⚖️ Foundation to Higher crossover check

Answer key

1. (d) 23.57 °C — Method: add all seven temperatures, divide by the number of readings and round only at the end. Working: 22 + 24 + 23 + 25 + 26 + 21 + 24 = 165, and 165 ÷ 7 = 23.5714…, which rounds to 23.57 to 2 decimal places. Answer: 23.57 °C. The distractors: 24 °C comes from writing down the mode, the only temperature recorded twice, instead of the mean; 27.5 °C comes from dividing the total by 6 instead of by the 7 days recorded; 5 °C comes from working out the range, 26 − 21, which is a measure of spread and not an average.
2. (d) x² − 49 — Area = length × width = (x + 7)(x − 7). Expanding: x × x = x², x × (−7) = −7x, 7 × x = 7x, 7 × (−7) = −49. The two middle terms −7x and 7x cancel, leaving x² − 49. A candidate who misremembers the difference-of-two-squares result as a sum gets x² + 49. A candidate who makes a sign error and treats both middle terms as −7x instead of cancelling gets x² − 14x − 49. A candidate who confuses area with perimeter and simply adds the length and width gets 2x.
3. (b) 12 — The difference between the parts of the ratio is 5 − 2 = 3 parts, and this is worth 18. Divide to find one part: 18 ÷ 3 = 6. Cats have 2 parts: 2 × 6 = 12. (30 is the number of dogs, using 5 parts instead of 2. 6 is the value of one part — the number of cats is 2 lots of this, not just one. 9 comes from dividing 18 by 2 and stopping there, instead of dividing by the difference in parts, 3, and then multiplying by 2.)
4. (a) 3/8, 41%, 0.43 — Method: convert every value to a decimal so they can be compared on the same scale, then order them. Working: 3/8 = 0.375, 41% = 0.41, and 0.43 stays as 0.43, so from smallest to largest the decimals are 0.375, 0.41, 0.43, giving the order 3/8, 41%, 0.43. Answer: 3/8, 41%, 0.43. The order 3/8, 0.43, 41% comes from comparing 0.43 and 41% as raw digits (43 versus 41) without converting 41% into the decimal 0.41 first, wrongly placing 0.43 before 41%. The order 0.43, 41%, 3/8 comes from placing the values in completely reversed order, from largest to smallest instead of smallest to largest. The order 41%, 0.43, 3/8 comes from ordering the values by their TYPE (percentage, then decimal, then fraction) rather than by their actual size.
5. (b) 5 — Method: expand the bracket first, then solve the resulting linear equation. Working: 3(2x − 1) = 6x − 3, so 6x − 3 = 27. Add 3 to both sides: 6x = 30. Divide by 6: x = 5. Answer: 5. 4 2/3 comes from multiplying only the 2x inside the bracket by 3 and forgetting to multiply the −1 as well, giving 6x − 1 = 27. 4 comes from a sign error when expanding, writing 6x + 3 instead of 6x − 3. 4.5 comes from dividing 27 by 3 to get 2x − 1 = 9, then forgetting to add 1 back before dividing by 2, using 2x = 9 instead of 2x = 10.
6. (c) 36 — Add the parts of the ratio: 3 + 4 = 7. Divide the total by the number of parts: 84 ÷ 7 = 12, so one part is worth 12. The smaller share has 3 parts: 3 × 12 = 36. (48 is the larger share, using 4 parts instead of 3. 42 comes from splitting 84 in half, treating the ratio as if it were 1:1. 28 comes from dividing 84 by 3 — one of the ratio numbers — instead of dividing by the total number of parts, 7.)
7. (c) x ≥ 3 — Method: collect the number terms first; the x term is negative, so the final step multiplies both sides by −1, and that is the one step that turns the inequality sign round. Working: subtracting 5 from both sides of 5 − x ≤ 2 gives −x ≤ −3; multiplying both sides by −1 turns −x into x and −3 into 3, and because the multiplier is negative the ≤ becomes ≥, so x ≥ 3. Answer: x ≥ 3. The distractors: x ≤ 3 comes from multiplying by −1 without turning the sign round, the commonest slip on this type; x ≤ −3 comes from reading −x ≤ −3 as though the minus sign could simply be rubbed off the left-hand side; x ≥ −3 comes from turning the sign round correctly but leaving the right-hand side at −3 instead of multiplying it by −1 as well.
