⚖️ Foundation to Higher crossover check

Answer key

1. (c) 150% — Percentage = (180,000 ÷ 120,000) × 100 = 150%.
2. (d) 63.6 — Method: the three angles inside the triangle formed by the two ladders and the ground add up to 180°. Working: 180 − 58.2 − 58.2 = 63.6. Answer: 63.6°. A candidate who assumes the top angle equals the base angles gives 58.2. A candidate who subtracts only one base angle from 180°, working out 180 − 58.2, gets 121.8. A candidate who doubles the base angle instead of subtracting it twice from 180°, working out 2 × 58.2, gets 116.4.
3. (a) 36 — Method: add the parts of the ratio, divide the total by the number of parts to find the value of one part, then multiply by the number of parts in the share asked for. Working: 1 + 2 + 3 = 6 parts, 72 ÷ 6 = 12 for one part, and the largest number is 3 parts, so 3 × 12 = 36. Answer: 36. The distractors: 12 is the value of one part, which is the smallest of the three numbers rather than the largest; 24 is 2 parts, the middle number; 216 comes from multiplying 72 by 3 instead of dividing 72 by the 6 parts first.
4. (b) 53.1° — The angle of elevation is opposite the height of the flagpole, 12 m, and adjacent to the distance from its base, 9 m, so tan θ = 12/9 = 1.333..., giving θ = tan⁻¹(1.333...) = 53.13...° ≈ 53.1°. "36.9°" finds the OTHER acute angle of the triangle, 90° − 53.1°, the angle at the top of the flagpole rather than the angle of elevation at Freya's position. "48.6°" comes from wrongly treating 9/12 as a sine ratio and finding sin⁻¹(0.75) = 48.6°, when neither side here is the hypotenuse. "41.4°" comes from wrongly treating 9/12 as a cosine ratio and finding cos⁻¹(0.75) = 41.4°, again without a hypotenuse in the ratio at all.
5. (a) 44.7 m — Method: the line joining the two tops is the hypotenuse of a right-angled triangle whose horizontal side is the gap between the masts and whose vertical side is the difference in their heights, so Pythagoras' theorem applies. Working: the difference in heights is 50 − 30 = 20 m, so d² = 40² + 20² = 1600 + 400 = 2000 and d = √2000 = 44.721…, which is 44.7 m to 1 decimal place. Answer: 44.7 m. The distractors: 34.6 m comes from subtracting the squares, √(40² − 20²), instead of adding them; 60.0 m comes from adding the two sides of the triangle, 40 + 20, rather than using Pythagoras' theorem; 50.0 m is the height of the taller mast, copied from the question in place of the distance asked for.
6. (d) 7 — Method: set up the equation 2.50 + 1.80m = 15.10, then subtract the booking fee and divide by the cost per mile. Working: 1.80m = 15.10 − 2.50 = 12.60; m = 12.60 ÷ 1.80 = 7. Answer: 7 miles. 8.39 comes from dividing the whole £15.10 by £1.80 without first subtracting the booking fee: 15.10 ÷ 1.80 ≈ 8.39. 5.32 comes from swapping the two amounts round, subtracting £1.80 and dividing by £2.50: (15.10 − 1.80) ÷ 2.50 ≈ 5.32. 9.78 comes from adding the booking fee instead of subtracting it: (15.10 + 2.50) ÷ 1.80 ≈ 9.78.
7. (c) 32 — Method: alternate angles between parallel lines are equal, so 2x + 10 = 74. Working: subtracting 10 from both sides gives 2x = 64; dividing by 2 gives x = 32. Answer: x = 32. A candidate who forgets to subtract 10 first and divides 74 by 2 directly gets 37. A candidate who treats the angles as co-interior instead of alternate, so that the two expressions add to 180° rather than being equal, gets 48 after solving. A candidate who makes a sign error and treats the equation as 2x equalling 10 minus 74 instead of 74 minus 10 gets −32.
