⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (a) 2.5 × 10⁷ — Method: place the decimal point so that the coefficient is at least 1 and less than 10, then count the places it has moved. Working: the digits give a coefficient of 2.5, and the decimal point travels from the end of 25,000,000 until it sits between the 2 and the 5, a move of 7 places. Answer: 2.5 × 10⁷. The distractors: 25 × 10⁶ is the same area but not in standard form, because the coefficient must be less than 10; 2.5 × 10⁸ comes from counting the eight digits of 25,000,000 instead of the seven places the decimal point moves; 2.5 × 10⁻⁷ comes from making the index negative because the decimal point was carried to the left.
2. (d) x = 9 or x = −9 — Taking the square root of both sides of x² = 81 gives x = ±9, i.e. x = 9 or x = −9, since both 9² and (−9)² equal 81. A candidate who forgets the negative square root gives only x = 9. A candidate who halves 81 instead of taking its square root gets x = 40.5. A candidate who squares 81 instead of taking its square root gets x = 6561.
3. (c) 6 — Method: substitute the value, work out the top of the fraction first, then the division, and add the 3 last. Working: the top gives 10 − 4 = 6, dividing by 2 gives 6 ÷ 2 = 3, and adding 3 gives 3 + 3 = 6. Answer: 6. The distractors: 11 comes from dividing only the 4 by 2 instead of the whole of the top, giving 10 − 2 + 3; 4.5 comes from dividing the + 3 by 2 as well, giving (10 − 4 + 3) ÷ 2; 0 comes from subtracting the wrong way round on the top, giving (4 − 10) ÷ 2 = −3 and then −3 + 3.
4. (d) 63.6 — Method: the three angles inside the triangle formed by the two ladders and the ground add up to 180°. Working: 180 − 58.2 − 58.2 = 63.6. Answer: 63.6°. A candidate who assumes the top angle equals the base angles gives 58.2. A candidate who subtracts only one base angle from 180°, working out 180 − 58.2, gets 121.8. A candidate who doubles the base angle instead of subtracting it twice from 180°, working out 2 × 58.2, gets 116.4.
5. (d) 25 — Method: add the parts of the ratio, divide the total membership by the number of parts to find the value of one part, then multiply by the parts belonging to the group asked for. Working: 3 + 5 = 8 parts, 40 ÷ 8 = 5 members in one part, and the seniors are 5 parts, so 5 × 5 = 25. Answer: 25 seniors. The distractors: 15 is the number of juniors, which is the 3-part group; 5 is the size of one part only; 24 comes from dividing the 40 by 5, the seniors' number in the ratio, to get 8 and then multiplying that by 3.
6. (a) 8.35 ≤ L < 8.45 — Method: a length rounded to 1 decimal place lies within half of 0.1 cm, that is 0.05 cm, of the value written down. The lower limit is included because it rounds up to that value, and the upper limit is excluded because it rounds up to the next value instead. Working: 8.4 − 0.05 = 8.35 and 8.4 + 0.05 = 8.45, so a length of 8.35 cm still rounds to 8.4 cm while a length of 8.45 cm rounds to 8.5 cm. Answer: 8.35 ≤ L < 8.45. The distractors: 8.3 ≤ L < 8.5 goes a whole 0.1 cm either side instead of half of it; 8.35 < L ≤ 8.45 has the two limits the wrong way round, excluding the length that does round to 8.4 cm and including the one that does not; 8.4 ≤ L < 8.5 is the interval for a length truncated to 1 decimal place, not one rounded to it.
7. (c) 6 km/h — Total distance = 8 + 4 = 12 km. Total time = 1 hour + 0.5 hours resting + 0.5 hours = 2 hours. Average speed = total distance ÷ total time = 12 ÷ 2 = 6 km/h. A speed of 8 km/h comes from leaving the resting time out of the total time: 12 ÷ 1.5 = 8. A speed of 4 km/h comes from dividing by too much time, such as double-counting the rest period: 12 ÷ 3 = 4. A speed of 12 km/h simply gives the total distance and forgets to divide by the total time at all.
8. (c) 6 cm — For a parallelogram, area = base × height, so height = area ÷ base = 54 ÷ 9 = 6 cm. 12 cm comes from using the triangle's reverse formula, height = 2 × area ÷ base, which does not apply to a parallelogram. 45 cm comes from subtracting the base from the area, 54 − 9, instead of dividing. 486 cm comes from multiplying the area by the base, 54 × 9, instead of dividing.
9. (d) 13 — Method: OP and PQ meet at a right angle because of the tangent–radius fact, so triangle OPQ is right-angled at P; use Pythagoras' theorem. Working: OQ² = OP² + PQ² = 5² + 12² = 25 + 144 = 169; OQ = √169 = 13. A student who answers 17 has simply added the two given lengths (5 + 12) instead of using Pythagoras' theorem. A student who answers 7 has subtracted the two given lengths (12 − 5) instead of using Pythagoras' theorem. A student who answers 144 has correctly squared 12 but stopped there, forgetting to add 5² and take the square root. Answer: 13 cm.
10. (c) tan 45° — Method: replace each ratio by its exact value, then compare. Working: a right-angled triangle with a 45° angle is isosceles, so its opposite and adjacent sides are equal and the tangent of 45° is exactly 1. The others are cos 30° = √3/2, about 0.87; sin 45° = √2/2, about 0.71; and cos 60° = 1/2. Answer: tan 45°, the only one of the four that reaches 1. Reading √3/2 as though it were √3, about 1.73, makes cos 30° look the largest, but the division by 2 is part of the value. Ranking by the size of the angle also fails here, because the cosine of an angle falls as the angle grows.
11. (a) No — the cost per metre differs: £2.50/m vs £2.20/m — Method: divide cost by length for each pair and compare the unit rates. Working: £7.50 ÷ 3 = £2.50 per m; £11.00 ÷ 5 = £2.20 per m. The rates are different, so this is NOT direct proportion. Wrong options: 'Yes — both amounts increase' wrongly assumes any increasing relationship is proportional; 'No — because 5 m costs more in total' judges by total cost rather than the rate per metre, which is not valid reasoning on its own; 'Yes — the cost per metre is £2.50 in both cases' miscalculates the second rate (11.00 ÷ 5 is £2.20, not £2.50).
12. (b) 120, unreliable — x = 25 is outside 1 to 12 — The line of best fit is y = 4x + 20. 4 × 25 = 100, and 100 + 20 = 120, so the estimate is y = 120. But x = 25 lies far outside the plotted range of 1 to 12 years, so this is an extrapolation, and the estimate is not reliable. Reaching 100 instead of 120 comes from 4 × 25 = 100 with the intercept of 20 left out — still correctly flagged as unreliable, but the wrong value. Calling the estimate reliable simply because it was calculated correctly, giving 120, wrongly assumes that a correct calculation is automatically trustworthy, ignoring that x = 25 lies far beyond the data actually collected. Reaching 68, from 4 × 12 = 48 and 48 + 20 = 68, substitutes x = 12, the top of the plotted range, instead of the assistant's actual x = 25, and wrongly calls that reliable because 12 lies inside the range.