🧮 Paper 1 non-calculator warm-up — Higher

Answer key

1. (d) 6 — By Pythagoras' theorem, the square of the hypotenuse equals the sum of the squares of the other two sides: (√12)² + (√24)² = 12 + 24 = 36. The hypotenuse is √36 = 6 cm. Adding the two side lengths directly instead of squaring them first, treating the theorem as if it were a straight sum of the sides, gives √12 + √24 = 2√3 + 2√6. Multiplying the two squared values, 12 × 24 = 288, instead of adding them, then taking the root, gives √288 = 12√2. Adding the squares correctly to get 36 but forgetting to take the square root at the end leaves 36 as the answer instead of the hypotenuse itself.
2. (a) 7/8 — Method: write the decimal over the power of ten that matches the number of digits after the point, then divide the numerator and the denominator by their highest common factor. Working: 0.875 has three digits after the point, so it is 875 thousandths and can be written as 875/1000; the highest common factor of 875 and 1000 is 125, and 875 ÷ 125 = 7 with 1000 ÷ 125 = 8. Answer: 7/8. The distractors: 8/7 comes from cancelling correctly but writing the two parts the wrong way round; 9/10 comes from rounding 0.875 to one decimal place as 0.9 before converting; 7/80 comes from counting four decimal places instead of three and using a denominator of 10000, giving 875/10000.
3. (a) 1/3 — Method: find the total fraction eaten, then subtract it from the whole pizza. Working: together they eat 5/12 + 3/12 = 8/12, so the fraction left is 12/12 − 8/12 = 4/12 = 1/3. Answer: 1/3. 2/3 comes from giving the fraction eaten instead of the fraction left. 7/12 comes from only subtracting Ben's slices and forgetting Mia's. 1/2 comes from comparing the 4 slices left with the 8 slices eaten, 4/8, a part-to-part comparison instead of comparing with the whole pizza of 12 slices.
4. (a) 0.625 — Method: convert the fraction to a decimal so it can be compared properly with 0.6. Working: 5/8 = 0.625, and since 0.625 > 0.6, the larger value is 0.625. Answer: 0.625. 0.6 repeats Sam's incorrect claim, made by comparing single digits rather than full place value. 0.58 comes from converting 5/8 incorrectly, treating it as if it read 5 tenths and 8 hundredths. 0.85 comes from turning the fraction upside down and writing its digits straight after the decimal point, 8 then 5, instead of dividing.
5. (a) 17 — Method: work out each power separately, then combine them as the question asks. Working: $2^3 = 8$ and $3^2 = 9$, and 8 + 9 = 17. 72 comes from working out 8 × 9 = 72, multiplying the two powers instead of adding them. 12 comes from misreading the powers as repeated multiplication of the base by the index, 2 × 3 + 3 × 2 = 6 + 6 = 12. −1 comes from working out 8 − 9 = −1, subtracting the powers instead of adding them. Answer: 17.
6. (d) 3√5 — Split 45 into a perfect square times a factor: 45 = 9 × 5. Take the square root of each part separately: √45 = √9 × √5 = 3√5, since √9 = 3. Writing the perfect-square factor itself (9) as the coefficient instead of its root would give 9√5 — that trap comes from forgetting the last step, rooting 9. Multiplying 3 and 5 together instead of keeping them as coefficient and radicand gives 15, which throws away the surd entirely. Doubling the correct coefficient by mistake gives 6√5.
7. (a) 3 m — Height = sloping length × sin 45° = 3√2 × √2/2 = (3 × 2)/2 = 3 m, since √2 × √2 = 2. 3√2 m comes from forgetting to multiply by sin 45° at all. 3√2/2 m comes from using sin 30° = 1/2 instead of sin 45° = √2/2. 6 m comes from using √2 instead of √2/2 for sin 45°, dropping the denominator of the exact value: 3√2 × √2 = 6.
8. (b) 3²⁰ is larger — Method: two powers with different bases and different indices can be compared once they are rewritten with a common index, which is possible whenever the indices share a factor. Working: 30 and 20 have a highest common factor of 10, so 2³⁰ = (2³)¹⁰ = 8¹⁰ and 3²⁰ = (3²)¹⁰ = 9¹⁰. Both are now tenth powers, and since 9 is larger than 8, 9¹⁰ is larger than 8¹⁰. Answer: 3²⁰ is larger. The distractors: 2³⁰ is larger comes from comparing only the indices and choosing the power with the bigger index; They are equal comes from multiplying base by index, 2 × 30 and 3 × 20, and finding 60 each time; They cannot be compared without a calculator comes from assuming that powers this large can only be ranked by evaluating them in full.
9. (a) 1/3 — To subtract these fractions, first write 3/4 with a denominator of 12: 3/4 = 9/12. Then 9/12 − 5/12 = 4/12, which simplifies to 1/3. Subtracting the numerators and the denominators separately, (3 − 5)/(4 − 12), gives −2/−8, which simplifies to 1/4. Changing 3/4 to twelfths by only changing the denominator, without scaling the numerator to match, gives 3/12 − 5/12 = −2/12, which simplifies to −1/6. Adding the fractions instead of subtracting them, 9/12 + 5/12, gives 14/12, which simplifies to 7/6.
10. (d) x = 2 or x = −5 — Method: find two numbers that multiply to give −10 and add to give 3 — these are 5 and −2. So x² + 3x − 10 = (x + 5)(x − 2) = 0, giving x = −5 or x = 2. Distractor origins: x = −2 or x = 5 swaps the signs of the two roots; x = 2 or x = 5 makes both roots positive, ignoring the sign of −10; x = −5 or x = −2 makes both roots negative.
