⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (a) 16 — k = 8m ÷ 5 = (8 × 10) ÷ 5 = 80 ÷ 5 = 16. A candidate who multiplies 8 by 10 but forgets to divide by 5 gets 80. A candidate who divides 10 by 8 and multiplies by 5, using the fraction upside down, gets 10 × 5 ÷ 8 = 6.25. A candidate who adds instead of substituting into the formula gets 8 + 10 = 18.
2. (d) 2x + 4 — Method: collect the like terms, which here are the two terms in x, and leave the number term on its own because a number and a term in x are unlike. Working: x + x is one lot of x added to one more lot of x, which is 2x; the 4 has nothing like it to join with, so it is written after the 2x. Answer: 2x + 4. The distractors: x² + 4 comes from multiplying the two x terms instead of adding them; x + 4 comes from treating x + x as a single x, as though the repeated letter counted only once; 6x comes from collecting the unlike terms together, adding 1 + 1 + 4 and attaching the letter to that total.
3. (c) 1 : 300 — First convert both lengths to the same unit: 15 m = 1500 cm. The scale compares 5 cm on the drawing to 1500 cm in real life, so dividing both parts by 5 gives a scale of 1 : 300. A candidate who compares 5 to 15 without converting units gets 1 : 3. A candidate who converts 15 m to 150 cm, using the wrong conversion factor, gets 1 : 30. A candidate who converts 15 m to 15000 cm, again using the wrong conversion factor, gets 1 : 3000. The scale of the drawing is 1 : 300.
4. (a) 15 cm — Take the square root of each part of the area ratio to find the length ratio: the square root of 4 is 2 and the square root of 25 is 5, giving a length ratio of 2 : 5. Multiply the smaller flag's height by the scale factor 5 ÷ 2 = 2.5: 6 × 2.5 = 15, so the larger flag is 15 cm tall. Giving 37.5 cm uses the area ratio, 25 ÷ 4 = 6.25, directly as the scale factor without square-rooting it first (6 × 6.25 = 37.5). Giving 2.4 cm applies the length ratio the wrong way round, scaling the smaller flag down by 2 ÷ 5 instead of up by 5 ÷ 2 (6 × 0.4 = 2.4). Giving 27 cm adds the difference between the two area-ratio numbers, 25 − 4 = 21, onto the smaller height instead of using it as a scale factor (6 + 21 = 27).
5. (a) isosceles trapezium — One pair of parallel sides, plus a separate pair of equal non-parallel sides, is exactly the definition of an isosceles trapezium — the shape the designer should draw. Parallelogram is wrong because a parallelogram needs BOTH pairs of opposite sides parallel, but only one pair is parallel here. Kite is wrong because a kite has two separate pairs of adjacent equal sides and no requirement for any sides to be parallel, a different combination of properties. Rhombus is wrong because a rhombus needs all four sides equal, but the description only makes two of the four sides equal to each other.
6. (c) 21.6 — m² = (−2.4)² = 5.76, since a negative number squared is positive, so 5m² = 28.8. Then 3m = 3 × (−2.4) = −7.2. Total: 28.8 + (−7.2) = 21.6. −36 comes from taking m² as negative, 5 × (−5.76) − 7.2 = −36, forgetting that squaring removes the negative sign. 36 comes from ignoring the negative sign on m altogether and using m = 2.4 throughout. 29.4 comes from treating 3m as 3 + m instead of 3 × m, giving 28.8 + (3 + (−2.4)).
7. (d) 15 cm — An enlargement by scale factor 3 means every length is multiplied by 3: 5 × 3 = 15 cm. Dividing by the scale factor instead, 5 ÷ 3 = 1.7 (to 1 d.p.), gives 1.7 cm — dividing shrinks the plan rather than enlarging it. Adding the scale factor instead of multiplying, 5 + 3 = 8, gives 8 cm. Squaring the scale factor, as you would for an area, 5 × 3² = 45, gives 45 cm — length scales by the factor itself, not its square.
8. (a) 160 g — Method: use the ratio 20:100 to find the mass of the whole solution from the mass of acid, then take the acid away to leave the water. Working: 20:100 = 40:m, and 40 ÷ 20 = 2, so m = 2 × 100 = 200 g of solution; the water is 200 − 40 = 160 g. Answer: 160 g. The distractors: 200 g is the mass of the whole solution, which is the middle step and includes the acid the question asks you to leave out; 8 g comes from working out 20% of 40 g, which treats the 40 g as the whole solution rather than as the 20% inside it; 10 g comes from reading the 40 g as the 80% that is water, giving a solution of 50 g and a difference of 50 − 40.
9. (c) A line has no endpoints; a segment has two — A line extends without end in both directions, whereas a line segment is the part of a line between two specific fixed endpoints, so 'a line has no endpoints; a segment has two' is correct. 'A line has two endpoints; a segment has none' reverses these two definitions, so it is wrong. 'A line segment is always curved' is wrong because a line segment is straight, not curved, and does not extend infinitely. 'A line segment is a closed shape' is wrong because a line segment is a straight length between two points, not a polygon.
10. (c) 25 m — The gardener needs the circumference, since the trim goes around the flower bed. Circumference = πd = 3.14 × 8 = 25.12 m, which rounds to 25 m. A student who mistakes the diameter (8 m) for the radius, then doubles it before multiplying by π, gets 3.14 × 16 = 50.24 m, rounding to 50 m. A student who makes the same mistake but uses the area formula instead of the circumference gets 3.14 × 8² = 200.96 m², rounding to 201. A student who correctly halves the diameter to find the radius (4 m) but then uses πr instead of πd gets 3.14 × 4 = 12.56 m, rounding to 13 m.
11. (a) A smaller circle — Since the cutting plane is parallel to the circular base, the cross-section is also a circle, but smaller than the base because the cone narrows as it rises towards the apex, so 'a smaller circle' is correct. 'A triangle' wrongly describes the outline seen from the side of the cone, not a horizontal cross-section. 'An ellipse' would only result from a cut made at an angle to the base, not one parallel to it. 'The same size circle as the base' wrongly ignores that the cone tapers, so any parallel cross-section above the base must be smaller.
12. (d) 1 hour 32 minutes — T = 40 × 1.8 + 20 = 72 + 20 = 92 minutes. Since 92 = 60 + 32, the cooking time is 1 hour 32 minutes. A candidate who rounds the mass to 2 kg before substituting gets 40 × 2 + 20 = 100 minutes = 1 hour 40 minutes. A candidate who forgets to add the 20 minutes gets 40 × 1.8 = 72 minutes = 1 hour 12 minutes. A candidate who multiplies the mass by (40 + 20) = 60 instead of substituting into the formula gets 1.8 × 60 = 108 minutes = 1 hour 48 minutes.