8. (a) 7 — Subtract 4 from both sides: 3h ≤ 21. Divide both sides by 3: h ≤ 7, so the greatest whole number of hours is 7. A candidate who forgets the £4 fixed fee solves 3h ≤ 25, getting h ≤ 8.33, rounded down to 8. A candidate who adds the £4 instead of subtracting it solves 3h ≤ 29, getting h ≤ 9.67, rounded down to 9. A candidate who reaches h ≤ 7 but wrongly assumes the boundary value cannot be used, thinking that spending the whole £25 is not allowed, answers 6.
9. (a) 27 — Method: turn the mean into a total using total = mean × number of values, then subtract the numbers that are already known. Working: four numbers with a mean of 18 have a total of 18 × 4 = 72; the three known numbers give 10 + 15 + 20 = 45; so x = 72 − 45 = 27. Answer: 27, and checking, (10 + 15 + 20 + 27) ÷ 4 = 72 ÷ 4 = 18. The distractors: 72 comes from stopping at the total the four numbers must reach and never subtracting the known three; 18 comes from assuming the missing number must equal the mean; 45 comes from stopping at the total of the three known numbers.
10. (c) y = 2 — Method: substituting Noah's value shows why it fails, and the equation is then solved by undoing the addition. Working: substituting y = 3 gives 3 + 10 = 13, which is not 12, so Noah's value is not a solution; subtracting 10 from both sides of y + 10 = 12 gives y = 2, and substituting back gives 2 + 10 = 12. Answer: y = 2. The distractors: y = 22 comes from adding 10 to both sides instead of subtracting it; y = −2 comes from carrying out the subtraction the wrong way round, 10 − 12 rather than 12 − 10; y = 12 comes from copying the right-hand side as the value of y and ignoring the 10 that is added to it.
11. (d) (x − 8)(x + 8) — x² − 64 = x² − 8², a difference of two squares, which factorises as (x − 8)(x + 8). A candidate who treats it as a perfect square with a repeated negative factor gets (x − 8)(x − 8), which expands to x² − 16x + 64 — wrong on both the middle and constant terms. A candidate who uses a repeated positive factor gets (x + 8)(x + 8), which expands to x² + 16x + 64. A candidate who picks a different factor pair of 64, such as 4 and 16, without checking that the middle term cancels, gets (x − 4)(x + 16), which expands to x² + 12x − 64 — the wrong middle term.
12. (a) y = −3x − 5 — Gradient = (−8 − 4) ÷ (1 − (−3)) = −12 ÷ 4 = −3. Using the point (1, −8): −8 = −3(1) + c, so c = −5, giving y = −3x − 5. A candidate who drops the negative sign on the gradient, using m = 3 instead, would then solve −8 = 3(1) + c to get c = −11, writing y = 3x − 11. A candidate who makes a sign error isolating c, writing c = 5 instead of −5, would write y = −3x + 5. A candidate who mixes up both mistakes — keeping the correct gradient but the wrong, positive value of c from the flipped-gradient calculation — would write y = −3x + 11.
13. (a) 105° — The interior angles of a pentagon add up to (5 − 2) × 180° = 540°. Subtracting the three known angles, 540 − 100 − 110 − 120 = 210°, and this 210° is shared equally between the two angles marked x°, so each one is 210 ÷ 2 = 105°. 210° stops one step early, giving the total of the two unknown angles instead of one of them. 108° is the interior angle of a regular pentagon, which does not apply here since this pentagon's angles are not all equal. 55° comes from halving one of the given angles, 110°, instead of halving the remaining total.
14. (c) £840 — Method: find the total amount raised using the reverse percentage, then subtract the entry fees to find the donations. Working: £1,260 is 60% of the total, so the total is £1,260 ÷ 0.6, and subtracting the entry fees from this total leaves £840 raised through donations. Answer: £840. £2,100 comes from correctly finding the total amount raised but then forgetting to subtract the entry fees, giving the total instead of the donations alone. £504 comes from working out 40% of the entry fees themselves, £1,260 × 0.4 = £504, instead of first finding the total amount raised. £1,890 comes from treating £1,260 as 40% of the total instead of 60%, dividing by 0.4 to get a total of £3,150, and then subtracting the entry fees from that incorrect total.
