⚖️ Foundation to Higher crossover check

Answer key

1. (a) 3/8, 41%, 0.43 — Method: convert every value to a decimal so they can be compared on the same scale, then order them. Working: 3/8 = 0.375, 41% = 0.41, and 0.43 stays as 0.43, so from smallest to largest the decimals are 0.375, 0.41, 0.43, giving the order 3/8, 41%, 0.43. Answer: 3/8, 41%, 0.43. The order 3/8, 0.43, 41% comes from comparing 0.43 and 41% as raw digits (43 versus 41) without converting 41% into the decimal 0.41 first, wrongly placing 0.43 before 41%. The order 0.43, 41%, 3/8 comes from placing the values in completely reversed order, from largest to smallest instead of smallest to largest. The order 41%, 0.43, 3/8 comes from ordering the values by their TYPE (percentage, then decimal, then fraction) rather than by their actual size.
2. (a) x > 4 — Subtract 2x from both sides: 3x − 3 > 9. Add 3 to both sides: 3x > 12. Divide both sides by 3: x > 4. A candidate who subtracts 3 from 9 instead of adding gets 3x > 6, so x > 2. A candidate who divides correctly but wrongly flips the inequality (as if dividing by a negative) gets x < 4. A candidate who multiplies by 3 instead of dividing gets x > 36.
3. (d) They are always equal to each other — Method: label the four angles a, b, c, d in order around the crossing point, then use the fact that neighbouring angles lie on a straight line. Working: a and b lie on a straight line, so a + b = 180°; b and c also lie on a straight line, so b + c = 180°. Both a and c are therefore 180° minus b, which forces a = c. Answer: a pair of vertically opposite angles is always equal to each other. The distractors: the claim that each is 90° holds only when the two lines happen to be perpendicular, so it is not always true; the claim that they add to 180° confuses the opposite pair with the neighbouring pair that lies along a straight line, and again holds only in the perpendicular case; the claim that they add to 360° uses the total of all four angles at the point rather than of the opposite pair.
4. (b) 62 — Method: co-interior (allied) angles between parallel lines add up to 180°. Working: 180 − 118 = 62. Answer: 62°. A candidate who treats co-interior angles as equal, like corresponding angles, gives 118. A candidate who uses 360° instead of 180°, working out 360 − 118, gets 242. A candidate who subtracts as if the angles were complementary, working out 118 − 90, gets 28.
5. (a) −10 — Method: multiply each bracket out, treating the second bracket as being multiplied by −3 because it is subtracted, then collect like terms. Working: 4(2x − 1) = 8x − 4 and −3(x + 2) = −3x − 6, so the expression becomes 8x − 4 − 3x − 6 − 5x; the x terms give 8x − 3x − 5x = 0, so no term in x survives, and the numbers give −4 − 6 = −10. Answer: −10. The distractors: 2 comes from expanding −3(x + 2) as −3x + 6, leaving the numbers −4 + 6; 5x − 10 comes from forgetting the final −5x, so the x terms give 8x − 3x = 5x; −7 comes from multiplying the 4 over only the first term of its bracket, giving 8x − 1 and so the numbers −1 − 6.
6. (a) 75% — Method: to express one quantity as a percentage of another, divide the part by the whole and multiply by 100. Working: 18 ÷ 24 = 0.75, and 0.75 × 100 = 75. Answer: 75%. The distractors: 25% is the percentage she got wrong, 6 out of 24; 133% comes from dividing the whole by the part, 24 ÷ 18; 18% comes from writing the number of correct answers with a percent sign.
7. (d) 5x ≤ 30 — Method: write the total cost as the cost of one book times the number of books, then turn the limit into an inequality sign; 'at most' allows the limit to be reached but not passed. Working: x books at £5 each cost 5x pounds; that total must not go above £30, and spending exactly £30 is allowed, so the two sides are joined by ≤ and the inequality is 5x ≤ 30. Answer: 5x ≤ 30. The distractors: 5x ≥ 30 comes from reading 'at most' as 'at least', which reverses the condition; x + 5 ≤ 30 comes from adding the price of a book to the number of books instead of multiplying; 5x < 30 comes from reading 'at most £30' as 'less than £30', which wrongly rules out spending the whole £30.
