⚖️ Foundation to Higher crossover check

Answer key

1. (d) 4 — Method: collect the x terms on one side and the number terms on the other. Working: subtract 3x from both sides: 4x − 5 = 11. Add 5 to both sides: 4x = 16. Divide by 4: x = 4. Answer: 4. 0.6 comes from adding the x terms instead of subtracting when collecting them, 7x + 3x = 10x, and also subtracting the constants the wrong way round, 11 − 5 = 6, giving 10x = 6. 1.5 comes from correctly collecting the x terms as 4x but subtracting the constants the wrong way round, 11 − 5 instead of 11 + 5. −4 comes from moving the x terms to the wrong side, giving 3x − 7x instead of 7x − 3x, along with a matching sign error on the constants.
2. (a) 49° — Method: an exterior angle of a triangle equals the sum of the two interior angles that are not next to it, which here are the angles at A and at C; since those two are equal, the exterior angle is twice the angle at A. Working: 2 × angle A = 98, so angle A = 98 ÷ 2 = 49. Answer: 49°. The distractors: 82° is the interior angle at B, 180 − 98, given in place of the angle at A; 41° comes from finding that interior angle of 82° and halving it, 82 ÷ 2, instead of halving the exterior angle; 98° comes from taking the exterior angle to be equal to the angle at A on its own, with no halving at all.
3. (b) 53.1° — The angle of elevation is opposite the height of the flagpole, 12 m, and adjacent to the distance from its base, 9 m, so tan θ = 12/9 = 1.333..., giving θ = tan⁻¹(1.333...) = 53.13...° ≈ 53.1°. "36.9°" finds the OTHER acute angle of the triangle, 90° − 53.1°, the angle at the top of the flagpole rather than the angle of elevation at Freya's position. "48.6°" comes from wrongly treating 9/12 as a sine ratio and finding sin⁻¹(0.75) = 48.6°, when neither side here is the hypotenuse. "41.4°" comes from wrongly treating 9/12 as a cosine ratio and finding cos⁻¹(0.75) = 41.4°, again without a hypotenuse in the ratio at all.
4. (d) £200 — Method: add the parts of the ratio, divide the total paid by the number of parts to find the value of one part, then multiply by the parts in the most expensive item. Working: 2 + 3 + 5 = 10 parts, £400 ÷ 10 = £40 for one part, and the most expensive item is 5 parts, so 5 × £40 = £200. Answer: £200. The distractors: £40 is the value of one part; £80 is the 2-part item, the cheapest of the three; £120 is the 3-part item.
5. (c) 36 — Add the parts of the ratio: 3 + 4 = 7. Divide the total by the number of parts: 84 ÷ 7 = 12, so one part is worth 12. The smaller share has 3 parts: 3 × 12 = 36. (48 is the larger share, using 4 parts instead of 3. 42 comes from splitting 84 in half, treating the ratio as if it were 1:1. 28 comes from dividing 84 by 3 — one of the ratio numbers — instead of dividing by the total number of parts, 7.)
6. (a) 62.5 — Method: a mean cannot be averaged with a new value — rebuild the total, add the new value to it, then divide by the new count. Working: three numbers with a mean of 50 have a total of 50 × 3 = 150; adding 100 makes the total 150 + 100 = 250; there are now 4 numbers, so the new mean is 250 ÷ 4 = 62.5. Answer: 62.5. The distractors: 75 comes from averaging the old mean with the new value, (50 + 100) ÷ 2, which ignores that three numbers pull against one; 50 comes from assuming an extra value leaves the mean unchanged; 37.5 comes from dividing the old total of 150 by the new count of 4, adding the new value to the count but not to the total.
7. (a) £50 — Substituting x = 200 into y = 0.15x + 20 gives y = 0.15 × 200 + 20 = 30 + 20 = £50. A candidate who forgets to add the standing charge would get only 0.15 × 200 = £30. A candidate who misplaces the decimal point in the rate, using 1.5 instead of 0.15, would get 1.5 × 200 + 20 = £320. A candidate who swaps the roles of the rate and the number of units would work out 0.15 × 20 + 200 = £203.
8. (c) 8x − 12 — Multiply each term inside the bracket by 4: 4 × 2x = 8x and 4 × (−3) = −12, so 4(2x − 3) = 8x − 12. A candidate who forgets to multiply the second term by 4 gets 8x − 3. A candidate who makes a sign error, treating 4 × (−3) as +12, gets 8x + 12. A candidate who adds 4 to the bracket instead of multiplying gets 2x + 1.
9. (d) x ≤ 30 — Method: add the fixed cost to the cost of x balloons, set that total against the £150 limit with the sign that 'at most' calls for, then solve. Working: the total spend is 60 + 3x pounds, so 60 + 3x ≤ 150; subtracting 60 from both sides gives 3x ≤ 90; dividing both sides by 3, a positive number, gives x ≤ 30. Answer: x ≤ 30. The distractors: x ≤ 90 comes from taking the cake off the budget and stopping at 3x ≤ 90, reading the 90 as a number of balloons when it is the money left for them; x ≤ 50 comes from dividing the whole £150 by 3 and leaving the cake out of the calculation altogether; x ≥ 30 comes from reading 'at most' as 'at least', which reverses the condition.
10. (d) £195 — Substituting x = 3 into y = 45x + 60 gives y = 45 × 3 + 60 = 135 + 60 = 195. A candidate who forgets to add the call-out fee would get only 45 × 3 = £135. A candidate who adds the hours to the fee and the rate instead of multiplying would get 45 + 60 + 3 = £108. A candidate who multiplies both the hourly rate and the call-out fee by the number of hours would get 45 × 3 + 60 × 3 = £315.
