⏱️ Ten-minute starters — Foundation

Answer key

1. (d) 1/5 — Method: list the pairs systematically, work out each total, then count the pairs that meet the condition and compare that count with the length of the list. Working: the pairs and their totals are 1 and 2 giving 3, 1 and 3 giving 4, 1 and 4 giving 5, 1 and 5 giving 6, 2 and 3 giving 5, 2 and 4 giving 6, 2 and 5 giving 7, 3 and 4 giving 7, 3 and 5 giving 8, and 4 and 5 giving 9. That is 10 pairs, of which 2 have a total of more than 7. Answer: the probability is 1/5. The distractors: 2/5 comes from counting the totals of exactly 7 as well, reading 'more than 7' as '7 or more'; 1/10 comes from finding only the pair 4 and 5 and missing that 3 and 5 also beat 7; 4/5 comes from counting the pairs on the wrong side of the condition, the 8 pairs whose total is 7 or less.
2. (a) $\binom{-5}{-4}$ — Method: one translation followed by another is a single translation, and the two vectors are added: top to top, bottom to bottom. Working: across, 4 − 9 = −5; up, −7 + 3 = −4. Answer: $\binom{-5}{-4}$. Subtracting the second vector instead of adding it gives 13 on top and −7 − 3 = −10 underneath. Adding the top numbers correctly but subtracting the bottom ones gives −10 underneath with −5 on top. Adding 4 and 9 as though both were positive and then keeping the minus sign of the larger gives −13 on top.
3. (b) £2.00 — Subtracting the second equation from the first eliminates the pastries: (3c + 2p) − (2c + 2p) = 9.60 − 7.60, so c = 2.00. A candidate who divides the first total by the number of coffees alone, ignoring the pastries, would get 9.60 ÷ 3 = £3.20. A candidate who finds the price of a pastry instead of a coffee — using c = 2.00 in 2c + 2p = 7.60 to get p = 1.80 — would answer £1.80. A candidate who reaches the correct difference of £2.00 but then mistakenly divides again or misplaces the decimal point would get £0.20.
4. (d) Formula A gives £39 and Formula B gives £39, and since 3(2n + 5) expands to 6n + 15 for every value of n, the stallholder is correct. — Formula A: 3(2 × 4 + 5) = 3 × 13 = £39. Formula B: 6 × 4 + 15 = 24 + 15 = £39. Expanding Formula A algebraically gives 3(2n + 5) = 6n + 15, which is identical to Formula B for every value of n, not just n = 4, so the stallholder is correct — this is an identity, not a coincidence. The option giving £29 for Formula A comes from multiplying only the 2n by 3 and forgetting to also multiply the 5, then adding the unmultiplied 5: 3 × 2 × 4 = 24, + 5 = 29. The two options that reach the correct numbers but reject the stallholder's claim both use faulty reasoning — matching values at one value of n, or counting terms, does not decide whether two expressions are identical for every n; expanding the bracket does.
5. (a) 24 — The display is 4 tins wide, 3 tins high and 2 tins deep, and every position in that block is filled, so the total number of tins is the product of all three measurements: 4 × 3 × 2 = 24. "12" comes from multiplying only the width and height shown in the front elevation (4 × 3), forgetting the depth entirely. "9" comes from adding the three measurements (4 + 3 + 2) instead of multiplying them. "6" comes from multiplying only the height and depth (3 × 2), forgetting the width shown by the front elevation.
6. (a) 1/3 — Method: for two independent spinners, multiply the probability of each separate outcome, but first work out each spinner's own probability correctly, using how many of its equal sections actually carry that result. Working: Spinner A has 2 even numbers, 2 and 4, out of 4 sections, so P(even) = 2/4 = 1/2. Spinner B has 2 red sections out of 3, so P(red) = 2/3. Multiplying gives 1/2 × 2/3, which cancels down to 1/3. Answer: 1/3. Watch out: writing down 1/4 treats Spinner B's two colours as equally likely and uses 1/2 for red, when in fact 2 of its 3 sections are red — the sections are not split evenly between the two colours. Writing down 1/6 undercounts Spinner A's even numbers as just one out of four instead of two. And writing down 5/6 applies the 'at least one' formula, P(A) + P(B) − P(A)×P(B), which answers a different question about EITHER spinner landing the right way, not both together.
7. (c) £136 — 5% interest each year means the value becomes 100% + 5% = 105% of the previous year's value, and 105% = 1.05, so the multiplier is 1.05. Account A: £3200 × 1.05 × 1.05 = £3528. Account B (simple interest): £3200 + 2 × (£3200 × 0.03) = £3392. The difference is £3528 − £3392 = £136. (£128 comes from working out Account A with simple interest too, instead of compound: £3200 + 2 × (£3200 × 0.05) = £3520, then £3520 − £3392 = £128. £3528 is the value of Account A on its own, not the difference between the two accounts. £3392 is the value of Account B on its own, not the difference.)
8. (d) 5 — The gradient equals the amount gained divided by the time taken: 15 ÷ 3 = 5 litres per minute.
9. (d) 6 — Method: a value satisfies x ≥ 7 when it is greater than 7 or exactly equal to 7, so test each value against the boundary. Working: 8 is greater than 7 and 100 is greater than 7, so both satisfy the inequality; 7 is equal to the boundary and ≥ includes equality, so 7 satisfies it as well; 6 is less than 7, so 6 is the one value that fails. Answer: 6. The distractors: 7 is chosen by candidates who read ≥ as a strict 'greater than' and so shut the boundary value out of the solution set; 8 is chosen by reading the question as asking which value DOES satisfy the inequality and taking the smallest such value; 100 is chosen by the same misreading, taking instead the value furthest above the boundary.
10. (b) Square — A square has all four sides equal, all four angles equal to 90°, and diagonals that are equal in length and bisect each other at right angles — every part of the description matches, so Square is correct. A rhombus has all four sides equal and diagonals bisecting at right angles, but its interior angles are not generally 90° (only a square, a special rhombus, has that), so it does not fully match. A rectangle has four 90° angles and equal diagonals, but its sides are not all equal in general, so it fails the equal-sides condition. A kite has two pairs of adjacent equal sides rather than all four sides equal, and its diagonals are not generally equal in length, so it fails both conditions.
11. (b) 8,100 — First find the total number of alerts sent in the month: 1,500 × 30 = 45,000. Then apply the probability of a 'STOP' reply: 45,000 × 0.18 = 8,100. Stopping after finding only one day's expected replies, 1,500 × 0.18 = 270, forgets to scale up to the whole month. Multiplying the number of days by the probability instead of by the daily total of alerts gives 30 × 0.18 = 5.4, which rounds to 5. Shifting the decimal point in the probability, using 0.018 instead of 0.18, gives 45,000 × 0.018 = 810.
12. (c) 5/8 — Method: the sections are all the same size, so every section is equally likely; count the sections that are not red and write that count over the total number of sections. Working: 8 − 3 = 5 sections are not red, and there are 8 sections altogether. Answer: 5/8, a value between 0 and 1 and a little above the halfway point of the scale. The distractors: 3/8 comes from giving the probability that the spinner does land on red; 5/11 comes from adding the 3 red sections to the 8 sections to make a total of 11 instead of using the 8 sections that exist; 1/2 comes from assuming that 'red' and 'not red' must be equally likely because there are only two possibilities.