⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (c) 1 — cos 45° = √2/2 and sin 45° = √2/2. Squaring each gives (√2/2)² = 2/4 = 1/2, so (cos 45°)² + (sin 45°)² = 1/2 + 1/2 = 1. The distractor √2 comes from adding cos 45° + sin 45° directly without squaring first (√2/2 + √2/2 = √2). The distractor 2 comes from squaring the top of the fraction, (√2)² = 2, but then dividing by 2 instead of 4 for each term, giving 1 + 1 = 2. The distractor 1/2 comes from squaring only cos 45° and forgetting to add the sin 45° term.
2. (b) 1 — Method: replace the letter with its value, work out the multiplication first and the subtraction afterwards. Working: 3n = 3 × 1 = 3, so the expression becomes 3 − 2, which is 1. Answer: 1. The distractors: 3 comes from substituting into 3n but stopping before the 2 is taken away; −1 comes from subtracting the wrong way round and working out 2 − 3; 5 comes from adding the 2 instead of subtracting it, giving 3 + 2.
3. (a) 5 — Method: add the two triangular end faces to the three rectangular side faces. Working: 2 triangular faces + 3 rectangular faces = 5 faces in total. A student who answers 6 has confused this with a cuboid's face count. A student who answers 9 has counted the edges instead of the faces. A student who answers 3 has only counted the rectangular faces and forgotten the two triangular ends. Answer: 5 faces.
4. (b) Tea — Method: the mode is the category with the highest frequency. Working: tea has a frequency of 8, which is higher than coffee's 7, hot chocolate's 4 and juice's 1. Mode = tea. Coffee has the second-highest frequency, 7, not the highest, so it is not the mode. Hot chocolate, with a frequency of 4, and juice, with a frequency of 1, both have lower frequencies still. Always compare every frequency in the table before naming the mode — the highest number wins, however close the next one is.
5. (d) £4.80 — Method: find the error interval, then check which value falls outside it. Working: half of 20p is 10p, so the actual cost, c, satisfies £4.50 ≤ c < £4.70. £4.80 is above £4.70, so it could not be the actual cost. Answer: £4.80. (£4.50 is a genuine possible cost — it sits at the included lower boundary. £4.65 is a genuine possible cost, below the £4.70 upper boundary. £4.55 is a genuine possible cost, well inside the interval.)
6. (b) £220 — Method: round each ticket price to the nearest £5, multiply each rounded price by the number of tickets, then add the two totals. Working: the adult price £38.50 rounds to £40, and 4 × £40 = £160; the child price £19.75 rounds to £20, and 3 × £20 = £60; £160 + £60 = £220. Answer: £220. £213.25 is the exact total cost, found without rounding the prices first, so it is not an estimate. £160 comes from including the cost of the adult tickets only and forgetting the three children's tickets. £200 comes from swapping the two ticket quantities, using 3 adults and 4 children instead of 4 adults and 3 children.
7. (a) x = 0 gives y = −20: a negative number sold — The y-intercept is the value the line predicts when x = 0: y = 3 × 0 − 20 = −20. A kiosk cannot sell a negative number of ice creams, so this is not a sensible estimate. The 3 in the equation is the gradient, not the intercept, so an option claiming x = 0 gives y = 3 has swapped the two numbers around — substituting x = 0 makes the 3x term equal 0, leaving −20, not 3. The danger of extrapolating to very high temperatures is a real issue with this line, but it is a different issue from the y-intercept, so it does not answer this question. And whether x = 0 could occur on a trading day is beside the point: the model still makes that prediction, and it is the prediction itself, −20, that is impossible.
8. (b) 045° — North is 000° and east is 090°; halfway between them, measured clockwise, is 045°. Choosing 090° gives east itself, not the midpoint between north and east. Choosing 135° gives the midpoint between east (090°) and south (180°) instead of between north and east. Choosing 225° is the back bearing of 045° (045° + 180°), not the bearing itself.
9. (c) 18 cm — Method: a square has four equal sides, so the perimeter is 4 × the side length. Working: 4 × 4.5 = 4 × 4 + 4 × 0.5 = 16 + 2 = 18. Answer: 18 cm. The distractors: 9 cm comes from 2 × 4.5, adding only one pair of sides; 16 cm comes from rounding the side length down to 4 cm before multiplying, so the 0.5 cm on each side is lost; 20.25 cm² comes from working out 4.5 × 4.5, which is the area of the tile and carries a squared unit.
10. (b) No, it needs one more square — A closed cube has exactly 6 faces, so its net must be made of exactly 6 identical squares, arranged so each one unfolds to a separate face with none overlapping. This net has only 5 squares, so it is one square short and cannot be folded into a closed cube. Choosing 'Yes, it folds into a cube' ignores that a cube needs 6 faces, not 5. Choosing 'No, it has one square too many' miscounts in the wrong direction — 5 is one too FEW, not one too many. Choosing 'Yes, but only if two squares overlap' is not a valid net: a net's faces must not overlap when folded.
11. (c) 12.3 ≤ t < 12.4 — Method: truncating cuts the later digits off instead of rounding them, so nothing is ever pushed upwards. The displayed value is therefore the smallest the time can be, and the time can run up to, but not reach, the next value the display can show. Working: the display reads 12.3, so the actual time is at least 12.3 seconds; as soon as the time reaches 12.3 + 0.1 = 12.4 seconds the display would read 12.4, so 12.4 is not included. Answer: 12.3 ≤ t < 12.4. The distractors: 12.25 ≤ t < 12.35 is the interval for a time rounded to 1 decimal place, and this display does not round; 12.3 < t ≤ 12.4 excludes the one value the display certainly allows and includes the one it rules out; 12.3 ≤ t ≤ 12.4 treats 12.4 seconds as possible, but at 12.4 seconds the display would no longer read 12.3.
12. (c) 2.00 kg — Convert the tin's mass to kilograms first: 650 g = 0.65 kg. Adding this to the bag's mass gives 0.65 + 1.35 = 2.00 kg. Converting 650 g to kilograms by dividing by 100 instead of 1000 gives 6.5 kg, and adding this to 1.35 kg gives 7.85 kg. Adding the two masses without converting grams to kilograms at all — treating 650 as if it were already measured in kilograms — gives 651.35 kg. Subtracting the tin's mass from the bag's mass instead of adding the two together, 1.35 − 0.65, gives 0.70 kg.