⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (d) −2 — Method: substitute the value into both terms, working out the index and the multiplication before the addition. Working: m² = (−2) × (−2) = 4 and 3m = 3 × (−2) = −6, so the expression becomes 4 + (−6), which is −2. Answer: −2. The distractors: −10 comes from squaring −2 as −4, giving −4 + (−6); 10 comes from working out 3m as +6 and losing the minus sign, giving 4 + 6; −14 comes from working from left to right instead of multiplying first, giving (4 + 3) × (−2).
2. (a) 150° — The arc length is the same fraction of the circumference as the angle is of 360°. The full circumference is 2 × 3.14 × 6 = 37.68 cm, so the angle is 15.7 ÷ 37.68 × 360 = 150°. Treating the 6 cm as a diameter instead of a radius gives a circumference of 18.84 cm and an angle of 300°. Using π = 3 instead of the given 3.14 gives a circumference of 36 cm and an angle of 157°. Treating the fraction 15.7 ÷ 37.68 as being out of 100 rather than 360 gives about 42°.
3. (a) 36 — Method: add the parts of the ratio, divide the total by the number of parts to find the value of one part, then multiply by the number of parts in the share asked for. Working: 1 + 2 + 3 = 6 parts, 72 ÷ 6 = 12 for one part, and the largest number is 3 parts, so 3 × 12 = 36. Answer: 36. The distractors: 12 is the value of one part, which is the smallest of the three numbers rather than the largest; 24 is 2 parts, the middle number; 216 comes from multiplying 72 by 3 instead of dividing 72 by the 6 parts first.
4. (b) No — the angle given is not the included angle — Method: check whether the given angle sits between the two given sides, since SAS requires the included angle. Working: sides AB and BC meet at vertex B, so the angle between them is angle B — but the angle given is angle A, which is not between the two given sides, and the same mismatch happens in triangle DEF. Options: 'two sides and one angle match' restates SAS's ingredients without checking their positions, which is exactly Meera's mistake; 'SSS needs three equal sides' is a true fact about a different condition, but it is not the reason Meera is wrong here; 'SAS allows any equal angle' states a rule that is not how SAS works, since the angle must be the included one. Answer: no, the angle given is not the included angle.
5. (d) 2:3:5 — The highest common factor of 12, 18 and 30 is 6. Divide every part by 6: 12 ÷ 6 = 2, 18 ÷ 6 = 3, 30 ÷ 6 = 5, giving 2 : 3 : 5. Dividing by 2 instead of 6 gives 6 : 9 : 15, which still shares a common factor of 3, so it is not fully simplified. Dividing by 3 instead of 6 gives 4 : 6 : 10, which still shares a common factor of 2, so it is not fully simplified either. Swapping the first two parts gives 3 : 2 : 5, the parts in the wrong order.
6. (c) 3c + 2d — Method: 'triple c' is 3c, 'double d' is 2d, and 'add' joins the two separate terms with a plus sign. Working: 3c + 2d. Answer: 3c + 2d. 2c + 3d comes from swapping which letter gets tripled and which gets doubled. 6cd comes from multiplying the two terms together instead of adding them, and also multiplying the coefficients (3 × 2 = 6). 5(c + d) comes from adding the coefficients (3 + 2 = 5) and applying that single number to both letters together, as if c and d always came as a pair.
7. (d) 3x² + 4x − 7 — Method: the minus sign in front of the second bracket changes the sign of every term inside it; then collect like terms. Working: removing the brackets gives 5x² + 3x − 2 − 2x² + x − 5; the squared terms give 5x² − 2x² = 3x², the x terms give 3x + x = 4x, and the number terms give −2 − 5 = −7. Answer: 3x² + 4x − 7. The distractors: 7x² + 2x + 3 comes from adding the two brackets instead of subtracting, giving 5x² + 2x², 3x − x and −2 + 5; 3x² + 2x + 3 comes from applying the minus sign to 2x² only, leaving −x and +5 unchanged so that 3x − x = 2x and −2 + 5 = 3; 3x² + 4x + 3 comes from changing the signs of the terms with letters but leaving +5 as it stood, so the number terms give −2 + 5 = 3.
8. (b) £76.00 — One part of the ratio is £47.50 ÷ 5 = £9.50. The school receives 8 parts, so its share is 9.50 × 8 = £76.00. Dividing £47.50 by 8 instead of 5, treating the charity's amount as if it were 8 parts, gives 47.50 ÷ 8 = 5.9375, then × 5 = £29.69. Adding the charity's amount to the school's amount instead of stopping at the school's own share gives the total collected, 9.50 × 13 = £123.50. Adding one part to the charity's amount instead of multiplying one part by 8 gives 47.50 + 9.50 = £57.00.
9. (d) sin 30°, tan 30°, cos 30° — sin 30° = 1/2 = 0.5, tan 30° = √3/3 ≈ 0.577 and cos 30° = √3/2 ≈ 0.866, so the correct order from smallest to largest is sin 30°, tan 30°, cos 30°. 'sin 30°, cos 30°, tan 30°' swaps the last two, wrongly putting cos 30° before tan 30°. 'cos 30°, tan 30°, sin 30°' is the correct list written backwards, from largest to smallest. 'tan 30°, sin 30°, cos 30°' wrongly swaps sin 30° and tan 30° at the start.
10. (a) 0.62 miles — The gradient of the line is the change in miles divided by the change in kilometres: 31 ÷ 50 = 0.62, so 1 kilometre converts to 0.62 miles. Dividing the wrong way round, 50 ÷ 31 = 1.612..., rounds to 1.61 miles — that finds how many kilometres are in 1 mile, not the reverse. Doubling the gradient, 1.24 miles, comes from using 62 ÷ 50 instead of 31 ÷ 50. Reading off the y-coordinate of the given point without dividing by the x-coordinate gives 31.00 miles, which is the number of miles for 50 kilometres, not for 1 kilometre.
11. (c) 13 — Area of the trapezium = 1/2 × (8 + 12) × 5 = 1/2 × 100 = 50 m². Number of bags = 50 ÷ 4 = 12.5, which rounds up to 13 bags since seed is sold only in whole bags. A student who mistakenly uses 2 m² of coverage per bag instead of 4 m² finds 50 ÷ 2 = 25 bags.
12. (a) 1.5 km — Multiply the map length by the scale: 6 × 25 000 = 150 000 cm. Convert to kilometres: 150 000 cm = 1.5 km. Dividing by only 1000 instead of the full conversion when changing units gives 150 km, a hundred times too large. Misreading the scale as 1 : 2500 instead of 1 : 25 000 gives 6 × 2500 = 15 000 cm = 0.15 km, a hundred times too small. Leaving the answer as 150 000 without converting units at all, and calling it 150 000 km, mistakes centimetres for kilometres completely.