⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (a) 195 — The relative frequency from the trial is 52 ÷ 80 = 0.65, and the expected number of point-up landings in 300 drops is 0.65 × 300 = 195. Giving 52 as the answer reuses the original count from the 80-drop trial without scaling it up to 300 drops at all. Misreading 52 out of 80 as 52% and finding 52% of 300 gives 156. Finding the expected number of point-DOWN landings instead of point-up, using the relative frequency 28 ÷ 80 = 0.35, gives 0.35 × 300 = 105.
2. (d) 19% — Method: write each decrease as a multiplier, multiply the multipliers, then compare the result with 100%. Working: a 10% decrease is a multiplier of 0.9, so the two reductions together give 0.9 × 0.9 = 0.81; the final price is 81% of the original, so the price has fallen by 100% − 81% = 19%. Answer: an overall decrease of 19%. The distractors: 20% comes from adding the two reductions, 10% + 10%, which charges the second 10% against the original price instead of against the already reduced price; 21% comes from using the increase multiplier by mistake, since 1.1 × 1.1 = 1.21, and reading that 21% as a decrease; 81% is the percentage of the original price still being paid, not the percentage taken off.
3. (d) 9 — List all the factors of 36 in pairs that multiply to give 36: 1 × 36, 2 × 18, 3 × 12, 4 × 9, and 6 × 6. This gives the factors 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 36 — nine factors in total, with 6 counted only once even though it appears in a pair with itself. Forgetting that 36 is itself a factor of 36 and leaving it off the list gives 8. Counting the number of factor pairs, five of them, rather than the number of individual factors gives 5. Treating the repeated pair 6 × 6 as two separate factors, 6 and 6 again, gives 10 instead of 9. So 36 has 9 factors.
4. (a) 45 — a²b means a × a × b, so the index applies to a only and b is multiplied on afterwards. Substituting the values gives 3 × 3 = 9, then 9 × 5 = 45. Reading a²b as (ab)² gives (3 × 5)², which is 15² = 225 and squares b as well. Substituting the two values the wrong way round works out 5 × 5 × 3 = 75, and reading the letters written side by side as an addition gives 9 + 5 = 14.
5. (d) 88° — Method: the three angles add up to 180°, and here it is the two equal base angles that are known, so take both of them away from 180°. Working: the two base angles come to 2 × 46° = 92°, and 180° − 92° = 88°. Answer: 88°. The distractors: 134° comes from subtracting only one base angle, 180° − 46°, and forgetting that there are two of them; 92° comes from doubling the base angle and stopping there, which is the two base angles together rather than the apex; 46° comes from assuming that all three angles of the triangle are equal to the one that is given.
6. (a) 40 — From 9am to 12 noon is 3 hours, so the population doubles three times: 5 × 2³ = 40. A candidate who counts the elapsed time as 4 hours (an off-by-one counting error) would reach 5 × 2⁴ = 80. A candidate who counts it as only 2 hours would reach 5 × 2² = 20. A candidate who misreads 'doubles' as 'increases by 2' each hour would compute 5 + 3 × 2 = 11.
7. (c) (5, 1) — Moving right increases the x-coordinate, and moving down decreases the y-coordinate, so (2, 5) becomes (2 + 3, 5 − 4) = (5, 1). (5, 9) comes from adding 4 to the y-coordinate instead of subtracting, as if the point moved up rather than down. (−1, 1) comes from subtracting 3 from the x-coordinate instead of adding, as if the point moved left rather than right. (2, 1) keeps the x-coordinate unchanged and only applies the vertical move, forgetting the horizontal move altogether.
8. (d) 40 miles — Method: round each number to 1 significant figure first, then divide to estimate the daily distance. Working: 830 rounds to 800, and 19 rounds to 20, and 800 ÷ 20 = 40, so the estimate is 40 miles per day. 41.5 miles comes from rounding only the number of days and working out 830 ÷ 20 = 41.5, without rounding the distance too. 830 miles is the total distance for the whole trek, given as the answer without dividing by the number of days at all. 4 miles comes from working out 80 ÷ 20 = 4, misplacing a digit in the rounded distance. Answer: 40 miles.
9. (d) Yes, by the AA condition — Method: similarity is decided by the angles, and because the three angles of a triangle add up to 180°, two matching pairs force the third pair to match as well. Working: the angles at A and D are both 40° and the angles at B and E are both 70°, so the third angles are both 180° − 40° − 70° = 70° and all three pairs are equal. Two pairs were enough, and that is the AA condition. Answer: yes, by the AA condition. The distractors: 'Yes, by the SSS condition' names a condition about three pairs of sides in proportion, and the question gives no side lengths at all; 'No, because no side lengths are given' treats side information as necessary, which it is for congruence but not for similarity; 'No, because the triangles may be different sizes' turns the definition of similarity into an objection, since similar figures are allowed to differ in size and only their shape must match.
10. (c) 67 — Method: the mean is the total of the values divided by how many values there are, so add first and divide second. Working: the total is 50 + 83 + 68 = 201 points and three matches were played, so the mean is 201 ÷ 3 = 67 points. Answer: 67. The distractors: 68 comes from writing down the median, the middle value of 50, 68, 83, instead of the mean; 33 comes from working out the range, 83 − 50, which measures spread and not centre; 100.5 comes from dividing the total by 2 instead of by the 3 matches played.
11. (d) 66 — 6 and (4x + 3) are correct factors of 24x + 18. — Substituting x=2 into 24x+18: 24×2+18=48+18=66. Checking the factorisation: 6×4x=24x and 6×3=18, so 6(4x+3)=24x+18, matching the original expression — 6 and (4x+3) are correctly identified as factors. A candidate who substitutes x=2 into (4x+3) but forgets to multiply by the factor 6 afterwards would compute just 4×2+3=11. A candidate who adds 24 and 18 together before multiplying by x, instead of multiplying 24 by x first, would compute (24+18)×2=84. A candidate who distributes the 6 over only the first term inside the brackets, forgetting the second, would check the factorisation as 6×4x=24x but leave the 3 unmultiplied, getting 24x+3 instead of 24x+18 — and would wrongly conclude that 6 and (4x+3) are not correct factors.
12. (c) 15 — Method: the number of cakes is in direct proportion to the mass of flour, so find the multiplier between the two masses and apply it to the number of cakes. Working: 6 ÷ 2 = 3, so there is three times as much flour, and 5 × 3 = 15. Answer: 15. The distractors: 10 comes from multiplying the 5 cakes by 2, the mass in the recipe, instead of by the multiplier 3; 20 comes from multiplying by the difference 6 − 2 = 4, treating a proportion problem as a difference problem; 12 comes from rounding 5 ÷ 2 down to 2 cakes per kilogram and working out 6 × 2.