⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (c) SAS - two sides and the included angle equal — Two sides (AB and BC) and the angle between them (angle B) are equal in both triangles, so this is SAS. SSS would need all three sides given, but only two sides are stated. ASA needs two angles and the side between them, but only one angle is given. AAS needs two angles and a side, but again only one angle is given here.
2. (a) Yes - SSS, the three side lengths all match — Bracket P's sides (12 cm, 16 cm, 20 cm) can each be matched to one of Bracket Q's sides (16 cm, 20 cm, 12 cm) — the same three lengths, just listed differently — so the brackets are congruent by SSS. SAS is wrong here because no angle is stated for either bracket, only three sides. The order the sides are listed in does not matter for SSS — only whether the SET of three lengths matches, and it does, so 'listed in a different order' is not a reason to say no. Nothing extra is needed: SSS proves congruence from side lengths alone, without any angles, so it can be determined.
3. (b) 0.4 — The two events are independent, so multiply the two probabilities: 0.8 × 0.5 = 0.4. Choosing 1.3 comes from adding the two probabilities instead of multiplying, 0.8 + 0.5 = 1.3. Choosing 0.3 comes from subtracting the two probabilities, 0.8 − 0.5 = 0.3, instead of multiplying them. Choosing 0.1 comes from using the probability that Ben is NOT on time, 1 − 0.8 = 0.2, and multiplying that by Freya's probability instead, 0.2 × 0.5 = 0.1.
4. (a) 3/8 — Convert 2 hours to minutes: 2 hours = 120 minutes. Form the fraction 45/120. Both numbers share a factor of 15, so 45 ÷ 15 = 3 and 120 ÷ 15 = 8, giving 3/8. 8/3 comes from writing the fraction the wrong way round, as 120/45. 9/40 comes from converting 2 hours using ×100 instead of ×60, treating it as 200 minutes, then simplifying 45/200. 45/2 comes from not converting the hours to minutes at all, and writing 45 over 2.
5. (d) 1 hour 32 minutes — T = 40 × 1.8 + 20 = 72 + 20 = 92 minutes. Since 92 = 60 + 32, the cooking time is 1 hour 32 minutes. A candidate who rounds the mass to 2 kg before substituting gets 40 × 2 + 20 = 100 minutes = 1 hour 40 minutes. A candidate who forgets to add the 20 minutes gets 40 × 1.8 = 72 minutes = 1 hour 12 minutes. A candidate who multiplies the mass by (40 + 20) = 60 instead of substituting into the formula gets 1.8 × 60 = 108 minutes = 1 hour 48 minutes.
6. (a) The equation has one solution; the inequality has many. — Method: solve each statement. From 2x + 3 = 11, 2x = 8, so x = 4 — a single value. From 2x + 3 > 11, 2x > 8, so x > 4 — every number greater than 4 makes the inequality true, so there are many solutions. So the equation has one solution and the inequality has many. Distractor origins: swapping the two round gives the range to the equation and the single value to the inequality; saying both have exactly one solution treats the > sign as if it were an = sign; saying both have many solutions treats the equation as if it were an inequality.
7. (a) 2 — Gradient = (change in y) ÷ (change in x) = (11 − 3) ÷ (6 − 2) = 8 ÷ 4 = 2. "0.5" comes from dividing the change in x by the change in y the wrong way round: 4 ÷ 8. "8" is only the change in y, forgetting to divide by the change in x at all. "−2" comes from a sign error, as if the y-coordinate had decreased rather than increased.
8. (b) (48/52) × (47/51) — Method: for two deals one after the other with nothing put back, multiply the probability of the first by the probability of the second worked out from the cards that are left. Working: 52 − 4 = 48 cards are not aces, so the first card is not an ace with probability 48/52. One card has now gone and it was not an ace, so 51 cards remain and 47 of them are not aces, giving 47/51. Answer: the probability is (48/52) × (47/51). The distractors: (48/52) × (48/52) comes from leaving the pack at 52 cards for the second deal, which is only true if the first card is replaced; (4/52) × (3/51) comes from working out the probability that both cards ARE aces instead of neither; (4/52) × (4/51) comes from the same misreading with the ace count left at 4 while the total is reduced, adjusting only half of the second fraction.
9. (c) 100√3 cm — The height is opposite the 60° angle, so height = 2 × sin 60° = 2 × √3/2 = √3 m. Converting to centimetres: √3 m = 100√3 cm. '√3 cm' forgets to convert the answer from metres to centimetres. '200√3 cm' comes from mis-recalling sin 60° as √3 instead of √3/2, dropping the denominator of the exact value: 2 × √3 = 2√3 m = 200√3 cm. '50√3 cm' comes from halving the ladder's length before multiplying by sin 60°, instead of using the full 2 m.
10. (c) 32 — Method: alternate angles between parallel lines are equal, so 2x + 10 = 74. Working: subtracting 10 from both sides gives 2x = 64; dividing by 2 gives x = 32. Answer: x = 32. A candidate who forgets to subtract 10 first and divides 74 by 2 directly gets 37. A candidate who treats the angles as co-interior instead of alternate, so that the two expressions add to 180° rather than being equal, gets 48 after solving. A candidate who makes a sign error and treats the equation as 2x equalling 10 minus 74 instead of 74 minus 10 gets −32.
11. (a) 600 cm — Method: a scale of 1 : n means each 1 cm on the plan stands for n cm in real life, so multiply the plan length by the scale. Working: 3 × 200 = 600. Answer: 600 cm. The distractors: 60 cm comes from multiplying by 20 instead of 200; 203 cm comes from adding the scale to the plan length instead of multiplying; 6000 cm comes from reading the scale as 1 : 2000.
12. (b) 20 — The gradient is the change in p divided by the change in t: (90 − 30) ÷ (5 − 2) = 60 ÷ 3 = 20. Choosing 0.05 comes from dividing the change in t by the change in p, the wrong way round (3 ÷ 60). Choosing −20 comes from subtracting the coordinates in the wrong order for one part of the calculation, for example (30 − 90) ÷ (5 − 2), giving a negative value. Choosing 18 comes from dividing the second p-coordinate by the second t-coordinate directly (90 ÷ 5) instead of using the change between the two points.