11. (c) 8 — Method: the exterior angles of a polygon add up to 360°, so divide 360° by the size of one exterior angle. Working: 360 ÷ 45 = 8. Answer: 8 sides. A candidate who divides into a half turn instead of a full turn, working out 180 ÷ 45, gets 4. A candidate who reads off the given exterior angle as if it were the number of sides gets 45. A candidate who subtracts instead of dividing, working out 360 − 45, gets 315.
12. (b) £52,000 — Method: convert 130% to a decimal multiplier and multiply it by last year's profit. Working: 130% = 1.3, so this year's profit is £40,000 × 1.3 = £52,000. Answer: £52,000. £12,000 comes from using only the extra 30% (130% − 100%) and forgetting to include the original 100%, £40,000 × 0.3 = £12,000. £40,130 comes from simply adding 130 onto £40,000, treating the percentage as an amount of money rather than a multiplier. £5,200 comes from misreading 130% as 13%, giving £40,000 × 0.13 = £5,200.
13. (b) x = 8 — Method: undo the addition first, then undo the division by 4. Working: subtracting 1 from both sides gives x/4 = 2, and multiplying both sides by 4 gives x = 8. Answer: x = 8. The distractors: x = 2 comes from stopping at x/4 = 2 and writing 2 as the value of x; x = 16 comes from adding 1 to both sides instead of subtracting it, giving x/4 = 4; x = 0.5 comes from dividing by 4 instead of multiplying by 4 at the last step.
14. (d) 4.6 cm — Method: BC is opposite the 30° angle and AC is next to it, so the ratio that links the two is tan θ = opposite ÷ adjacent. Working: tan 30° = BC ÷ 8, so BC = 8 × tan 30° = 4.6188…, which is 4.6 to 1 decimal place. Answer: 4.6 cm. The distractors: 13.9 cm comes from dividing by tan 30° instead of multiplying by it; 4.0 cm comes from using sin 30°, which treats the 8 cm side as the hypotenuse when it is the side next to the 30° angle; 6.9 cm comes from using cos 30° in place of tan 30°, which gives the wrong pair of sides.
15. (d) 29 — Method: with an even number of values there is no single middle value, so the median is the mean of the two values either side of the middle. Working: the six numbers are already in order and 6 ÷ 2 = 3, so the middle pair are the third and fourth values, 22 and 36; their mean is (22 + 36) ÷ 2 = 58 ÷ 2 = 29. Answer: 29, which lies between the two middle values as a median of an even data set must. The distractors: 22 comes from taking the lower of the two middle values and stopping there instead of averaging the pair; 36 comes from taking the larger value of that pair because it sits just past the halfway point of the list; 34 comes from working out the range, 47 − 13, instead of a measure of centre.
16. (a) x > 4 — Subtract 2x from both sides: 3x − 3 > 9. Add 3 to both sides: 3x > 12. Divide both sides by 3: x > 4. A candidate who subtracts 3 from 9 instead of adding gets 3x > 6, so x > 2. A candidate who divides correctly but wrongly flips the inequality (as if dividing by a negative) gets x < 4. A candidate who multiplies by 3 instead of dividing gets x > 36.
17. (d) 77 — Method: angles that meet at a point add up to 360°. Working: 82 + 105 + 96 = 283; 360 − 283 = 77. Answer: 77°. A candidate who gives the sum of the three known angles and forgets to subtract it from 360° gets 283. A candidate who leaves out the 105° angle, working out 360 − 82 − 96, gets 182. A candidate who leaves out the 82° angle, working out 360 − 105 − 96, gets 159.
18. (c) x ≥ 3 — Method: collect the number terms first; the x term is negative, so the final step multiplies both sides by −1, and that is the one step that turns the inequality sign round. Working: subtracting 5 from both sides of 5 − x ≤ 2 gives −x ≤ −3; multiplying both sides by −1 turns −x into x and −3 into 3, and because the multiplier is negative the ≤ becomes ≥, so x ≥ 3. Answer: x ≥ 3. The distractors: x ≤ 3 comes from multiplying by −1 without turning the sign round, the commonest slip on this type; x ≤ −3 comes from reading −x ≤ −3 as though the minus sign could simply be rubbed off the left-hand side; x ≥ −3 comes from turning the sign round correctly but leaving the right-hand side at −3 instead of multiplying it by −1 as well.
19. (c) 12 m — Method: the perimeter of a rectangle is twice the sum of the length and the width, so half the perimeter is one length plus one width; split that half using the ratio. Working: half of 64 is 64 ÷ 2 = 32 m, the ratio 5:3 has 5 + 3 = 8 parts, so one part is 32 ÷ 8 = 4 m, and the width is 3 × 4 = 12 m. So the width is 12 m. Distractor 20 m is the length, 5 parts, not the width. Distractor 24 m comes from splitting the whole perimeter, 64 m, into 8 parts and multiplying by 3, forgetting to halve the perimeter first. Distractor 8 m comes from the same slip stopped one step earlier: splitting the whole perimeter into 8 parts, 64 ÷ 8 = 8, and giving that instead of the width.
20. (c) 3 — Gradient = (change in y) ÷ (change in x) = (11 − 5) ÷ (4 − 2) = 6 ÷ 2 = 3. A candidate who puts the change in x over the change in y instead would get 2 ÷ 6 = 1/3. A candidate who subtracts the y-coordinates in the reverse order, but not the x-coordinates, would get (5 − 11) ÷ (4 − 2) = −3. A candidate who adds the coordinates instead of subtracting them would get (11 + 5) ÷ (4 + 2) = 16/6 = 8/3.