⚖️ Foundation to Higher crossover check

Answer key

1. (d) £270 — Method: the £90 is a difference between two shares, so turn it into a number of parts before finding the value of one part. Working: the largest share is 3 parts and the smallest is 1 part, so the difference is 3 − 1 = 2 parts and 2 parts are worth £90; one part = £90 ÷ 2 = £45; the whole amount is 1 + 2 + 3 = 6 parts, so 6 × £45 = £270. Answer: £270. The distractors: £540 comes from treating the £90 as the value of one part and multiplying it by the 6 parts; £180 comes from finding the £45 correctly but adding only the 1-part and 3-part shares and forgetting the middle share; £135 comes from multiplying £45 by 3 and giving the largest share instead of the total.
2. (a) 40 — Method: the mean is the total divided by how many values there are, so rearranging gives total = mean × number of values. Working: the mean is 8 and there are 5 numbers, so the total is 8 × 5 = 40. Answer: 40, and checking, 40 ÷ 5 = 8, which is the mean given. The distractors: 13 comes from adding the mean and the count, 8 + 5, instead of multiplying them; 1.6 comes from dividing the mean by the count, 8 ÷ 5, which reverses the relationship; 8 comes from quoting the mean itself as the total, which is only true when there is a single number.
3. (a) £20,000 — Method: add the parts of the ratio, divide the profit by the number of parts to find the value of one part, then multiply by the parts belonging to the partner asked about. Working: 3 + 5 + 4 = 12 parts, £48,000 ÷ 12 = £4,000 for one part, and that partner has 5 parts, so 5 × £4,000 = £20,000. Answer: £20,000. The distractors: £4,000 is the value of one part; £12,000 is the 3-part share; £16,000 is the 4-part share, which is what a candidate reaches by assuming the biggest share must go with the number written last in the ratio.
4. (c) 60 minutes — Method: the median is the middle value once the data have been put in order of size, so the list must be sorted before any position is read. Working: in order the times are 50, 55, 60, 65, 90 minutes; there are 5 values, so the middle position is the third and the time sitting there is 60 minutes. Answer: 60 minutes. The distractors: 64 minutes comes from working out the mean, 320 ÷ 5, instead of the median; 70 minutes comes from taking the time halfway between the shortest and the longest, (50 + 90) ÷ 2; 40 minutes comes from working out the range, 90 − 50, which measures spread rather than centre.
5. (d) £195 — Substituting x = 3 into y = 45x + 60 gives y = 45 × 3 + 60 = 135 + 60 = 195. A candidate who forgets to add the call-out fee would get only 45 × 3 = £135. A candidate who adds the hours to the fee and the rate instead of multiplying would get 45 + 60 + 3 = £108. A candidate who multiplies both the hourly rate and the call-out fee by the number of hours would get 45 × 3 + 60 × 3 = £315.
6. (d) x = 6 — Method: with an unknown on both sides, first collect the x terms on one side by subtracting the smaller x term from both sides, then deal with the numbers. Working: subtracting x from both sides gives x + 7 = 13, and subtracting 7 from both sides gives x = 6. Answer: x = 6. The distractors: x = 20 comes from adding 7 to 13 instead of subtracting it once the x terms have been collected; x = 2 comes from collecting the x terms by adding them, giving 3x + 7 = 13 and then 3x = 6; x = −6 comes from subtracting 2x from both sides to get 7 = −x + 13, reaching −6 = −x and then copying the sign straight across instead of dividing by −1.
7. (b) £13,860 — Method: apply the first year's percentage decrease, then apply the second year's percentage decrease to the new value. Working: after the first year, the car is worth £17,500 × 0.88. Multiplying this result by 0.90 gives the value at the end of the second year, £13,860. Answer: £13,860. £13,650 comes from adding the two percentages together (12% + 10% = 22%) and applying a single 22% decrease, £17,500 × 0.78 = £13,650, instead of applying the decreases one after the other. £15,750 comes from applying only the second year's 10% decrease to the original price, forgetting the first year's decrease entirely, £17,500 × 0.90 = £15,750. £15,400 comes from applying only the first year's 12% decrease and stopping there, forgetting to apply the second year's decrease at all.
8. (b) £20 — Method: add the parts of the ratio, divide the amount by the number of parts to find the value of one part, then take the parts belonging to the person asked about. Working: 1 + 2 = 3 parts, £60 ÷ 3 = £20 for one part, and Isla has 1 part. Answer: £20. The distractors: £40 is the 2-part share, which belongs to her brother; £30 comes from reading 1:2 as one part out of two and halving the £60; £120 comes from multiplying the £60 by 2 instead of dividing it into 3 parts.
9. (d) 125° — Method: two angles that sit next to each other at a crossing point lie on a straight line, so they add up to 180°; the angle that faces the given one across the point is the equal one, and that is not the angle asked for here. Working: 180° − 55° = 125°. Answer: 125°. The distractors: 55° is the angle vertically opposite the given one, taken by a candidate who reads “next to” as the facing angle and applies the equal-angles rule to the wrong pair; 35° comes from subtracting from 90°, treating the pair as complementary instead of as angles on a straight line; 90° comes from assuming that a line crossing a pair of parallel lines must meet them at right angles, which the question never says.
10. (d) 2x − 26 — Method: multiply each term inside the bracket by the 2 in front of it, and keep the sign that belongs to each term. Working: 2 × x = 2x and 2 × 13 = 26; the bracket contains a subtraction, so the second term is subtracted. Answer: 2x − 26. The distractors: 2x − 13 comes from multiplying only the x by 2 and copying the 13 across unchanged; 2x + 26 comes from multiplying both terms correctly but losing the minus sign that belongs to the second term; 2x − 11 comes from subtracting 2 from 13 instead of multiplying 13 by 2.
