⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (c) L/5 − 3 — Each of the 5 equal pieces is L/5 metres long, and removing 3 metres from one piece gives L/5 − 3. Subtracting the 3 metres before dividing by 5, (L − 3)/5, divides the removed length between all 5 pieces instead of taking it from just one. Dividing only the 3 by 5 instead of dividing L by 5, L − 3/5, divides the wrong number. Writing 5/L − 3 inverts the fraction, swapping which number is the numerator.
2. (c) AB and CD are equal in length — AB = CD states that the line segments AB and CD are equal in length; it says nothing about their direction or position. 'AB is parallel to CD' would be written AB ∥ CD, not AB = CD. 'A, B, C and D all lie on one line' is not what an equals sign between two segment names states at all. 'AB is perpendicular to CD' would be written AB ⊥ CD, not AB = CD.
3. (a) 17 cm — Convert the real distance to centimetres first: 3.4 km = 340 000 cm. Then divide by the scale factor, 20 000, since the map is 20 000 times smaller than real life: 340 000 ÷ 20 000 = 17, so the map distance is 17 cm. Choosing 1700 cm divides by 200 instead of 20 000, losing two zeros from the scale factor (340 000 ÷ 200 = 1700). Choosing 170 cm divides by 2 000 instead of 20 000, losing one zero from the scale factor (340 000 ÷ 2 000 = 170). Choosing 0.17 cm divides by 2 000 000 instead of 20 000, adding two extra zeros to the scale factor (340 000 ÷ 2 000 000 = 0.17).
4. (c) The median, £160,000, as one very high price lifts the mean — Method: find both averages, then choose the one that sits closer to the bulk of the data. Working: in order the prices are 140,000, 150,000, 160,000, 170,000 and 580,000, so the median is the third of the five, £160,000. For the mean, 140,000 + 150,000 + 160,000 + 170,000 + 580,000 = 1,200,000 and 1,200,000 ÷ 5 = 240,000, so the mean is £240,000. Four of the five houses sold for £170,000 or less, so a reader told that a typical price is £240,000 would expect to pay at least £70,000 more than any of those four cost. Answer: the median, £160,000, as one very high price lifts the mean. The distractors: £580,000 is the middle value of the list as it is printed, which is the median only when the values have first been put in order; £240,000 is the mean, chosen on the ground that a median ignores three of the five prices, but a median uses all five to find which one is central and is then untroubled by how extreme the outer values are; £155,000 comes from deleting the £580,000 house and taking the mean of what is left, since 140,000 + 150,000 + 160,000 + 170,000 = 620,000 and 620,000 ÷ 4 = 155,000, but a real sale may not be thrown away merely for being large.
5. (d) The roots of x² − 6x + 5 = 0 are x = 1 and x = 5 (since it factorises to (x − 1)(x − 5)), so by symmetry the turning point has x-coordinate 3, not 6. — Factorising, x² − 6x + 5 = (x − 1)(x − 5), so the roots are x = 1 and x = 5. The turning point lies midway between the roots by symmetry: (1 + 5) ÷ 2 = 3. The coefficient of x has no direct role in locating the turning point this way. The option giving −6 makes an arbitrary sign change with no mathematical basis. The option giving 5 wrongly takes just one of the two roots instead of their midpoint.
6. (d) 8 — Method: write both present ages in terms of one letter, take four years off each of them, and form an equation from the comparison four years ago. Working: let Amelia be y, so her mother is 3y; four years ago they were y − 4 and 3y − 4, giving 3y − 4 = 5(y − 4); expanding gives 3y − 4 = 5y − 20; adding 20 and subtracting 3y from both sides gives 16 = 2y, and dividing by 2 gives y = 8. Checking: Amelia is 8 and her mother 24; four years ago they were 4 and 20, and 20 = 5 × 4. Answer: 8. The distractors: 4 comes from solving correctly but giving Amelia's age four years ago instead of her age now; 16 comes from stopping at 2y = 16 and giving 16 as her age; 2 comes from collecting the y terms by adding the 5y instead of subtracting it, giving 3y + 5y = 20 − 4 and so 8y = 16.
7. (a) 1/29 — The probability that Priya's ticket wins is 6/30. Since her ticket is not returned, there are now only 5 winning tickets left out of 29 tickets in total, so the probability that Tom's ticket also wins is 5/29. Multiplying these, 6/30 × 5/29 = 30/870 = 1/29. A candidate who answers 1/25 has treated Priya's ticket as returned, using 6/30 twice. A candidate who answers 1/30 has correctly reduced the winning tickets to 5 for Tom but forgotten to reduce the total number of tickets, using 5/30 instead of 5/29. A candidate who answers 11/59 has added the numerators and added the denominators, (6+5)/(30+29), instead of multiplying.
8. (a) £54 — Method: for direct proportion, wage = rate × hours. Working: £9 × 6 = £54. Wrong options: £15 comes from adding the rate and the hours instead of multiplying (£9 + 6); £63 comes from using 7 hours instead of 6; £1.50 comes from dividing the rate by the hours instead of multiplying (£9 ÷ 6).
9. (c) 6 — Listing systematically: red-black, red-grey, blue-black, blue-grey, green-black, green-grey gives 6 different outfits, matching 3 × 2 = 6. 5 comes from adding the number of T-shirts and shorts instead of multiplying them. 3 comes from counting only the T-shirts. 2 comes from counting only the pairs of shorts.
10. (c) y = x² — Method: test a candidate rule against every pair given, not just one — a rule that fits one pair and fails another is not the rule. Working: the outputs 1, 4, 9 rise by 3 and then by 5, so they are not going up in equal steps and the input is not simply multiplied by a fixed number; comparing each output with its own input gives 1 × 1 = 1, 2 × 2 = 4 and 3 × 3 = 9, and all three pairs fit. Answer: y = x². The distractors: y = 3x comes from fitting only the last pair, where 3 × 3 = 9, and reading that 3 as a multiplier; y = 3x − 2 comes from assuming a multiply-then-add rule and using the first step in the outputs, 4 − 1 = 3, as the multiplier — it fits the first two pairs and fails the third; y = 2x comes from fitting only the pair 2 and 4 and reading every output as double its input.
11. (d) 7 — Method: substitute both values, work out the two multiplications first, and only then subtract. Working: 3a = 3 × 5 = 15 and 2b = 2 × 4 = 8, so the expression becomes 15 − 8 = 7. Answer: 7. The distractors: 23 comes from adding the two products instead of subtracting, giving 15 + 8; −7 comes from subtracting the wrong way round and working out 8 − 15; 52 comes from working from left to right instead of following the order of operations, giving 3 × 5 = 15, then 15 − 2 = 13, then 13 × 4.
12. (c) 12 — Method: a square root asks which positive number multiplied by itself gives the number under the root sign. Working: 11 × 11 = 121, which is too small, and 12 × 12 = 144. Answer: 12. The distractors: 14 comes from recalling the wrong square fact, since 14 × 14 = 196; 36 comes from dividing 144 by 4 instead of taking a square root; 72 comes from halving 144, treating a square root as a halving.