8. (c) 7 — Method: the median is the middle value when the data are written in order of size, and with an odd number of values there is exactly one middle value. Working: the numbers are already in order, 2, 4, 7, 12, 26, and there are 5 of them, so the middle position is the third and the value sitting there is 7. Answer: 7, with two values below it and two above it. The distractors: 10.2 comes from working out the mean, 51 ÷ 5, instead of the median; 14 comes from taking the value halfway between the smallest and the largest, (2 + 26) ÷ 2; 24 comes from working out the range, 26 − 2, which measures spread rather than centre.
9. (a) x = 2 — Method: undo the subtraction first, then undo the multiplication, doing the same to both sides each time. Working: adding 2 to both sides gives 2x = 4, and dividing both sides by 2 gives x = 2. Answer: x = 2. The distractors: x = 4 comes from stopping at 2x = 4 and writing 4 as the value of x; x = 0 comes from subtracting 2 from both sides instead of adding it, giving 2x = 0; x = 8 comes from multiplying 4 by 2 instead of dividing by 2.
10. (c) y = 3x + 7 — Method: the gradient is the change in y divided by the change in x with both taken in the same order, and a point whose x-coordinate is 0 gives the constant straight away because it lies on the y-axis. Working: m = (7 − 1) ÷ (0 − (−2)) = 6 ÷ 2 = 3; the point (0, 7) lies on the y-axis, so c = 7 and the line is y = 3x + 7. Answer: y = 3x + 7. The distractors: y = −3x + 7 comes from taking the y-difference as 1 − 7 while taking the x-difference as 0 − (−2), so the two subtractions run in opposite orders; y = 3x + 1 comes from using the y-coordinate of (−2, 1) as the constant instead of the point that actually lies on the y-axis; y = (1/3)x + 7 comes from writing the gradient upside down as the change in x over the change in y, 2 ÷ 6.
11. (b) x ≤ 5 — Method: divide out the bracket first, then undo the number term; the inequality sign turns round only if both sides are multiplied or divided by a negative number. Working: dividing both sides of 2(x − 1) ≤ 8 by 2 gives x − 1 ≤ 4, and 2 is positive so the ≤ is unchanged; adding 1 to both sides gives x ≤ 5. Answer: x ≤ 5. The distractors: x ≤ 3 comes from subtracting 1 from 4 instead of adding 1 to both sides; x ≤ 4 comes from stopping at 8 ÷ 2 = 4 and never undoing the −1 inside the bracket; x < 5 comes from reading ≤ as a strict inequality, which wrongly leaves the boundary value out of the solution set.
12. (c) 21% — Method: an increase of 10% is a multiplier of 1.1, and two successive increases are found by multiplying the multipliers. Working: 1.1 × 1.1 = 1.21, so the rent is 121% of the original, which is an increase of 21%. Answer: 21%. The distractors: 20% comes from adding the two percentages, which ignores that the second 10% is taken of a larger amount; 121% is the multiplier written as the change rather than the change itself; 11% comes from slipping in the multiplication and getting 1.11 instead of 1.21.
13. (b) x ≥ 5 — Expand the bracket: 2(3x − 1) = 6x − 2, so the inequality is 6x − 2 ≥ 4x + 8. Subtract 4x from both sides and add 2 to both sides: 2x ≥ 10. Divide both sides by 2: x ≥ 5. A candidate who only multiplies the 3x by 2 and forgets to multiply the −1 gets 6x − 1 ≥ 4x + 8, leading to x ≥ 4.5. A candidate who adds 4x instead of subtracting it gets 10x ≥ 10, leading to x ≥ 1. A candidate who multiplies by 2 instead of dividing gets x ≥ 20.
