⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (b) −4 — To subtract a negative number, add its positive equivalent: −7 − (−3) becomes −7 + 3. Work out −7 + 3 to get −4. Treating "− (−3)" as simply "−3" without flipping the sign gives the wrong working −7 − 3, which is −10. Ignoring the negative sign on −7 and just subtracting the values, 7 − 3, gives 4, which loses the sign of the starting number. Flipping the sign of both numbers, 7 + 3, gives 10, which changes more than the double negative allows. So −7 − (−3) = −4.
2. (d) 7 — Method: set up the equation 2.50 + 1.80m = 15.10, then subtract the booking fee and divide by the cost per mile. Working: 1.80m = 15.10 − 2.50 = 12.60; m = 12.60 ÷ 1.80 = 7. Answer: 7 miles. 8.39 comes from dividing the whole £15.10 by £1.80 without first subtracting the booking fee: 15.10 ÷ 1.80 ≈ 8.39. 5.32 comes from swapping the two amounts round, subtracting £1.80 and dividing by £2.50: (15.10 − 1.80) ÷ 2.50 ≈ 5.32. 9.78 comes from adding the booking fee instead of subtracting it: (15.10 + 2.50) ÷ 1.80 ≈ 9.78.
3. (c) The 5 must multiply both terms inside the bracket, so 5(x + 2) expands to 5x + 10, which is never equal to 5x + 2 for any value of x. — Expanding the bracket correctly, 5(x + 2) = 5x + 10, since the 5 multiplies both the x and the 2. This is never equal to 5x + 2, since that would require 10 = 2. The option claiming 5(x + 2) means 5 × x + 2 ignores that the 5 must multiply the whole bracket, not just the x-term. The option about working out the bracket first with a value of x misunderstands algebraic expansion, which holds for every x, not just specific ones. The option about addition before multiplication misapplies the order of operations to bracket expansion, which always distributes the outer factor over every term inside, whatever x is.
4. (d) 3 : 2 — Convert both amounts to pence: £3.60 = 360p and £2.40 = 240p, giving the ratio 360 : 240. Divide both parts by their highest common factor, 120, to get 3 : 2. Giving 360 : 240 has not been simplified at all. Giving 2 : 3 swaps the order. Giving 36 : 24 has been divided by 10, which is a common factor but not the highest one, so it is not yet in simplest form.
5. (b) 18 — Method: multiply the two numbers ignoring their signs, then apply the rule that a negative number multiplied by a negative number gives a positive answer. Working: 6 × 3 = 18; since both −6 and −3 are negative, the product is positive. Answer: 18. −18 comes from keeping the answer negative, as if only one of the two negative signs affects the sign of the product. −9 comes from adding the two numbers instead of multiplying them, −6 + (−3) = −9. 9 comes from adding 6 and 3 as if both numbers were positive, ignoring the negative signs entirely.
6. (c) 6 squares — Method: the plan view shows the footprint of the solid; a second layer stacked on top of floor positions that are already covered does not create any new squares in the plan. Working: the row of 4 cubes and the row of 2 cubes attached at the end do not overlap, so the footprint has 4 + 2 = 6 distinct squares. Answer: 6 squares. The distractors: 12 squares comes from counting the total number of cubes used, including the second layer (6 floor positions × 2 layers = 12), instead of the footprint. 4 squares comes from counting only the row of four and forgetting the attached row of two. 5 squares comes from wrongly treating the corner square as shared between the two rows (4 + 1 instead of 4 + 2).
7. (b) 5 — Method: expand the bracket first, then solve the resulting linear equation. Working: 3(2x − 1) = 6x − 3, so 6x − 3 = 27. Add 3 to both sides: 6x = 30. Divide by 6: x = 5. Answer: 5. 4 2/3 comes from multiplying only the 2x inside the bracket by 3 and forgetting to multiply the −1 as well, giving 6x − 1 = 27. 4 comes from a sign error when expanding, writing 6x + 3 instead of 6x − 3. 4.5 comes from dividing 27 by 3 to get 2x − 1 = 9, then forgetting to add 1 back before dividing by 2, using 2x = 9 instead of 2x = 10.
8. (a) 3 squares — Method: the plan view shows only the floor positions that have at least one cube standing on them; height does not add extra squares to the plan. Working: the base row occupies three floor positions in a line. The two extra cubes stand on top of two of those same three positions, so they do not create any new floor position. Answer: 3 squares. The distractors: 5 squares comes from adding the total number of cubes used (3 + 2 = 5) instead of counting distinct floor positions. 2 squares comes from counting only the raised two-cube section and ignoring the single cube at the other end of the row. 4 squares comes from counting one of the shared positions twice.
9. (d) Full-time workers, as most are at work at that time — Method: a sample is biased when the method of contact makes part of the population much less likely to be reached, so test each group against where its members actually are between 10 am and 2 pm on a weekday, and test each stated reason against the facts. Working: those hours are the middle of the working day, so people in full-time employment are at work and not beside a landline telephone, while people who are retired and people who are unemployed are far more likely to be at home and are reached at the usual rate; the method therefore collects far fewer replies from full-time workers than their share of the adult population the council is consulting. Answer: full-time workers, as most are at work at that time. The distractors: the reply naming retired people rests on the false claim that most retired people are at work in the daytime, when in fact a daytime call reaches them more easily than anyone; the reply naming unemployed people rests on the false claim that they are out during the day, when they too are among the easiest people to reach by a daytime call; the reply naming children rests on the false claim that children are at home at 11 am on a Tuesday, when they are at school and so are not reached by the call at all, and school-age children are in any case not the adults whose views the council is collecting.
10. (b) 2.1 m — The three pieces use 3 × 0.9 = 2.7 m of wood. Remaining wood = 4.8 − 2.7 = 2.1 m. A candidate who miscounts and only subtracts 2 pieces instead of 3 gets 4.8 − 1.8 = 3.0 m. A candidate who adds instead of subtracting gets 4.8 + 2.7 = 7.5 m. A candidate who gives the length used instead of the length remaining gets 2.7 m.
11. (c) 20 cm — Convert 5 km to centimetres: 5 km = 5000 m = 500 000 cm. Divide by the scale factor: 500 000 ÷ 25 000 = 20, giving 20 cm. Converting only as far as metres, 5000 ÷ 25 000 = 0.2, gives 0.2 cm — the conversion to centimetres was never finished. Dropping a zero in the division gives 2 cm, ten times too small. Misreading the scale as 1 : 2500 instead of 1 : 25 000 gives 500 000 ÷ 2500 = 200 cm, ten times too big.
12. (c) 45° — Method: the tower, the ground and the line of sight form a right-angled triangle in which the 25 m height is opposite the angle of elevation and the 25 m along the ground is adjacent to it, so use tan θ = opposite ÷ adjacent. Working: tan θ = 25 ÷ 25 = 1, so θ = tan⁻¹(1). Answer: 45°. The distractors: 90° comes from using sin θ = 25 ÷ 25 = 1, which treats the 25 m along the ground as the hypotenuse when it is the side next to the angle; 1° comes from writing down the value of tan θ as though it were the angle itself; 50° comes from adding the two given lengths, 25 + 25, instead of comparing them.