🧮 Paper 1 non-calculator warm-up — Higher

Answer key

1. (c) 2/5 — To find a fraction of a fraction, multiply them together: 3/5 × 2/3 = 6/15, which simplifies to 2/5. Multiplying only the numerators, 3 × 2 = 6, but adding the denominators, 5 + 3 = 8, instead of multiplying them gives 6/8, which simplifies to 3/4. Using only the fraction who study French, 3/5, and ignoring that a further fraction of them also study Spanish gives 3/5. Dividing by 2/3 instead of multiplying by it, using its reciprocal 3/2, gives 3/5 × 3/2 = 9/10.
2. (b) 5² — Method: multiplying two powers of the same base adds their indices, and a negative index is added as a negative number. Working: −2 + 4 = 2, so 5⁻² × 5⁴ = 5². Answer: 5². The distractors: 5⁶ comes from adding the sizes of the indices, 2 + 4, and ignoring the minus sign; 5⁻⁸ comes from multiplying the indices, −2 × 4, instead of adding them; 5⁻⁶ comes from subtracting the indices, −2 − 4, as though the powers were being divided.
3. (d) 2x/(x − 2) — Factorise x² − 4 as (x − 2)(x + 2) first — it's a difference of two squares. The (x + 2) in the numerator then cancels with the (x + 2) in the factorised denominator, and 6x² ÷ 3x simplifies to 2x, leaving 2x/(x − 2). Writing 2/(x − 2) comes from over-cancelling 6x² ÷ 3x as 2 instead of 2x, dropping the x that should remain. Writing 2x/(x + 2) comes from factorising x² − 4 as (x + 2)² instead of (x − 2)(x + 2), a difference of two squares always has one plus and one minus bracket. Writing 2x²/(x − 2) comes from simplifying 6x² ÷ 3x as 2x² instead of 2x, dividing the coefficients but not reducing the power of x.
4. (a) 3x/2 — Factorise top and bottom first: 6x³ − 15x² = 3x²(2x − 5), and 4x² − 10x = 2x(2x − 5). The bracket (2x − 5) is common to both, so it cancels, leaving 3x²/(2x); dividing the power of x, 3x² ÷ x = 3x, gives 3x/2. Writing 3x²/2 cancels the (2x − 5) correctly and removes the denominator's x, but never reduces the power of x left in the numerator — 3x² ÷ x should give 3x, not stay as 3x². Writing 3/2 cancels the (2x − 5) correctly but then drops the x from the numerator altogether, treating 3x² over x as if it cancelled completely to 3 instead of reducing to 3x. Writing −3x/2 comes from factorising the denominator with the wrong sign, as 2x(5 − 2x) instead of 2x(2x − 5); cancelling (5 − 2x) against the numerator's (2x − 5) then needs an extra minus sign, which flips the answer to −3x/2.
5. (d) 3/8 — Method: making half the recipe means dividing the quantity of sugar by 2. Working: 3/4 ÷ 2 = 3/8. Answer: 3/8. 3/2 comes from multiplying by 2 instead of dividing, as if doubling the recipe. 5/4 comes from adding 1/2 to 3/4 instead of halving it, confusing "half of" with "plus a half". 3/4 comes from leaving the amount unchanged, forgetting to halve it for the smaller recipe.
6. (b) 8π cm² — A diameter of 8 cm gives a radius of 4 cm. The area of a full circle would be π × r² = π × 4² = 16π cm², and a semicircle is exactly half of this, giving 16π ÷ 2 = 8π cm². Forgetting to halve the area for the semicircle gives 16π cm², the area of the whole circle. Halving the diameter twice, using a radius of 2 instead of 4, gives π × 2² = 4π cm². Using the diameter itself as the radius, so π × 8² = 64π, and then halving that for the semicircle gives 32π cm².
7. (d) 1/16 — Method: a negative index means the reciprocal of the power, so 2⁻⁴ is 1 divided by 2⁴. Working: 2⁴ = 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 = 16, so the value is 1/16. Answer: 1/16. The distractors: −16 comes from reading the negative index as a minus sign on the result; 16 comes from ignoring the minus sign and working out 2⁴; 1/8 comes from multiplying the base by the index, 2 × 4, and writing 1 over that product.