14. (b) 4x − 4 = 20 — Method: subtract 2x from both sides of the equation, and simplify each side separately. Working: left side: 6x − 4 − 2x = 4x − 4. Right side: 2x + 20 − 2x = 20. Answer: 4x − 4 = 20. 4x = 20 drops the −4 from the left side, as though subtracting 2x also removes the constant term. 8x − 4 = 20 comes from moving the 2x across to the left without changing its sign: it is taken off the right side correctly, leaving 20, but added to the left side instead of subtracted, giving 6x + 2x = 8x. 4x − 4 = 2x + 20 comes from subtracting 2x from the left-hand side only and leaving the right-hand side unchanged; whatever is done to one side must be done to the other.
15. (d) £195 — Substituting x = 3 into y = 45x + 60 gives y = 45 × 3 + 60 = 135 + 60 = 195. A candidate who forgets to add the call-out fee would get only 45 × 3 = £135. A candidate who adds the hours to the fee and the rate instead of multiplying would get 45 + 60 + 3 = £108. A candidate who multiplies both the hourly rate and the call-out fee by the number of hours would get 45 × 3 + 60 × 3 = £315.
16. (d) 75% — Method: change a fraction to a percentage by dividing the numerator by the denominator and multiplying by 100. Working: 3 ÷ 4 = 0.75, and 0.75 × 100 = 75. Answer: 75%. The distractors: 34% comes from reading the digits 3 and 4 straight off as a percentage; 0.75% comes from dividing but forgetting to multiply by 100; 133% comes from inverting the fraction and working out 4 ÷ 3 instead.
17. (d) x < 7 — Method: add 10 to both sides to leave x on its own; adding the same number to both sides never changes the direction of an inequality. Working: adding 10 to both sides of x − 10 < −3 leaves x on the left and −3 + 10 on the right, and −3 + 10 = 7, so x < 7. Answer: x < 7. The distractors: x > 7 comes from turning the sign round while adding, as though every move flipped it; x < −13 comes from subtracting 10 from both sides instead of adding it, giving −3 take away 10; x < 13 comes from ignoring the minus sign on −3 and working out 3 + 10 instead.
18. (b) 55° — Method: complementary angles are a pair that add up to 90°, so subtract the known angle from 90°. Working: 90 − 35 = 55. Answer: 55°. The distractors: 145° comes from subtracting from 180°, which is the rule for supplementary angles and not for complementary ones; 325° comes from subtracting from 360°, the total of the angles at a point; 90° is the total that the pair must make, written down in place of the missing angle.
19. (c) £478.40 — Method: apply the percentage increase, then apply the percentage decrease to the new price. Working: after the increase, the laptop costs £520 × 1.15. Multiplying this result by 0.80 gives the final price, £478.40. Answer: £478.40. £494 comes from combining the two percentages into a single net change (15% − 20% = −5%) and applying it directly, £520 × 0.95 = £494, instead of applying the two changes one after the other. £416 comes from applying only the 20% decrease to the original price, £520 × 0.80 = £416, forgetting the increase entirely. £598 comes from applying only the 15% increase and stopping there, forgetting to apply the decrease at all.
20. (c) x = 5 — Method: every point on a vertical line has the same x-coordinate however far up or down the line it lies, so the equation of a vertical line fixes x at a number and does not involve y at all. Working: of the four equations only x = 5 fixes x; it is satisfied by (5, 0), (5, 1), (5, 7) and by every other point whose x-coordinate is 5, and those points form a vertical line. Answer: x = 5. The distractors: y = 5 fixes the y-coordinate instead of the x-coordinate, which gives a horizontal line; y = 5x is a line through the origin with gradient 5, steep but not vertical, and it has a different y-value for every x; x = y fixes neither coordinate and is the line through the origin with gradient 1.