8. (a) 30 — Method: an outlier is a value that lies far away from the pattern set by the rest of the data, so compare each value with the group the others form. Working: five of the counts, 5, 7, 8, 9 and 11, lie within 6 of one another and the steps between them are 2, 1, 1 and 2; the remaining count of 30 is 19 above the nearest of them, so it is the value that does not belong to the pattern. Answer: 30. The distractors: 5 comes from picking the smallest value, on the idea that the odd one out must be at the bottom of the list; 11 comes from ordering the data and stopping one value short, taking the largest of the counts that sit close together; 8.5 comes from working out the median, (8 + 9) ÷ 2, and giving a measure of centre where a value standing apart was asked for.
9. (d) 2x + 4 — Method: collect the like terms, which here are the two terms in x, and leave the number term on its own because a number and a term in x are unlike. Working: x + x is one lot of x added to one more lot of x, which is 2x; the 4 has nothing like it to join with, so it is written after the 2x. Answer: 2x + 4. The distractors: x² + 4 comes from multiplying the two x terms instead of adding them; x + 4 comes from treating x + x as a single x, as though the repeated letter counted only once; 6x comes from collecting the unlike terms together, adding 1 + 1 + 4 and attaching the letter to that total.
10. (c) y = 3x + 1 — Method: a line of known gradient m has equation y = mx + c, and c is found by substituting the coordinates of a point known to lie on it. Working: the gradient is 3, so the line is y = 3x + c; substituting x = 1 and y = 4 gives 4 = 3 × 1 + c, so c = 4 − 3 = 1. Answer: y = 3x + 1. The distractors: y = 3x − 1 comes from working out the constant as mx − y, 3 − 4 = −1, instead of y − mx; y = x + 3 comes from swapping the two numbers over, putting the gradient 3 in the constant position and the x-coordinate 1 in front of x; y = 3x + 4 comes from using the y-coordinate 4 as the constant without substituting.
11. (c) y = 9x + 3 — Method: in a linear cost model the charge that is paid once is the constant term and the charge made for each item is the coefficient of x. Working: each pizza costs £9, so x pizzas cost 9x pounds; the £3 delivery fee is paid once whatever the value of x, so it is added on as a constant and the total cost is y = 9x + 3. Answer: y = 9x + 3. The distractors: y = 3x + 9 comes from swapping the two charges over, treating the £3 delivery as a per-pizza cost and the £9 as the one-off charge; y = 9x leaves out the delivery fee altogether, which undercharges every order by £3; y = 12x comes from adding the delivery fee to the price of each pizza, £9 + £3 = £12 each, so the fee is charged once per pizza instead of once per order.
12. (d) 7.7 m — The horizontal distance is adjacent to the 50° angle and the zip wire is the hypotenuse, so horizontal distance = 12 × cos 50° = 12 × 0.6428... = 7.71...≈ 7.7 m. "9.2 m" uses the sine ratio instead of cosine, 12 × sin 50° = 9.19...≈ 9.2 m, which actually finds the vertical drop of the zip wire, not the horizontal distance. "15.7 m" comes from dividing by the sine ratio instead of multiplying by the cosine ratio, 12 ÷ sin 50° = 15.66...≈ 15.7 m, both the wrong operation and the wrong ratio. "12.0 m" simply uses the length of the zip wire itself as the horizontal distance, ignoring the angle of 50° altogether.
13. (b) 4 — Method: subtract the constant term from both sides first, then divide by the coefficient of x. Working: 4x = 24 − 8 = 16; x = 16 ÷ 4 = 4. Answer: x = 4. Priya's 6 comes from dividing 24 by 4 without first subtracting the 8, ignoring the constant term; substituting it back gives 4 × 6 + 8 = 32, not 24, which is why she is wrong. 16 comes from correctly finding 4x = 16 but forgetting to divide by 4. 12 comes from subtracting the coefficient 4 instead of dividing by it: 16 − 4 = 12. 8 comes from correctly finding 4x = 16 but then halving instead of dividing by 4.