8. (a) 0.1666... — Method: a fraction bar means divide, so the decimal is found by dividing the numerator by the denominator; when a remainder comes back unchanged the division never ends, the digit it produces repeats for ever, and the exact value has to be written with that recurring digit rather than a rounded one. Working: 1 ÷ 6 is set out as 1.000 ÷ 6; six does not go into 1, and six goes into 10 tenths once with 4 left over, so the first decimal digit is 1; the 4 left over makes 40 hundredths, and six goes into 40 six times with 4 left over again; that same remainder of 4 returns at every step, so the digit 6 repeats without end. Answer: 0.1666... The distractors: 0.16 comes from carrying the division out to two decimal places and stopping there, as though the decimal terminated; 0.17 comes from rounding the division to two decimal places, which gives a value close to one sixth but not equal to it; 0.6 comes from writing the digit of the denominator straight after the decimal point, as though 1/6 meant six tenths.
9. (b) (x − 3)/(x + 2) — Factorise both: x² − 9 = (x − 3)(x + 3) (difference of two squares), and x² + 5x + 6 = (x + 2)(x + 3) (two numbers multiplying to 6 and adding to 5, namely 2 and 3). The factor (x + 3) is common to both, so it cancels, leaving (x − 3)/(x + 2). Choosing −9/(5x + 6) comes from cancelling the x² terms directly without factorising first — x² is not a common factor of the whole numerator or denominator. Choosing (x + 3)/(x + 2) cancels the (x − 3) factor instead of the shared (x + 3) factor, and (x − 3) does not appear in the denominator to cancel with. Choosing x − 3 cancels the whole denominator (x + 2) as though it were equal to 1.
10. (c) 7/30 — Let x = 0.2333... . Because only the 3 recurs, use two multiples of x that line up the recurring part exactly: 10x = 2.333... and 100x = 23.333... . Subtracting removes the recurring tail completely: 100x − 10x = 23.333... − 2.333... = 21, so 90x = 21, giving x = 21/90 = 7/30. Treating the decimal as if it terminated after two places, writing 0.23 as 23/100, ignores that the 3 carries on forever. Misreading which digits recur — treating 0.2333... as if the block '23' repeated, giving 0.232323... — leads to x = 23/99, which is a different, larger recurring decimal from the one given. A numerator slip in the subtraction, computing 22 instead of 21, gives x = 22/90 = 11/45.
11. (a) x = 3/2 or x = −3/2 — Method: the equation has an x² term and a number but no x term, so make x² the subject and then take the square root of both sides, keeping the negative root as well as the positive one. Working: adding 9 to both sides of 4x² − 9 = 0 gives 4x² = 9, and dividing both sides by 4 gives x² = 9/4. Square-rooting the top and the bottom of 9/4 gives 3/2, so x = 3/2 or x = −3/2, and each value checks out because 4 × 9/4 − 9 = 0. Answer: x = 3/2 or x = −3/2. The distractors: x = 3 or x = −3 comes from square-rooting both sides of 4x² = 9 without first dividing by the 4, so the coefficient of x² is ignored; x = 9/4 or x = −9/4 comes from stopping at x² = 9/4 and writing that value down as x, leaving the square root undone; x = 3/2 only comes from taking the positive square root of 9/4 and losing the negative solution.
12. (b) 7 cm — The side opposite the 30° angle is found using sin 30° = opposite/hypotenuse, so opposite = 14 × sin 30° = 14 × 1/2 = 7 cm. 7√3 cm comes from using cos 30° = √3/2 instead of sin 30° (mixing up the opposite and adjacent sides). 14/√3 cm comes from using tan 30° = 1/√3 instead of sin 30°. 28 cm comes from dividing 14 by sin 30° instead of multiplying by it.
13. (a) 7/8 — Method: write the decimal over the power of ten that matches the number of digits after the point, then divide the numerator and the denominator by their highest common factor. Working: 0.875 has three digits after the point, so it is 875 thousandths and can be written as 875/1000; the highest common factor of 875 and 1000 is 125, and 875 ÷ 125 = 7 with 1000 ÷ 125 = 8. Answer: 7/8. The distractors: 8/7 comes from cancelling correctly but writing the two parts the wrong way round; 9/10 comes from rounding 0.875 to one decimal place as 0.9 before converting; 7/80 comes from counting four decimal places instead of three and using a denominator of 10000, giving 875/10000.
