🧮 Paper 1 non-calculator warm-up — Higher

Answer key

1. (b) 5/27 — Method: multiply the numerators together and the denominators together, then simplify. Working: (5 × 2)/(6 × 9) = 10/54 = 5/27. Answer: 5/27. 7/15 comes from adding the fractions instead of multiplying: (5+2)/(6+9) = 7/15. 15/4 comes from flipping the second fraction, as if dividing: (5 × 9)/(6 × 2) = 45/12 = 15/4. 5/3 comes from cancelling the two denominators against each other, dividing both 6 and 9 by 3 to leave 5/2 × 2/3 = 10/6 = 5/3; cancelling is only valid between a numerator and a denominator, never between two denominators.
2. (c) 7 + 4√3 — Expand the brackets fully: (2 + √3)² = 2² + 2 × 2 × √3 + (√3)² = 4 + 4√3 + 3. Adding the two whole-number terms, 4 + 3 = 7, gives 7 + 4√3. Using (a + b)² = a² + b² and skipping the middle cross term entirely gives just 4 + 3 = 7, with no surd term at all. Treating (√3)² as if it stayed √3 rather than becoming 3, then merging it with the existing surd term, gives 4 + 5√3. Squaring only the surd term correctly but carrying the whole-number term as 2 instead of squaring it to 4 gives 2 + 3 + 4√3 = 5 + 4√3.
3. (c) 9π cm² — The area of a circle is π × r². With a radius of 3 cm this is π × 3² = 9π cm², and this is exact because π has not been replaced by any approximation. Writing 28.3 cm² replaces π with a rounded decimal value, 3.14, and then rounds the result again, so it is only an approximation. Writing 28.26 cm² uses π ≈ 3.14 without a final rounding step, but this is still only an approximation of 9π, not the exact value. Writing 27 cm² comes from replacing π with the rough approximation 3, which is even further from the true value.
4. (c) x = 3 or x = 1/2 — Method: factorise into two brackets whose x terms multiply to 2x² and whose numbers multiply to 3, checking that they produce the middle term −7x, then set each bracket equal to zero. Working: (2x − 1)(x − 3) expands to 2x² − 6x − x + 3 = 2x² − 7x + 3, so (2x − 1)(x − 3) = 0; then 2x − 1 = 0 gives x = 1/2 and x − 3 = 0 gives x = 3. Answer: x = 3 or x = 1/2. The distractors: x = 3/2 or x = 1 comes from factorising as (2x − 3)(x − 1), whose middle term is −5x and not −7x; x = −3 or x = −1/2 comes from reading the roots straight out of (2x − 1)(x − 3) without changing the signs; x = 6 or x = 1 comes from using the quadratic formula with the denominator written as a instead of 2a, dividing 7 ± 5 by 2.
5. (d) x = 3 or x = −3 — Method: get x² on its own with a coefficient of 1, then take the square root of both sides and keep both the positive and the negative root. Working: dividing 2x² = 18 by 2 gives x² = 9, and the square root of 9 is 3, so x = 3 or x = −3; both check, because 2 × 9 = 18 either way. Answer: x = 3 or x = −3. The distractors: x = 9 or x = −9 comes from dividing by 2 and then forgetting to take the square root; x = 4 or x = −4 comes from subtracting 2 from 18 instead of dividing by it, giving x² = 16; x = 6 or x = −6 comes from multiplying by 2 instead of dividing, giving x² = 36.
6. (b) (2x + 14)/((x − 1)(x + 3)) — To subtract these fractions, write them over the common denominator (x − 1)(x + 3): the numerator becomes 4(x + 3) − 2(x − 1). Expanding gives 4x + 12 − 2x + 2, which simplifies to 2x + 14, so the answer is (2x + 14)/((x − 1)(x + 3)). Writing (2x + 11)/((x − 1)(x + 3)) comes from not distributing the minus sign fully across the second bracket, treating −2(x − 1) as −2x − 1 instead of −2x + 2. Writing 2/((x − 1)(x + 3)) comes from subtracting the two original numerators directly, 4 − 2 = 2, the same mistake as subtracting fractions without a common denominator. Writing (2x − 10)/((x − 1)(x + 3)) comes from swapping which numerator multiplies which bracket, forming 4(x − 1) − 2(x + 3) instead of 4(x + 3) − 2(x − 1).
