⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (d) −6 — Method: check each option to see if it falls strictly between −8 and −5, remembering that numbers become smaller as they get more negative. Working: −8 < −6 < −5, so −6 lies between them. Answer: −6. −9 comes from a value that is more negative than −8, so it lies outside the range, below −8. −4 comes from a value that is less negative than −5, so it lies outside the range, above −5. 6 comes from ignoring the negative signs and picking a positive number between 5 and 8.
2. (a) A straight line sloping down from left to right — Method: a line of best fit is a straight line drawn to follow the trend of the points, so its slope is decided by the direction of the relationship between the two quantities. Working: as the price rises, the satisfaction score falls, so the points start high on the left of the graph and finish low on the right; the straight line that follows them therefore slopes downwards as the graph is read from left to right, which is the line of a negative correlation. Answer: a straight line sloping down from left to right. The distractors: a line sloping up comes from reading a falling relationship as a rising one; a horizontal line comes from expecting no correlation, since a horizontal line says the satisfaction score does not change as the price changes; a curve passing through every point comes from thinking a line of best fit has to touch all of the plotted points, when it is a single straight line drawn through the middle of them.
3. (c) (4, −3) — For a 90° clockwise rotation about the origin, (x, y) → (y, −x), so (3, 4) → (4, −3). ((−4, 3) comes from using the rule for a 90° anticlockwise rotation instead; (−3, −4) comes from rotating through 180° instead of 90°; (4, 3) comes from swapping the coordinates but forgetting to change either sign.)
4. (b) £10 — Method: find the cost of 1 kg by dividing, then multiply by the mass wanted — the unitary method for direct proportion. Working: £6 ÷ 3 = £2 per kg, and £2 × 5 = £10. Answer: £10. The distractors: £11 comes from adding 5 to the £6 instead of scaling; £30 comes from multiplying £6 by 5 without first dividing by 3; £3.60 comes from turning the proportion upside down, dividing by 5 and multiplying by 3.
5. (b) 8 s — Rearranging v = u + at for t: subtract u from both sides to get v − u = at, then divide by a: t = (v − u)/a. Substituting u = 4, a = 2, v = 20: t = (20 − 4)/2 = 16/2 = 8 s. Answering 12 s comes from adding u instead of subtracting it: (20 + 4)/2 = 12. Answering 32 s comes from multiplying (v − u) by a instead of dividing by it: 16 × 2 = 32. Answering 6 s divides v by a first and then subtracts u, in the wrong order: 20/2 − 4 = 10 − 4 = 6. The time taken is 8 s.
6. (d) No, because 3/8 + 5/12 + 1/6 = 23/24 — Using a common denominator of 24: 3/8 = 9/24, 5/12 = 10/24 and 1/6 = 4/24. Adding these numerators gives 9 + 10 + 4 = 23, so the three probabilities sum to 23/24, which is less than 1 — Zara is not correct. Adding the original numerators (3 + 5 + 1 = 9) over a denominator of 12 instead of converting each fraction properly gives 9/12 = 3/4, still less than 1 but the wrong fraction. Converting 1/6 to 5/24 instead of 4/24 (using the wrong scaling) makes the total 9/24 + 10/24 + 5/24 = 24/24 = 1, wrongly suggesting the probabilities are valid. Judging validity from the fact that each individual fraction lies between 0 and 1 ignores that an exhaustive set must sum to exactly 1, not merely contain valid individual values.
7. (b) (3, −2) — A 90° clockwise rotation about the origin maps (x, y) to (y, −x): (2, 3) → (3, −2). A pupil who uses the rule for a 90° anticlockwise rotation instead, (x, y) → (−y, x), gets (−3, 2). A pupil who uses the rule for a 180° rotation, (x, y) → (−x, −y), gets (−2, −3). A pupil who swaps the coordinates but forgets to change any sign gets (3, 2). The correct image is (3, −2).
8. (d) £195 — Substituting x = 3 into y = 45x + 60 gives y = 45 × 3 + 60 = 135 + 60 = 195. A candidate who forgets to add the call-out fee would get only 45 × 3 = £135. A candidate who adds the hours to the fee and the rate instead of multiplying would get 45 + 60 + 3 = £108. A candidate who multiplies both the hourly rate and the call-out fee by the number of hours would get 45 × 3 + 60 × 3 = £315.
9. (c) 13 — Area of the trapezium = 1/2 × (8 + 12) × 5 = 1/2 × 100 = 50 m². Number of bags = 50 ÷ 4 = 12.5, which rounds up to 13 bags since seed is sold only in whole bags. A student who mistakenly uses 2 m² of coverage per bag instead of 4 m² finds 50 ÷ 2 = 25 bags.
10. (c) 1 : 16 — Work out each area before comparing. Square P has area 3 × 3 = 9 cm². Square Q has area 12 × 12 = 144 cm². The ratio of the areas is 9 : 144, and both parts divide by 9: 9 ÷ 9 = 1 and 144 ÷ 9 = 16, giving 1 : 16. Notice that the sides are in the ratio 1 : 4, and the areas are in the ratio of the squares of those parts, which is what always happens when a length is scaled. Stopping at 1 : 4 would compare the sides and never the areas, and cubing the parts to reach 1 : 64 is the rule for volumes rather than for areas. The order matters too: the question names square P first, so its area must be the first part of the ratio.
11. (d) 5n − 1 — The common difference is 5 (9−4=5), so the expression starts 5n. To match the first term when n=1, 5×1+c=4, so c=−1: the nth term is 5n−1. A candidate who uses the first term itself as the constant, instead of first term minus the common difference, would write 5n+4 (giving 9, 14, 19, 24 — one term too high throughout). A candidate who omits the constant term altogether would write just 5n (giving 5, 10, 15, 20, not matching the sequence). A candidate who adds the common difference to n instead of multiplying would write n+5 (giving 6, 7, 8, 9, far too small).
12. (a) 0.09 — Method: two independent events that must both happen are combined by multiplying their probabilities. Working: the same probability 0.3 applies to each day, so the calculation is 0.3 × 0.3. Written as fractions this is 3/10 × 3/10 = 9/100. Answer: the probability is 0.09. The distractors: 0.6 comes from adding 0.3 and 0.3 instead of multiplying them; 0.3 comes from quoting the single-day probability, as though the second day added no further condition; 0.9 comes from multiplying 3 by 3 correctly but keeping only one decimal place in the product instead of two.