14. (d) Line 3 — Method: check each line of Chloe's working against the correct algebraic step. Working: Line 1 to Line 2 is correct, subtracting 2x from both sides gives 3x − 4 = 8. But Line 2 to Line 3 should add 4 to both sides, giving 3x = 12, not 3x = 4 — the constant −4 has been dropped rather than removed correctly. Line 4 follows correctly from Chloe's own, incorrect, Line 3. Answer: Line 3. Line 1 is simply the original equation, copied out correctly. Line 2 correctly subtracts 2x from both sides of Line 1. Line 4 divides Chloe's own Line 3 by 3 correctly — the arithmetic there is fine, the mistake happened one line earlier.
15. (c) 40° — Method: the three angles of a triangle always add up to 180°, so split 180° into the number of parts shown by the ratio. Working: the ratio 2:3:4 has 2 + 3 + 4 = 9 parts, so one part is 180 ÷ 9 = 20°, and the smallest angle is 2 × 20 = 40°. So the smallest angle is 40°. Distractor 60° is the middle-sized angle, 3 parts. Distractor 80° is the largest angle, 4 parts. Distractor 20° is the value of one part, found correctly but never multiplied by 2.
16. (c) £90 — Method: split the total amount into the number of parts shown by the ratio, then find Chloe's share. Working: the ratio 2:3 has 2 + 3 = 5 parts, so one part is £150 ÷ 5 = £30, and Chloe's share is 3 × £30 = £90. So Chloe receives £90. Distractor £60 is Ben's share, not Chloe's. Distractor £75 comes from splitting the money into two equal halves, ignoring the ratio. Distractor £30 is the value of one part, found correctly but never multiplied by 3.
17. (b) 5 — Method: add 9 to both sides, then divide by 5. Working: 5x = 16 + 9 = 25, so x = 25 ÷ 5 = 5. Answer: 5. 3.2 comes from dividing 16 by 5 directly, without adding 9 first. 1.4 comes from a sign error, subtracting 9 from 16 instead of adding it, then dividing by 5. 25 comes from correctly working out 5x = 25 but stopping there, without dividing by 5 to find x.
18. (a) 20% — Method: percentage increase = increase ÷ original amount × 100. Working: the increase is 84 − 70 = 14 marks, and 14 ÷ 70 = 0.2, so 0.2 × 100 = 20. Answer: an increase of 20%. The distractors: 14% comes from quoting the 14 mark increase as though marks and per cent were the same thing; 17% comes from dividing the 14 by the new mean 84 instead of by the original 70, which gives 17% to the nearest per cent; 120% is the new mean written as a percentage of the old one, which is the whole of the new mean rather than the increase.
19. (b) 10 — Corresponding angles are equal, so 5x + 4 = 3x + 24. Subtracting 3x from both sides gives 2x + 4 = 24, then subtracting 4 gives 2x = 20, so x = 10. 14 comes from adding the constants, 4 + 24, instead of subtracting them when rearranging. 19 comes from treating the angles as co-interior (summing to 180°): 5x + 4 + 3x + 24 = 180 gives 8x = 152, so x = 19. 20 correctly reaches 2x = 20 but stops without dividing by 2.
20. (d) 20 — Alternate angles between parallel lines are equal, so 3x + 10 = 5x − 30. Rearranging, 10 + 30 = 5x − 3x, so 40 = 2x, and x = 20. −10 comes from a sign error when rearranging, moving a term to the wrong side and getting −20 = 2x instead. 25 comes from wrongly treating the two angles as co-interior and adding them to 180°: (3x + 10) + (5x − 30) = 180 gives 8x − 20 = 180, so x = 25. 47.5 makes the same co-interior mistake but sets the sum equal to 360° instead of 180°, giving 8x − 20 = 360 and x = 47.5.