⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (c) y = 2x + 1 — Method: the gradient of the line through two points is the change in y divided by the change in x, and the constant is then found by substituting one of the points into y = mx + c. Working: m = (5 − 3) ÷ (2 − 1) = 2 ÷ 1 = 2, so the line is y = 2x + c; substituting x = 1 and y = 3 gives 3 = 2 × 1 + c, so c = 3 − 2 = 1. Answer: y = 2x + 1. The distractors: y = x + 2 comes from taking the gradient as the change in x, 2 − 1 = 1, and then substituting (1, 3) to reach a constant of 2; y = 2x − 1 comes from working out the constant as mx − y, 2 × 1 − 3 = −1, instead of y − mx; y = 2x + 3 comes from using the y-coordinate of (1, 3) as the constant without substituting at all.
2. (b) 10 — The probability that the spinner lands on green is its angle out of the whole circle: 60° ÷ 360° = 1/6. Expected number of times on green = 1/6 × 60 = 10. Assuming the three colours are equally likely because there are three sectors, regardless of their different angles, gives 60 ÷ 3 = 20. Using red's angle of 180° instead of green's 60° gives a probability of 1/2, so 60 × 1/2 = 30. Treating green's angle, 60°, as a percentage instead of finding its fraction of 360° gives 60 × 0.60 = 36.
3. (a) 15:1 — Write the ratio distance : petrol using the numbers in the question: 90 : 6. Divide both parts by their highest common factor, 6, to give 15 : 1. (1:15 comes from writing the ratio the wrong way round, petrol : distance. 5:2 comes from dividing only the distance by 6 and leaving the 6 litres unchanged, giving 15:6, which does simplify to 5:2 — the error is the step before, because both parts of a ratio must be divided by the same number. 14:1 comes from subtracting at the first step instead of dividing, 90 − 6 = 84, and then writing 84 : 6 and dividing both parts by 6 to get 14 : 1; subtracting has no part in simplifying a ratio.)
4. (b) At 0 guests, the model predicts 2 m of table — The y-intercept of a line of best fit y = mx + c is the value of y when x = 0. Here y = 0.5 × 0 + 2 = 2, so the line predicts a table length of 2 m when there are 0 guests. The 2 m does not grow as more guests arrive — that role belongs to the gradient, 0.5 — so an option saying each extra guest adds 2 m has swapped the two numbers around. The 2 is a length in metres, not a number of guests, so an option requiring 2 guests before set-up has misread its units. And the table length does change with x, since it is 0.5x + 2 and not a fixed value, so an option claiming the table is always 2 m ignores the 0.5x term completely.
5. (d) 24.69 — To round to 2 decimal places, look only at the third decimal digit to decide whether the second decimal digit rounds up. In 24.6851 the third decimal digit is 5, and since 5 is 5 or more, the second decimal digit rounds up from 8 to 9, giving 24.69. Rounding to 1 decimal place instead of 2 gives 24.7, one place value too coarse. Keeping the third decimal digit rather than dropping it gives 24.685, which is 3 decimal places. Looking at the fourth decimal digit, 1, instead of the third one, and wrongly deciding that no rounding is needed, leaves the length unrounded at 24.68.
6. (d) £20 — 1% of £250 = £2.50, so 8% = 8 × £2.50 = £20. A candidate who misplaces the decimal point and finds 0.8% instead gets £2. A candidate who confuses 8% with 80% gets £200. A candidate who rounds 8% up to the nearby 10% gets £25.
7. (b) −1 — Method: in the form y = mx + c the gradient m is the number multiplying x, and an x term written with no number in front of it has a coefficient of 1. Working: y = −x + 3 is the same equation as y = (−1)x + 3, so comparing it with y = mx + c gives m = −1 and c = 3. Answer: −1. The distractors: 1 comes from taking the coefficient as 1 and leaving the minus sign out of the answer; 3 comes from reading the constant as the gradient, confusing m with c; −3 comes from moving the minus sign across to the constant term and then reading the gradient off that term instead of the x term.
8. (b) A person's shoe size and their favourite colour — A person's shoe size is not linked to which colour they prefer, so these two show no correlation. The other three pairs are all genuinely correlated: distance travelled and fuel used rise together, which is positive correlation; hours of revision and test score generally rise together, which is also positive correlation; and as outdoor temperature rises, fewer woolly hats are sold, which is negative correlation. Negative correlation is still a real relationship between two variables — it is not the same thing as no relationship at all, so the temperature and hats pair is not the answer to this question.
9. (d) 1/8 — Method: a run of flips of a fair coin gives equally likely sequences of heads and tails, so count the sequences that match and divide by how many sequences there are. Working: each flip lands two ways and no flip affects another, so three flips give 2 × 2 × 2 = 8 equally likely sequences: HHH, HHT, HTH, HTT, THH, THT, TTH and TTT. Only HHH has a head at every flip, so 1 sequence of the 8 matches. Answer: the probability is 1/8. The distractors: 1/4 comes from treating 'three heads', 'two heads', 'one head' and 'no heads' as four equally likely results, which they are not, since one sequence gives three heads and three sequences give two; 1/6 comes from taking the number of sequences to be 2 + 2 + 2 = 6, adding the two ways each flip can land instead of multiplying them; 1/2 comes from reading the first flip only and giving the probability of a head on one flip, without combining it with the other two.
10. (a) £3.00 per window — The gradient is the change in C divided by the change in w. Change in C = 26 − 14 = 12. Change in w = 6 − 2 = 4. Gradient = 12 ÷ 4 = £3.00 per window. Dividing the change in w by the change in C instead gives 4 ÷ 12 = £0.33 per window. Dividing 12 by the larger w-value only, 12 ÷ 6 = £2.00 per window, comes from not subtracting the smaller w-value first. Adding the w-values instead of subtracting, 12 ÷ (6 + 2) = £1.50 per window, comes from a sign error when finding the change in w.
11. (b) −3 — Method: the gradient is the change in the vertical value divided by the change in the horizontal value, with both changes taken in the same direction along the line. Working: going from (1, 20) to (5, 8) the change in y is 8 − 20 = −12 and the change in x is 5 − 1 = 4, so the gradient is −12 ÷ 4 = −3. Answer: −3, and the negative sign is expected because the line falls from left to right. The distractors: 3 comes from subtracting the smaller y from the larger, 20 − 8 = 12, while still taking the x values from left to right, which loses the minus sign that says the line falls; −12 is the change in y left undivided by the change in x of 4; −1/3 comes from dividing the change in x by the change in y, 4 ÷ (−12), turning the gradient upside down.
12. (b) 4 — Method: find the length scale factor by taking the cube root of the volume scale factor, then square it to get the area scale factor. Working: 8 = 2³, so the length scale factor is 2, and the area scale factor is 2² = 4. Answer: 4. 8 comes from using the volume scale factor itself as if it were the area scale factor. 64 comes from squaring the volume scale factor, 8² = 64, instead of first taking its cube root. 2 comes from correctly finding the length scale factor but then forgetting to square it.