⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (c) An L-shape — Method: to find the front elevation, trace the outline of the solid seen from directly in front. Working: the low, wide cuboid gives a wide rectangle across the bottom, and the taller, narrower cuboid sitting on one end adds a narrower rectangle rising above only that end of the base, so the outline steps up on one side only. Answer: an L-shape. The distractors: a rectangle comes from taking the outline of the box the whole solid would just fit inside, ignoring the step created by the taller block. A T-shape comes from placing the taller block in the middle of the base instead of at one end, so that the base would show on both sides of it. A parallelogram comes from copying a face as it is drawn in the sketch — the top of the taller block is drawn as a sloping parallelogram because the solid is drawn at an angle — instead of drawing the true outline seen looking straight at the front.
2. (d) £2.00 — Cost for Printer A = 200 × £0.04 = £8. Cost for Printer B = 200 × £0.05 = £10. Difference = £10 − £8 = £2.00.
3. (d) 2x + 4 — Method: collect the like terms, which here are the two terms in x, and leave the number term on its own because a number and a term in x are unlike. Working: x + x is one lot of x added to one more lot of x, which is 2x; the 4 has nothing like it to join with, so it is written after the 2x. Answer: 2x + 4. The distractors: x² + 4 comes from multiplying the two x terms instead of adding them; x + 4 comes from treating x + x as a single x, as though the repeated letter counted only once; 6x comes from collecting the unlike terms together, adding 1 + 1 + 4 and attaching the letter to that total.
4. (d) 13 — Method: the numbers of matchsticks form a sequence with a term-to-term rule, so count the first square in full and then add the repeated amount once for every extra square. Working: one square uses 4 matchsticks; a row of 4 squares has 3 extra squares after the first, and each of those adds 3 matchsticks, giving 3 × 3 = 9 to add on to the 4. Answer: 13. The distractors: 16 comes from counting each square as a separate set of 4 matchsticks, 4 × 4, and ignoring the shared sides; 12 comes from using 3 matchsticks for all four squares, 3 × 4, and forgetting that the first square needs a fourth side; 10 comes from adding the 3 only twice, as though a row of four squares had two extra squares rather than three.
5. (b) 2² × 3 × 5 — Repeatedly divide 60 by prime numbers: 60 ÷ 2 = 30, 30 ÷ 2 = 15, 15 ÷ 3 = 5, and 5 is itself prime. So 60 is 2 × 2 × 3 × 5, which in index notation is 2² × 3 × 5. Stopping the factor tree after only three divisions and writing 2 × 3 × 5 misses that the 2 divides in twice, and gives only 30, not 60. Squaring the 3 as well as the 2 gives 2² × 3² × 5, which comes to 180, far too big. Squaring the 5 instead of the 2 gives 2 × 3 × 5², which comes to 150, also too big. So 60 = 2² × 3 × 5.
6. (a) 11 — Substitute n=6 into 2n−1: 2×6−1=11. A candidate who adds 2 and 6 and then subtracts 1, instead of multiplying 2 by 6 first, would compute 2+6−1=7. A candidate who substitutes the wrong term number, n=5, would reach 2×5−1=9. A candidate who forgets to subtract 1 would compute just 2×6=12.
7. (a) 100 — The difference between the parts of the ratio is 7 − 3 = 4 parts, and this is worth 40 beads. Divide to find one part: 40 ÷ 4 = 10. The total number of parts is 7 + 3 = 10, so the total number of beads is 10 × 10 = 100. (40 is just the given difference between gold and silver, not the total. 70 is the number of gold beads only, using 7 parts. 30 is the number of silver beads only, using 3 parts.)
8. (d) Correlation is a link; causation is one causing the other — Method: the two words describe different claims — one is about a pattern in the data, the other is about what produced that pattern. Working: correlation says only that two quantities tend to change together, which is something a scatter graph can display; causation says that a change in one quantity actually brings about the change in the other, which needs evidence a scatter graph cannot supply, because a third quantity may be driving both. Answer: correlation is a link between the quantities, while causation is one quantity causing the change in another. The distractors: the statement giving causation as the link and correlation as the cause simply swaps the two words over; the statement that the words mean the same thing is the classic error of reading a correlation as proof of cause; the statement that a scatter graph shows causation but not correlation reverses what a scatter graph can do, since the pattern it displays is exactly the correlation.
9. (b) 3/5 — The question asks about the girls only, so use the girls' total of 70 as the denominator: 42 out of 70 girls walk, giving 42/70 = 3/5. Choosing 21/65 comes from using the whole survey of 130 pupils as the denominator instead of just the 70 girls, 42/130 = 21/65. Choosing 33/70 comes from using the boys' walking count, 33, over the girls' total of 70, mixing up the two rows of the table. Choosing 2/5 comes from using the number of girls who CYCLE, 70 − 42 = 28, instead of the number who walk, giving 28/70 = 2/5.
10. (a) 9 — A cube has 9 planes of symmetry in total: 3 that pass through the middles of pairs of opposite faces, and 6 more that pass through pairs of opposite edges diagonally. A candidate who counts only the 3 face-to-face planes — which is correct for a cuboid with three different edge lengths, but forgets that a cube's equal edges create 6 more diagonal planes — answers 3. A candidate who counts only the 6 diagonal planes and forgets the 3 face-to-face ones answers 6. A candidate who confuses the number of planes of symmetry with the number of edges on a cube answers 12. The correct total for a cube is 9.
11. (d) Yes, because 45 ÷ 360 = 1/8, and this fraction applies to any radius. — Priti is correct: 45 ÷ 360 = 1/8, and because sector area = (angle ÷ 360) × full circle area, this fraction depends only on the angle, not on the radius, so it holds for every circle. (The statement giving 45 ÷ 360 = 1/6 comes from an arithmetic slip when simplifying the fraction; the statement that the fraction depends on the radius is wrong because the radius cancels out of the angle fraction in the sector-area formula; the statement adding that it only works for this particular radius is wrong because the 1/8 fraction is true for every radius, not a special case.)
12. (a) 2 — Method: recall that the diagonals of a rhombus are always lines of symmetry, whatever its angles are. Working: a rhombus (all sides equal) always has its two diagonals as lines of symmetry, giving 2 lines of symmetry, whether or not the angles are 90°. Options: 0 wrongly assumes a non-square rhombus has no symmetry at all; 4 comes from the number of lines of symmetry a square has, mistaking this rhombus for a square; 1 comes from treating the rhombus like a kite, which has only one diagonal as a line of symmetry. Answer: 2.