⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (b) A right-angled triangle — The right angle at Y makes this a right-angled triangle, so that description is correct. Since XY is twice YZ, those two sides cannot be equal. The third side XZ is opposite the right angle, so it is the hypotenuse and is longer than either XY or YZ, so it cannot equal either of them. No two sides are equal, which rules out 'an isosceles triangle' and 'a right-angled isosceles triangle', both of which wrongly assume two equal sides. 'An equilateral triangle' would need all three sides equal, which contradicts XY being twice YZ, so it is wrong too.
2. (a) 4x + 2 — Expand the bracket: 4(x − 2) = 4x − 8. Then add the 10 that follows the bracket: 4x − 8 + 10 = 4x + 2. The option 4x − 8 comes from expanding the bracket correctly but then forgetting to add the 10. The option 4x + 8 comes from forgetting to multiply the 2 inside the bracket by 4 (treating it as 4x − 2 instead of 4x − 8), then adding 10. The option 4x + 18 comes from a sign error when expanding — treating 4 × (−2) as +8 instead of −8, giving 4x + 8, then adding 10.
3. (d) Line 3 — Method: check each line of Chloe's working against the correct algebraic step. Working: Line 1 to Line 2 is correct, subtracting 2x from both sides gives 3x − 4 = 8. But Line 2 to Line 3 should add 4 to both sides, giving 3x = 12, not 3x = 4 — the constant −4 has been dropped rather than removed correctly. Line 4 follows correctly from Chloe's own, incorrect, Line 3. Answer: Line 3. Line 1 is simply the original equation, copied out correctly. Line 2 correctly subtracts 2x from both sides of Line 1. Line 4 divides Chloe's own Line 3 by 3 correctly — the arithmetic there is fine, the mistake happened one line earlier.
4. (a) 62.5 — Method: a mean cannot be averaged with a new value — rebuild the total, add the new value to it, then divide by the new count. Working: three numbers with a mean of 50 have a total of 50 × 3 = 150; adding 100 makes the total 150 + 100 = 250; there are now 4 numbers, so the new mean is 250 ÷ 4 = 62.5. Answer: 62.5. The distractors: 75 comes from averaging the old mean with the new value, (50 + 100) ÷ 2, which ignores that three numbers pull against one; 50 comes from assuming an extra value leaves the mean unchanged; 37.5 comes from dividing the old total of 150 by the new count of 4, adding the new value to the count but not to the total.
5. (a) 0.0069 — Leading zeros are not significant, so the significant figures in 0.006852 start at 6: 6, 8, 5, 2. Rounding to 2 significant figures means keeping 6 and 8, and looking at the next digit, 5, to decide whether to round up. Since 5 rounds up, the second significant figure increases from 8 to 9: 0.006852 rounds to 0.0069. A candidate who rounded to 1 significant figure instead of 2 wrote 0.007. A candidate who rounded to 3 significant figures instead of 2 wrote 0.00685. A candidate who did not round up despite the next digit being 5 wrote 0.0068.
6. (c) 3 : 5 — The club is 8 equal shares and the girls take 3 of them, so the boys take 8 − 3 = 5 shares. A ratio compares one part with the other part, so girls : boys = 3 : 5. Writing 3 : 8 compares the girls with the whole club rather than with the boys, 5 : 3 puts the two parts in the wrong order, and 8 : 3 compares the whole club with the girls.
7. (b) 1 : 2.25 — Method: to write a ratio in the form 1 : n, divide both parts by the first part. Working: 4 ÷ 4 = 1 and 9 ÷ 4 = 2.25, so 4 : 9 = 1 : 2.25. Working out 9 ÷ 4 = 2.25 correctly but then writing it as the first part gives 2.25 : 1, the two parts the wrong way round. Subtracting 9 − 4 = 5 gives 1 : 5, confusing the difference between the parts with the ratio. Multiplying 4 × 9 = 36 gives 1 : 36, confusing the product of the parts with the ratio.
8. (a) 8 × 10³ — Method: divide the capacity of the card by the size of one photograph, dividing the coefficients and subtracting the indices, then bring the coefficient back into the range 1 to 10. Working: 3.2 ÷ 4 = 0.8 and 10 − 6 = 4, which gives 0.8 × 10⁴; a coefficient of 0.8 is smaller than 1, so the decimal point moves one place to the right and the index falls by 1. Answer: 8 × 10³. The distractors: 8 × 10⁴ comes from correcting 0.8 to 8 without reducing the index, which makes the answer ten times too large; 1.28 × 10¹⁷ comes from multiplying the two numbers instead of dividing them, since 3.2 × 4 = 12.8 and 10 + 6 = 16; 8 × 10¹⁵ comes from dividing the coefficients but adding the indices instead of subtracting them.
9. (c) 3/7 — Method: every counter is equally likely to be taken, so write the number of red counters over the total number of counters in the bag. Working: the bag holds 3 + 2 + 2 = 7 counters, of which 3 are red. Answer: 3/7, a value between 0 and 1 and just below the middle of the scale. The distractors: 4/7 comes from giving the probability that the counter is not red, counting the 2 blue and 2 green instead; 2/7 comes from counting one of the other colours by mistake and giving 2 counters over the total; 3/4 comes from writing the 3 red counters over the 4 counters that are not red instead of over all 7 counters.
10. (b) 7 — Method: compare the equation with y = mx + c, where m is the gradient. Working: in y = 7x − 2, the coefficient of x is 7. Answer: the gradient is 7. −2 comes from confusing the gradient with the y-intercept. −7 comes from a sign error, treating the coefficient of x as negative. 2 comes from using the y-intercept but dropping its sign.
11. (d) 8 — Since the mean of the four numbers is 12.5, their total is 4 × 12.5 = 50. The three known numbers add up to 8 + 15 + 19 = 42, so n = 50 − 42 = 8. A candidate who multiplies the mean by 3 instead of 4 gets a total of 37.5, giving n = 37.5 − 42 = −4.5. A candidate who forgets to subtract the three known numbers and gives the total itself as n states n = 50. A candidate who subtracts the mean from the total of the three known numbers instead of the other way round gets n = 42 − 12.5 = 29.5.
12. (a) 2/5 — Method: compare the equation with y = mx + c, where m is the gradient. Working: in y = (2x/5) − 3, the coefficient of x is 2/5. Answer: the gradient is 2/5. −3 comes from confusing the gradient with the y-intercept. 5/2 comes from inverting the fraction that multiplies x. −2/5 comes from wrongly carrying the negative sign from the −3 term onto the coefficient of x.