🧮 Paper 1 non-calculator warm-up — Higher

Answer key

1. (b) 3/50 — Method: write the decimal over the power of ten that matches the number of digits after the point, counting every digit including a zero, then divide the numerator and the denominator by their highest common factor. Working: 0.06 has two digits after the point, so it is 6 hundredths and can be written as 6/100; the highest common factor of 6 and 100 is 2, and 6 ÷ 2 = 3 with 100 ÷ 2 = 50. Answer: 3/50. The distractors: 3/5 comes from ignoring the zero straight after the point and converting 0.6 instead, giving 6/10, which cancels to 3/5; 3/500 comes from counting three decimal places instead of two and writing 6/1000, which cancels to 3/500; 1/6 comes from putting 1 over the digits after the point, as though 0.06 meant one sixth.
2. (a) x = 10 or x = −10 — Rearranging, x² = 100. Taking the square root of both sides gives x = ±10, i.e. x = 10 or x = −10. A candidate who forgets the negative root gives only x = 10. A candidate who halves 100 instead of taking its square root gets x = 50. A candidate who applies the ± sign to 100 itself instead of to its square root gets x = 100 or x = −100.
3. (d) x² − 49 — Area = length × width = (x + 7)(x − 7). Expanding: x × x = x², x × (−7) = −7x, 7 × x = 7x, 7 × (−7) = −49. The two middle terms −7x and 7x cancel, leaving x² − 49. A candidate who misremembers the difference-of-two-squares result as a sum gets x² + 49. A candidate who makes a sign error and treats both middle terms as −7x instead of cancelling gets x² − 14x − 49. A candidate who confuses area with perimeter and simply adds the length and width gets 2x.
4. (d) 6 — By Pythagoras' theorem, the square of the hypotenuse equals the sum of the squares of the other two sides: (√12)² + (√24)² = 12 + 24 = 36. The hypotenuse is √36 = 6 cm. Adding the two side lengths directly instead of squaring them first, treating the theorem as if it were a straight sum of the sides, gives √12 + √24 = 2√3 + 2√6. Multiplying the two squared values, 12 × 24 = 288, instead of adding them, then taking the root, gives √288 = 12√2. Adding the squares correctly to get 36 but forgetting to take the square root at the end leaves 36 as the answer instead of the hypotenuse itself.
5. (c) It has two different real solutions — Method: the discriminant is the quantity under the square root sign in the quadratic formula, so its sign decides how many real values the formula produces. Working: when the discriminant is positive its square root is a real number that is not zero, and the formula adds that root and subtracts it in turn, so the two results are different; a positive discriminant that is not a perfect square still gives two solutions, but they are not whole numbers. Answer: it has two different real solutions. The distractors: one repeated real solution is what a discriminant of zero gives, because adding and subtracting zero changes nothing; no real solutions is what a negative discriminant gives, because a negative number has no real square root; two whole-number solutions happens only when the discriminant is a perfect square and the division works out exactly, which a positive discriminant does not guarantee.
6. (d) 3√5 — Split 45 into a perfect square times a factor: 45 = 9 × 5. Take the square root of each part separately: √45 = √9 × √5 = 3√5, since √9 = 3. Writing the perfect-square factor itself (9) as the coefficient instead of its root would give 9√5 — that trap comes from forgetting the last step, rooting 9. Multiplying 3 and 5 together instead of keeping them as coefficient and radicand gives 15, which throws away the surd entirely. Doubling the correct coefficient by mistake gives 6√5.
7. (c) 0.7, 0.72, 3/4 — Method: numbers written in different forms cannot be compared as they stand, so every fraction is turned into a decimal by dividing the numerator by the denominator, and the decimals are then compared place by place from the left. Working: 3/4 means 3 ÷ 4 = 0.75, so the three values to compare are 0.7, 0.75 and 0.72; written to two decimal places they are 0.70, 0.75 and 0.72, and the hundredths digits 0, 5 and 2 put 0.70 first, 0.72 next and 0.75 last; written again in the forms the question used, the order from smallest is 0.7, then 0.72, then 3/4. Answer: 0.7, 0.72, 3/4. The distractors: 3/4, 0.7, 0.72 comes from turning 3/4 into 0.34 by writing the numerator and the denominator as the two digits after the point, which makes the fraction the smallest of the three; 0.72, 3/4, 0.7 comes from the belief that the more digits a decimal has the smaller it must be, which puts both 0.72 and 0.75 below 0.7 and 0.72 below 0.75; 3/4, 0.72, 0.7 comes from comparing the three values correctly but listing them largest first, against an instruction to start with the smallest.