15. (b) 6 cm — Method: the right angle is at A, so BC is the hypotenuse and AC is the side opposite the angle at B; sin B = opposite ÷ hypotenuse therefore gives AC ÷ BC = 3/5. Working: AC ÷ 10 = 3/5, so AC = 10 × 3 ÷ 5 = 6. Answer: 6 cm. The distractors: 8 cm is AB, the side next to the angle at B, which is what cos B = 4/5 produces — the right method used on the wrong side; 3 cm comes from reading the 3 in the ratio as a length and never scaling it up to the 10 cm hypotenuse; 30 cm comes from multiplying by 3 and forgetting to divide by 5.
16. (d) 2x + 4 — Method: collect the like terms, which here are the two terms in x, and leave the number term on its own because a number and a term in x are unlike. Working: x + x is one lot of x added to one more lot of x, which is 2x; the 4 has nothing like it to join with, so it is written after the 2x. Answer: 2x + 4. The distractors: x² + 4 comes from multiplying the two x terms instead of adding them; x + 4 comes from treating x + x as a single x, as though the repeated letter counted only once; 6x comes from collecting the unlike terms together, adding 1 + 1 + 4 and attaching the letter to that total.
17. (d) 36.9° — sin θ = opposite/hypotenuse = 6/10 = 0.6, so θ = sin⁻¹(0.6) = 36.86...° ≈ 36.9°. "53.1°" finds the OTHER acute angle in the triangle, 90° − 36.9°, instead of θ itself, as if the two acute angles had been swapped. "31.0°" comes from using the tangent ratio instead of sine, working out tan⁻¹(6/10) = 31.0° with the wrong ratio for the two sides given. "36.8°" rounds sin⁻¹(0.6) = 36.86...° down to 36.8° instead of correctly rounding it up to 36.9°.
18. (d) 19% — Method: write each decrease as a multiplier, multiply the multipliers, then compare the result with 100%. Working: a 10% decrease is a multiplier of 0.9, so the two reductions together give 0.9 × 0.9 = 0.81; the final price is 81% of the original, so the price has fallen by 100% − 81% = 19%. Answer: an overall decrease of 19%. The distractors: 20% comes from adding the two reductions, 10% + 10%, which charges the second 10% against the original price instead of against the already reduced price; 21% comes from using the increase multiplier by mistake, since 1.1 × 1.1 = 1.21, and reading that 21% as a decrease; 81% is the percentage of the original price still being paid, not the percentage taken off.
19. (d) 6.0 — Subtract 1.8 from both sides: 6.3x ≤ 38.2. Divide both sides by 6.3: x ≤ 6.0634… . The question asks for the greatest value to 1 decimal place that still satisfies the inequality. Testing 6.1: 6.3 × 6.1 + 1.8 = 40.23, which is more than 40, so 6.1 fails. Testing 6.0: 6.3 × 6.0 + 1.8 = 39.6, which is no more than 40, so 6.0 works and is the greatest such value. A candidate who simply rounds 6.0634… to 1 decimal place answers 6.1, without checking that it satisfies the inequality. A candidate who adds 1.8 instead of subtracting works out 41.8 ÷ 6.3 and answers 6.6. A candidate who forgets the 1.8 altogether divides 40 by 6.3 and answers 6.3.
20. (c) 7.1 cm — Method: a shorter side is opposite the 45° angle and the hypotenuse is known, so sin θ = opposite ÷ hypotenuse gives that side directly. Working: sin 45° = x ÷ 10, so x = 10 × sin 45° = 7.071…, which is 7.1 to 1 decimal place. Answer: 7.1 cm. The distractors: 5.0 cm comes from halving the hypotenuse, which is the rule for the side opposite a 30° angle and not a 45° one; 14.1 cm comes from dividing by sin 45° instead of multiplying by it, which makes a shorter side longer than the hypotenuse; 10.0 cm comes from taking tan 45° = 1 and concluding that the shorter side matches the hypotenuse.