7. (a) 2√3/3 — tan 30° = √3/3, so tan 30° + tan 30° = 2 × √3/3 = 2√3/3. √3 comes from wrongly treating tan 30° + tan 30° as tan(30° + 30°) = tan 60° = √3 — adding angles is not the same as adding ratios. √3/3 comes from forgetting to double the value and just writing down tan 30° on its own. 2√3 comes from doubling the numerator of √3/3 but forgetting to keep the denominator of 3.
8. (b) (2x + 1)/(x − 3) — Factorise both the numerator and the denominator before you cancel anything. The numerator 2x² + 7x + 3 factorises to (2x + 1)(x + 3), and the denominator x² − 9 is a difference of two squares, factorising to (x − 3)(x + 3). The (x + 3) factor is common to both, so it cancels, leaving (2x + 1)/(x − 3). Writing (2x + 1)/(x + 3) comes from factorising x² − 9 as (x + 3)² instead of (x − 3)(x + 3) — a difference of two squares always has one plus and one minus bracket. Writing (2x + 3)/(x − 3) comes from mis-factorising the numerator as (2x + 3)(x + 1) and then wrongly cancelling the (x + 1) against the denominator's (x + 3) as though they were the same bracket. Writing 2x + 1 comes from cancelling the (x + 3) factor correctly but then dropping the remaining (x − 3) on the denominator altogether.
9. (b) 0.58333... — Divide 7 by 12 using long division. 70 ÷ 12 = 5 remainder 10, so the first decimal digit is 5. Bring down a 0 to make 100: 100 ÷ 12 = 8 remainder 4, so the second digit is 8. Bring down a 0 to make 40: 40 ÷ 12 = 3 remainder 4, so the third digit is 3. Bring down a 0 to make 40 again — the remainder 4 has reappeared, so the digit 3 repeats forever from here. This gives 7/12 = 0.58333... . Stopping the division after two digits and writing 0.58 treats it as if it terminated, when the remainder is not yet zero. Misreading the pattern as a two-digit repeating block, '58', gives 0.585858..., which wrongly makes the 5 recur as well as the 3. A slip in the long division that carries the wrong remainder forward can make the second digit itself appear to repeat instead of the third, giving 0.588888... .
10. (a) x¹¹ — Method: when multiplying powers of the same base, add the indices. Working: 7 + 4 = 11, so x⁷ × x⁴ = x¹¹. x²⁸ comes from multiplying the indices, 7 × 4 = 28, instead of adding them. x³ comes from working out 7 − 4 = 3, which is the rule for dividing powers, not multiplying them. 11x comes from adding the indices to make 11 but then treating x as a coefficient instead of a power. Answer: x¹¹.
11. (a) x = 6 or x = −4 — We need two numbers that multiply to −24 and add to −2: these are −6 and 4, since −6 × 4 = −24 and −6 + 4 = −2. So x² − 2x − 24 = (x − 6)(x + 4) = 0, giving x = 6 or x = −4. A candidate who swaps the signs, using 6 and −4 the wrong way round in the brackets, gets x = −6 or x = 4. A candidate who picks the wrong factor pair, 8 and −3 (which multiply to −24 but add to +5, not −2), gets (x + 8)(x − 3) = 0 and answers x = −8 or x = 3. A candidate who makes both factors negative gets x = −6 or x = −4, which would require the constant term to be +24, not −24.
12. (d) (x − 8)(x + 8) — x² − 64 = x² − 8², a difference of two squares, which factorises as (x − 8)(x + 8). A candidate who treats it as a perfect square with a repeated negative factor gets (x − 8)(x − 8), which expands to x² − 16x + 64 — wrong on both the middle and constant terms. A candidate who uses a repeated positive factor gets (x + 8)(x + 8), which expands to x² + 16x + 64. A candidate who picks a different factor pair of 64, such as 4 and 16, without checking that the middle term cancels, gets (x − 4)(x + 16), which expands to x² + 12x − 64 — the wrong middle term.
13. (c) x⁽²⁄³⁾ — Method: a root can be written as a fractional index, with the root's index as the denominator and the power inside the root as the numerator. Working: the cube root gives a denominator of 3 and the square inside gives a numerator of 2, so ∛(x²) = x⁽²⁄³⁾. Answer: x⁽²⁄³⁾. The distractors: x⁽³⁄²⁾ comes from writing the fraction upside down, with the root's index on top; x⁽¹⁄⁶⁾ comes from treating the square as a second root and multiplying 1/3 by 1/2; x⁶ comes from multiplying the root's index by the power, 3 × 2, and keeping the result as a whole-number index.