8. (a) 1/2 — cos 0° = 1 and sin 30° = 1/2, so cos 0° − sin 30° = 1 − 1/2 = 1/2. 1 comes from writing down cos 0° alone and forgetting to subtract sin 30°. 3/2 comes from adding the two values instead of subtracting. −1/2 comes from working out sin 30° − cos 0°, the two terms the wrong way round.
9. (c) 5/11 — Let x = 0.45 recurring, so x = 0.454545... . Since two digits repeat, multiply by 100: 100x = 45.454545... . Subtracting the original x removes the recurring part exactly, because it lines up digit for digit: 100x − x = 45.454545... − 0.454545... = 45, so 99x = 45, giving x = 45/99 = 5/11. Treating the decimal as if it terminated at two places gives 45/100 = 9/20, which is only 0.45 and drops the repeating part entirely. Subtracting 10x instead of x — using 100x − 10x = 90x = 45 — is the wrong power of ten for a two-digit repeating block, and gives x = 45/90 = 1/2. Making an arithmetic slip in the numerator, 45 − 1 = 44 instead of 45, gives 44/99 = 4/9.
10. (a) x⁶ — Method: work through the powers in order — multiplying powers of the same base means adding indices, and dividing powers of the same base means subtracting indices. Working: first, x⁵ × x³ = x⁸ (adding 5 and 3); then x⁸ ÷ x² = x⁶ (subtracting 2 from 8). x⁴ comes from swapping the two rules — subtracting for the multiplication, 5 − 3 = 2, and then adding for the division, 2 + 2 = 4. x¹⁰ comes from adding all three indices, 5 + 3 + 2 = 10, treating the division the same as a multiplication. 6x comes from correctly reaching a total index of 6 but then writing it as a coefficient of x instead of as its power. Answer: x⁶.
11. (d) x = 2 or x = −5 — Method: find two numbers that multiply to give −10 and add to give 3 — these are 5 and −2. So x² + 3x − 10 = (x + 5)(x − 2) = 0, giving x = −5 or x = 2. Distractor origins: x = −2 or x = 5 swaps the signs of the two roots; x = 2 or x = 5 makes both roots positive, ignoring the sign of −10; x = −5 or x = −2 makes both roots negative.
12. (a) x¹¹ — Method: when multiplying powers of the same base, add the indices. Working: 7 + 4 = 11, so x⁷ × x⁴ = x¹¹. x²⁸ comes from multiplying the indices, 7 × 4 = 28, instead of adding them. x³ comes from working out 7 − 4 = 3, which is the rule for dividing powers, not multiplying them. 11x comes from adding the indices to make 11 but then treating x as a coefficient instead of a power. Answer: x¹¹.
13. (c) Exactly 1: the subtraction has no rounding at any step. — 10x − x removes the recurring part completely, because the digits after the decimal point in 10x and in x are identical from the tenths place onward, so they cancel exactly: 9.999... − 0.999... = 9.000... = 9. Nothing was rounded to reach 9x = 9, so x = 1 is an exact equality, not an approximation, and the statement that the value is exactly 1, with no rounding at any step, is the correct one. Calling it only approximately 1, on the ground that a recurring decimal can never reach a whole number, misunderstands what the subtraction has just shown: the recurring tail cancels completely, leaving no gap to approximate away. Claiming the method only works because the recurring digit is 9 is also wrong — the same subtraction cancels the recurring part for any repeating digit, not just 9; it is the choice of multiplier (10, matching the one-digit repeat) that makes the cancellation exact, not the digit itself. Saying 10x minus x gives 8.999... rather than 9 misreads the subtraction: 9.999... − 0.999... has no digit to borrow from, since every decimal digit in the two numbers matches, so the result is exactly 9, not 8.999... .