14. (d) x = 3 or x = −3 — Method: get x² on its own with a coefficient of 1, then take the square root of both sides and keep both the positive and the negative root. Working: dividing 2x² = 18 by 2 gives x² = 9, and the square root of 9 is 3, so x = 3 or x = −3; both check, because 2 × 9 = 18 either way. Answer: x = 3 or x = −3. The distractors: x = 9 or x = −9 comes from dividing by 2 and then forgetting to take the square root; x = 4 or x = −4 comes from subtracting 2 from 18 instead of dividing by it, giving x² = 16; x = 6 or x = −6 comes from multiplying by 2 instead of dividing, giving x² = 36.
15. (b) 6√3 m — The horizontal distance covered by one support is adjacent to the 30° angle, so it equals 6 × cos 30° = 6 × √3/2 = 3√3 m. The total base width is made up of both supports, so it is 2 × 3√3 = 6√3 m. '3√3 m' gives only one support's horizontal distance and forgets to double it for the total width. '6 m' comes from using sin 30° instead of cos 30° for the horizontal distance (6 × sin 30° = 3, doubled to 6). '12 m' comes from doubling the full sloping length of 6 m without using any trigonometry at all.
16. (b) 1/9 — Method: let x stand for the recurring decimal, multiply by the power of ten that moves exactly one repeating block past the decimal point, subtract the original equation so that the recurring tail cancels, and solve the equation that is left. Working: let x = 0.111...; the repeating block is one digit long, so multiply by 10 to give 10x = 1.111...; subtracting the first equation from the second gives 10x − x = 1.111... − 0.111..., that is 9x = 1; dividing both sides by 9 gives x = 1/9. Answer: 1/9. The distractors: 1/10 comes from dividing by the multiplier 10 at the last step instead of by the 9 that is left in front of x; 1/11 comes from recalling the elevenths family instead of the ninths, although 1/11 = 0.0909... has a two-digit repeating block rather than a one-digit one; 11/100 comes from stopping the decimal after two digits and converting 0.11 into hundredths.
17. (d) 8 — Method: write $16^{3/4}$ as $(\sqrt[4]{16})^3$ — the denominator of the index gives the root, the numerator gives the power. Working: $\sqrt[4]{16} = 2$, so $16^{3/4} = 2^3 = 8$. Answer: 8. A candidate who multiplies 16 by 3/4 is treating the index as an ordinary factor and gets 12 — a fractional index is not a multiplier. A candidate who takes the square root instead of the fourth root and then cubes it works out $(\sqrt{16})^3 = 4^3$ and gets 64; the denominator 4 names a fourth root, not a square root. A candidate who takes the fourth root of 16 correctly but stops there, without cubing it, gets 2.
18. (b) −23 — Expand two of the three brackets first: (x + 5)(x − 2) = x² + 3x − 10. Then multiply this by the remaining bracket: (2x − 1)(x² + 3x − 10) = 2x³ + 6x² − 20x − x² − 3x + 10, which simplifies to 2x³ + 5x² − 23x + 10, so the coefficient of x is −23. Writing −13 comes from a sign slip in the first expansion, combining 5x − 2x as −5x − 2x = −7x instead of +3x, which carries through to a wrong final coefficient. Writing −20 comes from forgetting to distribute the −1 across every term of x² + 3x − 10, dropping the −1 × 3x = −3x contribution. Writing 10 comes from reading off the constant term of the expansion instead of the coefficient of x.
19. (c) 1 — sin 30° = 1/2 and cos 60° = 1/2, so sin 30° + cos 60° = 1/2 + 1/2 = 1. 0 comes from subtracting the two values instead of adding them (1/2 − 1/2). 1/2 comes from writing down only one of the two exact values and forgetting to add the other. √3 comes from swapping the two angles and working out sin 60° + cos 30° = √3/2 + √3/2 = √3.
20. (b) 3²⁰ is larger — Method: two powers with different bases and different indices can be compared once they are rewritten with a common index, which is possible whenever the indices share a factor. Working: 30 and 20 have a highest common factor of 10, so 2³⁰ = (2³)¹⁰ = 8¹⁰ and 3²⁰ = (3²)¹⁰ = 9¹⁰. Both are now tenth powers, and since 9 is larger than 8, 9¹⁰ is larger than 8¹⁰. Answer: 3²⁰ is larger. The distractors: 2³⁰ is larger comes from comparing only the indices and choosing the power with the bigger index; They are equal comes from multiplying base by index, 2 × 30 and 3 × 20, and finding 60 each time; They cannot be compared without a calculator comes from assuming that powers this large can only be ranked by evaluating them in full.