11. (a) x = 4 or x = −3 — Method: find two numbers that multiply to give −12 and add to give −1 — these are −4 and 3. So x² − x − 12 = (x − 4)(x + 3) = 0, giving x = 4 or x = −3. Distractor origins: x = −4 or x = 3 has the signs the wrong way round; x = 4 or x = 3 makes both roots positive, ignoring the sign of −12; x = 12 or x = −1 comes from reading off the coefficient and the constant directly instead of factorising.
12. (c) 1/x⁶ — Method: raising a power to another power multiplies the two indices, and a negative index means one over the matching positive power. Working: −2 × 3 = −6, so (x⁻²)³ = x⁻⁶, and x⁻⁶ written as a fraction is 1/x⁶. Answer: 1/x⁶. The distractors: x⁶ comes from multiplying the indices correctly but dropping the minus sign; 1/x⁵ comes from adding the sizes of the indices, 2 + 3, instead of multiplying them; −x⁶ comes from reading the negative index as a minus sign in front of the whole term.
13. (d) 3/8 — Method: making half the recipe means dividing the quantity of sugar by 2. Working: 3/4 ÷ 2 = 3/8. Answer: 3/8. 3/2 comes from multiplying by 2 instead of dividing, as if doubling the recipe. 5/4 comes from adding 1/2 to 3/4 instead of halving it, confusing "half of" with "plus a half". 3/4 comes from leaving the amount unchanged, forgetting to halve it for the smaller recipe.
14. (d) x³ + 6x² + 11x + 6 — (x + 1)(x + 2) = x² + 3x + 2. Multiplying by (x + 3): (x² + 3x + 2)(x + 3) = x³ + 3x² + 2x + 3x² + 9x + 6, which simplifies to x³ + 6x² + 11x + 6. Choosing x³ + 6x² + 6x + 6 has the right x² and constant terms but adds 1 + 2 + 3 = 6 for the x-coefficient instead of the correct sum of pairwise products 1×2 + 1×3 + 2×3 = 11. Choosing x³ + 5x² + 11x + 6 sums only two of the three constants (2 + 3 = 5) for the x² coefficient, leaving out the 1. Choosing x³ + 6x² + 11x + 5 adds the last two constants (2 + 3 = 5) instead of multiplying all three (1 × 2 × 3 = 6) for the constant term.
15. (a) 2√3/3 — tan 30° = √3/3, so tan 30° + tan 30° = 2 × √3/3 = 2√3/3. √3 comes from wrongly treating tan 30° + tan 30° as tan(30° + 30°) = tan 60° = √3 — adding angles is not the same as adding ratios. √3/3 comes from forgetting to double the value and just writing down tan 30° on its own. 2√3 comes from doubling the numerator of √3/3 but forgetting to keep the denominator of 3.
16. (a) x = 4 ± √13 — Method: halve the coefficient of x to form the bracket, subtract the square of that number to keep the expression equal to the original, then rearrange and take the square root of both sides. Working: half of −8 is −4, so x² − 8x + 3 = (x − 4)² − 16 + 3 = (x − 4)² − 13; setting this equal to zero gives (x − 4)² = 13, so x − 4 = ±√13 and x = 4 ± √13. Answer: x = 4 ± √13. The distractors: x = 8 ± √13 comes from putting the whole coefficient 8 inside the bracket instead of half of it; x = 4 ± √19 comes from adding 16 and 3 rather than subtracting 3 from 16; x = −4 ± √13 comes from writing the bracket as (x + 4)², which reverses the sign of the number that comes out of it.
17. (c) 1 — sin 30° = 1/2 and cos 60° = 1/2, so sin 30° + cos 60° = 1/2 + 1/2 = 1. 0 comes from subtracting the two values instead of adding them (1/2 − 1/2). 1/2 comes from writing down only one of the two exact values and forgetting to add the other. √3 comes from swapping the two angles and working out sin 60° + cos 30° = √3/2 + √3/2 = √3.
18. (c) 3/11 — Method: let a letter stand for the recurring decimal, multiply by the power of ten that shifts exactly one repeating block past the point, subtract the original equation so that the recurring tail cancels, then solve and cancel. Working: let x = 0.272727...; the repeating block is two digits long, so multiply by 100 to give 100x = 27.272727...; subtracting gives 99x = 27, so x = 27/99; the highest common factor of 27 and 99 is 9, and 27 ÷ 9 = 3 with 99 ÷ 9 = 11. Answer: 3/11. The distractors: 27/100 comes from writing the repeating block over 100 instead of over 99, forgetting that subtracting x leaves 99x rather than 100x; 3/10 comes from rounding the decimal to one place and converting 0.3; 2/9 comes from treating only the 2 as recurring and converting 0.222... instead.
19. (b) 24√2 — The side length of the tile is √72. Since 72 = 36 × 2, √72 = √36 × √2 = 6√2 cm. A square has four equal sides, so the perimeter is 4 × 6√2 = 24√2 cm. Simplifying √72 by writing the perfect-square factor itself as the coefficient instead of its root, 36√2 instead of 6√2, and then multiplying by 4 lands on 144√2. Working out the correct side length, 6√2 cm, but then giving that as the final answer without multiplying by 4 for the perimeter gives 6√2. Doubling the side length instead of quadrupling it, as if the perimeter were 2 × 6√2 rather than 4 × 6√2, gives 12√2.
20. (d) 27/80 — Method: write the total as a fraction of a litre, then divide by the number of glasses. Working: 1.35 = 27/20, so each glass holds 27/20 ÷ 4 = 27/80 of a litre. Answer: 27/80. 27/20 comes from converting the total correctly to a fraction but forgetting to divide by the number of glasses. 27/5 comes from multiplying the total by 4 instead of dividing. 17/50 comes from rounding 1.35 ÷ 4 to 0.34 before converting to a fraction.