⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (d) (4, 8) — The other endpoint is found from 2 × midpoint − known endpoint: x = 2 × (−1) − (−6) = −2 + 6 = 4, y = 2 × 5 − 2 = 10 − 2 = 8, giving (4, 8). (−3.5, 3.5) comes from averaging the given endpoint and the midpoint as if they were the two endpoints of a segment, instead of working backwards from the midpoint. (5, 3) comes from working out (−1 − (−6), 5 − 2) instead of doubling the midpoint before subtracting. (4, 5) comes from correctly finding the x-coordinate but copying the midpoint's y-coordinate of 5 instead of doubling it.
2. (a) 4 — Method: set up the equation 35 + 20h = 115, then subtract the fixed fee and divide by the hourly rate. Working: 20h = 115 − 35 = 80; h = 80 ÷ 20 = 4. Answer: 4 hours. 5.75 comes from dividing the whole £115 by £20 without first subtracting the fixed fee: 115 ÷ 20 = 5.75. 2.71 comes from swapping the fee and the rate round, subtracting £20 and dividing by £35: (115 − 20) ÷ 35 ≈ 2.71. 7.5 comes from adding the fixed fee instead of subtracting it: (115 + 35) ÷ 20 = 7.5.
3. (a) 120 — For the lowest common multiple, take each prime that appears in either factorisation, raised to the higher power. In 2³ × 3 and 2² × 3 × 5, the prime 2 appears with power 3 in one and power 2 in the other — take the higher, 2³; the prime 3 appears with the same power in both, 3¹; and the prime 5 appears only in the second factorisation, so use 5¹. Multiplying these, 2³ × 3 × 5, gives 120. Taking the lower power of 2 instead of the higher, and leaving out 5 altogether, gives the highest common factor, 12, instead. Multiplying the two original numbers together, 24 × 60, gives 1440, which double-counts every shared prime factor. Assuming the lowest common multiple is simply the larger of the two numbers gives 60, but 60 is not a multiple of 24 — 60 ÷ 24 does not divide exactly. So the lowest common multiple of 24 and 60 is 120.
4. (c) 5 : 9 — Write the ratio mass : cost = 3 : 5.4. Multiply both parts by 10 to clear the decimal: 30 : 54. Both numbers share a factor of 6, so 30 ÷ 6 = 5 and 54 ÷ 6 = 9, giving 5 : 9. 3 : 5 comes from ignoring the decimal point and treating £5.40 as £5. 9 : 5 comes from writing the ratio the wrong way round, cost to mass instead of mass to cost. 1 : 18 comes from multiplying only the cost by 10 instead of both parts, giving 3 : 54, and then cancelling that correctly to 1 : 18 — the cancelling is fine, but the ratio being cancelled is not the right one.
5. (b) 1 : 2.25 — Method: to write a ratio in the form 1 : n, divide both parts by the first part. Working: 4 ÷ 4 = 1 and 9 ÷ 4 = 2.25, so 4 : 9 = 1 : 2.25. Working out 9 ÷ 4 = 2.25 correctly but then writing it as the first part gives 2.25 : 1, the two parts the wrong way round. Subtracting 9 − 4 = 5 gives 1 : 5, confusing the difference between the parts with the ratio. Multiplying 4 × 9 = 36 gives 1 : 36, confusing the product of the parts with the ratio.
6. (b) k − 5 — Method: the width is 5 less than the length, so subtract 5 from the length. Working: length − 5 = k − 5. Answer: k − 5. 5 − k comes from subtracting in the wrong order, taking the length away from 5 instead of the other way round. k + 5 comes from adding instead of subtracting, missing that the width is smaller than the length. 5k comes from multiplying the length by 5 instead of subtracting 5 from it.
7. (d) It is n-shaped, since the x² coefficient is negative. — The coefficient of x² is −2, which is negative, so the quadratic curve opens downward — shaped like an n, with a maximum turning point. Saying it is U-shaped focuses only on x² being non-negative and ignores that the −2 in front of it flips the whole curve to open downward. Saying it is a straight line confuses having a constant term with being linear — any equation with an x² term is a curve, not a line. Saying it repeatedly rises and falls like a wave describes a trigonometric graph such as y = sin x, not a quadratic.
8. (a) 1/2 — cos 0° = 1 and sin 30° = 1/2, so cos 0° − sin 30° = 1 − 1/2 = 1/2. 1 comes from writing down cos 0° alone and forgetting to subtract sin 30°. 3/2 comes from adding the two values instead of subtracting. −1/2 comes from working out sin 30° − cos 0°, the two terms the wrong way round.
9. (d) w ≤ 630 — 'No more than 630 kg' means the weight can be exactly 630 kg or anything less, so the correct inequality is w ≤ 630, using 'less than or equal to' to include the limit itself. Writing w < 630 excludes 630 kg itself, as though the limit could not be reached exactly. Writing w ≥ 630 reverses the direction, describing a minimum weight rather than a maximum. Writing w > 630 both reverses the direction and excludes the boundary value. The inequality describing the lift's weight limit is w ≤ 630.
10. (d) 50 — The angles in any triangle add up to 180°, so x = 180 − 90 − 40 = 50. "90" comes from subtracting only the 90° angle from 180° and forgetting to also subtract the 40°. "130" comes from adding 90° and 40° together instead of subtracting them from 180°. "45" comes from halving the 90° angle instead of using the angle sum of the triangle at all.
11. (c) minor segment — A chord splits a circle into two segments; the smaller of the two is called the minor segment and the larger one the major segment. "major segment" names the larger region, the opposite of what is asked for. "sector" is a different region altogether, enclosed by two radii and an arc, not by a chord. "arc" is a curved length along the circumference, not an enclosed region at all.
12. (a) 1276 — Method: an unbiased relative frequency tends towards the theoretical probability as the number of trials increases, so use the record resting on the most trials, then multiply by the number of new trials. Working: the three records rest on 50, 200 and 1000 drops, so the most reliable is the one after 1000 drops, namely 0.638, and the run is indeed settling as the trials increase. The expected number of point up landings in 2000 further drops is 2000 × 0.638 = 1276. Answer: about 1276 times. The distractors: 1440 uses the earliest record, which rests on only 50 drops, giving 2000 × 0.720 = 1440; 1330 uses the middle record, treating 200 drops as a safe compromise when 1000 drops is better still, giving 2000 × 0.665 = 1330; 1348 comes from averaging the three records, since 0.720 + 0.665 + 0.638 = 2.023 and 2.023 ÷ 3 = 0.674, then 2000 × 0.674 = 1348, which gives the 50 drop record the same weight as the 1000 drop record.