the −1 as well, giving 6x − 1 = 27. 4 comes from a sign error when expanding, writing 6x + 3 instead of 6x − 3. 4.5 comes from dividing 27 by 3 to get 2x − 1 = 9, then forgetting to add 1 back before dividing by 2, using 2x = 9 instead of 2x = 10.
2. (a) 5 — The symbol ≤ means n can equal 5 or any number less than 5, so 5 is included and is the largest integer value. A candidate who treats the inequality as strict, as if it were n < 5, answers 4. A candidate who confuses ≤ with ≥ and looks for a value just above the boundary answers 6. A candidate who makes a sign error and reads the inequality as n ≤ −5 answers −5.
3. (d) 75% — Method: change a fraction to a percentage by dividing the numerator by the denominator and multiplying by 100. Working: 3 ÷ 4 = 0.75, and 0.75 × 100 = 75. Answer: 75%. The distractors: 34% comes from reading the digits 3 and 4 straight off as a percentage; 0.75% comes from dividing but forgetting to multiply by 100; 133% comes from inverting the fraction and working out 4 ÷ 3 instead.
4. (c) £478.40 — Method: apply the percentage increase, then apply the percentage decrease to the new price. Working: after the increase, the laptop costs £520 × 1.15. Multiplying this result by 0.80 gives the final price, £478.40. Answer: £478.40. £494 comes from combining the two percentages into a single net change (15% − 20% = −5%) and applying it directly, £520 × 0.95 = £494, instead of applying the two changes one after the other. £416 comes from applying only the 20% decrease to the original price, £520 × 0.80 = £416, forgetting the increase entirely. £598 comes from applying only the 15% increase and stopping there, forgetting to apply the decrease at all.
5. (a) 65° — Method: a line that divides an angle into two equal parts gives each part half of the original angle, so halve 130°. Working: 130 ÷ 2 = 65. Answer: 65°. The distractors: 130° is the whole of angle ABC, written down without halving it; 50° comes from working out 180 − 130, using the angles on a straight line instead of dividing the angle in two; 32.5° comes from dividing by 4 instead of by 2, as though the line split the angle into four equal parts.
6. (c) 5 — Method: the mode is the value that occurs most often, so count how many times each different value appears and compare the counts. Working: 3 appears twice, 5 appears three times, 7 appears once and 8 appears once, so the highest frequency is three and the value carrying it is 5. Answer: 5. The distractors: 3 comes from writing down the frequency of the most common answer instead of the answer itself; 7 comes from taking the middle number of the list as it was written, which applies the median without ordering the data and without answering the question asked; 8 comes from picking the largest value, which confuses the mode with the maximum.
7. (a) 30° — Method: the exterior angles of any convex polygon add up to 360°, and in a regular polygon they are all equal, so divide 360° by the number of sides. Working: 360 ÷ 12 = 30. Answer: 30°. The distractors: 150° is the interior angle, 180 − 30, which answers for the wrong angle at the vertex; 15° comes from dividing 180 by 12, using the angles on a straight line instead of the full turn; 36° comes from dividing 360 by 12 − 2 = 10, carrying the subtraction of 2 out of the interior angle sum formula into a calculation that does not need it.
8. (a) x < 7 — Subtract 5 from both sides: x < 12 − 5, so x < 7. A candidate who adds 5 instead of subtracting gets x < 17. A candidate who subtracts the wrong way round gets x < −7. A candidate who correctly finds 7 but wrongly flips the inequality (as if dividing by a negative had happened) writes x > 7.
9. (a) £1,000 — Method: find the increase, then add it to the original price; the multiplier 1.25 does both steps at once. Working: 25% is one quarter, so 25% of £800 = £800 ÷ 4 = £200, and £800 + £200 = £1,000. Answer: £1,000. The distractors: £200 is the increase on its own, not the new price; £825 comes from adding £25 to £800, treating the 25% as £25; £600 comes from taking the 25% off the price instead of adding it on.
10. (d) 3x² + 4x − 7 — Method: the minus sign in front of the second bracket changes the sign of every term inside it; then collect like terms. Working: removing the brackets gives 5x² + 3x − 2 − 2x² + x − 5; the squared terms give 5x² − 2x² = 3x², the x terms give 3x + x = 4x, and the number terms give −2 − 5 = −7. Answer: 3x² + 4x − 7. The distractors: 7x² + 2x + 3 comes from adding the two brackets instead of subtracting, giving 5x² + 2x², 3x − x and −2 + 5; 3x² + 2x + 3 comes from applying the minus sign to 2x² only, leaving −x and +5 unchanged so that 3x − x = 2x and −2 + 5 = 3; 3x² + 4x + 3 comes from changing the signs of the terms with letters but leaving +5 as it stood, so the number terms give −2 + 5 = 3.
11. (d) x² − 49 — Area = length × width = (x + 7)(x − 7). Expanding: x × x = x², x × (−7) = −7x, 7 × x = 7x, 7 × (−7) = −49. The two middle terms −7x and 7x cancel, leaving x² − 49. A candidate who misremembers the difference-of-two-squares result as a sum gets x² + 49. A candidate who makes a sign error and treats both middle terms as −7x instead of cancelling gets x² − 14x − 49. A candidate who confuses area with perimeter and simply adds the length and width gets 2x.
