⚖️ Foundation to Higher crossover check

Answer key

1. (a) 60° — Method: the angles of a triangle add up to 180°, so add the three expressions, solve for x and then substitute back into the expression for angle B. Working: 2x + 3x + 4x = 9x, so 9x = 180 and x = 20. Angle B is 3x, so angle B = 3 × 20 = 60. Answer: 60°. The distractors: 20° is the value of x, from stopping as soon as the equation is solved instead of substituting back; 120° comes from using 360° as the angle sum, which gives x = 40 and 3x = 120; 80° is 4x, the angle at C, from substituting into the wrong expression.
2. (b) 4 — Method: subtract the constant term from both sides first, then divide by the coefficient of x. Working: 4x = 24 − 8 = 16; x = 16 ÷ 4 = 4. Answer: x = 4. Priya's 6 comes from dividing 24 by 4 without first subtracting the 8, ignoring the constant term; substituting it back gives 4 × 6 + 8 = 32, not 24, which is why she is wrong. 16 comes from correctly finding 4x = 16 but forgetting to divide by 4. 12 comes from subtracting the coefficient 4 instead of dividing by it: 16 − 4 = 12. 8 comes from correctly finding 4x = 16 but then halving instead of dividing by 4.
3. (a) 44.7 m — Method: the line joining the two tops is the hypotenuse of a right-angled triangle whose horizontal side is the gap between the masts and whose vertical side is the difference in their heights, so Pythagoras' theorem applies. Working: the difference in heights is 50 − 30 = 20 m, so d² = 40² + 20² = 1600 + 400 = 2000 and d = √2000 = 44.721…, which is 44.7 m to 1 decimal place. Answer: 44.7 m. The distractors: 34.6 m comes from subtracting the squares, √(40² − 20²), instead of adding them; 60.0 m comes from adding the two sides of the triangle, 40 + 20, rather than using Pythagoras' theorem; 50.0 m is the height of the taller mast, copied from the question in place of the distance asked for.
4. (b) 80% — Percentage = (40 ÷ 50) × 100 = 80%.
5. (b) £52 — Method: the difference between the two ratio numbers tells you how many parts the £39 difference represents. Working: the difference in parts is 7 − 4 = 3, and this represents £39, so one part is £39 ÷ 3 = £13. Josh's savings are 4 × £13 = £52. So Josh has £52. Distractor £91 is Mia's savings, not Josh's. Distractor £39 comes from using the given £39 difference as the final answer, without scaling it to Josh's number of parts. Distractor £13 is the value of one part, found correctly but never multiplied by 4.
6. (c) 36 — Add the parts of the ratio: 3 + 4 = 7. Divide the total by the number of parts: 84 ÷ 7 = 12, so one part is worth 12. The smaller share has 3 parts: 3 × 12 = 36. (48 is the larger share, using 4 parts instead of 3. 42 comes from splitting 84 in half, treating the ratio as if it were 1:1. 28 comes from dividing 84 by 3 — one of the ratio numbers — instead of dividing by the total number of parts, 7.)
7. (d) x = 5 — Method: expand the bracket by multiplying both terms inside it by 5, then undo the addition and the multiplication in turn. Working: expanding gives 5x + 15 = 40; subtracting 15 from both sides gives 5x = 25; dividing both sides by 5 gives x = 5. Answer: x = 5. The distractors: x = 8 comes from dividing both sides by 5 first, reaching x + 3 = 8 and writing 8 as the value of x without taking the 3 away; x = 11 comes from adding 15 to both sides instead of subtracting it, giving 5x = 55; x = 7.4 comes from expanding 5(x + 3) as 5x + 3, multiplying only the x by the 5, which leads to 5x = 37.
8. (b) £13,860 — Method: apply the first year's percentage decrease, then apply the second year's percentage decrease to the new value. Working: after the first year, the car is worth £17,500 × 0.88. Multiplying this result by 0.90 gives the value at the end of the second year, £13,860. Answer: £13,860. £13,650 comes from adding the two percentages together (12% + 10% = 22%) and applying a single 22% decrease, £17,500 × 0.78 = £13,650, instead of applying the decreases one after the other. £15,750 comes from applying only the second year's 10% decrease to the original price, forgetting the first year's decrease entirely, £17,500 × 0.90 = £15,750. £15,400 comes from applying only the first year's 12% decrease and stopping there, forgetting to apply the second year's decrease at all.
9. (c) y = 2x + 1 — Method: the gradient of the line through two points is the change in y divided by the change in x, and the constant is then found by substituting one of the points into y = mx + c. Working: m = (5 − 3) ÷ (2 − 1) = 2 ÷ 1 = 2, so the line is y = 2x + c; substituting x = 1 and y = 3 gives 3 = 2 × 1 + c, so c = 3 − 2 = 1. Answer: y = 2x + 1. The distractors: y = x + 2 comes from taking the gradient as the change in x, 2 − 1 = 1, and then substituting (1, 3) to reach a constant of 2; y = 2x − 1 comes from working out the constant as mx − y, 2 × 1 − 3 = −1, instead of y − mx; y = 2x + 3 comes from using the y-coordinate of (1, 3) as the constant without substituting at all.
10. (d) 4 — Method: collect the x terms on one side and the number terms on the other. Working: subtract 3x from both sides: 4x − 5 = 11. Add 5 to both sides: 4x = 16. Divide by 4: x = 4. Answer: 4. 0.6 comes from adding the x terms instead of subtracting when collecting them, 7x + 3x = 10x, and also subtracting the constants the wrong way round, 11 − 5 = 6, giving 10x = 6. 1.5 comes from correctly collecting the x terms as 4x but subtracting the constants the wrong way round, 11 − 5 instead of 11 + 5. −4 comes from moving the x terms to the wrong side, giving 3x − 7x instead of 7x − 3x, along with a matching sign error on the constants.