14. (c) 7/30 — Let x = 0.2333... . Because only the 3 recurs, use two multiples of x that line up the recurring part exactly: 10x = 2.333... and 100x = 23.333... . Subtracting removes the recurring tail completely: 100x − 10x = 23.333... − 2.333... = 21, so 90x = 21, giving x = 21/90 = 7/30. Treating the decimal as if it terminated after two places, writing 0.23 as 23/100, ignores that the 3 carries on forever. Misreading which digits recur — treating 0.2333... as if the block '23' repeated, giving 0.232323... — leads to x = 23/99, which is a different, larger recurring decimal from the one given. A numerator slip in the subtraction, computing 22 instead of 21, gives x = 22/90 = 11/45.
15. (b) (x − 5)(x + 2) — We need two numbers that multiply to −10 and add to −3: these are −5 and 2, since −5 × 2 = −10 and −5 + 2 = −3. So x² − 3x − 10 = (x − 5)(x + 2). A candidate who swaps the signs, using +5 and −2, gets (x + 5)(x − 2), which expands to x² + 3x − 10 — the wrong middle term. A candidate who picks the factor pair 1 and 10 instead of 2 and 5 gets (x − 10)(x + 1), which expands to x² − 9x − 10. A candidate who makes both factors negative gets (x − 5)(x − 2), which expands to x² − 7x + 10 — the wrong sign on the constant term.
16. (a) 1/3 — Method: find the total fraction eaten, then subtract it from the whole pizza. Working: together they eat 5/12 + 3/12 = 8/12, so the fraction left is 12/12 − 8/12 = 4/12 = 1/3. Answer: 1/3. 2/3 comes from giving the fraction eaten instead of the fraction left. 7/12 comes from only subtracting Ben's slices and forgetting Mia's. 1/2 comes from comparing the 4 slices left with the 8 slices eaten, 4/8, a part-to-part comparison instead of comparing with the whole pizza of 12 slices.
17. (c) 25 cm — Method: for a cube, the edge length is the cube root of the volume. Working: 25 × 25 × 25 = 15,625, so the edge length is 25 cm. 5 cm comes from cube-rooting 125 instead of 15,625, misreading the number of digits. 50 cm comes from working out 25 × 2 = 50, doubling the correct edge length. 125 cm comes from taking the square root of the volume instead of the cube root, since 125 × 125 = 15,625 — that would be the side of a SQUARE of area 15,625, not the edge of a cube of that volume. Answer: 25 cm.
18. (c) It has two different real solutions — Method: the discriminant is the quantity under the square root sign in the quadratic formula, so its sign decides how many real values the formula produces. Working: when the discriminant is positive its square root is a real number that is not zero, and the formula adds that root and subtracts it in turn, so the two results are different; a positive discriminant that is not a perfect square still gives two solutions, but they are not whole numbers. Answer: it has two different real solutions. The distractors: one repeated real solution is what a discriminant of zero gives, because adding and subtracting zero changes nothing; no real solutions is what a negative discriminant gives, because a negative number has no real square root; two whole-number solutions happens only when the discriminant is a perfect square and the division works out exactly, which a positive discriminant does not guarantee.
19. (d) x² − 49 — Area = length × width = (x + 7)(x − 7). Expanding: x × x = x², x × (−7) = −7x, 7 × x = 7x, 7 × (−7) = −49. The two middle terms −7x and 7x cancel, leaving x² − 49. A candidate who misremembers the difference-of-two-squares result as a sum gets x² + 49. A candidate who makes a sign error and treats both middle terms as −7x instead of cancelling gets x² − 14x − 49. A candidate who confuses area with perimeter and simply adds the length and width gets 2x.
20. (b) 3²⁰ is larger — Method: two powers with different bases and different indices can be compared once they are rewritten with a common index, which is possible whenever the indices share a factor. Working: 30 and 20 have a highest common factor of 10, so 2³⁰ = (2³)¹⁰ = 8¹⁰ and 3²⁰ = (3²)¹⁰ = 9¹⁰. Both are now tenth powers, and since 9 is larger than 8, 9¹⁰ is larger than 8¹⁰. Answer: 3²⁰ is larger. The distractors: 2³⁰ is larger comes from comparing only the indices and choosing the power with the bigger index; They are equal comes from multiplying base by index, 2 × 30 and 3 × 20, and finding 60 each time; They cannot be compared without a calculator comes from assuming that powers this large can only be ranked by evaluating them in full.