12. (c) y = 9x + 3 — Method: in a linear cost model the charge that is paid once is the constant term and the charge made for each item is the coefficient of x. Working: each pizza costs £9, so x pizzas cost 9x pounds; the £3 delivery fee is paid once whatever the value of x, so it is added on as a constant and the total cost is y = 9x + 3. Answer: y = 9x + 3. The distractors: y = 3x + 9 comes from swapping the two charges over, treating the £3 delivery as a per-pizza cost and the £9 as the one-off charge; y = 9x leaves out the delivery fee altogether, which undercharges every order by £3; y = 12x comes from adding the delivery fee to the price of each pizza, £9 + £3 = £12 each, so the fee is charged once per pizza instead of once per order.
13. (c) 40 cm — Method: split the total length into the number of parts shown by the ratio, then find the value of the shorter share. Working: the ratio 4:5 has 4 + 5 = 9 parts, so one part is 90 ÷ 9 = 10 cm, and the shorter piece is 4 × 10 = 40 cm. So the shorter piece is 40 cm. Distractor 50 cm is the length of the LONGER piece, not the shorter one. Distractor 45 cm comes from splitting the ribbon into two equal halves, ignoring the ratio. Distractor 10 cm is the value of one part, found correctly but never multiplied by 4.
14. (d) 6 — Method: a value satisfies x ≥ 7 when it is greater than 7 or exactly equal to 7, so test each value against the boundary. Working: 8 is greater than 7 and 100 is greater than 7, so both satisfy the inequality; 7 is equal to the boundary and ≥ includes equality, so 7 satisfies it as well; 6 is less than 7, so 6 is the one value that fails. Answer: 6. The distractors: 7 is chosen by candidates who read ≥ as a strict 'greater than' and so shut the boundary value out of the solution set; 8 is chosen by reading the question as asking which value DOES satisfy the inequality and taking the smallest such value; 100 is chosen by the same misreading, taking instead the value furthest above the boundary.
15. (c) x ≥ 3 — Method: x is multiplied by 6, so divide both sides by 6; dividing by a positive number leaves the direction of the inequality unchanged. Working: dividing both sides of 6x ≥ 18 by 6 gives x on the left and 18 ÷ 6 on the right, and 18 ÷ 6 = 3, so x ≥ 3. Answer: x ≥ 3. The distractors: x ≤ 3 comes from turning the sign round on dividing, a step that is needed only when the divisor is negative; x ≥ 12 comes from subtracting 6 from both sides instead of dividing, giving 18 take away 6; x ≤ 12 comes from making both of those mistakes together.
16. (a) 20% — Method: a percentage is a number of parts per hundred, so divide the numerator by the denominator and multiply by 100. Working: 1 ÷ 5 = 0.2, and 0.2 × 100 = 20; the same result comes from scaling 1/5 to 20/100. Answer: 20%. The distractors: 5% comes from reading the denominator 5 straight off as the percentage; 25% comes from confusing 1/5 with 1/4, the fraction met most often in percentage work; 50% comes from a place value slip in the division, writing 1 ÷ 5 as 0.5 instead of 0.2.
17. (c) 36 — Add the parts of the ratio: 3 + 4 = 7. Divide the total by the number of parts: 84 ÷ 7 = 12, so one part is worth 12. The smaller share has 3 parts: 3 × 12 = 36. (48 is the larger share, using 4 parts instead of 3. 42 comes from splitting 84 in half, treating the ratio as if it were 1:1. 28 comes from dividing 84 by 3 — one of the ratio numbers — instead of dividing by the total number of parts, 7.)
18. (b) 53.1° — The angle of elevation is opposite the height of the flagpole, 12 m, and adjacent to the distance from its base, 9 m, so tan θ = 12/9 = 1.333..., giving θ = tan⁻¹(1.333...) = 53.13...° ≈ 53.1°. "36.9°" finds the OTHER acute angle of the triangle, 90° − 53.1°, the angle at the top of the flagpole rather than the angle of elevation at Freya's position. "48.6°" comes from wrongly treating 9/12 as a sine ratio and finding sin⁻¹(0.75) = 48.6°, when neither side here is the hypotenuse. "41.4°" comes from wrongly treating 9/12 as a cosine ratio and finding cos⁻¹(0.75) = 41.4°, again without a hypotenuse in the ratio at all.
19. (c) 6.3 m — By Pythagoras' theorem, the height = √(7² − 3²) = √(49 − 9) = √40 = 6.32...≈ 6.3 m. "6.4 m" rounds 6.32...m up to 6.4 instead of correctly rounding it down to 6.3. "4.0 m" comes from subtracting the two given lengths directly, 7 − 3 = 4, instead of subtracting their squares. "10.0 m" comes from adding the two given lengths, 7 + 3 = 10, instead of using Pythagoras' theorem at all.
20. (d) 6.0 — Subtract 1.8 from both sides: 6.3x ≤ 38.2. Divide both sides by 6.3: x ≤ 6.0634… . The question asks for the greatest value to 1 decimal place that still satisfies the inequality. Testing 6.1: 6.3 × 6.1 + 1.8 = 40.23, which is more than 40, so 6.1 fails. Testing 6.0: 6.3 × 6.0 + 1.8 = 39.6, which is no more than 40, so 6.0 works and is the greatest such value. A candidate who simply rounds 6.0634… to 1 decimal place answers 6.1, without checking that it satisfies the inequality. A candidate who adds 1.8 instead of subtracting works out 41.8 ÷ 6.3 and answers 6.6. A candidate who forgets the 1.8 altogether divides 40 by 6.3 and answers 6.3.