11. (c) 3 — Gradient = (change in y) ÷ (change in x) = (11 − 5) ÷ (4 − 2) = 6 ÷ 2 = 3. A candidate who puts the change in x over the change in y instead would get 2 ÷ 6 = 1/3. A candidate who subtracts the y-coordinates in the reverse order, but not the x-coordinates, would get (5 − 11) ÷ (4 − 2) = −3. A candidate who adds the coordinates instead of subtracting them would get (11 + 5) ÷ (4 + 2) = 16/6 = 8/3.
12. (b) 5 — Method: expand the bracket first, then solve the resulting linear equation. Working: 3(2x − 1) = 6x − 3, so 6x − 3 = 27. Add 3 to both sides: 6x = 30. Divide by 6: x = 5. Answer: 5. 4 2/3 comes from multiplying only the 2x inside the bracket by 3 and forgetting to multiply the −1 as well, giving 6x − 1 = 27. 4 comes from a sign error when expanding, writing 6x + 3 instead of 6x − 3. 4.5 comes from dividing 27 by 3 to get 2x − 1 = 9, then forgetting to add 1 back before dividing by 2, using 2x = 9 instead of 2x = 10.
13. (b) y = 84 − 14x — Method: the distance still to go is the whole route minus the distance already covered, and at a steady speed the distance covered after x hours is the speed multiplied by x. Working: after x hours Freya has cycled 14x km, so the distance remaining is the 84 km route take away 14x, giving y = 84 − 14x, a straight line with intercept 84 and gradient −14. Answer: y = 84 − 14x. The distractors: y = 84 + 14x comes from adding the distance cycled to the length of the route rather than taking it away, so the ride would grow longer the further she goes; y = 14x − 84 comes from carrying out the subtraction the wrong way round, which is negative for the whole of the ride; y = 14 − 84x comes from swapping the two numbers over, treating 84 km as the hourly speed and 14 km as the length of the route.
14. (c) y = −x + 30 — Method: in a linear model the value at the start is the constant term and the steady rate of change is the gradient, which is negative when the quantity is falling. Working: at x = 0 the candle is 30 cm tall, so the constant term is 30; it loses 1 cm every hour, so the gradient is −1 and the height after x hours is y = −x + 30. Answer: y = −x + 30. The distractors: y = x + 30 comes from taking the rate as +1 and making the candle grow rather than shrink; y = 30x − 1 comes from building the model correctly as 30 − 1x and then copying it into the form y = mx + c with the two numbers left where they stood, so the starting height 30 ends up multiplying x and the hourly 1 is left behind as the constant being taken away; y = −30x + 1 comes from reading the two numbers the other way round, taking 30 cm per hour as the rate and 1 cm as the starting height, which burns 30 cm an hour from a candle only 1 cm tall.
15. (b) 80 — Method: the difference between 40% and 25% of the number is 15% of the number, and that difference is 12. Working: 15% of the number is 12, so 1% of the number is 12 ÷ 15 = 0.8, and the number is 0.8 × 100 = 80. Check: 40% of 80 is 32, 25% of 80 is 20, and 32 − 20 = 12. Answer: 80. The distractors: 30 comes from solving 40% of the number = 12; 48 comes from solving 25% of the number = 12; 15 is the percentage difference written as the answer.
16. (b) 9 — Subtract 14 from both sides: 4s ≤ 36. Divide both sides by 4: s ≤ 9, so the greatest number of tickets is 9. A candidate who forgets the £14 coach cost solves 4s ≤ 50, getting s ≤ 12.5, rounded down to 12. A candidate who adds the £14 instead of subtracting it solves 4s ≤ 64, getting s = 16. A candidate who miscalculates 50 − 14 as 32 solves 4s ≤ 32, getting s = 8.
17. (a) 3 — Method: subtract the constant term from both sides first, then divide by the coefficient of x. Working: 5x = 17 − 2 = 15; x = 15 ÷ 5 = 3. Answer: x = 3. 3.8 comes from adding 2 instead of subtracting it: (17 + 2) ÷ 5 = 3.8. 1.4 comes from dividing by 5 before subtracting the 2, the wrong order: 17 ÷ 5 = 3.4, then 3.4 − 2 = 1.4. 15 comes from correctly subtracting the 2 but then forgetting to divide by 5.
18. (d) 36.9° — sin θ = opposite/hypotenuse = 6/10 = 0.6, so θ = sin⁻¹(0.6) = 36.86...° ≈ 36.9°. "53.1°" finds the OTHER acute angle in the triangle, 90° − 36.9°, instead of θ itself, as if the two acute angles had been swapped. "31.0°" comes from using the tangent ratio instead of sine, working out tan⁻¹(6/10) = 31.0° with the wrong ratio for the two sides given. "36.8°" rounds sin⁻¹(0.6) = 36.86...° down to 36.8° instead of correctly rounding it up to 36.9°.
19. (d) 50 — The angles in any triangle add up to 180°, so x = 180 − 90 − 40 = 50. "90" comes from subtracting only the 90° angle from 180° and forgetting to also subtract the 40°. "130" comes from adding 90° and 40° together instead of subtracting them from 180°. "45" comes from halving the 90° angle instead of using the angle sum of the triangle at all.
20. (b) 47 — Method: angles on a straight line add up to 180°. Working: 180 − 38 − 95 = 47. Answer: x = 47. A candidate who uses 360° instead of 180° gets 227. A candidate who subtracts only one of the two given angles from 180° gets 142. A candidate who adds the two given angles instead of subtracting them from 180° gets 133.