11. (b) 53.1° — The angle of elevation is opposite the height of the flagpole, 12 m, and adjacent to the distance from its base, 9 m, so tan θ = 12/9 = 1.333..., giving θ = tan⁻¹(1.333...) = 53.13...° ≈ 53.1°. "36.9°" finds the OTHER acute angle of the triangle, 90° − 53.1°, the angle at the top of the flagpole rather than the angle of elevation at Freya's position. "48.6°" comes from wrongly treating 9/12 as a sine ratio and finding sin⁻¹(0.75) = 48.6°, when neither side here is the hypotenuse. "41.4°" comes from wrongly treating 9/12 as a cosine ratio and finding cos⁻¹(0.75) = 41.4°, again without a hypotenuse in the ratio at all.
12. (a) 27 — Method: turn the mean into a total using total = mean × number of values, then subtract the numbers that are already known. Working: four numbers with a mean of 18 have a total of 18 × 4 = 72; the three known numbers give 10 + 15 + 20 = 45; so x = 72 − 45 = 27. Answer: 27, and checking, (10 + 15 + 20 + 27) ÷ 4 = 72 ÷ 4 = 18. The distractors: 72 comes from stopping at the total the four numbers must reach and never subtracting the known three; 18 comes from assuming the missing number must equal the mean; 45 comes from stopping at the total of the three known numbers.
13. (b) 5 — Method: add 9 to both sides, then divide by 5. Working: 5x = 16 + 9 = 25, so x = 25 ÷ 5 = 5. Answer: 5. 3.2 comes from dividing 16 by 5 directly, without adding 9 first. 1.4 comes from a sign error, subtracting 9 from 16 instead of adding it, then dividing by 5. 25 comes from correctly working out 5x = 25 but stopping there, without dividing by 5 to find x.
14. (d) 77 — Method: angles that meet at a point add up to 360°. Working: 82 + 105 + 96 = 283; 360 − 283 = 77. Answer: 77°. A candidate who gives the sum of the three known angles and forgets to subtract it from 360° gets 283. A candidate who leaves out the 105° angle, working out 360 − 82 − 96, gets 182. A candidate who leaves out the 82° angle, working out 360 − 105 − 96, gets 159.
15. (b) £60 — £48 represents 100% − 20% = 80% of the original price. 1% = £48 ÷ 80 = £0.60, so 100% = £0.60 × 100 = £60.
16. (c) A solid circle at −1 with the arrow pointing right — Method: a number line picture of an inequality carries two decisions: the circle at the boundary says whether the boundary value itself belongs to the solution set, and the arrow says which way the solutions run. Working: the sign is ≥, which includes equality, so x = −1 is itself a solution and the circle drawn at −1 is filled in; testing a value above the boundary, 4 ≥ −1 is true, and testing one below it, −5 ≥ −1 is false, so the solutions lie above −1 and the arrow runs to the right. Answer: a solid circle at −1 with the arrow pointing right. The distractors: an open circle with the arrow pointing right comes from treating ≥ as a strict >, which would shut the boundary value out; a solid circle with the arrow pointing left comes from reading the statement backwards, as if it said −1 ≥ x; an open circle with the arrow pointing left comes from making both of those mistakes at once.
17. (c) £840 — Method: find the total amount raised using the reverse percentage, then subtract the entry fees to find the donations. Working: £1,260 is 60% of the total, so the total is £1,260 ÷ 0.6, and subtracting the entry fees from this total leaves £840 raised through donations. Answer: £840. £2,100 comes from correctly finding the total amount raised but then forgetting to subtract the entry fees, giving the total instead of the donations alone. £504 comes from working out 40% of the entry fees themselves, £1,260 × 0.4 = £504, instead of first finding the total amount raised. £1,890 comes from treating £1,260 as 40% of the total instead of 60%, dividing by 0.4 to get a total of £3,150, and then subtracting the entry fees from that incorrect total.
18. (b) (x − 5)(x + 2) — We need two numbers that multiply to −10 and add to −3: these are −5 and 2, since −5 × 2 = −10 and −5 + 2 = −3. So x² − 3x − 10 = (x − 5)(x + 2). A candidate who swaps the signs, using +5 and −2, gets (x + 5)(x − 2), which expands to x² + 3x − 10 — the wrong middle term. A candidate who picks the factor pair 1 and 10 instead of 2 and 5 gets (x − 10)(x + 1), which expands to x² − 9x − 10. A candidate who makes both factors negative gets (x − 5)(x − 2), which expands to x² − 7x + 10 — the wrong sign on the constant term.
19. (b) 10 — Corresponding angles are equal, so 5x + 4 = 3x + 24. Subtracting 3x from both sides gives 2x + 4 = 24, then subtracting 4 gives 2x = 20, so x = 10. 14 comes from adding the constants, 4 + 24, instead of subtracting them when rearranging. 19 comes from treating the angles as co-interior (summing to 180°): 5x + 4 + 3x + 24 = 180 gives 8x = 152, so x = 19. 20 correctly reaches 2x = 20 but stops without dividing by 2.
20. (b) x = 8 — Method: undo the addition first, then undo the division by 4. Working: subtracting 1 from both sides gives x/4 = 2, and multiplying both sides by 4 gives x = 8. Answer: x = 8. The distractors: x = 2 comes from stopping at x/4 = 2 and writing 2 as the value of x; x = 16 comes from adding 1 to both sides instead of subtracting it, giving x/4 = 4; x = 0.5 comes from dividing by 4 instead of multiplying by 4 at the last step.