⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (b) 2² × 3 × 5 — Repeatedly divide 60 by prime numbers: 60 ÷ 2 = 30, 30 ÷ 2 = 15, 15 ÷ 3 = 5, and 5 is itself prime. So 60 is 2 × 2 × 3 × 5, which in index notation is 2² × 3 × 5. Stopping the factor tree after only three divisions and writing 2 × 3 × 5 misses that the 2 divides in twice, and gives only 30, not 60. Squaring the 3 as well as the 2 gives 2² × 3² × 5, which comes to 180, far too big. Squaring the 5 instead of the 2 gives 2 × 3 × 5², which comes to 150, also too big. So 60 = 2² × 3 × 5.
2. (a) 28.6 m — The perimeter of a sector is the two straight radii plus the curved arc. This sector's 90° angle is one quarter of a full turn, so its arc length is one quarter of the full circle's circumference. The full circumference is 2 × 3.14 × 8 = 50.24 m, and one quarter of that is 50.24 ÷ 4 = 12.56 m. Add the two 8 m radii: 12.56 + 8 + 8 = 28.56 m, which rounds to 28.6 m. Choosing 12.6 m gives the arc length alone (rounded), forgetting the two straight edges of the sector. Choosing 20.6 m adds only one radius to the arc length instead of two, missing one of the two straight sides. Choosing 41.1 m comes from using the diameter, 16 m, as if it were the radius when working out the arc length (2 × 3.14 × 16 = 100.48, one quarter of which is 25.12), then adding the two correct 8 m radii (25.12 + 8 + 8 = 41.12).
3. (a) 24 — Method: rearrange the relationship so that the lowest common multiple stands alone; it is the product of the two numbers divided by their highest common factor. Working: 48 = 2 × the lowest common multiple, so the lowest common multiple is 48 ÷ 2 = 24. Checking, 24 is in the 6 times table and in the 8 times table. Answer: 24. The distractors: 48 comes from giving the product of the two numbers and never dividing by the highest common factor; 96 comes from multiplying by the highest common factor instead of dividing by it; 12 comes from dividing by the highest common factor twice, once for each of the two numbers.
4. (c) 24 — PQ lies along the x-axis with length 6, and PR lies along the y-axis with length 8, meeting at a right angle at P, so QR = √(6² + 8²) = √100 = 10. The perimeter is 6 + 8 + 10 = 24. "14" adds only the two shorter sides, PQ and PR, and leaves out the hypotenuse QR completely. "28" comes from finding QR incorrectly as 6 + 8 = 14 instead of using Pythagoras' theorem, then adding 6 + 8 + 14. "48" comes from multiplying the two shorter sides, 6 × 8, instead of finding and adding all three sides of the triangle.
5. (d) The cyclist's speed, in kilometres per hour — Method: on any straight-line graph the gradient is the change in the quantity on the vertical axis for each 1 unit of the quantity on the horizontal axis, so its meaning is read off the two axis labels. Working: the vertical axis is distance in kilometres and the horizontal axis is time in hours, so the gradient counts kilometres for each hour, and distance for each hour is speed. Answer: the cyclist's speed, in kilometres per hour. The distractors: 'the total distance the cyclist travels, in kilometres' reads the gradient as a value taken off the vertical axis, but a gradient is a rate and no end point of the journey has been given; 'the time the cyclist takes, in hours' names the horizontal axis, which is the quantity the gradient divides by rather than the gradient itself; 'the distance the cyclist travels in 18 hours' treats the 18 as a value of t, when 18 is the steepness of the line and not a point on it.
6. (b) 2.1 m — The three pieces use 3 × 0.9 = 2.7 m of wood. Remaining wood = 4.8 − 2.7 = 2.1 m. A candidate who miscounts and only subtracts 2 pieces instead of 3 gets 4.8 − 1.8 = 3.0 m. A candidate who adds instead of subtracting gets 4.8 + 2.7 = 7.5 m. A candidate who gives the length used instead of the length remaining gets 2.7 m.
7. (a) x = 6, y = 27 — Method: for direct proportion, y = kx, so k = y ÷ x. Working: k = 9 ÷ 2 = 4.5. At x = 6: y = 4.5 × 6 = 27. Wrong options: x = 6, y = 13 comes from adding the change in x (4) onto y instead of scaling by k; x = 6, y = 3 comes from treating the relationship as inverse proportion (k = 2 × 9 = 18, then y = 18 ÷ 6 = 3); x = 6, y = 24 comes from rounding the constant of proportionality down to 4 instead of using 4.5.
8. (d) 283 cm³ — Volume of a cylinder = πr²h. Using π = 3.14: V = 3.14 × 3² × 10 = 3.14 × 9 × 10 = 282.6, which rounds to 283 cm³. A pupil who uses the diameter, 6 cm, instead of the radius gets 3.14 × 6² × 10 = 1130.4 ≈ 1130 cm³. A pupil who forgets to square the radius gets 3.14 × 3 × 10 = 94.2 ≈ 94 cm³. A pupil who uses the circumference formula 2πr instead of πr² gets 2 × 3.14 × 3 × 10 = 188.4 ≈ 188 cm³. The correct volume is 283 cm³.
9. (b) likely — On the probability scale, 'certain' is reserved for a probability of exactly 1, and 'evens' describes a probability of exactly 0.5. A probability of 0.9 is high but not equal to 1, so the correct word is 'likely'. Choosing 'certain' treats a probability close to 1 as if it were exactly 1, which it is not. Choosing 'evens' misjudges 0.9 as being close to the midpoint of the scale, when it is close to the 'certain' end instead. Choosing 'unlikely' reads the scale the wrong way round, as if a high probability meant a low chance of happening.
10. (c) 20p — Turn each price into the same rate before comparing. The small bag is 400 g = 0.4 kg, so it costs £1.12 ÷ 0.4 = £2.80 per kg. The large bag costs £3.90 ÷ 1.5 = £2.60 per kg. The saving is £2.80 − £2.60 = £0.20, which is 20p per kg. 2p compares the prices per 100 g rather than per kilogram, £2.78 subtracts one bag price from the other without turning either into a rate, and £2.60 is the large bag's price per kilogram rather than the saving.
11. (a) Negative correlation — As the age of the car increases, the points fall towards a lower value, so the value decreases as the age increases. This falling pattern is a negative correlation. A positive correlation would show the points rising together instead. No correlation would apply only if the points showed no pattern at all, and correlation is not the same as causation — strong causation is not a type of correlation.
12. (b) 4,700 — To round to the nearest 100, look at the digit in the tens column, which decides whether the hundreds column rounds up or stays the same. In 4,685 that digit is 8, and since 8 is 5 or more, the 6 in the hundreds column rounds up to 7, giving 4,700. Simply changing the last two digits to zero without checking the tens digit gives 4,600, which rounds down when it should round up. Rounding to the nearest 10 instead of the nearest 100 gives 4,690. Rounding to the nearest 1,000 instead gives 5,000, one place value too coarse.