⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (d) 4 — Method: collect the x terms on one side and the number terms on the other. Working: subtract 3x from both sides: 4x − 5 = 11. Add 5 to both sides: 4x = 16. Divide by 4: x = 4. Answer: 4. 0.6 comes from adding the x terms instead of subtracting when collecting them, 7x + 3x = 10x, and also subtracting the constants the wrong way round, 11 − 5 = 6, giving 10x = 6. 1.5 comes from correctly collecting the x terms as 4x but subtracting the constants the wrong way round, 11 − 5 instead of 11 + 5. −4 comes from moving the x terms to the wrong side, giving 3x − 7x instead of 7x − 3x, along with a matching sign error on the constants.
2. (b) x = 5 — Every point on a vertical line has the same x-coordinate, so the equation of a vertical line through (5, 2) is x = 5. "y = 5" mixes up the coordinates, using the x-value of 5 to write a y-equation. "y = 2" is the equation of the horizontal line through (5, 2), not the vertical one. "x = 2" uses the correct letter but the wrong coordinate, the y-value of 2 instead of the x-value of 5.
3. (a) An identity, true for every value of x — Expanding the bracket on the left gives 3x + 12, which matches the right-hand side exactly, so the statement is true for every value of x — this makes it an identity. A candidate who reasons that any statement with an equals sign must be an equation picks that option, missing that an equation is only true for particular value(s) of x, not all of them. A candidate who confuses an identity with a formula, because both relate two expressions, picks the formula option — but a formula connects two different quantities, such as area and side length, not two equivalent forms of the same expression. A candidate who assumes it can be solved for a single value of x, as with a normal equation, picks that option, not realising there is no single solution here.
4. (a) 3/5 — The quantity being described goes on the top of the fraction and the quantity it is compared with goes on the bottom. Here the potatoes are written as a fraction of the carrots, so the mass of the potatoes is the numerator and the mass of the carrots is the denominator. Both masses are already in kilograms, so no conversion is needed. This gives 3/5, and since 3 and 5 share no common factor it is already in its simplest form.
5. (d) 2 — Method: a fourth root undoes raising to the power 4, so look for the number that gives 16 when it is multiplied by itself four times. Working: 2 × 2 = 4, 4 × 2 = 8 and 8 × 2 = 16, which uses four factors of 2. Answer: 2. The distractors: 4 comes from taking the square root of 16 instead of its fourth root; 8 comes from halving 16, treating any root as a halving; 64 comes from multiplying 16 by 4 instead of taking a fourth root.
6. (c) 2000 mm — Put both lengths into the same unit first. There are 1000 mm in a metre, so the ribbon is 2.4 × 1000 = 2400 mm, and there are 10 mm in a centimetre, so the piece cut off is 40 × 10 = 400 mm. The length left is 2400 − 400 = 2000 mm. 2360 mm subtracts 40 mm instead of 400 mm, 200 mm works in centimetres and then labels the result as millimetres, and 2800 mm adds the piece that was cut off instead of subtracting it.
7. (b) −3 — Method: the gradient of a straight line is the change in y divided by the change in x, with the two coordinates taken in the same order in the numerator as in the denominator. Working: going from (−1, 5) to (3, −7), the change in y is −7 − 5 = −12 and the change in x is 3 − (−1) = 4, so the gradient is −12 ÷ 4 = −3. Answer: −3. The distractors: 3 comes from subtracting the y-coordinates in one order and the x-coordinates in the other, giving 12 ÷ 4; −1/3 comes from dividing the change in x by the change in y instead of the other way round, giving 4 ÷ (−12); −6 comes from working out 3 − (−1) as 3 − 1 = 2, so that the change in y is divided by 2 rather than by 4.
8. (d) Yes, since 3² + 4² = 5² — AB is horizontal with length 5 − 1 = 4, BC is vertical with length 4 − 1 = 3, and CA = √(4² + 3²) = √25 = 5. Since the two shorter sides satisfy 3² + 4² = 5², the triangle is right-angled, with the right angle at B. "No, since 3 + 4 ≠ 5" wrongly tests Pythagoras' theorem by adding the sides instead of squaring them first. "No, since AB, BC and CA are not all equal" confuses a right-angled triangle with an equilateral one — a triangle does not need equal sides to have a right angle. "Yes, since 4² + 5² = 3²" reaches the correct conclusion but puts the longest side, 5, on the wrong side of the equation, as if it were one of the two shorter sides instead of the hypotenuse.
9. (c) 4n − 2 — Method: find the common difference, then find the constant that fits the first term. Working: 6 − 2 = 4, 10 − 6 = 4, 14 − 10 = 4, so the terms increase by 4 each time and the nth term has the form 4n + c. Substituting n = 1: 4(1) + c = 2, so c = −2. Answer: the correct nth term is 4n − 2. The value 4n is Priya's value, which comes from using only the common difference and leaving out the constant. The value 4n + 2 comes from a sign error when finding the constant. The value 2n + 2 comes from using the first term, 2, as the coefficient of n instead of the common difference, and then attaching +2 rather than working the constant out.
10. (b) £1,000 — Wages take up 150° out of 360°, so the amount spent on wages is 150 ÷ 360 × 2400 = £1,000. Choosing £600 uses the repairs angle, 90°, instead of the wages angle: 90 ÷ 360 × 2400 = 600. Choosing £3,600 treats the angle in degrees as if it were a percentage, 150 ÷ 100 × 2400 = 3600, instead of dividing by 360°. Choosing £800 uses the angle for the 'other costs' sector, 360 − 90 − 150 = 120°, instead of the wages sector: 120 ÷ 360 × 2400 = 800.
11. (a) y = (x − 2)² + 3 — Since (x − 2)² is never negative, (x − 2)² + 3 is always at least 3, so y can never equal 0 and the graph never crosses the x-axis. The other three graphs are all given in a factorised or difference-of-squares form that shows two real roots: y = (x − 2)(x + 3) crosses at x = 2 and x = −3; y = x² − 9 = (x − 3)(x + 3) crosses at x = 3 and x = −3; y = (x + 4)(x − 1) crosses at x = −4 and x = 1.
12. (b) 0.49 — Adding all four pupils' flips gives 40 + 25 + 20 + 15 = 100 flips in total, and adding their heads gives 24 + 10 + 9 + 6 = 49 heads in total, so the combined estimate is 49/100 = 0.49. Writing 0.46 is wrong because it averages the four pupils' individual rates (0.60, 0.40, 0.45 and 0.40) as if they all came from the same number of flips, which they do not — this ignores that Sam and Priti flipped far more times than Leo and Fatima. Writing 0.60 is wrong because it only uses Sam's own result (24/40 = 0.60), ignoring the other three pupils. Writing 0.40 is wrong because it only combines Priti and Fatima's results (16/40 = 0.40), leaving out Sam and Leo entirely. The combined estimate from all four pupils is 0.49.