14. (a) 0.1 m — Method: the sloping surface is the hypotenuse and the vertical rise is the side opposite the 30° angle, so rise = 4.8 × sin 30°; then compare that rise with the limit. Working: the exact value of sin 30° is one half, so the rise = 4.8 × 1/2 = 2.4 m. The limit is 2.5 m, and 2.5 − 2.4 = 0.1. Answer: the ramp is 0.1 m below the limit. Working out the rise and stopping there gives 2.4 m, which answers a question that was not asked. Dividing by sin 30° instead of multiplying gives 4.8 ÷ 0.5 = 9.6 and then 9.6 − 2.5 = 7.1 m. Treating sine as proportional to the angle, so that sin 30° is a third of sin 90°, gives 4.8 ÷ 3 = 1.6 and then 2.5 − 1.6 = 0.9 m.
15. (b) −23 — Expand two of the three brackets first: (x + 5)(x − 2) = x² + 3x − 10. Then multiply this by the remaining bracket: (2x − 1)(x² + 3x − 10) = 2x³ + 6x² − 20x − x² − 3x + 10, which simplifies to 2x³ + 5x² − 23x + 10, so the coefficient of x is −23. Writing −13 comes from a sign slip in the first expansion, combining 5x − 2x as −5x − 2x = −7x instead of +3x, which carries through to a wrong final coefficient. Writing −20 comes from forgetting to distribute the −1 across every term of x² + 3x − 10, dropping the −1 × 3x = −3x contribution. Writing 10 comes from reading off the constant term of the expansion instead of the coefficient of x.
16. (a) 4 + √6 — Multiply top and bottom by the conjugate, 4 + √6. The denominator becomes (4 − √6)(4 + √6) = 4² − (√6)² = 16 − 6 = 10. The numerator becomes 10 × (4 + √6) = 40 + 10√6. So the fraction is (40 + 10√6)/10 = 4 + √6, since both terms in the numerator divide by 10. Distributing the conjugate to only the whole-number term of the numerator, and forgetting the surd term entirely, leaves just 4. Rationalising by multiplying the numerator by the conjugate but leaving the ORIGINAL denominator's sign unchanged instead of squaring it lands on 4 − √6, with the surd's sign never actually flipping to positive. Dividing only the whole-number part of the numerator by 10 and forgetting to divide the surd term too leaves 4 + 10√6.
17. (c) 25 cm — Method: for a cube, the edge length is the cube root of the volume. Working: 25 × 25 × 25 = 15,625, so the edge length is 25 cm. 5 cm comes from cube-rooting 125 instead of 15,625, misreading the number of digits. 50 cm comes from working out 25 × 2 = 50, doubling the correct edge length. 125 cm comes from taking the square root of the volume instead of the cube root, since 125 × 125 = 15,625 — that would be the side of a SQUARE of area 15,625, not the edge of a cube of that volume. Answer: 25 cm.
18. (a) 0.625 — Method: convert the fraction to a decimal so it can be compared properly with 0.6. Working: 5/8 = 0.625, and since 0.625 > 0.6, the larger value is 0.625. Answer: 0.625. 0.6 repeats Sam's incorrect claim, made by comparing single digits rather than full place value. 0.58 comes from converting 5/8 incorrectly, treating it as if it read 5 tenths and 8 hundredths. 0.85 comes from turning the fraction upside down and writing its digits straight after the decimal point, 8 then 5, instead of dividing.
19. (d) 2/25 — Method: write the decimal over 100 using its two decimal places, then simplify. Working: 0.08 = 8/100 = 2/25 (dividing both numerator and denominator by 4). Answer: 2/25. The student's fraction, 8/10, comes from ignoring the zero in the tenths column and reading 0.08 as though it were 0.8; it simplifies to 4/5. 1/125 comes from writing the decimal over 1000 instead of 100, as if there were three decimal places. 25/2 comes from flipping the correct fraction upside down.
20. (b) (x − 3)/(x + 2) — Factorise both: x² − 9 = (x − 3)(x + 3) (difference of two squares), and x² + 5x + 6 = (x + 2)(x + 3) (two numbers multiplying to 6 and adding to 5, namely 2 and 3). The factor (x + 3) is common to both, so it cancels, leaving (x − 3)/(x + 2). Choosing −9/(5x + 6) comes from cancelling the x² terms directly without factorising first — x² is not a common factor of the whole numerator or denominator. Choosing (x + 3)/(x + 2) cancels the (x − 3) factor instead of the shared (x + 3) factor, and (x − 3) does not appear in the denominator to cancel with. Choosing x − 3 cancels the whole denominator (x + 2) as though it were equal to 1.