⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (b) (3, −3) — Subtracting column vectors means subtracting the top numbers and subtracting the bottom numbers, in the order given: top = 5 − 2 = 3, bottom = 1 − 4 = −3, giving (3, −3). A candidate who works out v − u instead of u − v, reversing the order, gets (−3, 3). A candidate who makes a sign error on the bottom number, treating 1 − 4 as 3 instead of −3, gets (3, 3). A candidate who adds the vectors instead of subtracting gets (7, 5). Because the question asks for u − v, not v − u, the correct answer is (3, −3).
2. (d) Isla is right, because 5 + 1 = 6 — Method: put the input through the machine yourself, then compare what comes out with the output claimed, and check that the reason given with the verdict is itself true. Working: the machine adds 1 to whatever is put in, so an input of 5 gives 5 + 1 = 6, which is exactly the output claimed. Answer: Isla is right, and the reason is that 5 + 1 = 6. The distractors: the statement that the machine adds 1 to its output describes a different machine — this one adds 1 to what goes in — so the verdict is right but the reason is false; 5 − 1 = 4 comes from running the machine backwards and subtracting instead of adding; 5 × 1 = 5 comes from reading ‘adds 1’ as ‘multiplies by 1’, which leaves the input unchanged.
3. (b) x = y − 7 — The letter x has 7 added to it, and the inverse of adding 7 is subtracting 7. Subtracting 7 from both sides leaves x on its own on the right, giving y − 7 = x, which is written x = y − 7. Adding 7 to both sides instead repeats the operation rather than undoing it; writing 7 − y reverses the subtraction, which changes the sign of the whole expression; writing 7y treats the addition as a multiplication.
4. (b) (2, 6) — To add column vectors, add the top numbers together and add the bottom numbers together, separately: top = 3 + (−1) = 2, bottom = 2 + 4 = 6, giving (2, 6). A candidate who writes the top and bottom numbers of the correct answer in the wrong order gives (6, 2). A candidate who subtracts instead of adds, working out 3 − (−1) = 4 and 2 − 4 = −2, gives (4, −2). A candidate who adds the top numbers correctly but subtracts the bottom numbers by mistake, working out 2 − 4 = −2, gives (2, −2). The correct answer is (2, 6).
5. (b) 4/5 — Write the mass of the beans over the mass of the soup: 400/500. Divide the top and bottom by 100 to get 4/5. Choosing 5/4 comes from writing the soup's mass over the beans' mass, the wrong way round. Choosing 1/5 comes from finding the difference in mass (500 − 400 = 100) and writing that over the mass of the soup, instead of using the mass of the beans. Choosing 5/9 comes from writing the mass of the soup over the total mass of both tins (500 out of 900), instead of over the mass of the beans.
6. (b) Kite — Method: name a quadrilateral by matching what is given — which sides are equal, whether those equal sides lie next to each other or opposite each other, and whether any sides are parallel — against the definitions of the special quadrilaterals. Working: the two 6 cm sides meet at B and the two 9 cm sides meet at D, so each pair of equal sides is a pair of neighbours rather than a pair of opposites, and the stem rules out any parallel sides. The quadrilateral with two pairs of equal adjacent sides and no parallel sides is a kite. Answer: kite. The distractors: a rhombus is chosen by candidates who see two pairs of equal sides and read that as all four sides being equal, which the two different lengths of 6 cm and 9 cm rule out; a parallelogram is chosen by candidates who remember that a parallelogram has two pairs of equal sides but not that in a parallelogram the equal sides are the opposite ones, and who pass over the statement that nothing is parallel; an isosceles trapezium is chosen by candidates who notice that the shape is symmetrical about the line BD and treat symmetry on its own as the mark of a trapezium, when a trapezium needs a pair of parallel sides.
7. (d) 4.44 m — The real van's length is 18.5 × 24 = 444 cm, which converts to 4.44 m. '0.77 m' comes from dividing by 24 instead of multiplying, using the ratio the wrong way round (18.5 ÷ 24 = 0.77 cm), and then writing that figure down as metres. '44.4 m' comes from converting 444 cm to metres with the decimal point in the wrong place. '444 m' comes from working out 444 cm correctly but forgetting to convert it into metres at all.
8. (a) 110° — The truss is isosceles, so its two base angles are equal; since the three angles of the triangle add up to 180° and the apex is 40°, each base angle is (180 − 40) ÷ 2 = 70°. The angle between the sloping edge and the joist, extended beyond the base of the truss, sits on a straight line with that 70° base angle, and angles on a straight line add up to 180°, so the required angle is 180 − 70 = 110°. "70°" comes from stopping after finding the base angle and giving it directly, without also using the straight-line fact to find the angle on the OUTSIDE of the truss. "140°" comes from doubling the base angle instead of using the straight-line fact. "20°" comes from taking half of the apex angle (40° ÷ 2), mistaking it for the required angle instead of properly using the triangle's angle sum.
9. (d) 24 — Method: for a sample in proportion to the population, apply the same fraction that each group makes up of the whole population to the size of the sample. Working: women make up 300 out of the 500 members, a fraction of 300 ÷ 500 = 0.6. Applying that fraction to the sample of 40 gives 0.6 × 40 = 24 women. Splitting the sample evenly, 40 ÷ 2 = 20, ignores that the club has more women than men and treats the two groups as equal in size, which they are not. Misreading the sample size as 50 instead of 40, then applying the 3:2 ratio of women to men, 3 ÷ 5 × 50 = 30, uses the right ratio but the wrong sample total. Working out the number of MEN instead of women, 200 ÷ 500 × 40 = 16, answers a different question — how many men, not how many women, belong in the sample. Always apply each group's own share of the population to the sample size, and check which group the question is actually asking about.
10. (b) 37/75 — There are 150 − 84 = 66 men. 84 − 50 = 34 women prefer weight training, and 40 men prefer weight training, so 34 + 40 = 74 people in total prefer weight training, out of 150: 74/150 = 37/75. Writing 4/15 is wrong because it only counts the men who prefer weight training (40/150, simplified), leaving out the 34 women. Writing 17/75 is wrong because it only counts the women who prefer weight training (34/150, simplified), leaving out the 40 men. Writing 37/42 is wrong because it uses the number of women (84) as the denominator instead of the whole gym (150) — 74/84 simplifies to 37/42, but that is not a probability out of the whole group. The probability is 37/75.
11. (c) No, 90 cm is far outside the heights on the graph — Method: a line of best fit describes the trend only across the stretch of data it was drawn through; predicting beyond that stretch is extrapolation, and nothing in the data supports it. Working: the heights used to draw this line run from 150 cm to 180 cm, all of them Year 10 pupils, while 90 cm is 60 cm below the shortest of them and belongs to a two-year-old child, whose build follows no trend the graph has measured. Substituting anyway gives 0.9 × 90 − 85 = −4, a mass of −4 kg, which cannot exist. Answer: no, because 90 cm is far outside the heights on the graph. The distractors: saying a line of best fit cannot be used to predict at all throws away its main purpose, since a prediction made between the plotted values is perfectly sound; saying the line passes through all 20 points misdescribes a line of best fit, which is drawn to follow the trend of the points and will normally pass through few of them; saying the equation works for any value put into it treats an equation fitted to Year 10 heights as a law of nature, and the mass of −4 kg shows what that assumption produces.
12. (a) 17 cm — Convert the real distance to centimetres first: 3.4 km = 340 000 cm. Then divide by the scale factor, 20 000, since the map is 20 000 times smaller than real life: 340 000 ÷ 20 000 = 17, so the map distance is 17 cm. Choosing 1700 cm divides by 200 instead of 20 000, losing two zeros from the scale factor (340 000 ÷ 200 = 1700). Choosing 170 cm divides by 2 000 instead of 20 000, losing one zero from the scale factor (340 000 ÷ 2 000 = 170). Choosing 0.17 cm divides by 2 000 000 instead of 20 000, adding two extra zeros to the scale factor (340 000 ÷ 2 000 000 = 0.17).